<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Is China Building Aircraft Carriers?</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2008/05/23/is-china-building-aircraft-carriers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/23/is-china-building-aircraft-carriers/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:06:43 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Gary</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/23/is-china-building-aircraft-carriers/#comment-257253</link> <dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:23:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2861#comment-257253</guid> <description>During the Ming dynasty the Chinese had a massive fleet which they used for gunboat diplomacy and to attack and invade other countries that didn&#039;t bow to their rule. So I find it a bit strange that the Chinese say they are peaceful and have never invaded another country, they actually pioneered the methods the US uses today. This obsession China has with obtaining aircraft carriers stems from a desire to return to the days of the great fleet led by Admiral Zheng-He. They want to once again exert their influence on other countries, especially in the South China Sea. Except this time the US also has a great fleet and the members of ASEAN are relying on it for protection, this is why the US was invited to join the organisation. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the Ming dynasty the Chinese had a massive fleet which they used for gunboat diplomacy and to attack and invade other countries that didn’t bow to their rule. So I find it a bit strange that the Chinese say they are peaceful and have never invaded another country, they actually pioneered the methods the US uses today.</p><p>This obsession China has with obtaining aircraft carriers stems from a desire to return to the days of the great fleet led by Admiral Zheng-He. They want to once again exert their influence on other countries, especially in the South China Sea. Except this time the US also has a great fleet and the members of ASEAN are relying on it for protection, this is why the US was invited to join the organisation.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: skf</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/23/is-china-building-aircraft-carriers/#comment-237380</link> <dc:creator>skf</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 07:09:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2861#comment-237380</guid> <description>The Chinese is a peaceful people by nature.In its long history,the Chinese Han has had never invaded any country.In fact in the late 19th century and early 20th century,it was humilated by both the Japanese and the Western powers of the time.America has shown its navy might by sending its aircraft  carriers  to cruise near the Chinese coastline in its navy drill with Korean and the Japanese recently. What can China do? Nothing! Because its Navy is not strong enough to stop the American. Only when China is strong will America and others respect her. And the chinese people is resolute in this aspect, to become strong and be respected!. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Chinese is a peaceful people by nature.In its long history,the Chinese Han has had never invaded any country.In fact in the late 19th century and early 20th century,it was humilated by both the Japanese and the Western powers of the time.America has shown its navy might by sending its aircraft  carriers  to cruise near the Chinese coastline in its navy drill with Korean and the Japanese recently. What can China do?<br /> Nothing! Because its Navy is not strong enough to stop the American. Only when China is strong will America and others respect her. And the chinese people is resolute in this aspect, to become strong and be respected!.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: C</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/23/is-china-building-aircraft-carriers/#comment-230684</link> <dc:creator>C</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 06:57:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2861#comment-230684</guid> <description>With ASBM these US carriers are just sitting ducks waiting to be sunk</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With ASBM these US carriers are just sitting ducks waiting to be sunk</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Zurf</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/23/is-china-building-aircraft-carriers/#comment-225195</link> <dc:creator>Zurf</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 22:49:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2861#comment-225195</guid> <description>I don&#039;t think its likely that China will become an agressor. At least not for another 20 years. China has much more to gain by stability than war.  We started an article with the assumption that China was increasing exports, but came to a different conclusion:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://aircraft.zurf.info/article/made-china-selling-combat-aircraft-world&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://aircraft.zurf.info/article/made-china-sell...&lt;/a&gt; Building aircraft carriers is most likely to defend strategic interests such as supply routes.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://aircraft.zurf.info/article/building-chinas-aircraft-carriers-return-zheng-he&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://aircraft.zurf.info/article/building-chinas...&lt;/a&gt; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t think its likely that China will become an agressor. At least not for another 20 years. China has much more to gain by stability than war.  We started an article with the assumption that China was increasing exports, but came to a different conclusion: <a href="http://aircraft.zurf.info/article/made-china-selling-combat-aircraft-world" rel="nofollow">http://aircraft.zurf.info/article/made-china-sell…</a></p><p>Building aircraft carriers is most likely to defend strategic interests such as supply routes. <a href="http://aircraft.zurf.info/article/building-chinas-aircraft-carriers-return-zheng-he" rel="nofollow">http://aircraft.zurf.info/article/building-chinas…</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Benjamin</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/23/is-china-building-aircraft-carriers/#comment-215349</link> <dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 16:43:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2861#comment-215349</guid> <description>Don&#039;t forget about Vietnam during the mid to late 70&#039;s. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don’t forget about Vietnam during the mid to late 70’s.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Buster he Body Crab</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/23/is-china-building-aircraft-carriers/#comment-215343</link> <dc:creator>Buster he Body Crab</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 11:17:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2861#comment-215343</guid> <description>China not aggressors for 1000 years? Go visit Tibet.  Opps, sorry there is no Tibet.  It was absorbed by communist China, via military force. And there has been a lot of ongoing killing to back that up.  Especially killing of unarmed peoples. This is not saying that almost all nations, that had the ability to be aggressors, were innocent, as China also is aggressive.  But just showing your comment quite in error. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China not aggressors for 1000 years?<br /> Go visit Tibet.  Opps, sorry there is no Tibet.  It was absorbed by communist China, via military force.</p><p>And there has been a lot of ongoing killing to back that up.  Especially killing of unarmed peoples.</p><p>This is not saying that almost all nations, that had the ability to be aggressors, were innocent, as China also is aggressive.  But just showing your comment quite in error.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: LockMan</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/23/is-china-building-aircraft-carriers/#comment-210543</link> <dc:creator>LockMan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:59:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2861#comment-210543</guid> <description>At least for the last 1000 years, China has never been an agressor. unlike western powers who colonized many nations, created slavery, many other horrible things. Please see ourselves in the mirror before pointing to others. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least for the last 1000 years, China has never been an agressor. unlike western powers who colonized many nations, created slavery, many other horrible things. Please see ourselves in the mirror before pointing to others.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Booker</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/23/is-china-building-aircraft-carriers/#comment-208901</link> <dc:creator>John Booker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:55:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2861#comment-208901</guid> <description>And what has China done to achieve the label as aggressors ? I have a long list of US activities that could categorize the US as aggressors. As for stopping exporting coal to China. How is this in Australia&#039;s interests ? I don&#039;t think US interests are necessarily Australias interests ? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what has China done to achieve the label as aggressors ? I have a long list<br /> of US activities that could categorize the US as aggressors. As for stopping exporting<br /> coal to China. How is this in Australia’s interests ? I don’t think US interests are necessarily<br /> Australias interests ?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Camrober</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/23/is-china-building-aircraft-carriers/#comment-208525</link> <dc:creator>Camrober</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 20:38:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2861#comment-208525</guid> <description>If China looks like doing another Pearl Harbour in the future we can always slap a trade embargo on them. Australia can stop exporting coal, iron ore, gas and other industrial raw materials and energy  to China  though this would severly impact the Australian economy. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If China looks like doing another Pearl Harbour in the future we can always slap a trade embargo on them. Australia can stop exporting coal, iron ore, gas and other industrial raw materials and energy  to China  though this would severly impact the Australian economy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: phil</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/05/23/is-china-building-aircraft-carriers/#comment-205075</link> <dc:creator>phil</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 19:50:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2861#comment-205075</guid> <description>I think all of you are pretty well,,, naiive no doubt we are talking about china here .The next ultimate super power in the whole flippin world they are massing a brutal arrmement. bigger than you can imagine. by the time they are done it would take the whole world to take them on . only with nucs. we would stand a chance. they have a lot of secrets up there sleeves just like the states .it wont take  china long to catch up . glad I wont be here to see it all go down .... and it WILL go down </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think all of you are pretty well„, naiive no doubt we are talking about china here .The next ultimate super power in the whole flippin world they are massing a brutal arrmement. bigger than you can imagine. by the time they are done it would take the whole world to take them on . only with nucs. we would stand a chance. they have a lot of secrets up there sleeves just like the states .it wont take  china long to catch up . glad I wont be here to see it all go down .… and it WILL go down</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 743/747 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 04:36:31 -->
