If you’re old enough, the pictures of Soviet ICBM missiles presented to the United Nations during the Cuban missile crisis left an indelible mark in your cortex.
US Ambassador to the United Nations, Adlai Stevenson, placed a series of photos on an easel to answer Soviet charges that the US had no proof that the Soviets had placed missiles in the island state and that the Soviets were just helping Cuba develop.
Stevenson told the Soviets that, “we do have the evidence. We have it, and it is clear and it is incontrovertible.” And it was. The first pictures were of an area north of the village of Candelaria, southwest of Havana. The first photograph was taken in late August 1962 and it simply showed undeveloped countryside. The next picture showed a few tents and vehicles and several new roads. The next picture, taken 24 hours later, revealed tents for up to 500 men and seven ICBM missile trailers. But the jackpot wasn’t hit until mid-October when a U-2 aircraft photographed the area of San Cristobal.
“In only six minutes, US Air Force Maj. Richard Heyser snapped 928 photographs that yielded the first confirmation of offensive missiles in Cuba,” according to “Soviet Deception in the Cuban Missile Crisis,” an April 2007 article by James Hansen, who served in both CIA and DIA.
The Soviets had lied about the presence of missiles just 90 miles from the US mainland and they had been caught at it. This was probably the first time that Americans were exposed publicly to the art and science of what intelligence types call change detection. But it turns out that what has become one of the touchstones of the fabulous capabilities of spies in the skies — also known as high-flying planes such as the U-2 and satellites — was not quite as seminal as it seemed at the time.
Many argued that the pictures were proof of the superiority of what became known during the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT) as “national technical means.”
But, at an April 28 conference held at Georgetown University to celebrate the donation to the university of a lot of personal papers and recently declassified files from former CIA Director Richard Helms, that conventional wisdom was dealt a death blow.
Bud Wheelon, the CIA’s first deputy director for science and technology, said that the agency knew about the missiles from other, more prosaic sources beforehand. In fact, human sources in Cuba had obtained detailed information about the Cuban bombers and missiles, Wheelon told me this week.
The first solid information was obtained Sept. 17, he said, from agents on the ground. Using that and other information, the US flew the U-2 and other planes over Cuba to get confirmation and to provide the world with undeniable proof that did not compromise intelligence sources and methods. After all, the Cubans and Soviets knew about the U-2s and other planes because they shot at them. We understand that at least one senior intelligence official — long since retired — was secretly awarded one of the CIA’s highest honors for the spying done on the ground in Cuba. Senior intelligence officials, including Wheelon and CIA Director John McCone, knew about the intelligence from the agent and believed it. But the intelligence community did not.
A National Intelligence Estimate dated Sept. 19, 1962 concluded the Soviets were unlikely to try and install missiles in Cuba.
“The USSR could derive considerable military advantage from the establishment of Soviet medium and intermediate range ballistic missiles in Cuba, or from the establishment of a Soviet submarine base there. As between these two, the establishment of a submarine base would be the more likely. Either development, however, would be incompatible with Soviet practice to date and with Soviet policy as we presently estimate it,” the estimate concluded.
Not the first time they goofed. And it won’t be the last. But that is the nature of intelligence. It is the analysis of uncertain information and yields insights that are often wrong. But remember that the U-2 was built. Remember that agent working in Cuba.
And remember those 928 photographs. The process wasn’t perfect. But war was averted.
– Colin Clark
This brings up an irrelevant yet related question I’ve had for a while:
Need one have –two– working eyes these days to do IMINT interpretation?
Or can visually-impaired folks like me get in on the action?
YOu know, that has always been one of my gripes with the military..they fill jobs like mess chief and anylist jobs with able bodied troops that could be out on the ground. Instead of terminating the service of individuals that are too injured for front line duty, give them the option (with proper security clearance levels of course) for those jobs that DON’T require you to be a young buck (like the guy that got let go because he turned 60…and his job was running the chow hall).
This was a good story. I was one of many who served during this time period aboard the U.S.S.Shangri-La CVA-38. We were in a 40 ship convoy patroling the Cuban waters, and it was clear that the Cubans were serious about their nuclear weapons.We circled the Island for 27 days and were glad things turned out as they did. It was a very trying situation and all hell could have broke loose.But the Armed forces of the United States of America were on the job!God Bless America.
I was one of many that participated in this. I remember the Cuban missile crisis well. I was assigned to A Btry, 3/6th FA, 3rd Corps. Back then we were part of a STRAC force and kept our bags packed 24/7 so we could move fast. We loaded on rail cars back then and went to Ft Stewart, GA and from there, we went to Port Everglades, Fl and loaded our equipment on a LST. We were stayiny at the Gulfstream Race Track not far from the Port. I can’t remember what day, but we left the Race Track and boarded the LST and left. I spent a lot of years in the Army after that, but the Cuban Missile Crisis always sticks out in my mind. We were very close to a nuclear war, but when you are so young, war is war and I never gave a thought as to what type it was going to be. All I knew, I had a job to do and was prepared to do it to the very best of my ability. If there are any of you guys out there, it sure would be nice to hear from you.
The only general awards for the ships (I was on the Independence CVA62) was the Navy Expeditionary Medal. There may have been other unit commendations
I served on the USS Independence CV-62 during the cuban missle crises. I am curius about whether any medals were awarded for service during this time.
Therefore, I diligently practiced the level to promote, only then promote only then can help me to save many cheap 2moons gold.
In order to play the Requiem, I bought much Requiem Lant, it spend me much money.
Actually I practice the level by myself to be much quicker than together, and I need not buy cronous gold for , but it was very amusing that two people played in together.
I want to forget you, but I cannot achieve, see the computer and I remember you, see my cheap imvu credits that I remember you once again.
Actually I hoped that other come to buy mabinogi gold for their hurts.
If we do not have the good fortune this life, we will see with each other and that time I will buy last chaos gold enough for you in next life.
Because each people is not so rich, you have Hellgate London gold and you might save much time that practice the level.
For in the game I can have a family, I was go all out to work make Lord Of The Rings Gold, so long as there were the methods which could make money I has tried.
As your apprentice, I always waste your cheap Habbo Coins. But I really not to think that you left so suddenly, then am duty-bound not to turn back!
The very first thing that you have to do is to find out how somebody got your Tibia money account data. If none of these questions helps you to buy Tibia Gold find the security problem, do not simply ignore it.
If you’re wondering how to look out for bots, how to avoid them and what to do buy sro gold, you have come to the right place.
Thanks for reading and hopefully there will be a lot more Silkroad gold where that came from!
very good
very good
aaa
aaa
good
good
very good!!
very good!!
buy cheap nokia n95 experience without nokia mobile learning is better than learning without excperi-ence. I have nokia 6300 but one lamp wait which my feet are guided; and that bose headphones is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the apple touch past. http://www.leadsoftstore.com/