<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Osprey Fire Injures Marine</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2008/04/17/osprey-fire-injures-marine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/04/17/osprey-fire-injures-marine/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:25:49 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: TrustButVerify</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/04/17/osprey-fire-injures-marine/#comment-178718</link> <dc:creator>TrustButVerify</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:21:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2791#comment-178718</guid> <description>I&#039;m pretty ambivalent about this bird. On one hand I&#039;d love to see it succeed, and it&#039;s not going away any time soon- thank Congress for that. On the other hand, the Osprey has arguably cost a good deal more than it&#039;s worth. The fact is that this program won&#039;t vanish into the breeze because of the problems listed in this post, because they can be called &quot;teething problems.&quot; Every system has them. A system as complex as the V-freakin&#039;-22 is going to have plenty, and in the end I&#039;m just happy there haven&#039;t been any more catastrophic (or fatal) failures. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m pretty ambivalent about this bird. On one hand I’d love to see it succeed, and it’s not going away any time soon– thank Congress for that. On the other hand, the Osprey has arguably cost a good deal more than it’s worth. The fact is that this program won’t vanish into the breeze because of the problems listed in this post, because they can be called “teething problems.” Every system has them. A system as complex as the V-freakin’-22 is going to have plenty, and in the end I’m just happy there haven’t been any more catastrophic (or fatal) failures.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Grandjester</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/04/17/osprey-fire-injures-marine/#comment-178716</link> <dc:creator>Grandjester</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:59:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2791#comment-178716</guid> <description>And you know, after Christian&#039;s video I was almost ready to eat my words about this very expensive turkey, but... &quot;...suffered an engine nacelle fire, a recurring problem.&quot; &quot;...reliability in Iraq (and stateside) continues to be less than desired...&quot; &quot;...engines are wearing way too fast.&quot; &quot;...a nasty tendency to go bad,&quot; I return to my original assesment. This thing is a TURD. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you know, after Christian’s video I was almost ready to eat my words about this very expensive turkey, but…<br /> ”…suffered an engine nacelle fire, a recurring problem.“<br /> ”…reliability in Iraq (and stateside) continues to be less than desired…“<br /> ”…engines are wearing way too fast.“<br /> ”…a nasty tendency to go bad,“<br /> I return to my original assesment. This thing is a TURD.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ron</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/04/17/osprey-fire-injures-marine/#comment-178715</link> <dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:40:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2791#comment-178715</guid> <description>And Rolls-Royce is bailing out on taking care of the engines, so the rumor is that the Marines are going to go for GE engines.  Seems everything about these toys is short-lived, except the politics that kept the program alive. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Rolls-Royce is bailing out on taking care of the engines, so the rumor is that the Marines are going to go for GE engines.  Seems everything about these toys is short-lived, except the politics that kept the program alive.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vstress</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/04/17/osprey-fire-injures-marine/#comment-178714</link> <dc:creator>Vstress</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:25:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2791#comment-178714</guid> <description>Vercingetorix: I&#039;m not completely clued up on military operational aspects (even though I work on design).  But shouldn&#039;t the pilot notice that on a quick walk-around of the a/c? Anyways, yup the engines will be Rolls Royce&#039;s responsibility, hence why Bell aren&#039;t afraid to comment on it.  Otherwise they would also be keeping quiet.  Maybe DT can ask Rolls Royce some questions, as a press organisation? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vercingetorix:<br /> I’m not completely clued up on military operational aspects (even though I work on design).  But shouldn’t the pilot notice that on a quick walk-around of the a/c?<br /> Anyways, yup the engines will be Rolls Royce’s responsibility, hence why Bell aren’t afraid to comment on it.  Otherwise they would also be keeping quiet.  Maybe DT can ask Rolls Royce some questions, as a press organisation?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fier</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/04/17/osprey-fire-injures-marine/#comment-178713</link> <dc:creator>Fier</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 01:19:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2791#comment-178713</guid> <description>The thing with new toys is that, essentially, everything depends on whether or not you read the instruction manual, and furthermore, whether or not the instruction manual is in readable english... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing with new toys is that, essentially,<br /> everything depends on whether or not you read the instruction manual,<br /> and furthermore, whether or not the instruction manual is in readable english…</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: James</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/04/17/osprey-fire-injures-marine/#comment-38264</link> <dc:creator>James</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:52:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2791#comment-38264</guid> <description>LOL so much for idiot prof. I this the reason for the new engines? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL so much for idiot prof.<br /> I this the reason for the new engines?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vercingetorix</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/04/17/osprey-fire-injures-marine/#comment-178712</link> <dc:creator>Vercingetorix</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:26:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2791#comment-178712</guid> <description>&quot;And a Marine spokesman told me the fire on March 14 happened because someone neglected to remove an engine intake cover. I should have more on this later.&quot; That&#039;ll do it. There is a reason they stencil on the covers &#039;Remove Before Flight.&#039; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“And a Marine spokesman told me the fire on March 14 happened because someone neglected to remove an engine intake cover. I should have more on this later.“<br /> That’ll do it. There is a reason they stencil on the covers ‘Remove Before Flight.’</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.003 seconds using apc
Object Caching 710/714 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 02:51:15 -->
