DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Drones » Boeing’s New Helo-​​Drone

Boeing’s New Helo-​​Drone

This arti­cle first appeared in Aviation Week and Space Technology.


Boeing is poised to attempt a brace of world record endurance flights with its A160T Hummingbird unmanned air vehi­cle after installing new safe­guards to pre­vent a flight con­trol sys­tem fail­ure which led to the loss of a pro­to­type last December. 



The acci­dent put a three-​​month hold on an already aggres­sive test and demon­stra­tion sched­ule ear­marked for the A160T through the rest of 2008. Yet Boeing remains con­fi­dent it can meet its sched­ules, as well as set records for rotary UAV pay­load and endurance that it claims oth­ers will find dif­fi­cult to match.


The record attempt flights will include a hover out of ground effect at 15,000 ft. and an 18–20-hr. flight with a 300.-lb pay­load. Together they form the final mile­stones of the Phase 1 demon­stra­tion which began in August 2003. Supported by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa), the tests are intended to prove that a purpose-​​built, clean-​​sheet large ver­ti­cal take­off and land­ing unmanned air sys­tem (VUAS) can truly go the dis­tance com­pared to other rotary UAVs that are gen­er­ally derived from exist­ing manned helicopters.


“We think we’ve got some­thing dif­fer­ent here,” says Boeing Advanced Systems’ busi­ness devel­op­ment direc­tor, Grady Eakin. “The range, endurance and pay­load are unique for a rotary-​​wing UAV, and we think it can pro­vide a vari­ety of mis­sions all at the same time. We’ve proved we can get there quickly, stay a long time and fly to places that com­man­ders think are impor­tant,” he adds.


Although the A160T is aimed squarely at stan­dard UAV roles such as recon­nais­sance, sur­veil­lance, com­mu­ni­ca­tions relay, resup­ply and tar­get acqui­si­tion, Boeing says the broader capa­bil­i­ties of the turbine-​​powered heli­copter make it capa­ble of much more. One of the ini­tial test vehi­cles has been mocked-​​up with stub wings to carry up to eight AGM-​​114 Hellfire air-​​to-​​ground mis­siles, while another has flown with an aerodynamically-​​shaped pod large enough to evac­u­ate a wounded sol­dier or trans­port a small robotic vehicle.


With Northrop Grumman’s MQ-​​8B Fire Scout already des­tined for major VUAS roles with the U.S. Navy and Army, Boeing is seek­ing new niche oppor­tu­ni­ties for the A160T begin­ning with the U.S. Special Operations Command (Socom). Initial oper­a­tional eval­u­a­tions of the MQ-​​8B, a mod­i­fied Schweizer 333, are planned for 2008, while first flight of the Army’s MQ-​​8B vari­ant is slated for the end of 2010, with ini­tial oper­at­ing capa­bil­ity sched­uled for 2014. Demonstrations are also planned to the Navy. Operational tests of the A160T could, by con­trast, begin within the next year or so, says Boeing.


Part of the chal­lenge, says Eakin, is mak­ing poten­tial users aware of the A160T’s capa­bil­i­ties. “There [are] a vari­ety of mil­i­tary and gov­ern­ment users that haven’t thought yet about how far this has flown and what it can do for them. We’ve just recently talked to a cou­ple of poten­tial cus­tomers and they are sur­prised that we can carry a cou­ple of pay­loads, and fly far away from their bas­ing scheme,” he adds.


The 35 ft.-long A160T is pow­ered by a Pratt & Whitney Canada PW207D tur­boshaft dri­ving a 36-ft.-dia., four-​​blade rotor. The blades, like the fuse­lage itself, are made from light­weight car­bon fiber com­pos­ites, while the stream­lined fuse­lage shell is designed for both low drag and reduced radar cross-​​section.


“It’s sig­nif­i­cantly larger than any other VTOL [UAV], but it is sig­nif­i­cantly lighter as well,” says Eakin. “We have a fairly high fuel frac­tion of more than 50%, which is slightly higher than other UAVs and manned heli­copters.” Empty weight is 2,500 lb. and the heli­copter car­ries 2,600 lb. of fuel in large tanks clus­tered around the cen­ter of grav­ity. The for­ward tank, mounted just ahead of the mostly inter­nally housed rotor mast, occu­pies almost the whole depth of the fuse­lage, while a sec­ond large tank is sand­wiched beneath the engine and trans­mis­sion hous­ing and the bay in the belly for the retractable gear. Maximum take­off weight is 6,500 lb. while the largest pay­load car­ried to date is around 1,090 lb.

Read more on this story, French amphibi­ous land­ing craft, an April Fools joke on defense con­trac­tors and the many facets of FCS from our friends at Aviation Week on Military​.com.

– Christian

Share |

April 2nd, 2008 | Drones | 276513 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/04/02/boeings-new-helo-drone/Boeing%27s+New+Helo-Drone2008-04-02+16%3A51%3A23Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Why Do Commercial Platforms Make Such Lousy Military Aircraft? | An Objective View of Tankers? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. atacms says:
    April 2, 2008 at 3:16 pm

    I’ve been root­ing for the Hummingbird for a while and was sad to hear they ini­tially had some prob­lems with ear­lier pro­to­types. Look for­ward to see­ing this help troops point out where the enemy is and take them out too!

    Reply
  2. James says:
    April 2, 2008 at 3:22 pm

    sweet maybe the marines will be able to get some for fire sup­port sence the navy seems to think of infantry and shore assu­alts as iky.….
    any chance it could be tested in iraq or aph­gan­istan
    and any­one have news on the land based pha­lanx sys­tem? maybe israel should buy some

    Reply
  3. SMSgt Mac says:
    April 2, 2008 at 5:41 pm

    I’ve been fol­low­ing the ‘hum­ming­bird’ (like all of Dr Karem’s projects (yes I’m a huge fan) for a long time. Boeing bought them­selves game-​​changing tech­nol­ogy in this con­cept and I hope they have what it takes to exploit it fully.
    On a side note, it LOOKS (not nec­ces­sar­ily true — I’m not click­ing there!) like the Oregon State hack­ers asso­ci­a­tion has entered the domain. ;-)

    Reply
  4. Jeff Dulin says:
    April 2, 2008 at 9:01 pm

    This is GREAT! I hope they con­tinue to work on this life sav­ing equip­ment sys­tem. The gunship/​weapons plat­from is very sexy and all that but why not work on some­thing that could pro­vide nec­es­sary sup­plies to a unit in con­tact in any con­di­tions and any­where. (Ammo, H20, meds bat­ter­ies, you name it.) In many cases we see re-​​supply rotor­wing A/​C shot down dur­ing these types of mis­sions rather than dur­ing the more flashy gun runs! That was true in RVN and I expect it is still true. When you’re in a hover and doing a “Kick Out” of grenades/​ammo/​water, you’re a SITTING DUCK! (Ok,… Hovering Duck) If this lit­tle guy could hot foot it into the LZ and be expend­able while still get­ting that stuff to the troops, it would be really worth it!!
    Think how great a Robot Medivac would be! Small and fast and go anywhere/​anytime, even if the 1st cou­ple get shot down on the way in, the 3rd, 4th or 5th, still get in and get the guy out and back to med. All with NO LIGHTS at all. NONE!
    Go Boeing!!! This is great and will save a lot of peo­ple & A/C’s.
    JD

    Reply
  5. gad2 says:
    April 2, 2008 at 9:56 pm

    how much are these ?

    Reply
  6. Fixhist says:
    June 23, 2008 at 11:30 am

    Boeing had been inno­v­a­tive in aer­ial trans­porta­tion gears,has mirac­u­lously cut short world dis­tances. Added with ben­e­fits of tele­con­trols it has brought in new vis­tas to unmanned oper­a­tions. 15 watt two way trans/​receiver on each ship is all it takes to con­trol to man­age the com­plex world air traf­fic.
    Stored away dor­mant con­trollers inside wire mesh is a likely pos­si­bil­ity to divert world atten­tion & resources for entirely new dimen­sions of world affairs.
    I hope this was not the case for 911.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      LOL Still all this pissing an moaning about the editorial...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare that...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Islame isn't a race, genius……
      Philo
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I sure as hell don't need to have someone take pictures of me...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "Now please tell me where in the Bible Jesus or his disciples...
      DualityOfMan
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage