DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Drones » Robot Targets Men in Iraq

Robot Targets Men in Iraq

predator-balad.jpg

Yesterday after­noon we ran a story on Military​.com about a U.S. drone strike that killed four Shiite “mil­i­tants” in Basra.

An unmanned U.S. drone fired two Hellfire mis­siles at mil­i­tants attack­ing Iraqi sol­diers in a Shiite mili­tia strong­hold in the south­ern city of Basra on Wednesday, killing four of the gun­men, the mil­i­tary said.

The airstrike in Basra occurred about 1 a.m. after mili­ti­a­men attacked an Iraqi army patrol with rocket-​​propelled grenades on the east­ern side of the Hayaniyah dis­trict, the U.S. mil­i­tary said. A vehi­cle sus­pected of con­tain­ing more weapons and ammu­ni­tion also was destroyed. 

To me this strike seemed inter­est­ing for it’s “close air sup­port” fla­vor. Up until only recently, the armed Predators and Reapers have been used pri­marly for strate­gic and infra­struc­ture strikes. We all know about drones going after HVTs in a “sur­gi­cal” hit, but this time it seems they were used to sup­port Iraqi troops on the ground.

We also saw reports of drones being used in this way dur­ing last week’s fight­ing in Sadr City.

Does this sig­nal a par­a­digm shift in the use of com­bat drones? I’d be inter­ested to know what the coor­di­na­tion for CAS is with this kind of asset — what’s the response time? Seems to me it’s a good idea in a place where US assets are thinly dis­trib­uted like Basra. And as the US with­draws more and more troops over the com­ing years, we could see a lot more of this kind of drone-​​kills-​​man scenario.

– Christian

Share |

April 17th, 2008 | Drones | 278932 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/04/17/robot-targets-men-in-iraq/Robot+Targets+Men+in+Iraq2008-04-17+11%3A20%3A32Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « MRAP Review | Some New Tanker Gouge » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Bill says:
    April 17, 2008 at 8:38 am

    This could be a good oppor­tu­nity to replace one of the best manned close air sup­port air­craft, the A-​​10. Imagine a drone, with all its vuner­a­ble elec­tron­ics, encased in some light­weight armor, like the A-​​10 tita­nium bath tub around the pilot. Mount a gun on the drone, and it could be just as deadly as an A-​​10. Even bet­ter yet, use a design sim­i­lar to the Bell Eagle Eye tilt-​​rotor drone, and mod­ify it with the lethal fea­ture of the A-​​10. Then you would have a excel­lent CAS drone as well as a proper escort for the V-​​22 Osprey. I like the A-​​10, but the Airforce will not replace it prop­erly, except with the F-​​35 Joint Strike Fighter, which doesn’t have the loi­ter time the A-​​10 has.

    Reply
  2. Grandjester says:
    April 17, 2008 at 8:53 am

    Goes to show that F-​​35 is com­pletely unnec­es­sary for the close sup­port role. Give the Predators and Reapers to the Army already!

    Reply
  3. Ed says:
    April 17, 2008 at 11:04 am

    These have been used for a while now in the Close Air Support role. They intended it for that role when they gave it lethal­ity by arm­ing it with a hell­fire. The reaper is even more suited for such a role as it has a longer rnage and loi­ter time cou­pled with a heav­ier pay­load.
    I must dis­agree with these being the replace­ment for the A-​​10. I know troops can trust a pilot’s vision bet­ter than that of a UAV cam­era oper­a­tor and this is cru­cial for close air sup­port of the type the A-​​10 deliv­ers to you.
    These UAVs even uparmed to the extent you men­tion would be sit­ting ducks to a coun­try with mod­ern air defense capa­bil­i­ties, whereas an A-​​10 or F-​​35, they have reac­tion time that makes them far more suit­able for this role than a slower UAV.
    I do like the idea of using one or more of these as an armed escort for the V-​​22. That would enable the marines to not worry as much about the added weight and low­ered pay­load that encom­passes adding a self defense gun to the air­craft. Coupled by the enhanced sen­sors in a UAV, they would do much bet­ter, espe­cially at night to fend off an ambush or enemy attacks in all conditions.

    Reply
  4. Roy Smith says:
    April 17, 2008 at 11:33 am

    Damn,I thought this was the arti­cle about the Talon SWORDS robot that had to be shut down because it was aim­ing its weapon at its own men,shades of Skynet,my bad.

    Reply
  5. Rick, USA says:
    April 18, 2008 at 8:19 am

    I saw a show on the Military chan­nel about a Special Forces team that was dis­cov­ered early in the war and had to be extracted. They were under attack by sev­eral hun­dred men and only through the efforts of the air force pro­vid­ing close air sup­port did they make it out. There was so much one-​​on-​​one com­mu­ni­ca­tions between the air­men and the ground forces to make split sec­ond deci­sions that only a live pilot could make. I don’t think drones will ever totally replace live pilots.

    Reply
  6. Jeff Dulin says:
    April 18, 2008 at 8:26 am

    I agree. Further devel­op­ment of this type of close air sup­port sys­tem is a great way to go. Eliminating the pilot and replac­ing him with fuel, ord­nance and reduced size gives a longer TOT at a what SHOULD be a lower cost. SHOULD but WON’T! The guys in charge of mak­ing sure the con­trac­tors make lot$ of MONEY will gold plate these things till they cost more than an F-​​22, you watch ‘em!!
    The Army SHOUULD take over some of this role also. Along with the Marines. After all, it is usu­ally THEIR peo­ple who are being sup­ported isn’t it? The AF needs to take it’s lead in Space, Fast Movers (for as long as they con­tinue to exist) and Moving cargo/​people. That’s what they do best.
    Perhaps a SWARM type of Attack/​Defense sys­tem with these things would make future fight­ers obso­lete, for any coun­try. These could even, even­tu­ally, become fast enough to pro­vide a mis­sile defense if they could be placed in low orbit. (Screw the “treaty”)
    Pilots are good but the cost of the equip­met and the high loss/​capture fac­tor needs to be con­sid­ered. The only thing I worry about is that the Army is full of ham handed gen­er­als that are NOT Aviators. They really never will under­stand the best employ­ment of avi­a­tion assets because of thier atti­tudes toward pilots in gen­eral. It’s always been that way. I also doubt that the A&D of these air­craft would be as good as if it were done by the Air Force. So far, they have done a really great job!
    My Son is a an AF pilot and really is NOT going to appre­ci­ate me say­ing this but: GO ROBOT!
    JD

    Reply
  7. wpnexp says:
    April 18, 2008 at 8:33 am

    Grandjester and Skinner,
    Don’t think we will be see­ing Predators down many enemy fight­ers, more like the other way around, they are very vul­ner­a­ble to enemy air­craft and SAMs, which we haven’t seen in Iraq, but we may see in another war soon. Even if no pilot is lost when a Predator is shot down, they are expen­sive as well and we can’t afford to have many of them shot out of the sky. The F-​​35 will also carry a much larger and more var­ied pay­load. Trust me, the F-​​35 is needed more than ever as the F-​​22 is not being bought in the num­bers it should be.

    Reply
  8. Kale says:
    April 18, 2008 at 8:51 am

    I think its awe­some that an arti­cle like this for an unmanned air vehi­cle is praised as a break­through in mod­ern war­fare, but the sec­ond you put it on the ground it becomes some ter­ri­ble night­mare. What is up with that?
    I am all for putting more dis­tance between our ser­vice mem­bers and dan­ger. The Reaper/​Predator pro­gram is mak­ing great strides in the unmanned com­bat arena. Hopefully John Q Public will see that pro­vid­ing our mil­i­tary with these types of tools will do more to sup­port our troops than those “sup­port your troops” rib­bon stick­ers that are so popular.

    Reply
  9. Grandjester says:
    April 18, 2008 at 9:08 am

    wpn­exp,
    Funny name, since you didn’t get my point. F-​​35 is uneeded for many rea­son, but my point was about how unnec­es­sary it is in the close sup­port role, which pred/​reap is great for (yes Ed, I agree, NOTHING matches the A-​​10 but they wont last for­ever OR re-​​open the line and with HiDef imag­ing upgrades, they will be bet­ter than a pilots eyes) and CAS usu­ally takes place after Air supe­ri­or­ity and SEAD have been achived. Again, plac­ing these ass­est DIRECTLY under the con­trol of the ground com­man­ders makes the most sense.

    Reply
  10. Gunner says:
    April 18, 2008 at 12:26 pm

    I hon­estly believe we need to build more A-10’s. It’s a fan­tas­tic air­craft for ground sup­port of all kinds as well as the SAR mis­sion.
    I would even go so far as to say if the Air Force doesn’t want to keep them around let Army avi­a­tors have them. Yep the Army sup­port­ing the Army just as the Apache does now. Of course the Air Force would never go for that but I believe it would work very well.

    Reply
  11. Grandjester says:
    April 18, 2008 at 10:13 pm

    “The Fighter Pilot Generals have become the Battleship Admirals of the 21st cen­tury.“
    Quote of the day, Sir!

    Reply
  12. cheap hellgate gold says:
    August 1, 2008 at 11:38 pm

    No can not for­get is your own heart after all, now play­ing a game of this is that I will not go depends on what other peo­ple say, crit­i­cize what they play their own. I always warn my own cheap hell­gate gold. Often in the game, mixed how could not be right and wrong. Men not like Men, women not like women, like the cruel woman curse street. He play­ing is cer­tainly not sat­is­fac­tory or heat defects. In the game he is find his own meta­mor­pho­sis of the heart. For you, do not have to care about too much.

    Reply
  13. cheap snw vis says:
    August 8, 2008 at 3:34 am

    So here is where the cheap snw vis drops. K2 Network was nice enough to send us a review copy.

    Reply
  14. Tibia coins says:
    August 8, 2008 at 3:35 am

    Of course, when the rush is on pre­mium play­ers have an advan­tage when it comes to log­ging in. As a pre­mium player you will be able to log in on all game worlds even if the reg­u­lar player limit has already been reached Tibia coins. Play Tibia when­ever you like!

    Reply
  15. dofus kamas says:
    August 15, 2008 at 8:23 pm

    at that time I do not want to spend my time to the game, but later I met her, in my life she was very impor­tant, we together to earn the dofus kamas, I think this life­time I will never forget.

    Reply
  16. eve isk says:
    August 15, 2008 at 8:28 pm

    I was play­ing EVE more than a year, but I feel it was already had a long time, the feel­ing seems was many. In this more than one year I already for­got that I spend how much money to buy the eve isk, I already for­got in order to played the game how many things happened.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage