<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Some Good News on Army SARs</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2008/04/08/some-good-news-on-army-sars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/04/08/some-good-news-on-army-sars/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:25:49 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Random NecroPoster</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/04/08/some-good-news-on-army-sars/#comment-222070</link> <dc:creator>Random NecroPoster</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 12:28:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2773#comment-222070</guid> <description>STRAIGHT TO THE TIPPY TOPPITY! I DON&#039;T KNOW WHERE I AM LOST ON THE INTRANET/INTERNET HELLLLLLLP MEEEEEE! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STRAIGHT TO THE TIPPY TOPPITY! I DON’T KNOW WHERE I AM LOST ON THE INTRANET/INTERNET HELLLLLLLP MEEEEEE!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: RandomNecroPoster</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/04/08/some-good-news-on-army-sars/#comment-222069</link> <dc:creator>RandomNecroPoster</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 12:27:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2773#comment-222069</guid> <description>Really? Balderdash? This is the US ARMY correct? You may or may not be supply, but I am supply and the numbers I am lovin, albeit 144 weeks ago! NECROPOST! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? Balderdash? This is the US ARMY correct? You may or may not be supply, but I am supply and the numbers I am lovin, albeit 144 weeks ago! NECROPOST!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JFM Sars</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/04/08/some-good-news-on-army-sars/#comment-201242</link> <dc:creator>JFM Sars</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 21:17:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2773#comment-201242</guid> <description>A SAR is good but a SARS is better and more reliable. Thank you JFM Sars     Angel of Revenge </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A SAR is good but a SARS is better and more reliable.<br /> Thank you</p><p>JFM Sars     Angel of Revenge</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TacOps Security</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/04/08/some-good-news-on-army-sars/#comment-37786</link> <dc:creator>TacOps Security</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 05:27:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2773#comment-37786</guid> <description>These beasts look like something out aof a sci-fi film. Seeing all the new toys the military gets to play with makes me want to re-up. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These beasts look like something out aof a sci-fi film. Seeing all the new toys the military gets to play with makes me want to re-up.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wild Bill</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/04/08/some-good-news-on-army-sars/#comment-178184</link> <dc:creator>Wild Bill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 12:26:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2773#comment-178184</guid> <description>The amazing thing about these figures is when you factor in the massive and ongoing price increases for steel and other metals.  Just the increases since the beginning of the year are enough to cause some increase in pricing for military hardware such as Strykers. You might ask why we are having these increases.  Despite all of the gloom and doom you hear on the media every night, demand is still strong for metal products.  But the big reason is a lot of our steel production has moved over seas in the past ten years.  And when you pair that up with the falling dollar we have to pay a premium every time the dollar falls.  Also, the domestic supply of scrap steel is in short supply and a lot of steel in this country is made from scrap steel.  And why is scrap steel in this country in short supply</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The amazing thing about these figures is when you factor in the massive and ongoing price increases for steel and other metals.  Just the increases since the beginning of the year are enough to cause some increase in pricing for military hardware such as Strykers.<br /> You might ask why we are having these increases.  Despite all of the gloom and doom you hear on the media every night, demand is still strong for metal products.  But the big reason is a lot of our steel production has moved over seas in the past ten years.  And when you pair that up with the falling dollar we have to pay a premium every time the dollar falls.  Also, the domestic supply of scrap steel is in short supply and a lot of steel in this country is made from scrap steel.  And why is scrap steel in this country in short supply</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christian</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/04/08/some-good-news-on-army-sars/#comment-178183</link> <dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:44:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2773#comment-178183</guid> <description>Balderdash!...Balderdash you say!?...You probably know as well as I that the Army has been fighting cost growth in its SAR programs for years...And finally there&#039;s good news about cost control. This is NOT crap numbers from the Pentagon...The SAR data has always been a reliable method for us reporters to track cost growth... I&#039;ve long since learned NOT to tell DT readers what&#039;s right and wrong. They know better than me, &quot;b&quot;...kinda like you! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balderdash!…Balderdash you say!?…You probably know as well as I that the Army has been fighting cost growth in its SAR programs for years…And finally there’s good news about cost control. This is NOT crap numbers from the Pentagon…The SAR data has always been a reliable method for us reporters to track cost growth…<br /> I’ve long since learned NOT to tell DT readers what’s right and wrong. They know better than me, “b”…kinda like you!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: b</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/04/08/some-good-news-on-army-sars/#comment-178182</link> <dc:creator>b</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2773#comment-178182</guid> <description>So Christian - you didn&#039;t had time to write that up in a few sentences that make actually sense and explain why this or that the Pentagon says may be correct or not. Instead of that we get the pure balderdash and nothing else. Ok - better delete that bookmark of mine ... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Christian — you didn’t had time to write that up in a few sentences that make actually sense and explain why this or that the Pentagon says may be correct or not.<br /> Instead of that we get the pure balderdash and nothing else.<br /> Ok — better delete that bookmark of mine …</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 710/714 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 02:55:43 -->
