<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: The F-117 Nighthawk is Gone… We Think!</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2008/05/08/the-f-117-nighthawk-is-gone-we-think/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/08/the-f-117-nighthawk-is-gone-we-think/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:29:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Gilbert Wood</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/08/the-f-117-nighthawk-is-gone-we-think/#comment-228456</link> <dc:creator>Gilbert Wood</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 01:01:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2832#comment-228456</guid> <description>Please help...I remember seeing a picture of a P-51 on a wet floor with the F-117 reflected in the water upside down.  Does anyone remember this picture or am I so old I&#039;m losing my mind.  I really need a copy of this picture for a project.  If anyone can lead me in the right direction I would sure appreciate it.  Please contact me at 55apache@bellsouth.net. Thank you! ADCS Gilbert Wood USN (Ret.) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please help…I remember seeing a picture of a P-51 on a wet floor with the F-117 reflected in the water upside down.  Does anyone remember this picture or am I so old I’m losing my mind.  I really need a copy of this picture for a project.  If anyone can lead me in the right direction I would sure appreciate it.  Please contact me at <a href="mailto:55apache@bellsouth.net">55apache@bellsouth.net</a>.</p><p>Thank you!</p><p>ADCS Gilbert Wood USN (Ret.)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MAP</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/08/the-f-117-nighthawk-is-gone-we-think/#comment-214032</link> <dc:creator>MAP</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 07:51:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2832#comment-214032</guid> <description>Question isn&#039;t if the F22 will drop bombs against an enemy position or shoot down enemy aircraft. The question is if the US will attack Iran, North Korea or some other enemy country in the future. If they do, you can be certain that the F22 will be there and will drop bombs for sure. Also will engage any enemy aircraft that takes to the air. We have to hope the US will never have to engage Russia&#039;s or China&#039;s air force, as it will certainly mean nuclear war as well. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question isn’t if the F22 will drop bombs against an enemy position or shoot down enemy aircraft. The question is if the US will attack Iran, North Korea or some other enemy country in the future. If they do, you can be certain that the F22 will be there and will drop bombs for sure. Also will engage any enemy aircraft that takes to the air. We have to hope the US will never have to engage Russia’s or China’s air force, as it will certainly mean nuclear war as well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rf money</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/08/the-f-117-nighthawk-is-gone-we-think/#comment-179576</link> <dc:creator>rf money</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:49:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2832#comment-179576</guid> <description>So I know my paradise Nana, and some friends. Bu then, I added AQQI. And a variety of reasons, and the summer of cake, magic rabbit, blue shocks, such as several friends built a new council: Return of the King. And I recognized the beiertuo brotherhood. As the help of this friends and will help in growing, and this time sheikhs left the group B, the new president rose, lead us to defend the B group. We Society of Friends also actively participated in the mine warfare, winning glory for the family. Later, because a number of reasons I left the RF. And I took my all RF money send my friends. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I know my paradise Nana, and some friends. Bu then, I added AQQI. And a variety of reasons, and the summer of cake, magic rabbit, blue shocks, such as several friends built a new council: Return of the King. And I recognized the beiertuo brotherhood. As the help of this friends and will help in growing, and this time sheikhs left the group B, the new president rose, lead us to defend the B group. We Society of Friends also actively participated in the mine warfare, winning glory for the family. Later, because a number of reasons I left the RF. And I took my all RF money send my friends.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: buy rupees</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/08/the-f-117-nighthawk-is-gone-we-think/#comment-179574</link> <dc:creator>buy rupees</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:40:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2832#comment-179574</guid> <description>Leave for three years, I have quite repeatedly returned to the Rappelz game. I continue for good equipment to buy rupees. Three years of time I have played many games, but no a game can let me real input. By now I have found that the original is the lack of a person accompanying me. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leave for three years, I have quite repeatedly returned to the Rappelz game. I continue for good equipment to buy rupees. Three years of time I have played many games, but no a game can let me real input. By now I have found that the original is the lack of a person accompanying me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: iro zeny</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/08/the-f-117-nighthawk-is-gone-we-think/#comment-179573</link> <dc:creator>iro zeny</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:36:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2832#comment-179573</guid> <description>95 levels, to me this had been a friend of the people around, the new service first hand the hand of a person to manually 95, it is really difficult for my themselves, but I have been have a lot of iro zeny. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>95 levels, to me this had been a friend of the people around, the new service first hand the hand of a person to manually 95, it is really difficult for my themselves, but I have been have a lot of iro zeny.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: nic</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/08/the-f-117-nighthawk-is-gone-we-think/#comment-39238</link> <dc:creator>nic</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:37:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2832#comment-39238</guid> <description>please answer back as quick as u can </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please answer back as quick as u can</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: nic</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/08/the-f-117-nighthawk-is-gone-we-think/#comment-39237</link> <dc:creator>nic</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:35:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2832#comment-39237</guid> <description>i was woundering how many f-117&#039;s were made in 2008. i would also like to know how many have been shot down and how much fuel it uses in one flight. i would dearly like to know these answers for a project </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was woundering how many f-117’s were made in 2008. i would also like to know how many have been shot down and how much fuel it uses in one flight. i would dearly like to know these answers for a project</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ELP</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/08/the-f-117-nighthawk-is-gone-we-think/#comment-179566</link> <dc:creator>ELP</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 02:05:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2832#comment-179566</guid> <description>The USAF historian is wrong. F-117 may be able to do some things in a legacy IADS but not modern ones like what are forming today with S-300 and S-400_like SAM systems being fielded in the coming years. The F-22 doesn&#039;t just depend on stealth to give it an edge: Super cruise and a higher altitude and passive sensors like the AN/ALR-94 that can geo locate emitters give it a significant edge. SEAD/DEAD of high-end threats will be it&#039;s mission. No way will the F-117 survive a modern IADS. Lack of useful sensors, subsonic means that in a negative stealth event, it&#039;s all over. Comments by LM after the F-117 shootdown state that even a simple turning maneuver can kill your RCS by a factor of 100 or more. Stealth is useful but it isn&#039;t the be-all, end-all. Then of course there is the maintenance of the F-117 which sux and of course the near non-existent funding of U.S. stand-off jamming.  Hope no one is counting on the slow, pudgy Grower  (escort jammer) to save their stealth hide. This includes Growler being fielded with yesterday&#039;s jamming gear. Operation Shoestring. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The USAF historian is wrong. F-117 may be able to do some things in a legacy IADS but not modern ones like what are forming today with S-300 and S-400_like SAM systems being fielded in the coming years.<br /> The F-22 doesn’t just depend on stealth to give it an edge: Super cruise and a higher altitude and passive sensors like the AN/ALR-94 that can geo locate emitters give it a significant edge. SEAD/DEAD of high-end threats will be it’s mission.<br /> No way will the F-117 survive a modern IADS. Lack of useful sensors, subsonic means that in a negative stealth event, it’s all over. Comments by LM after the F-117 shootdown state that even a simple turning maneuver can kill your RCS by a factor of 100 or more. Stealth is useful but it isn’t the be-all, end-all.<br /> Then of course there is the maintenance of the F-117 which sux and of course the near non-existent funding of U.S. stand-off jamming.  Hope no one is counting on the slow, pudgy Grower  (escort jammer) to save their stealth hide. This includes Growler being fielded with yesterday’s jamming gear. Operation Shoestring.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pfcem</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/08/the-f-117-nighthawk-is-gone-we-think/#comment-179565</link> <dc:creator>pfcem</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 21:25:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2832#comment-179565</guid> <description>HumanPestControl, You are absolutely wrong about the F-22. The F-22 more than likely WILL drop bombs (which is very much part of its mission) &amp; shoot down another aircraft. Deterance IS NOT the F-22&#039;s only purpose.  Its purpose is to ensure US air dominace by being able to shoot down other aircraft (&amp; drop bombs) with relative/comparative impunity. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HumanPestControl,<br /> You are absolutely wrong about the F-22.<br /> The F-22 more than likely WILL drop bombs (which is very much part of its mission) &amp; shoot down another aircraft.<br /> Deterance IS NOT the F-22’s only purpose.  Its purpose is to ensure US air dominace by being able to shoot down other aircraft (&amp; drop bombs) with relative/comparative impunity.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: elijah</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/08/the-f-117-nighthawk-is-gone-we-think/#comment-179564</link> <dc:creator>elijah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 16:52:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2832#comment-179564</guid> <description>methinks that if the raptor would be a lot more readily accepted if it looked more like the nighthawk (or gasp, the most exotic YF-23 was chosen instead).  The raptor just looks so...conventional compared to the nighthawk and spirit that people have a hard time matching the cost and what it&#039;s capable of to its appearance. perhaps the airforce should just go ahead and paint all the raptors black...(that was supposed to be sarcasm, but one second thought, that would look incredibly cool) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>methinks that if the raptor would be a lot more readily accepted if it looked more like the nighthawk (or gasp, the most exotic YF-23 was chosen instead).  The raptor just looks so…conventional compared to the nighthawk and spirit that people have a hard time matching the cost and what it’s capable of to its appearance.<br /> perhaps the airforce should just go ahead and paint all the raptors black…(that was supposed to be sarcasm, but one second thought, that would look incredibly cool)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 743/747 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 04:46:42 -->
