DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Planes, Copters, Blimps » Boeing Takes Another Hit

Boeing Takes Another Hit

CH-47.jpg

In today’s afternoon headlines at Military​.com we have a story on the shut-down of Boeing’s CH-47 line in PA.

Army criminal investigators are looking into problems found in two military helicopters on a production line at a Boeing Co. plant in suburban Philadelphia, prompting the company to shut down the line.

A Boeing spokesman said Wednesday that aircraft at the plant were being inspected. The company didn’t disclose specifics about why it shut down the H-47 Chinook line at Boeing Rotorcraft Systems plant in Ridley Township, Pa., on Tuesday. Employees reported to work Wednesday morning, but the line had yet to fully resume operations.

U.S. Rep. Joe Sestak, a Democrat whose district includes the plant, said he was told during a briefing that wires that appeared to be broken or severed were found in one helicopter and a suspicious washer was found in a second.

Sestak said the assessment was preliminary and he expected the findings of a more thorough review would be available later Wednesday. He praised Boeing’s handling of the situation, and said it was too early to speculate on what happened.

Dave Foster, an Army spokesman, said in an e-mail that normal production was expected to resume shortly.

“At present, this is thought to be an isolated incident, confined to these two aircraft,” Foster said.

Foster said the Defense Contract Management Agency was overseeing the situation.

All aircraft on the premises were being inspected, said Jack Satterfield, a company spokesman. But he said the shutdown was isolated to one line at the plant and did not affect helicopters already in use by the military.

The Defense Criminal Investigative Service had agents on the premises conducting interviews, said Gary Comerford, a spokesman for the agency. Army Criminal Investigation Command spokesman Christopher Grey confirmed the agency was also involved in the investigation, but said he could not comment on it.

The Chinook is known as the Army’s workhorse aircraft. It is used to transport troops and supplies.

Boeing is currently producing new Chinooks for the Army, as well as updating older models.

Now, I’m sure these are isolated incidents. But still, with a tough protest fight going on in the CSAR-X program, this certianly can’t help matters in that arena at all.

Boeing’s sure taking some licks these days, huh?

– Christian

Share |

May 14th, 2008 | Planes, Copters, Blimps | 284410 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/05/14/boeing-takes-another-hit/Boeing+Takes+Another+Hit2008-05-14+18%3A41%3A33Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Do we have a strong case of next-war-itis? | NRO Loses Decision Powers on Hush-Hush Program » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Nessuno says:
    May 14, 2008 at 4:02 pm

    It seems to me you buried the lede here, Christian.
    Boeing’s troubles are small potatoes compared to potential sabotage of military aircraft coming off a production line.

    Reply
  2. TB says:
    May 14, 2008 at 4:13 pm

    I’m eager to hear why CID is investigating what appears to be (at first reading) a manufacturing issue. Did a suspect Chinook crash somewhere?

    Reply
  3. TJL says:
    May 14, 2008 at 4:59 pm

    As long as the aircraft didn’t get off the line before criminal investigations began it’s a good thing. Although it is disturbing that sabotage is a possibility, I would like to think it is just a manufacturing defect.

    Reply
  4. Jack D. Ripper says:
    May 14, 2008 at 5:02 pm

    Many years ago, while stationed at Nellis AFB, they had a mad wire cutter on the loose. The guy would pop open access panels and procede to cut chunks of wiring inside wiring harnesses. To his credit he didn’t attempt to hide the damage, but instead left the panel wide open. They eventually got the guy. He might actually be out of Leavenworth by now.

    Reply
  5. Poskiki says:
    May 14, 2008 at 6:49 pm

    The wording in the articles isnt clear( probably on purpose) but is this suspected sabotage or a manufacturing defect. Are the wires cut or are they just pulling out of their contacts?
    And I dont see what this would do but hurt Boeing since it would have to be fixed before they could even send the choppers to the Army.

    Reply
  6. Old Sailor says:
    May 14, 2008 at 9:34 pm

    The CH-47 is way past the age when it should be replaced, if for no other reason than they are just plain old worn out. Replace them ASAP.

    Reply
  7. CMC says:
    May 14, 2008 at 9:52 pm

    They are replacing them. I believe the Army just ordered something like 140 brand newly built CH-47F’s. The design works so as long as they build new ones and trash the old ones we are OK until the need for something bigger/better comes along.

    Reply
  8. Ed Liu says:
    May 15, 2008 at 9:30 am

    JD: “The Last Time we faced a religious war, (against Japan), it took a Nuke to finish it.“
    If you’re going to advance a theory from the lunatic fringe, it would help if you didn’t found it on “facts” that have absolutely no foundation in reality. Religious fervor never drove their aggression during WWII (and, in fact, I don’t think it was ever much of a factor in Japanese history). That can be explained purely from their intense and unshakable nationalistic conviction in their own superiority that justified any and all actions.
    I have no desire to feed the trolls, but first we get the nutballs trying to cite the provably fabricated “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” as fact, and now this. Assuming these things are serious, I find these things disturbing and noxious enough to drive me off the comments, and possibly DT as a whole.

    Reply
  9. Mark Zeski says:
    May 15, 2008 at 1:29 pm

    i heard the new order of CH-47’s were on hold until the came to some agreements after inspection. Bout like the car industry now.

    Reply
  10. CR says:
    May 19, 2008 at 3:03 pm

    Prob union guys pissed about a labor beef.….

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Got a program question for you Mac. What is the definition...
      TMB
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Re: #3 While maintaining that cutting edge is great, let us...
      TMB
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      It lowers the overall price tag though. It was done...
      STemplar
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      This is a great, fiscally sound, idea and it is...
      mr5t3v3n
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      Alright then good sir, fair enough. I just don't want...
      american1776
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      I think the best option would be to scrap the JSF, AF...
      Benjamin
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Every person posting here has made good points,...
      eyes_up
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Re: LAAR–just expand the UAV programs
      bjackson
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Good Morning Folks, LM to DoD: ” Stick...
      Byron Skinner
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      As an European living in Germany I would have love to see...
      fightingirish
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage