DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Catch the "Buzz" » Top Congressional Money Man Dismisses Gates Heritage Speech

Top Congressional Money Man Dismisses Gates Heritage Speech

On Tuesday, Defense Secretary Robert Gates called on Congress and the Pentagon to keep their eyes on the ball, namely the war we are fight­ing now, instead of the war we might face later, maybe.
murtha.jpg

It sounded ratio­nal and, per­haps, even seemed a sound reminder that the nation can’t spend every­thing it might want to spend on the military.

Gates’ mes­sage was heard loud and clear on the Hill. Today, the top defense appro­pri­a­tor — read money man — in the House of Representatives boldly stepped in front of the nation (also known as the floor of the House) and said Gates’ speech was “sim­ply a ratio­nal­iza­tion of short-​​term bud­get deci­sions made in the wan­ing months of this Administration. Now when Rep. John Murtha, (D-​​Penn.), chair­man of the House Appropriations defense sub­com­mit­tee, says some­thing like this, you can bet he has a larger point to deliver. And he did. Murtha said the admin­is­tra­tion is effec­tively wag­ing a war with­out a strat­egy to guide it.

“We need a National Security Strategy to iden­tify both the near-​​term and long-​​term threats to this coun­try. We need a vig­or­ous debate to achieve this strat­egy — this hasn’t hap­pened since the Cold War,” Murtha said. Then he sent a zinger that must have sent some shock waves through intel­li­gence com­mu­nity bud­geters: “This coun­try spends more money on intel­li­gence than all the nations of the world com­bined, and as I’ve observed our intel­li­gence is about as accu­rate as Punxsutawney Phil — 50 per­cent. 50 per­cent is unac­cept­able.” Perhaps Murtha has his eyes set on at least one major cut to an IC program.

But in the longer term, Murtha said, “It is time to look beyond Iraq and focus on future threats.” To that end, he claimed the emer­gency sup­ple­men­tal spend­ing bill being intro­duced on the House floor “pro­vides our mil­i­tary with equip­ment that will pre­pare them to face future threats under any sce­nario; not only to fight a war, but to pre­vent a war.” Then he listed some of the big­ger ticket items in the sup­ple­men­tal, including:

$3.6 bil­lion to pro­cure 15 C-​​17 air­craft
$2.5 bil­lion to pro­cure 34 C-​​130 air­craft
$750 mil­lion for National Guard and Reserve equip­ment
$1.5 bil­lion for Humvees
$3 bil­lion for Medium and Heavy Tactical Trucks
$500 mil­lion for Army and Marine Corps Facility Maintenance and Repairs (includ­ing the bar­racks that need repairs)
$300 mil­lion for facil­ity main­te­nance and repairs at mil­i­tary med­ical facil­i­ties
$570 mil­lion for treat­ment and research activ­i­ties within the Defense Health Program.

– Colin Clark

Share |

May 16th, 2008 | Catch the "Buzz" | 285145 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/05/16/top-congressional-money-man-dismisses-gates-heritage-speech/Top+Congressional+Money+Man+Dismisses+Gates+Heritage+Speech2008-05-16+17%3A31%3A33Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Chinook Production to Resume | Legislative Sausage in the Works » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Brian says:
    May 16, 2008 at 12:51 pm

    Well, what do you know, a demo­c­rat I agree with. Miracles do hap­pen. ;)

    Reply
  2. Brad says:
    May 16, 2008 at 1:09 pm

    I agree with Murtha?
    Well, even Satan him­self has to enjoy the occa­sional frosty bev­er­age, so there ya go: even stopped clocks being right twice a day, and all.

    Reply
  3. Seen the elephant says:
    May 16, 2008 at 2:34 pm

    If only this wasn’t elec­tion year grand­stand­ing. Remember, he is/​was in a posi­tion to say /​ do some­thing before this, in his posi­tion on the com­mit­tee. Talk is cheap…

    Reply
  4. citanon says:
    May 16, 2008 at 2:43 pm

    I’ve find some of Murtha’s past actions rep­re­hen­si­ble, but I have to agree with him on this one.
    Contrary to what some claim, Gates is the “best SecDef” we’ve ever had. He is merely a com­pe­tent man­ager and lackss long term strate­gic vision and the imag­i­na­tion nec­es­sary to over­haul the DoD.

    Reply
  5. slntax says:
    May 16, 2008 at 4:47 pm

    this proves that gates is right for sure. if that bag of garbage trai­tor­ous garbage murtha is against it, it must be right. besides we all know murtha loves his cam­paign dol­lars from defense com­pa­nies in his district.

    Reply
  6. Old Crusty Chief says:
    May 16, 2008 at 4:49 pm

    Not to get too tech­ni­cal, but Jack Murtha is a twit. Not just your run-​​of-​​the-​​mill twit but a stud­ied, strate­gic, and exas­per­at­ing twit. Twit!
    Monkeys. Typewriters. Time. Novel. (Same thing with Jack.)
    Jesus wept. Why is it that this guy causes me to lift a safety every time I see his jowls quiv­er­ing on the tube? Better yet, how the hell does he keep get­ting sent back to the Hill. (Nevermind… I know.)
    So today he’s kvel­ling about the size of the intel bud­get and its appar­ent inabil­ity to find the rear hous­ing sup­port group with both hands? Well, just who in the hell cut the guts out of it in the first place? Could it be the Jack and the rest of the group-​​hug pan­sies of a par­tic­u­lar polit­i­cal stripe?
    Jack Murtha just doesn’t get it. The other 50% he’s whin­ing about in the intel biz is a messy, bloody, stomach-​​turning busi­ness that most folks are bet­ter off not know­ing too much about. The same folks who wolf down their Jimmy Dean but would puke for a year if they really knew how it was made.
    Time was that the CIA had its black fin­gers in EVERYONES’ pie, ready to stir when needed. It cavorted with the worst, propped up the evil, fomented unrest when nations pissed us off, con­ducted splen­did lit­tle wars, and gen­er­ally went about as the min­istry of mur­der and bloody may­hem.
    In other words, it did its damned job. And thank God.
    People in this coun­try went about their white bread lives with­out hav­ing to worry about piss ants like Osama bin Laden or Hugo Chavez. The mas­ters of the black arts ensured that they were mur­dered, exiled, impris­oned, or turned to will for the explicit pur­pose of ensur­ing that they didn’t fly planes into our build­ings or threaten to choke off the oil.
    Jack wants sausage but he doesn’t want the mess that comes with mak­ing it. Jack Murtha ain’t no Jimmy Dean.
    Cheers,
    Chief B.

    Reply
  7. JAMES says:
    May 16, 2008 at 4:52 pm

    .…..Murtha…murtha!!!.…whats that wine and cheese eatin lib­eral doin still in con­gress! kennedy, murtha, and that weird old guy whats his name time to leave.…

    Reply
  8. Trent Telenko says:
    May 16, 2008 at 6:14 pm

    Actually, Murtha’s list is a very good one *if the intent is to “RESET” and revi­tal­ize the American mil­i­tary in a post-​​Iraqi with­drawal world.*
    The USAF is fly­ing the wings off its air­lift fleet and those were the first two items on the list.
    Replacing lost reserve unit equip­ment and revi­tal­iz­ing the ground forces wheeled trans­port fleet list is next.
    After that is hous­ing and med­ical care for return­ing troops.
    You can argue the wis­dom of the pol­icy, but that bud­get is right for the pol­icy choice the Democrats want to make in 2008.

    Reply
  9. CTR1(SW) says:
    May 16, 2008 at 7:22 pm

    I do not trust “Haditha” Murtha. I pray that the law­suit filed against him RUINS him.
    I want to know when a marine will expend the brass and retire this idiot.
    His list of expen­da­tures is inter­est­ing, but I sus­pect he is up for elec­tion, or some other equally nar­cis­sis­tic — “save my own a$$ — rea­son.
    I would say more, but just think­ing of him enrages me.

    Reply
  10. pedestrian says:
    May 16, 2008 at 7:41 pm

    I am no fan of this man, but he did say some­thing right this time. 4% of GDP is just not enough for the defense bud­get, not enough to pre­pare the mil­i­tary for mul­ti­ple threats rang­ing from anti-​​insurgency to mod­ern war­fare. You could tell that by the frus­tra­tions of Gates not hav­ing enough for counter insur­gency and frus­tr­ta­tions of the Air Force not hav­ing enough for mod­ern war­fare. However, what is really not enough is that there is just not enough defense spend­ing to defend America’s inter­est from the threats that may risk lives of Americans.

    Reply
  11. Joshik says:
    May 16, 2008 at 8:19 pm

    Chief:
    I appre­ci­ate the use of Yiddish in your post, but I must point out that “kvell/​kvelling” is the oppo­site of “kvetch/​kvetching”.
    I kvetch when I’m stuck in line at the DMV, but I’ll kvell if I hear that my lit­tle nephew just hit a home run in the pee-​​wee ball game.
    So in this con­text, I think you prob­a­bly mean “kvetch”.
    Carry on!

    Reply
  12. Old Crusty Chief says:
    May 17, 2008 at 6:53 am

    Re: Joshik
    Dank. My poor Yiddish is my own fault; I never should have learned it from a Jew from Mississippi. Seriously.
    Re: Apologia
    Fellas, don’t make any excuses for Jack Murtha “get­ting it right.” There is noth­ing new under the sun with this guile­ful wind­bag. Guaranteed that if there’s bacon for the 12th dis­trict of PA, a few Benjamins for his pocket, a party whore to be patron­ized, or a polit­i­cal enemy to be thrown under the bus, our man Jack will stick it in our backs.
    Cheers,
    Chief B.

    Reply
  13. Roy Smith says:
    May 17, 2008 at 1:40 pm

    If all of this is an issue over money,well,our gov­ern­ment always seems to find the money to pay for their pet pork projects.If any of you are still wait­ing for your income tax checks &/​or (whether you agree with it or not) tax rebate checks,well.…the IRS has “acci­dently” sent an unde­ter­mined number(but YOU know if it involves you) of these checks to the wrong bank accounts.But don’t worry,after they “recover the (by now already spent) money,in full I’m sure,from the wrong accounts &send it out to the right ones(someday)…but this takes time(years?decades?in our life­time?).
    I say this,because when it comes to YOUR money,they totally drag ass,but when it comes to THEIR pet projects,they can piss & shit out money left & right.
    So those weapon sys­tems that you are won­der­ing why they don’t sup­port more,well if it was on THEIR agaenda,they’d find the money(perhaps from mis-​​sent IRS checks,hmmmm?).

    Reply
  14. Jimbo Jones says:
    May 18, 2008 at 8:14 am

    John Murtha, lolz, even over here in the UK peo­ple know that hes a com­plete and utter joke!

    Reply
  15. Lawrence Romack says:
    May 18, 2008 at 9:19 am

    I served in Haditha,Iraq from Sept05-​​April 06 and John Murtha is a trai­tor. He smeared fel­low Marines over an inci­dent before any invest­ga­tion was done.I also went to his office with sev­eral mem­bers of Vets for Freedom to ask for an apol­ogy for his remarks and he refused to give us 30 sec­onds of his time. But his assis­tant told us over and over again how he always sup­ported the troops!Give me a break ! Lawrence Romack

    Reply
  16. CTR1(SW) says:
    May 18, 2008 at 11:14 am

    Not to turn this blog into a recap of Haditha, but it was that inci­dent that revealed that Murtha’s true col­ors are no longer Scarlet and Gold, or per­haps even Red, White, and Blue.
    If he does not like defense spend­ing, then the per­son he should be com­plain­ing to is in the mir­ror.
    Again, it is time for some­one to “retire” him.
    Now I am get­ting angry again …

    Reply
  17. jim says:
    May 18, 2008 at 9:13 pm

    As for Haditha, Wuterich is get­ting a raw deal.
    But I blame Army Generals Bargewell and Chiarelli, not Murtha. And Bush caved in to his buddy Maliki on Haditha. And as much as I hate to admit it, General Mattis too.
    As for the bud­get — we need to look ahead. If you think that Iraq is the last war we will ever fight, then you need to get sober and stop smok­ing crys­tal meth. Murtha may not be the bright­est bulb in con­gress, but he is on the right track with this one.

    Reply
  18. mike says:
    May 18, 2008 at 10:19 pm

    Murtha is the guid­ing force in the defense autho­riza­tion bill try­ing to give us a 3.9% pay raise. It is not enough I know, but it is a hell of a lot bet­ter than Bush who con­sid­ers a mil­i­tary pay raise a waste of money.
    That makes Murtha ok in my book.
    And I don’t believe Wuterich is get­ting a raw deal at all. He gives all of us a bad name. Hang the pr!ck I say. Mattis was right to not dis­miss the case.

    Reply
  19. Hatemachine says:
    May 19, 2008 at 5:26 am

    Throughout his­tory armies have been plagued with the syn­drome of want­ing to fight the last war. Just look at World War I for a fairly recent exam­ple. The counterinsurgency/​guerrilla style war­fare which seems to be here to stay for the fore­see­able future is prob­a­bly the the most fun­da­men­tal change to war­fare since WWI. It seems like mil­i­tary lead­er­ship and the politi­cians are still plan­ning for more con­ven­tional wars even though every­thing seen since about ’93 says oth­er­wise. While con­ven­tional war is some­thing we have to be pre­pared for I don’t see the use( right now) for stealth ships, new stealth air­craft, etc etc.
    The gen­eral prob­lem is that most of the peo­ple who decide how money is spent have lit­tle or no cur­rent oper­a­tional expe­ri­ence and it seems are blinded by tech gad­gets
    Gadgets and giz­mos have their place no doubt but it seems like a lot of money spent could be bet­ter spent with more imme­di­ate results. For instance, build­ing shoot houses, buy­ing range time for grunts, fund­ing large scale mil­i­tary exer­cises, search­ing for a 5.56 round with increased stop­ping power, fund­ing in depth lan­guage and cul­tural train­ing for all on the ground, devel­op­ing a Humvee replace­ment( too big, too slow, too lit­tle room for the size). My sug­ges­tions are from an Army grunt stand­point and I won’t com­ment on the other aspects save to say that dom­i­nance in the air and on the water are pretty mean­ing­less with­out dom­i­nance of the ground.

    Reply
  20. Jimbo Jones says:
    May 19, 2008 at 7:44 am

    “I served in Haditha,Iraq from Sept05-​​April 06 and John Murtha is a trai­tor. He smeared fel­low Marines over an inci­dent before any invest­ga­tion was done.I also went to his office with sev­eral mem­bers of Vets for Freedom to ask for an apol­ogy for his remarks and he refused to give us 30 sec­onds of his time.“
    You sir have my great­est repect, not only for serv­ing in Iraq but for your restraint, i don’t know how you man­aged to hold your­self back from phys­i­caly pound­ing the crap out of a trai­tor like Murtha or for that mat­ter his equally dis­hon­est assistant.

    Reply
  21. Jimbo Jones says:
    May 19, 2008 at 7:48 am

    “Murtha is the guid­ing force in the defense autho­riza­tion bill try­ing to give us a 3.9% pay raise. It is not enough I know, but it is a hell of a lot bet­ter than Bush who con­sid­ers a mil­i­tary pay raise a waste of money.“
    So in short, he’s a trai­tor who tryed his damned best to cause prob­lems for you and your col­legues by talk­ing sht about the events in Haditha, his lies stirred up a mas­sive amount of hatred for your fel­low ser­vice men, undoubtable lead­ing to more deaths of your fel­low war­riors and yet because he wants to give you a rise you think hes a ‘good guy’??? Strikes me as most odd if not twisted…

    Reply
  22. Scott says:
    May 19, 2008 at 8:56 am

    If Murtha wants to cut Intel spend­ing he should start with that waste of a pro­gram, National Counternarcotics intel cen­ter in his home­s­tate of PENN!!!

    Reply
  23. Old Crusty Chief says:
    May 19, 2008 at 10:09 am

    Re: Scott
    Hey, man, it ain’t just in PA, its in Johnstown the District’s home and the largest city in the 12th dis­trict.
    Pork, pork, pork.…

    Reply
  24. atacms says:
    May 20, 2008 at 8:33 pm

    For guys who post regard­ing Gates as not get­ting it, my ques­tion is how do you get to that con­clu­sion? Gates most def­i­nitely GETS it.
    Next wari­tis could also be termed as the wish for gold plated weapons and the con­stant reliance on a tech­no­log­i­cal fix. I’m a fan of mil­i­tary tech as much as the next guy. I suscribe to sev­eral defense pub­li­ca­tions whose sole func­tion is to inform of the lat­est defense tech­nolo­gies, so I WANT the US to have the lat­est and great­est.
    That being said, our ene­mies are seek­ing an asy­met­ric advan­tage, so con­trary to those who fear that the air supe­ri­or­ity advan­tage will wither away, the truth is our ene­mies AREN’T get­ting mas­sive air armies, they’re buy­ing SAM’s like the S-​​400. What works for that, EW.
    Are they build­ing air­craft car­ri­ers, no they’re build­ing ship killers like the Sunburn.
    Are they buy­ing new tanks, no they’re buy­ing RPG-29’s and most impor­tantly they are avoid­ing open ter­rain and try­ing to mix it up in urban areas.
    All of the asy­met­ric coun­ters that our ene­mies are choos­ing is to steal our tech­no­log­i­cal advan­tage not nec­es­sar­ily with an oppo­site, but a weapon that can threaten our advan­tage.
    Some will argue that I’ve made my own counter-​​argument as to why Gates is wrong. I say that most of these fixes are pro­ce­dural and depend­ing on our tac­tics and strate­gies.
    Did MRAP’s defeat the IED’s or the insur­gency, no, our troops are IN the process of doing so. How, tac­tics and strat­egy.
    Gates’ admo­ni­tion to get our heads in the game with the cur­rent war is the plea for our defense lead­ers to focus on the cur­rent bat­tle, not because of his “short-​​sightedness” but the oppo­site. We and the DOD have still not mas­tered coun­terin­sur­gen­cies.
    And say what you will about China, you can add all the techno gad­gets that the Chinese are work­ing on (and I don’t doubt that they are), but the key thing also will be their tac­tics.
    Guys let’s not focus on the equip­ment all the time, strength of heart, morale, will, and a supe­rior bat­tle­plan can trump tech: this is what I think Gates wants us to focus on.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • New Army PEO on the way
      To get our AAA quality shoes at reasonable price, Your...
      nike air force ones
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage