DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Fast Movers » Hypersonic Test Flights Set

Hypersonic Test Flights Set

hypersonic.jpg

I’m just fas­ci­nated by this stuff According to a report today, DARPA plans to flight test two hyper­sonic demon­stra­tor vehi­cles begin­ning in 2009.

There’s been a lot of talk about hyper­son­ics and what the flight regime can and can’t do for civil­ian and mil­i­tary appli­ca­tions. And finally there’s going to be some proof in the putting. It’ll be inter­est­ing to see the dynamic effects of such speeds and whether the sci­ence is there to build hyper­sonic planes and missiles.

From Flight Daily News:

Details have emerged of the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency’s (DARPA) plans to test fly its two expend­able dart-​​shaped Hypersonic Technology Vehicle (HTV)-2 demonstrators.

To be launched by Orbital Sciences Minotaur solid-​​fuel rock­ets from Vandenberg Air Force Base, HTV-​​2a will fly in May 2009 and HTV-​​2b will fol­low in the October of that year.

While the two flights have sep­a­rate tra­jec­to­ries they will both impact near the Kwajalein Atoll test site in the Pacific Ocean. HTV-​​1 was a ground test demonstrator.

The first flight will demon­strate per­for­mance char­ac­ter­is­tics, and the sec­ond cross-​​range manoeu­vring as well as ther­mal pro­tec­tion sys­tem performance.

The two HTVs will use iner­tial nav­i­ga­tional mea­sure­ment units and global posi­tion­ing sys­tem (GPS) for guid­ance, while test­ing satel­lite com­mu­ni­ca­tions and GPS recep­tion through the plasma that will sur­round the vehi­cles dur­ing their flight.

“The HTV-​​2 will have a plasma probe onboard [to exam­ine the hot gases] and we are expect­ing it to have good lift-​​over-​​drag per­for­mance,” said DARPA’s tac­ti­cal tech­nol­ogy office deputy direc­tor Steve Walker, speak­ing at the 15th AIAA International space planes, hyper­sonic sys­tems and tech­nolo­gies con­fer­ence in Dayton, Ohio on 28 April.

The arti­cle also men­tions another flight demon­stra­tor that will demon­strate some rad­i­cal flight characteristics:

The next flight demon­stra­tor after HTV-​​2 will be Blackswift. Lockheed Martin and Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne were work­ing on a waverider type vehi­cle called the HTV-​​3 but there are no plans to build this and the con­cept has been des­ig­nated HTV-​​3X.

Blackswift is a reusable hyper­sonic demon­stra­tor and the prime con­trac­tor for its con­struc­tion and flight test is yet to be selected. 

Should be an excit­ing year for exotic flight regimes.

(Gouge: NC)

– Christian

Share |

April 30th, 2008 | Fast Movers | 281914 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/04/30/hypersonic-test-flights-set/Hypersonic+Test+Flights+Set2008-04-30+19%3A39%3A45Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « It’s not $640 toilet seats, but… | Aussie KC-​​30 (EADS) Needs Mods » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. NitPick says:
    April 30, 2008 at 5:47 pm

    I enjoy the read­ing, but I’m feel­ing a bit picky today, sorry.
    ”…there’s going to be some proof in the putting.” should be, oddly enough, “proof in the pud­ding” (yes, food, please see: http://​www​.world​wide​words​.org/​q​a​/​q​a​-​p​r​o​1​.​htm)
    Although “putting” does sort of work, in the “We’re putting it out there and we’ll see how it goes.” sense.
    At those speeds pretty much every­thing is a dynamic effect, really. Either it will fly, fall, or spread itself all over the sky (very dynamic).
    I think the sci­ence is more than good enough. How’s the tech­nol­ogy, though (fly, fall, or frag)?

    Reply
  2. Ger says:
    April 30, 2008 at 6:10 pm

    I guess I’m picky too. “The proof of the pud­ding is in the eat­ing” would fit in that the eat­ing or tast­ing would be the final step as is the test­ing of the vehi­cles.
    Love your website

    Reply
  3. chris franklin says:
    May 1, 2008 at 5:58 am

    We’ve had hyper­sonic, stealth spy­planes for the nearly the last 20 years and the U.S. Air Force is stealth­ily run­ning its own space pro­gram — a two stage craft with a piloted “moth­er­ship” releas­ing a smaller piloted space-​​craft oper­at­ing in LEO.
    You don’t need to be in a for­eign intel­li­gence ser­vice to deduce the afore­men­tioned.
    Any hyper­conic proof-​​of-​​concept demo is an effort to jus­tify a large, publicly-​​acknowledgable con­gres­sional appro­pri­a­tion for a hyper­sonic pro­gram. It cer­tainly isn’t an effort to merely jus­tify the fund­ing of inves­ti­ga­tions to see if hyper­sonic craft are possible

    Reply
  4. 111 says:
    May 1, 2008 at 8:00 am

    I think the hyper­son­ics will be a + fea­ture. Imagine google ver­sus yahoo or msn, or aol. It is like day and night when we are talk­ing hyper­sonic speeds. It will be like this, “fir­ing” … “tar­get hit!“
    The … dots rep­re­sent a mil­lisec­ond pause while the dart locks on and fires. I am curoius to see if sams or rader will be even able to detect it. If not, we have a newer force to be reck­oned with that can smite any loca­tion at the push of a but­ton with pre­ci­sion if fins are added in right areas. Or we could use the tri-​​blended metal to bend the frame in mid­flight. If plasma stages occur on the outer frame we would def­i­nitely have enogh ther­mal ener­gies to bend the metal frame if nece­sary. Toss out hydroulics or cables for guid­ance. What does that mean, it is lighter weight! Send me some pics when it clsoer to up and running.

    Reply
  5. 111 says:
    May 1, 2008 at 8:04 am

    don’t for­get the star­dust. Toss out the ceram­ics innards! Also the HHo fuel addi­tive for higher heat verses ace­lyte. Also if the micro holes do not work in the star­dust innards, use the nanotubes.

    Reply
  6. Allen Thomson says:
    May 1, 2008 at 12:15 pm

    Isn’t this an accu­racy MaRV rather than a self-​​propelled hyper­sonic vehi­cle? Doubtless good for prompt global non­nu­clear strike.

    Reply
  7. Nick says:
    May 1, 2008 at 1:57 pm

    chris, if you’re refer­ring to the SR-​​71 (mach 3+), it has been around since the 60’s. You also seem to be sure that the Air Force has its own space pro­gram that has a multi-​​stage vehi­cle capa­ble of LEO, which I’m guess­ing is sim­i­lar to Scaled Composite’s Spaceship 1 & 2? I could only hope such a thing were true, see­ing as what an utter fail­ure both NASA and the Air Force have been in devel­op­ing space tech­nolo­gies and assets as well as hyper­sonic capa­bil­i­ties, though research is being done, it seems like after the 70s we became com­pla­cent with the aero­space capa­bil­i­ties we had, which is very disappointing.

    Reply
  8. stephen russell says:
    May 1, 2008 at 7:49 pm

    Dont for­get the A2 H2 SST from Reaction engines UK–
    Yes a Hydrogen fuelled SST.
    Add this to the HST mix alone.
    BUT Get em Built.
    Hate those 15 hour flights to Sydney at sub­sonic speeds. Boring.

    Reply
  9. chris franklin says:
    May 1, 2008 at 9:09 pm

    Nick, the U.S. Air Force has you and every­body else cov­ered. Were just not sup­posed to know about it yet.

    Reply
  10. Nick says:
    May 2, 2008 at 11:45 am

    As an engi­neer­ing stu­dent with not just a pas­sion­ate, vested inter­est but a career inter­est, in fact goal, I truly hope there is much more going on than has been exposed since the 70s, I remem­ber read­ing about Air Force pro­grams, in the 80s I believe it was, to develop a two stage LEO space craft, it was claimed at the time though that the tech­no­log­i­cal capa­bil­i­ties did not exist, a story I’ve had trou­ble believ­ing ever since we made it to the moon in the 9 years in the 60s. There are always whis­pers here and there of amaz­ing things going on in the deserts of the south­west, I hope there is more going on than we are aware of. It always seemed odd we never tried to go faster than the SR-​​71, I really hope we have, though I’m not sure it’s pos­si­ble with out ram/​scramjet engines, which are still expe­ri­enc­ing hic­cups today. chris, I hope you’re right or know some­thing we don’t, oth­er­wise my lack of faith in the AF and NASA is well founded.

    Reply
  11. quellish says:
    May 2, 2008 at 3:22 pm

    Kind of odd that all the sto­ries on the pro­gram show only HTV-​​1, which was can­celled, and not HTV-​​2 even though that is what is going to fly.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      LOL Still all this pissing an moaning about the editorial...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare that...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Islame isn't a race, genius……
      Philo
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I sure as hell don't need to have someone take pictures of me...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "Now please tell me where in the Bible Jesus or his disciples...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      No, I am not a muslim. And no, the Koran does not say anything about...
      DualityOfMan
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage