Comments on: Boeing: AF Had Worries About EADS Boom

By: Tibia money

Tibia money — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 07:27:32 +0000

The following benefits are available to Tibia money players:

By: Scions Of Fate gold

Scions Of Fate gold — Sat, 02 Aug 2008 04:20:21 +0000

I have adult, I was boring, so I into the SOF, 92 levels, I have not yet fight equipment and earn much Scions of Fate gold. Once have a friend call me, to know his friends knife mad. He is a master of the equipment. On the phone, I asked him to help me with equipment; he is very willing to accept. Then he finished my 90 levels equipments.

By: ahjst

ahjst — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:07:50 +0000

The Time Machine
STRATEGIC PIXEL
ORIS Games
FX
FX
FX ?
?
FX
FX
FX ?

By: WR

WR — Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:34:14 +0000

It would be interesting to see how this resolves. Although I’m partial to Boeing, I’ve taken a step back just to take a more objective 2nd look. Engineering-wise (Defense Mechanical Engineer by vocation) regarding passenger and defense applications, I tend to favor Airbus (except for the underpowered A340-300), but security-wise, I tend to favor Boeing.

By: C4Casey

C4Casey — Thu, 10 Apr 2008 02:52:39 +0000

I wouldn’t say this is clutching at straws at all. It’s suppossed to be a tanker, right? So it better do a damn good job at refueling aircraft, since that’s its primary mission at all. If the boom is shity, then that’s a big problem. Of course, that’s if you believe boeing’s side of the story.

By: Riss

Riss — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:54:04 +0000

Boeing clutching at straws.
deary me..

By: Jimbo Jones

Jimbo Jones — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:51:16 +0000

“Oh fer chrissake, the credibility of such an allegation is ZERO and both Aerospace Daily and DT should be ashamed to repeat Boeing propaganda.“
So i take it from that comment you sat in on these meetings, or else how would you know its propaganda? oh wait whats that — your not actually anything to do with the program just someone who likes to think he knows…

By: SMSgt Mac

SMSgt Mac — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 06:01:10 +0000

IMHO, this short piece is actually more ‘Boeinged up’ than the Amy Butler article posted 4 April at Av Week’s site, but my comment there still applies:
Some members ‘raised concerns’? Excellent.
A vigorous technical debate occured and ended in favoring the NG competitor. I would be alarmed if no discussions had transpired on any aspect of this competition. If Boeing’s boom actually existed, the AF could have debated their technical merits just as vigorously.
It is interesting that Mr. McGraw and Boeing focus on this aspect of the competition without acknowledging that the KC-45 boom risk-reduction and testing is proceeding apace and actually passed fuel the week of the contract award, while claiming the AF did them an injustice by not including their late-breaking CPAR ratings in the management evaluation portion of the contract.

By: Lugo

Lugo — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 01:56:51 +0000

Oh fer chrissake, the credibility of such an allegation is ZERO and both Aerospace Daily and DT should be ashamed to repeat Boeing propaganda.