DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Ground Vehicles » Humvee Maker Submits JLTV Design

Humvee Maker Submits JLTV Design

humvee-interior.jpg

I just received this release from Humvee manufacturer AM General describing its team concept for the development of the next-generation tactical transport: the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle.

As you all know, I think the JLTV project is a long time coming and is an exciting opportunity to leverage armor, powerplant, mechanical, vehicle systems and weapons advances since the design and fielding of the Humvee.

Its good to see some many companies jump into the program — and there’s a part of me that’s glad to see AM General isn’t fighting for the services to cling to its current technology, but is instead getting on the bandwagon with a strong effort on JLTV.

From “General Tactical Vehicles (a conglomerate of AM General and GD Land Systems):

Leveraging over 120 years of combined experience in the design, production and support of more than one million combat and tactical vehicles, General Tactical Vehicles has submitted its proposal for the Technology Development phase of the U.S. Army and U.S. Marine Corps Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) program.

GTV’s offer for the JLTV optimizes survivability while maximizing power and payload. The approach focuses on commonality of systems and components along with modular armor, resulting in an innovative and agile vehicle system that will provide enhanced crew protection, considerable cargo capacity, ready transportability and unprecedented networked mobility.

“Our JLTV will provide America’s Soldiers and Marines a vehicle with the strong performance, flexibility, protection and sustainability they need across the full range of missions, locations and operational scenarios,” said Don Howe, GTV’s JLTV program director. “GTV’s JLTV will give our armed forces the rapid deployability, reliability, networking capabilities and survivability they need today and in the decades ahead.”

General Tactical Vehicles applies proven technologies along with a modular design that will accommodate continuing advances in armor and vehicle systems. “While it’s a significant advancement in design, it’s also affordable and practical,” said Howe. “Combined with manufacturing readiness that allows an accelerated path to production, our design will make the JLTV program a smart, low-risk investment for America’s armed forces and taxpayers.”

Innovative features of the GTV design include:

  • Lightweight hybrid hull structure which provides a low-profile and blast-resistant vehicle designed to survive current and future threats
  • Parallel arm adjustable height suspension to give the vehicle increased mine blast protection without jeopardizing air and sea transportability;
  • Semi-active suspension ensuring safety enhanced mobility and crew comfort
  • Proven propulsion systems with a high horsepower-to-weight ratio to maximize payload, plus a driveline that gives the vehicle tough off road capabilities
  • Digital cockpit with C4I technologies connecting the crew to other units and systems
  • A unique modular and scalable trailer that has mobility equal to the JLTV vehicle itself.

General Tactical Vehicles is a joint venture between AM General and General Dynamics Land Systems, a business unit of General Dynamics formed to provide the U.S. Army and U.S. Marine Corps a low-risk, affordable, technically advanced and economically sustainable solution to their Joint Light Tactical Vehicle requirements. In 2006, both AM General and General Dynamics were awarded JLTV “Best Technical Approach” trade studies by the Office of Naval Research.

I’ve asked AM General for a photo or artist’s rendition of the vehicle, but I’m intrigued by this idea of a “modular and scalable trailer.” [Sounds like their making the vehicle itself smaller to generate a lower profile and adding a trailer for gear and other stuff. I wonder how well this is going to go over with the Army and Marine Corps. They could read it as just something else to break]…

EDITOR: good call dear readers, indeed a trailer is probably part of the RFP. I understand the need and the compatibility issues Ed, roger all and good input. Thanks!

– Christian

Share |

April 18th, 2008 | Ground Vehicles | 279310 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/04/18/humvee-maker-submits-jltv-design/Humvee+Maker+Submits+JLTV+Design2008-04-18+12%3A37%3A02Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Exclusive: Raytheon Wins Big Bucks for Missile Radar Move | Prez Helo to Counter New Threats » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. jeff says:
    April 18, 2008 at 8:12 am

    Christian,
    I thought I read somewhere that the gov’t had listed a request for a trailer to go along with the JLTV. I may be mistaken but I thought the other companies going after JLTV are, or have, made designs for a trailer.
    I have seen some of the pictures from AUSA and they have some very interesting designs for this, could be interesting.

    Reply
  2. stephen russell says:
    April 18, 2008 at 8:40 am

    Best news yet IF approved: More surplus Humvees for the Public to buy.
    OK.

    Reply
  3. James Mason says:
    April 18, 2008 at 9:35 am

    Stephen: The public can no longer buy Surplus HMMWVs. They must be destroyed before they can be sold publicly, as scrap. The reasoning is that the HMMWV does not meet DOT standards. See here: http://​www​.drms​.dla​.mil/​p​u​b​a​f​f​/​h​t​m​l​/​f​a​q​_​-​g​e​n​e​r​a​l​.​h​tml
    and here: http://​www​.olive​-drab​.com/​o​d​_​m​v​g​_​a​u​c​t​i​o​n​s​_​j​e​e​p​h​m​m​w​v​.​p​hp3

    Reply
  4. Ed says:
    April 18, 2008 at 9:47 am

    The current HMMWV already has a trailer setup, and many trailer mounted pieces of equipment are compatible with the HMMWV. It makes perfect sense to have the next vehicle have that capability otherwise you would need a separate vehicle just to tow stuff that the HMMWV already can do.

    Reply
  5. Bill says:
    April 18, 2008 at 12:55 pm

    As far as surplus Humvees go, I recall how much I hated them in the Army. Underpowered, they have that GM 6.2 liter diesel which was one of the worst engines ever put out. I drove humvees with that engine, two suburbans, and a couple of trucks. The 4x4 system was good, but a land cruiser has one at least as good and I trust it to keep running.

    Reply
  6. ADyer says:
    April 20, 2008 at 1:50 pm

    Glad to see another designer using the modular armor concept. It’s really the only way to go. MRAPs and even up-armored hummvees are not practical vehicles in many of the situations light trucks are used. At the same time, situations exist where some light resistance can be expected but moving heavy armor in is impractical.
    When the HMMWV was designed I think the assumption was that armor was largely superfluous since it would simply slow the vehicle down or waste resources without having any discernible impact on the effectiveness of enemy fire, presumed at that time to originate from Soviet armored columns or aircraft. Modular armor allows for the humvee’s replacement to be useful in the conventional scenario above, but allows for extra protection in urban combat or insurgency situations.

    Reply
  7. Dennis says:
    October 14, 2008 at 8:57 pm

    Modular is great, until they get the role wrong, and the “light” version starts geting into heavy combat.
    In other words, when the inevitable happens.
    In “The Long Road Home” this happened in our first conflict in Sadar City.
    They saw their role as just keeping the peace (since the Shia were supposed to be happy we were there.…) and roled into the city with people in Humvees with canvas tops and open trucks.….
    It did not work out so well.…

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    • South of the Border Mayhem
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
    • Rise of the Cyber Arms Dealers
    • Author Steven Pressfield Blogs Afghan Visit With Gen. Mattis
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
    • That Elephant’s Going To Do What? Where?
    Recent Comments
    • South of the Border Mayhem
      Legalize it, with heavy regulation. There's a program in...
      Flapjack
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      I have sadi from the start that the LCS is and always had...
      Dale
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      Time to bring the hydrofoils,"Pegasus" out of...
      9190835
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      Helicopters for reach, yes, but you can't...
      Brian Mulholland
    • Army’s GCV Not Just MGV Warmed Over
      "In urban areas, tracked vehicles have the...
      Ken
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      Helicopters for reach, yes, but you can't...
      Brian Mulholland
    • D.I.Y. GUN TRUCK
      Looks formidable, I'd like to see a larger, more detailed photograph....
      K-Bar
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      Toad – Precision rounds are not meant to and...
      dragon6actual
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      The flare at the end of the cannon is to reduce...
      dragon6actual
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      "The Infantry Company seldom engages target...
      dragon6actual
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage