<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Exclusive: Raytheon Wins Big Bucks for Missile Radar Move</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2008/04/17/exclusive-raytheon-wins-big-bucks-for-missile-radar-move/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/04/17/exclusive-raytheon-wins-big-bucks-for-missile-radar-move/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:06:43 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: FX  ?</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/04/17/exclusive-raytheon-wins-big-bucks-for-missile-radar-move/#comment-38279</link> <dc:creator>FX  ?</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:25:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2792#comment-38279</guid> <description>http://clmconcepts.com </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://clmconcepts.com" rel="nofollow">http://clmconcepts.com</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: FX ????</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/04/17/exclusive-raytheon-wins-big-bucks-for-missile-radar-move/#comment-178726</link> <dc:creator>FX ????</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:25:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2792#comment-178726</guid> <description>http://clmconcepts.com </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://clmconcepts.com" rel="nofollow">http://clmconcepts.com</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TrustButVerify</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/04/17/exclusive-raytheon-wins-big-bucks-for-missile-radar-move/#comment-178725</link> <dc:creator>TrustButVerify</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:57:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2792#comment-178725</guid> <description>Is a deeper game being played here? Hosting a U.S. base is generally seen as an economic benefit and hence there is an additional angle to consider here. I&#039;m all for putting USAREUR and USAFE in the Czech Republic and especially in Poland. ABM bases are, Russian arm-waving aside, very difficult to characterize as aggressive. (Less &quot;aggressive&quot; than a BCT or a fighter wing, certainly.) I haven&#039;t watched this closely, but perhaps if we look closely we can judge to what extent this system is a diplomatic &quot;carrot.&quot; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is a deeper game being played here? Hosting a U.S. base is generally seen as an economic benefit and hence there is an additional angle to consider here. I’m all for putting USAREUR and USAFE in the Czech Republic and especially in Poland. ABM bases are, Russian arm-waving aside, very difficult to characterize as aggressive. (Less “aggressive” than a BCT or a fighter wing, certainly.) I haven’t watched this closely, but perhaps if we look closely we can judge to what extent this system is a diplomatic “carrot.”</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pharsalus</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/04/17/exclusive-raytheon-wins-big-bucks-for-missile-radar-move/#comment-178723</link> <dc:creator>Pharsalus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:37:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2792#comment-178723</guid> <description>&quot;The U.S. wants to put an X-band radar in the Czech Republic to work with a missile interceptor site in Poland, to defend Europe against attack from Iran&quot; ...to defend Europe against attack from Iran... ??? Hahahahahahahahahahah... you&#039;re killing me. Attack Europe? With what? Are they planning on launching sheep at us? Or those hypothetical nukes. Or North-Korean missiles? If Iran attacks something, it&#039;s Israel first. This is just plain fearmongery. &quot;Look, people of Europe! You&#039;re in danger from several nondescript imaginary threats! You need us! Yes, really, you need us, we&#039;re serious!&quot; dixit US MoD. Crap. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“The U.S. wants to put an X-band radar in the Czech Republic to work with a missile interceptor site in Poland, to defend Europe against attack from Iran“<br /> …to defend Europe against attack from Iran…<br /> ???<br /> Hahahahahahahahahahah… you’re killing me. Attack Europe? With what? Are they planning on launching sheep at us? Or those hypothetical nukes. Or North-Korean missiles? If Iran attacks something, it’s Israel first.<br /> This is just plain fearmongery. “Look, people of Europe! You’re in danger from several nondescript imaginary threats! You need us! Yes, really, you need us, we’re serious!” dixit US MoD.<br /> Crap.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vstress</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/04/17/exclusive-raytheon-wins-big-bucks-for-missile-radar-move/#comment-178722</link> <dc:creator>Vstress</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:31:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2792#comment-178722</guid> <description>Umm... I doubt it affects Russia... but I see another further away threat addtitional to Iran, which is called China. I&#039;m surprised China still haven&#039;t done the Japan thing and invaded other places to allow their people to live without the current issues of overpopulation. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm… I doubt it affects Russia… but I see another further away threat addtitional to Iran, which is called China.<br /> I’m surprised China still haven’t done the Japan thing and invaded other places to allow their people to live without the current issues of overpopulation.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: LP</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/04/17/exclusive-raytheon-wins-big-bucks-for-missile-radar-move/#comment-38274</link> <dc:creator>LP</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 07:51:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2792#comment-38274</guid> <description>Not actually an exclusive - reported by DID two days ago! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not actually an exclusive — reported by DID two days ago!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.003 seconds using apc
Object Caching 699/703 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 04:28:46 -->
