DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Cyber-warfare » Better late than never to the cyber arms race

Better late than never to the cyber arms race

botnet.jpg

The U.S. Air Force announced it plans to con­struct a large bot­net. The term Botnet is jar­gon for a col­lec­tion of soft­ware robots, referred to as bots, that take over and run autonomously or by remote con­trol on infected com­put­ers. These bots present a seri­ous secu­rity threat to the com­puter owner. Cyber mil­i­taries and hack­ers lever­age the com­bined power of hun­dreds of thou­sands or even hun­dreds of mil­lions of com­put­ers that have been com­pro­mised to pump out spam e-​​mail or dis­able tar­geted servers by over­whelm­ing them with Internet traffic.

There are over 100 mil­lion com­put­ers that have been com­pro­mised and are now part of bot­nets. The largest bot­net is thought to owned and oper­ated by the RBN — Russian Business Network. They lease capac­ity of their bot­net for spam­ming and other more sin­is­ter pur­poses. The sec­ond largest bot­net is owned and oper­ated by the Chinese mil­i­tary. The esti­mated size of their bot­net is put at 85 mil­lion and grow­ing fast.

Military Applications

Espionage — col­lect­ing infor­ma­tion from the net­work of com­put­ers that have been infected with the mali­cious code. Collecting key­stroke infor­ma­tion that con­tains log-​​ins, IDs and sen­si­tive infor­ma­tion or actu­ally cap­tur­ing screen shots of what the user is doing.

DDoS — the net­work of com­put­ers can be remotely com­manded to start flood­ing a tar­get sys­tem with trans­ac­tion, over­whelm­ing it until it shuts down

A bit late to the game, the U.S. Air Force has to rapidly con­struct their bot­net. In the May edi­tion of the Armed Forces Journal, Col. Charles Williamson III out­lined the cyber war­fare strat­egy being hashed out by the U.S. mil­i­tary. There are reports that the plan calls for using the publics com­put­ers to cre­ate this offen­sive cyber weapon. There is no ques­tion in the minds of many who are work­ing in the cyber war­fare field that the U.S. must cre­ate cyber weapons and that a bot­net is just one of the many that need to be in our arse­nal. But the devil is in the details!

– Kevin Coleman

Share |

May 15th, 2008 | Cyber-warfare | 284611 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/05/15/better-late-than-never-to-the-cyber-arms-race/Better+late+than+never+to+the+cyber+arms+race2008-05-15+14%3A47%3A28Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « NRO Loses Decision Powers on Hush-​​Hush Program | Progress for Future Combat Systems? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. SpyGuy says:
    May 15, 2008 at 10:48 am

    Right to the point and not hold­ing back any punches — that is the Kevin we have all come to admire and respect!

    Reply
  2. caution says:
    May 15, 2008 at 1:51 pm

    I’m not sure the Air Force has announced it’s plan or just LCol Williamson. A brief and inter­est­ing response is here. http://​tinyurl​.com/​6​7​v​gcw

    Reply
  3. Kevin says:
    May 15, 2008 at 1:59 pm

    Another good link
    http://​wash​ing​ton​times​.com/​a​p​p​s​/​p​b​c​s​.​d​l​l​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​?​A​I​D​=​/​2​0​0​8​0​5​1​5​/​F​O​R​E​I​G​N​/​5​8​6​2​9​7​1​2​8​/​1​003

    Reply
  4. TrustButVerify says:
    May 15, 2008 at 4:36 pm

    Well, I’m skep­ti­cal, but pleased– and I’m also obliged to wipe the egg off my face and have a help­ing of crow, because I never expected the USAF to do this. Operational bot­nets gen­er­ally have the advan­tage of being spread all over the world, mak­ing them hard to stop by block­ing off IP ranges. I won­der how the AF plans to emu­late this attribute? It’s amus­ing to imag­ine a cheap apart­ment in Goa or Minsk with noth­ing inside but a dozen cast-​​off desk­tops being remote-admin’d by the “Cyber Command.”

    Reply
  5. Tim says:
    May 15, 2008 at 6:40 pm

    “The U.S. Air Force announced it plans to con­struct a large bot­net.“
    If your lead sen­tence is com­pletely wrong, you deserve a seri­ous spank­ing.
    The paper in ques­tion is a pro­posal by an Air Force colonel. It is not a “plan”, and the U.S. Air Force did not approve it.
    Kevin Coleman owes the DT read­er­ship an apol­ogy. Complete mis­un­der­stand­ing of the sub­ject in ques­tion is usu­ally han­dled by AP/​Reuters. DT should get out of that busi­ness, since they can­not compete.

    Reply
  6. Brian says:
    May 15, 2008 at 8:39 pm

    Tim & Kevin you are both right.
    Kevin the point you make is valid. PCs in the US being used in a bot­net would slow the Internet for every­one unless the Air Force have their own HUGE pipe through spe­cial rout­ing to take the DDoS they launch off our back­bone. Tim you are right, Kevin’s point I addressed above and his com­ment about DDoS archi­tec­tures require assets out­side the US to launch DDoS cyber attacks. It is this type of con­truc­tive dia­log I love on here. IT expands the under­stand­ing of the issues.

    Reply
  7. Bruce says:
    May 15, 2008 at 8:48 pm

    The num­bers seem a lit­tle wonky — 100M total bots, and the *second*-largest bot­net has 85M bots? Either the num­bers are off, or machines get infected into mul­ti­ple bot­nets. I could believe the lat­ter, but it would be inter­est­ing to see confirmation.

    Reply
  8. Betsy says:
    May 15, 2008 at 10:21 pm

    Hey there Tim, before you spank Kevin you had bet­ter check this link out!
    The Headline is Air Force Looks to Use Military, Civilian PCs For Offensive Botnet
    http://​www​.dai​lytech​.com/​A​i​r​+​F​o​r​c​e​+​L​o​o​k​s​+​t​o​+​U​s​e​+​M​i​l​i​t​a​r​y​+​C​i​v​i​l​i​a​n​+​P​C​s​+​F​o​r​+​O​f​f​e​n​s​i​v​e​+​B​o​t​n​e​t​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​1​1​7​6​0​.​htm
    Lets all work together and beat the bits out of them

    Reply
  9. Forex Trade says:
    June 1, 2008 at 8:06 am

    you sure got it on this one

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    Recent Comments
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      Yeah, I don't get it. The "Dragon...
      Ptsfp
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Should wikipedia Ned Kelly.He used armour that worked in...
      Nick
    • UPDATED: Details on Army’s New Afghanistan Duds
      Marines win agin hoo rur
      greg
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      To the poster "batvette" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage