Comments on: US Sells Secret Anti-IED Tech to Iraq

By: Nurlan Ospan

Nurlan Ospan — Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:09:53 +0000

We are a professional manufacturer of bomb jammers,visist at www.thejammerworld.com

By: Dude

Dude — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:36:17 +0000

Anyone ever thought about the fact that this might be a tactic to get these as close to the enemy as possible (i.e they buy them from the market) and then they find the frequencies and detonate the IED right there in the factory? I know that sounds far fetched, but what if?

By: Sunny Deng

Sunny Deng — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:00:09 +0000

Dear Sir or Madam
Wish you everything goes very well.
I will tell you good new, we manufacture new jammers with lots of function.
It is vehicle mounted bomb jammers for military convoy protection, convoy jamming system counters remote controlled IED attacks by terrorists for convoy security.
Any problem, please communicate me.
Waiting for your reply,
Regards
Sunny Deng
Shenzhen Tangreat Technology Co., Ltd.
Website: http://www.tangreat.com
E-mail: jammer_blocker05@tangreat.com
MSN: hongsunny2008@hotmail.com
Skype: sunny20081634
Tel: 86–755-33620232
Fax: 86–755-82527821
Mobile: 86–15815576734

By: Judah Ben Hur

Judah Ben Hur — Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:52:07 +0000

Gaiacomm International to develop Defeat IED technology
Gaiacomm International will develop Counter (defeat) IED technology for the US Military to be used in Iraq and Afghanistan. This technology is currently classified because of its accurate nature of detection. When deployed it will be able to detect and disable any device in the ground, on person, inside vehicle or building within a determined range, also classified. Soldiers are dying thus, the emphasis on accurate detection. Other technologies currently in the field simply do not operate as planned, thus the need for Gaiacomm’s technology.

By: P.A.

P.A. — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:27:55 +0000

The Isrealis have been pushing this technology for years now, and although it is ‘illegal’ to own here in the States, I have been in a movie theater where my cell phone had no signal, nor did one ring during an entire movie.
In Mexico, some Priests and Ministers have installed these same device-types in their churches, with nary a service being interrupted by some schmuck who can’t stop talking for one hour.
Who knows, ‘tamper proof’ could mean the same thing it did for the seismic/sound/wiretap relay boxes laid next to the Ho Chi Mihn trail by Road Runner teams. If someone wanted to open it up, it gave them and their friends a Birthday Party.
We aren’t going to be giving current-generation (and doubtful last generation either) technology away. As much as CBS and CNN would like to make everyone connected in the Military as a non-thinking knuckle-dragger, you can trip over a few that actually know what they’re doing.
Jeez relax already.….…..

By: contractor

contractor — Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:07:48 +0000

Being a Vet does not automatically make you informed. Some of you actually know just enough about spectrum dynamics to make yourselves sound credible .…except for the armchair warrior that said there was no way to control the spectrum.
go ahead and next time you go downrange, ask every last operator if they know exactly how the systems work. They dont. Theres a reason for that. Theres also a reason the Lockheed wont discuss this. And to prove that all you blowhards are in left field, you actually believe the Symphony was ever top of the line inventory!
I just have to add that, to the few of you old-skool throwbacks, until you can comprehend how we control the entire non-light data capable spectrum for 200 meters surrounding a moving vehicle and have communications at the same time…well, then do us a favor and shut your non-informed pieholes. You can blame the govts testing and regulation requirements for lack of fielding.
Too worried about politics to read between the blazing huge lines.

By: Dennis

Dennis — Fri, 25 Apr 2008 22:09:00 +0000

I guess it all comes down to how sophisticated the actual hardware is.
If the Software is the amazing part, and it locks up after a time not having the code, it is ok.
If the Hardware is the amazing part and even after the software control is cut off an replaced, well that

By: Robert

Robert — Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:41:40 +0000

we have allways trained country’s that at some point use it against us down the line.Ho
Che Ming Is a good example.And the list keep’s going!

By: andrew

andrew — Fri, 25 Apr 2008 02:38:47 +0000

We must truly have morons working at the upper levels of the Pentagon who approved this — this gear will be for sale in the Tehran bazaar witbin the week.

By: CTR1(SW)

CTR1(SW) — Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:08:05 +0000

Normally, I would read all input before responding. In this case I will do otherwise. ARE WE COMPLETELY NUTS???!!! I am supremely confident that within 12 hours one of those units was in Iran, and 12 hours later it was in Moscow. This is an example of complete lunacy.