<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Better late than never to the cyber arms race</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2008/05/15/better-late-than-never-to-the-cyber-arms-race/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/15/better-late-than-never-to-the-cyber-arms-race/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:15:28 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Forex Trade</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/15/better-late-than-never-to-the-cyber-arms-race/comment-page-1/#comment-39668</link> <dc:creator>Forex Trade</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 13:06:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2846#comment-39668</guid> <description>you sure got it on this one </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you sure got it on this one</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Betsy</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/15/better-late-than-never-to-the-cyber-arms-race/comment-page-1/#comment-179953</link> <dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 03:21:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2846#comment-179953</guid> <description>Hey there Tim, before you spank Kevin you had better check this link out!
The Headline is Air Force Looks to Use Military, Civilian PCs For Offensive Botnet
http://www.dailytech.com/Air+Force+Looks+to+Use+Military+Civilian+PCs+For+Offensive+Botnet/article11760.htm
Lets all work together and beat the bits out of them </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there Tim, before you spank Kevin you had better check this link out!<br
/> The Headline is Air Force Looks to Use Military, Civilian PCs For Offensive Botnet<br
/> <a
href="http://www.dailytech.com/Air+Force+Looks+to+Use+Military+Civilian+PCs+For+Offensive+Botnet/article11760.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailytech.com/Air+Force+Looks+to+Use+Military+Civilian+PCs+For+Offensive+Botnet/article11760.htm</a><br
/> Lets all work together and beat the bits out of them</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bruce</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/15/better-late-than-never-to-the-cyber-arms-race/comment-page-1/#comment-179951</link> <dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 01:48:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2846#comment-179951</guid> <description>The numbers seem a little wonky - 100M total bots, and the *second*-largest botnet has 85M bots?  Either the numbers are off, or machines get infected into multiple botnets.  I could believe the latter, but it would be interesting to see confirmation. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The numbers seem a little wonky — 100M total bots, and the *second*-largest botnet has 85M bots?  Either the numbers are off, or machines get infected into multiple botnets.  I could believe the latter, but it would be interesting to see confirmation.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brian</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/15/better-late-than-never-to-the-cyber-arms-race/comment-page-1/#comment-179950</link> <dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 01:39:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2846#comment-179950</guid> <description>Tim &amp; Kevin you are both right.
Kevin the point you make is valid.  PCs in the US being used in a botnet would slow the Internet for everyone unless the Air Force have their own HUGE pipe through special routing to take the DDoS they launch off our backbone.  Tim you are right, Kevin&#039;s point I addressed above and his comment about DDoS architectures require assets outside the US to launch DDoS cyber attacks.  It is this type of contructive dialog I love on here.  IT expands the understanding of the issues. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim &amp; Kevin you are both right.<br
/> Kevin the point you make is valid.  PCs in the US being used in a botnet would slow the Internet for everyone unless the Air Force have their own HUGE pipe through special routing to take the DDoS they launch off our backbone.  Tim you are right, Kevin’s point I addressed above and his comment about DDoS architectures require assets outside the US to launch DDoS cyber attacks.  It is this type of contructive dialog I love on here.  IT expands the understanding of the issues.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tim</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/15/better-late-than-never-to-the-cyber-arms-race/comment-page-1/#comment-179948</link> <dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:40:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2846#comment-179948</guid> <description>&quot;The U.S. Air Force announced it plans to construct a large botnet.&quot;
If your lead sentence is completely wrong, you deserve a serious spanking.
The paper in question is a proposal by an Air Force colonel.  It is not a &quot;plan&quot;, and the U.S. Air Force did not approve it.
Kevin Coleman owes the DT readership an apology.  Complete misunderstanding of the subject in question is usually handled by AP/Reuters.  DT should get out of that business, since they cannot compete. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“The U.S. Air Force announced it plans to construct a large botnet.“<br
/> If your lead sentence is completely wrong, you deserve a serious spanking.<br
/> The paper in question is a proposal by an Air Force colonel.  It is not a “plan”, and the U.S. Air Force did not approve it.<br
/> Kevin Coleman owes the DT readership an apology.  Complete misunderstanding of the subject in question is usually handled by AP/Reuters.  DT should get out of that business, since they cannot compete.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TrustButVerify</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/15/better-late-than-never-to-the-cyber-arms-race/comment-page-1/#comment-179947</link> <dc:creator>TrustButVerify</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 21:36:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2846#comment-179947</guid> <description>Well, I&#039;m skeptical, but pleased- and I&#039;m also obliged to wipe the egg off my face and have a helping of crow, because I never expected the USAF to do this. Operational botnets generally have the advantage of being spread all over the world, making them hard to stop by blocking off IP ranges. I wonder how the AF plans to emulate this attribute? It&#039;s amusing to imagine a cheap apartment in Goa or Minsk with nothing inside but a dozen cast-off desktops being remote-admin&#039;d by the &quot;Cyber Command.&quot; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I’m skeptical, but pleased– and I’m also obliged to wipe the egg off my face and have a helping of crow, because I never expected the USAF to do this. Operational botnets generally have the advantage of being spread all over the world, making them hard to stop by blocking off IP ranges. I wonder how the AF plans to emulate this attribute? It’s amusing to imagine a cheap apartment in Goa or Minsk with nothing inside but a dozen cast-off desktops being remote-admin’d by the “Cyber Command.”</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kevin</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/15/better-late-than-never-to-the-cyber-arms-race/comment-page-1/#comment-39660</link> <dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 18:59:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2846#comment-39660</guid> <description>Another good link
http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080515/FOREIGN/586297128/1003 </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another good link<br
/> <a
href="http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080515/FOREIGN/586297128/1003" rel="nofollow">http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080515/FOREIGN/586297128/1003</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: caution</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/15/better-late-than-never-to-the-cyber-arms-race/comment-page-1/#comment-39659</link> <dc:creator>caution</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 18:51:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2846#comment-39659</guid> <description>I&#039;m not sure the Air Force has announced it&#039;s plan or just LCol Williamson. A brief and interesting response is here. http://tinyurl.com/67vgcw </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m not sure the Air Force has announced it’s plan or just LCol Williamson. A brief and interesting response is here. <a
href="http://tinyurl.com/67vgcw" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/67vgcw</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SpyGuy</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/15/better-late-than-never-to-the-cyber-arms-race/comment-page-1/#comment-39658</link> <dc:creator>SpyGuy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 15:48:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2846#comment-39658</guid> <description>Right to the point and not holding back any punches - that is the Kevin we have all come to admire and respect! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right to the point and not holding back any punches — that is the Kevin we have all come to admire and respect!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 10/24 queries in 0.014 seconds using apc

Served from: unknown.dal.cologlobal.com @ 2010-03-22 11:21:55 -->