<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More CSAR-X Delays</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2008/03/26/more-csar-x-delays/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/03/26/more-csar-x-delays/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 23:53:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohwilleke</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/03/26/more-csar-x-delays/#comment-177744</link>
		<dc:creator>ohwilleke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2754#comment-177744</guid>
		<description>Boeing seems to be learning that the bribe and bamboozle the decision makers business model doesn&#039;t work anymore.
This is a contract that, unlike the tanker contract, there is a plausible military basis for questioning (as some folks more qualified than I in the defense community have), although I certainly am not qualified personally to evaluate who has the better argument.
Fortunately, because it has a healthy civilian large commercial aircraft business with only one other competitor in the world, this shouldn&#039;t keep Boeing out of the running for future contracts if it cleans up its act.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boeing seems to be learning that the bribe and bamboozle the decision makers business model doesn’t work anymore.<br />
This is a contract that, unlike the tanker contract, there is a plausible military basis for questioning (as some folks more qualified than I in the defense community have), although I certainly am not qualified personally to evaluate who has the better argument.<br />
Fortunately, because it has a healthy civilian large commercial aircraft business with only one other competitor in the world, this shouldn’t keep Boeing out of the running for future contracts if it cleans up its act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rip</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/03/26/more-csar-x-delays/#comment-177743</link>
		<dc:creator>Rip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2754#comment-177743</guid>
		<description>Old USAF mission - &quot;Fly and Fight&quot;
New USAF mission - &quot;Write Solicitations and Adjudicate Protests, Recycle Same.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Old USAF mission — “Fly and Fight“<br />
New USAF mission — “Write Solicitations and Adjudicate Protests, Recycle Same.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

