DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Cyber-warfare » Cyber-​​Sabotage in Counterfeit Hardware

Cyber-​​Sabotage in Counterfeit Hardware

circuitboard.jpg

Recent events have raised the con­cerns about hid­den back­doors and mali­cious code inside of coun­ter­feit hard­ware — all the way down to the inte­grated cir­cuit level.

In fact, a 2005 report by the Pentagon’s Defense Science Board addresses this issue. While this report assessed the prob­lem, recent events have now raised the anx­i­ety over cyber sab­o­tage in bogus hard­ware. In fact, many con­sider the use of com­pro­mised coun­ter­feit hard­ware as a strate­gic tac­tic in cyber warfare. 

In January of 2008, a joint task force seized $78 mil­lion of coun­ter­feit Cisco net­work­ing hard­ware. This inter­na­tional effort resulted in over 400 seizures of coun­ter­feit net­work­ing hard­ware that was shipped between China, Canada and the United States. This inter­na­tional effort between the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), US Customs and Border Protection (CBP), the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) and sup­ported by other agen­cies within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) clearly shows the crim­i­nal efforts that are underway.

This inves­ti­ga­tion has been under­way for the last two years and has shown great results.

The Numbers:

  • 36 search warrants
  • 115 seizures by ICE
  • 373 seizures by RCMP
  • 74,000 total coun­ter­feit com­po­nents confiscated

While there has been no pub­lic dis­clo­sure of coun­ter­feit hard­ware sabotage/​espionage on America by for­eign coun­tries or rogue groups, the threat is there. Supply-​​Chain threats have now moved into the spot­light and many orga­ni­za­tions are mov­ing to address the threat of pur­chas­ing coun­ter­feit com­puter related equip­ment. Sources at Spy-​​Ops told me that in 2008 they esti­mate coun­ter­feit com­puter hard­ware will exceed $1.25 bil­lion and that cur­rent secu­rity mea­sures such as holo­graphic labels on inte­grated cir­cuits and printed cir­cuit boards are no longer ade­quate means to iden­tify authen­tic equipment. 

Michelle Kalnas, a supply-​​chain sub­ject mat­ter expert work­ing with me on this issue pointed out that refur­bished com­puter equip­ment poses the same threat and is more dif­fi­cult to con­trol. She went on to say that, “Close coor­di­na­tion between the secu­rity depart­ment and pur­chas­ing with exter­nal crit­i­cal equip­ment ven­dors is nec­es­sary to resolve this issue. But at this time it is the excep­tion not the rule.”

– Kevin Coleman

Share |

April 1st, 2008 | Cyber-warfare | 276343 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/04/01/cyber-sabotage-in-counterfeit-hardware/Cyber-Sabotage+in+Counterfeit+Hardware2008-04-01+17%3A51%3A10Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « First KC-​​45 in Germany | Why Do Commercial Platforms Make Such Lousy Military Aircraft? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Patron Vectras says:
    April 1, 2008 at 4:50 pm

    my col­lege uses Cisco Access agent… and it sucks… hmmmm…
    This comes as a shock to me how much, but it makes sense that it could be so much — see­ing as it is in so high of a demand.

    Reply
  2. Kyle Gosnell says:
    April 1, 2008 at 8:07 pm

    It’s time
    It’s time to treat Military and Government soft and Hardware as if in War Time, duh.
    No offence intended on the lat­ter. It’s to point out how I can­not under­stand how sec­ond hand, or for­eign mate­ri­als are allowed into sen­si­tive places, in any busi­ness struc­ture, not count­ing such as the Military or Government. Any high tech busi­ness must treat this aspect as if spy’s are every­where. AS they are, it’s the 21st cen­tury, and Cyber busi­ness is big busi­ness, so comes under the National Security head­ing for prime man­u­fac­tur­ing and Government. Get on the stick guys, free­bies and cheepo’s are Not in our best inter­est at those lev­els.
    K.M.Gosnell
    U.S.A retired

    Reply
  3. Dianne says:
    April 2, 2008 at 7:54 am

    This is very scary…specifically with the Cisco prod­ucts. I believe that the DOD stan­dard is Cisco but if we are buy­ing refur­bished prod­ucts we are com­prim­is­ing our net­works and secu­rity.
    Not sure I will be pur­chas­ing refur­bished equip­ment in the future.
    The gov­ern­ment needs to take a look at keep­ing all of our man­u­fac­tur­ing in the US. We need to keep our tech­nol­ogy and jobs in this coun­try. Too many jobs lost and we are ruin­ing our own econ­omy fur­ther with big busi­ness try­ing to save the almighty dollar.

    Reply
  4. Spy Guy says:
    April 2, 2008 at 9:22 am

    Here is another inci­dent we uncov­ered.
    U.S. Customs and Border Protection Assistant Commissioner for the Office of International Trade Dan Baldwin and Director-​​General Robert Verrue, European Commission Tax and Customs Directorate, today announced the results of Operation Infrastructure, which took place last November and December.
    The Operation resulted in the seizure of more than 360,000 coun­ter­feit inte­grated cir­cuits and com­puter net­work com­po­nents bear­ing more than 40 dif­fer­ent trademarks.

    Reply
  5. David says:
    April 2, 2008 at 12:37 pm

    That’s it! How long and how much dam­age do we have to incur before we bring the Technology sec­tor back home? Although it may be an insur­mount­able task, it needs to be done ASAP to stem this tide!

    Reply
  6. Lt. Kl. Chief In Command Jenkees, 1st class says:
    April 2, 2008 at 12:39 pm

    Damn right! I say hit China with a full nuclear offen­sive, like we did to those ratty copy­cat Japanese in the 40’s. That will teach them to fol­low in our foot­steps! Damn their com­pet­ing mar­kets, damn their hard work­ing peo­ple, damn their blos­som­ing econ­omy! It’s an act of war, I say! We’ll force them to play fair! U.S. fair.
    *sob* Mommy… make them stop!

    Reply
  7. Harm says:
    April 2, 2008 at 12:39 pm

    How coun­ter­feit? If just the MEDIA (CDROM /​DVD) is coun­ter­feit, but it is still the orig­i­nal soft­ware then from a secu­rity view­point, it is not such an issue, of course if the code is altered it would be a dif­fer­ent story…

    Reply
  8. Kevin says:
    April 2, 2008 at 4:24 pm

    The hardware/​software issue.
    A few years ago I over­saw apro­ject that looked at for­eign sourced com­ponenets on a pop­u­lar piece of net­work­ing equip­ment. We dis­cov­ered that over 70% of the com­ponenets that went into the prod­uct came form out­side the United States. Remember there is allot of firmware and on chip soft­ware that could be altered with back doors or dime delay logic bombs. In once instance we esti­mated that the total amop­unt of soft­ware chip based and CD based was about 21 mil­lion lines of code. To ensure secu­rity and integrity, every line of code would have to be eval­u­ated and or com­pared against a known good source!

    Reply
  9. SkinTex says:
    April 2, 2008 at 5:48 pm

    Hmmmm, i do not see what the prob­lem is really. The west­ern world uses alot of crappy Chinese stuff in for a cheap price. If there was no demand for it, they would not have made and sent it, right?
    Sure, qual­ity pays off in the long run, but it never came as cheap as the imported mass pro­duc­tion stuff.
    As for secu­rity issues…it’s hyp­ocrites talk­ing. Think about how EVERY xerox ink has tiny mark­ings in it to trace the ori­gins (in case of a bomb-​​letter for instance). Think about project ech­e­lon at which almost every inter­net con­nec­tion is exam­ined through the back­bones. Think about how every net­work­ing com­po­nent has a unique MAC address which makes it trace­able (though there are ways to spoof it). I could go on with hun­dreds more exam­ples how YOU get pwned by a gov­ern­ment.
    It’s the pot whin­ing about the ket­tle, the only dif­fer­ence is the fact it’s coun­ter­feit, but don’t use cyber sab­o­tage as an argu­ment as that hap­pens more in the west­ern world then anywhere.

    Reply
  10. hah says:
    April 2, 2008 at 8:33 pm

    Who cares any­ways what amer­i­cans are doin on he web , 99 % of the usa is retarded

    Reply
  11. Vincent says:
    April 3, 2008 at 3:19 am

    It’s always good to check soft– and hard­ware but we have to be care­ful not te be caught in a neg­a­tive spi­ral towards each other. Checking this stuff requires spe­cial­ized agen­cies which costs a sig­nif­i­cant amount of tax. We are mov­ing towards a future where soft– and hard­ware get more and more com­plex. If we can’t trust each other than we will destroy each other. Besides, it’s known (in Europe at least) that the USA lives on fear, and this ‘news’ sounds like more fear to me.

    Reply
  12. Gavron says:
    April 3, 2008 at 3:59 am

    As if…
    Don’t know why and who cares actu­ally… What if the Chinese have spy­ing abil­i­ties on all MC they pro­duce… how are they going to mon­i­tor all the infor­ma­tion they are going to get..? It’s pretty lame not to com­plain about the patriot act when you are sure you can be watched and then wine about the posi­bil­ity that the Chinese might spy…

    Reply
  13. Karel says:
    April 3, 2008 at 4:19 am

    Just judg­ing from the anti American sen­ti­ment in many of the responses here, one should take this threat very seri­ously. There are a whole lot of jeal­ous peo­ple around in this world and we should bet­ter be pre­pared to deal with it!
    Maybe this prob­lem can be tack­led by soft­ware that works like a reg­u­lar virus scan­ner. Instead of only scan­ning the local com­puter and hard drive, it should also start scan­ning the infra­struc­ture devices like routers, switches, fire­walls etc. Hardware ven­dors, FBI, Interpol, and oth­ers, could pro­vide the hard­ware pro­files for these devices with back­doors.
    Big hard­ware ven­dors like Cisco need to pro­tect the integrity of their brand and should set the stan­dards for iden­ti­fi­ca­tion of these ille­gal devices. And soft­ware ven­dors cur­rently mak­ing virus scan­ners have a great oppor­tu­nity to open up new mar­kets, espe­cially in the Fortune 100!

    Reply
  14. ibo2147 says:
    April 4, 2008 at 4:48 pm

    Didnt you put your chips in your planes which you sold?

    Reply
  15. Jeff Shaw says:
    April 6, 2008 at 12:45 pm

    Well, what does it mat­ter? Our coun­try has already been sold out from under us. We are just mostly renters here now. Out gov­ern­ment holds the “1st mort­gage” on vir­tu­ally every­thing by emi­nant domain. And who owns the US gov­ernen­ment? “Government Of The People, By the People, and For the People” is noth­ing more than an adver­tis­ing slo­gan. No more “In God We Trust” on our money. As a vet, a patriot, and a cit­i­zen, I say out gov­ern­ment ZUCKS Big Time. Just my opinion…

    Reply
  16. matt says:
    April 7, 2008 at 6:43 pm

    I attended a con­fer­ence last week on elec­tron­ics inter­con­nect man­u­fac­tur­ing. In a new tech­nol­ogy meet­ing i heard from a col­league who spends a lot of time in China that Chinese elec­tron­ics man­u­fac­tur­ers are now in many ways more advanced than any­thing in America. Boeing is out­sourc­ing printed cir­cuit boards to a sub­sidiary of the People’s Liberation Air Force. Other defense con­trac­tors heard about this, and assum­ing it is okay, are now sourc­ing the high­est tech­nol­ogy cir­cuit boards going into clas­si­fied tech­nol­ogy at the same com­pany. Can you say treason?

    Reply
  17. vok says:
    April 7, 2008 at 11:07 pm

    amer­i­can man­u­fac­tur­ing just can’t com­pete against for­eign com­pe­ti­tion. just look around, motorola, gm, ford, boe­ing, etc. pretty soon, most u.s. com­pa­nies will become noth­ing but mar­ket­ing firms, sell­ing brands for prod­ucts made else­where. china is on the win­ning side, the decline of u.s. eco­nomic power is inevitable.

    Reply
  18. cheap rs gold says:
    August 1, 2008 at 9:44 pm

    I also give my account to her, she want to play my num­ber, she also can play. But one day, I found she had another hus­band, and she have no longer to play with me. And I found my num­ber is empty, she took my things changed the cheap RS gold. I was very sad; I did not believe she is the girl that I know.

    Reply
  19. cheap snw vis says:
    August 7, 2008 at 9:43 pm

    Some play­ers may notice that default cos­tumes on fam­i­lies cre­ated prior to the 2.4 cheap snw vis expan­sion have disappeared.

    Reply
  20. Shaiya money says:
    August 7, 2008 at 9:43 pm

    Her beauty faded along with her power Shaiya money. Taking advan­tage of the sit­u­a­tion, the Dumianas ended the Goddess

    Reply
  21. 2moons gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:08 pm

    in the game there are many play­ers do not have diathe­sis, can be said that there were very bored, they often like to ask some­thing about the play­ers looks like, fam­ily, and in the game can earn how much 2moons gold, I do not know these peo­ple are play­ing the game or game play them. Some peo­ple often put some pic­ture to the Internet, she thought that this way can let peo­ple feel humiliated

    Reply
  22. kamas says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:30 pm

    maybe I give you too much pres­sure, let you give up this feel­ing, I really want to know that do you really can for­get me and for­get the day s about we together to play and together to upgrade and together to earn the kamas, you really can for­get, maybe I never enter your heart. Your left let me feel that all thing can be changed, you often said that I was very stu­pid, in fact you were wrong

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage