DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » The View from Av Week » Coastie Cutter Deployment Delayed

Coastie Cutter Deployment Delayed


After four years of construction, the U.S. Coast Guard expects to accept its first National Security Cutter by early May, but testing and shakedown runs could delay full deployment for almost two years, according to a top Coast Guard official.


The cutter Bertholf is at sea, undergoing acceptance trials with a crew supplied by contractor Northrop Grumman and under the supervision of the U.S. Navy’s Board of Inspection and Survey, said Rear Adm. Gary Blore, the Coast Guard’s assistant commandant for acquisition.


“It’s been a long time coming but I’m glad we’re here,” Blore told reporters in a teleconference from Coast Guard headquarters, adding that the acquisition process, which he conceded has been criticized in the past, “has taken a little bit longer than I would have hoped.” That’s one reason the Navy was brought in as an outside inspector.


He said the Bertholf’s prospective captain, the Navy and a Coast Guard board will recommend whether or not to accept the 418-foot, 4,300-ton vessel, which is expected to cost $640.7 million. Instrument testing of the ship’s command, control, computers and communications systems are being conducted to ensure that commercial-off-the-shelf systems are properly shielded so that classified communications don’t emanate beyond the ship, posing security risks. Blore said he was “not optimistic” the C4ISR equipment would be certified for classified transmissions by May 1 “but we’ll know what the issues are” that must be addressed.


If all goes according to plan, the Coast Guard will take possession of the Bertholf by the first week in May, Blore said. The Bertholf is scheduled to be commissioned a Coast Guard cutter on Aug. 4 and posted to its permanent berth in Alameida, Calif. But Blore noted that additional trials, training and systems testing could take about 22 months before the Bertholf is fully deployed.


Among those tests could be takeoffs and landings of the Navy’s Fire Scout vertical unmanned aerial vehicle (VUAV). The National Security Cutter is designed to carry two helicopters and two VUAVS but last year the Coast Guard scrapped its Eagle Eye VUAV program. “We’re already talking with their squadron [PMA266] out of Patuxent River to see if they would like to bring Fire Scout on board” the Coast Guard cutter, Blore said.

Read more from our Av Week friends on UAVs, the FBI and F-35 studies at Military​.com.

– Christian

Share |

April 14th, 2008 | The View from Av Week | 27817 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/04/14/coastie-cutter-deployment-delayed/Coastie+Cutter+Deployment+Delayed2008-04-14+11%3A38%3A53Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Our Very Own Osprey Vid | Cover Your Computer Mics and WebCams » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Max says:
    April 14, 2008 at 9:59 am

    The puddle jumpers badly need these ships and lots of them. It’s a shame that the government can’t seem to move at more than a snails pace sometimes.

    Reply
  2. ohwilleke says:
    April 14, 2008 at 1:50 pm

    Northrop Grumman is the one having trouble delivering on time and on budget, not the U.S. government. The U.S. government’s problem is a lack of contract supervision expertise.

    Reply
  3. Thomas Jackson says:
    April 14, 2008 at 4:44 pm

    The problem is that Rear Adm. Blore and Rabago don

    Reply
  4. MalignedTruth says:
    April 15, 2008 at 8:09 am

    We noticed you failed to complete the anonymous survey…
    Hope they remember to turn the computer mics off, on all of those WinMe desktops installed in the cabins and secure bunkers!
    Yeah, the plaintext leaks out before it is even encrypted! Lucky that the spaces are all shielded, as in a Faraday Cage, but, Tempest is violated with open hatches!
    Ignorance is almost as great an equalizer as stupidity. Time for more training.

    Reply
  5. lance d. logue says:
    April 15, 2008 at 10:40 am

    Blore’s understatement of this program’s mismanagement further undermines the credibility of defense procurement officials. The procurement process is broken, and its insipid defense is pathetic.
    “The USA

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    • South of the Border Mayhem
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      RE: "The JOE discusses at length perilous...
      SMSgt Mac
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      I'm sure they will solve...
      STemplar
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      So there is your Affordable Weapon....
      drm
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      Just found out that Taiwan's...
      Reverse Kanga
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      Just keep in mind that the current...
      Reverse Kanga
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      For once I have to agree with Byron Skinner....
      pfcem
    • Trainer Shoots Down F-22 or What?
      f-22 article by bill sweetMan (page no. 102):...
      popular science
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      Thunder350, There is no 'out of control' cost increase....
      pfcem
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      I would like to see any conclusive data showing the...
      @Earlydawn
    • Trainer Shoots Down F-22 or What?
      King of Fighters F-22 Gets Killed by Humble T-38 Training...
      gizmodo
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage