DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Cyber-warfare » Russia’s Cyber Forces

Russia’s Cyber Forces

russian-flag.jpg

Russia is well known for its mil­i­tary men­tal­ity. Remember the cold war? It has taken nearly a decade for the world to real­ize the true threat of cyber war. Today, the world is depen­dent on com­put­ers and net­works much more than we were eight years ago when we expe­ri­enced the NATO-​​Serbia cyber war. Russia opened the eyes of the world to the loom­ing threat of cyber war­fare after the Estonia inci­dent. Just last week Russia’s State Sponsored cyber forces opened up a new front in cyber war.

Reports indi­cate that Russian Cyber Forces unleashed a large scale cyber attack on Radio Free Europe. In addi­tion, there is some evi­dence of the use of BotNets in polit­i­cally moti­vated dis­trib­uted denial-​​of-​​service (DDoS) attacks. With all this demon­strated abil­ity, should we be con­cerned? What are Russia’s true cyber war­fare ambi­tions? Russia’s Cyber Warfare Doctrine is designed to be a force mul­ti­plier along with more tra­di­tionary mil­i­tary actions includ­ing WMD attacks. A force mul­ti­plier is a mil­i­tary term that describes a weapon or tac­tic that, when added to and employed along with other com­bat forces, sig­nif­i­cantly increases the com­bat poten­tial of that force.

Like all offen­sive cyber strate­gies it includes the capa­bil­ity to dis­rup­tion the infor­ma­tion infra­struc­ture of their ene­mies. This doc­trine includes strate­gies that would dis­rupt finan­cial mar­kets, mil­i­tary and civil­ian com­mu­ni­ca­tions capa­bil­i­ties as well as other parts of the enemy’s crit­i­cal infra­struc­ture prior to the ini­ti­a­tion of tra­di­tional mil­i­tary oper­a­tions. They also address weaken the econ­omy of their adver­sary to fur­ther decrease their abil­ity to respond to the com­bined threat. Offensive cyber weapons receive great atten­tion in the Russian Cyber Warfare Doctrine. This cou­pled with advanced R&D puts them on the leader board in cyber warfare.

Cyber attacks and cyber weapons are strate­gic arms and in effect are real offen­sive weapons. Cyber-​​attacks can harm or even par­a­lyze a coun­try and there­fore have equiv­a­lent impli­ca­tions as that of phys­i­cal mil­i­tary attacks. Most cyber attacks leave behind foren­sic evi­dence that can be used to assess the capa­bil­i­ties of the attacker. With all the attacks attrib­uted to Russia, there has to be sig­nif­i­cant intel­li­gence out there about tech­niques, cyber weapons, and strate­gies that have been used in these cyber assaults. An inter­est­ing point is that NATO’s Defensive Treaty drawn up in 1949 does not deal with cyber weapons as the Internet did not yet exist and there were very few com­put­ers at the time.

Once again, war­fare capa­bil­i­ties have out­paced our legal and polit­i­cal sys­tems. Former Russian President Vladimir Putin has blasted the US for its mil­i­taris­tic approach to for­eign pol­icy, say­ing its actions were “nour­ish­ing an arms race.” Need some more evi­dence? In 1998, Russia’s defense bud­get was less than $3 bil­lion. Since that time, the Russian defense bud­get has been soar­ing, funded by sub­stan­tial increases in their petro­leum income, the bud­get jumped 23 per­cent in 2007 to $32.4 billion.

An inter­est­ing point to keep in mind is that Moscow does the arms busi­ness with over 70 coun­tries, includ­ing China, Iran, and Venezuela, and in 2006 exported $6 bil­lion worth of arms. Russian intel­li­gence ser­vices have a his­tory of employ­ing hack­ers against the United States. In 1985 the KGB hired Markus Hess, an East German hacker, to attack U.S. defense agen­cies in the infa­mous case of the Cuckoo’s Egg.

The fol­low­ing is an esti­mate of Russia’s cyber capabilities.

Russia’s 5th-​​Dimension Cyber Army:

Military Budget: $40 Billion USD

Global Rating in Cyber Capabilities: Tied at Number 4

Cyber Warfare Budget: $127 Million USD Offensive Cyber Capabilities: 4.1 (1 = Low, 3 = Moderate and 5 = Significant)

Cyber Weapons Arsenal in Order of Threat:

  • Large, advanced BotNet for DDoS and espionage
  • Electromagnetic pulse weapons (non-​​nuclear)
  • Compromised coun­ter­feit com­puter software
  • Advanced dynamic exploita­tion capabilities
  • Wireless data com­mu­ni­ca­tions jammers
  • Cyber Logic Bombs Computer viruses and worms
  • Cyber data col­lec­tion exploits Computer and net­works recon­nais­sance tools
  • Embedded Trojan time bombs (suspected)

Cyber Weapons Capabilities Rating: Advanced

Cyber force Size: 7,300 +

Reserves and Militia: None

Broadband Connections: 23.8 Million +

Close ties with Russian Business Network (RBN), who is thought to own and oper­ate the sec­ond largest BotNet in the world. Intelligence sug­gests there are orga­nized groups of hack­ers tied to the Federal Security Bureau (FSB).

The FSB is the inter­nal counter intel­li­gence agency of the Russian Federation and suc­ces­sor to the Soviet KGB. Russia is often over­looked as a sig­nif­i­cant player in the global soft­ware indus­try. Russia pro­duces 200,000 sci­en­tific and tech­nol­ogy grad­u­ates each year. This is as many as India, which has five times the pop­u­la­tion. This is hard to believe since their soft­ware indus­try can be traced back to the 1950s.

A study by the World Bank stated that more than one mil­lion peo­ple are involved in soft­ware research and devel­op­ment. Russia has the poten­tial to become one of the largest IT mar­kets in Europe. The Russian hacker attack on Estonia in 2007 rang the alarm bell. Nations around the world can no longer ignore the advanced threat that Russia’s cyber war­fare capa­bil­i­ties have today and the ones they aspire to have in the near future.

From this infor­ma­tion, one can only con­clude that Russia has advanced capa­bil­i­ties and the intent and tech­no­log­i­cal capa­bil­i­ties nec­es­sary to carry out a cyber attack any­where in the world at any time.

– Kevin Coleman

Share |

May 27th, 2008 | Cyber-warfare | 286517 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/05/27/russias-cyber-forces/Russia%27s+Cyber+Forces2008-05-27+14%3A17%3A10Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Exoskeleton vs Exoskeleton | The House Panel With No TIARA » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Ted says:
    May 27, 2008 at 11:07 am

    Are you going to review the U.S. stand­ing as well? I would be inter­ested in where we stand!

    Reply
  2. Kevin says:
    May 27, 2008 at 1:37 pm

    “b“
    There are over 1 mil­lion pieces of mal­ware. How can you even post such a state­ment!
    Consider this, if you wait for hard facts or “Intel” that means it has already hap­pened. Strategic advan­tage is cre­ated by edu­cated guesses, gen­er­ated by a process of ask­ing “what if.” Take for exam­ple cur­rent com­puter virus pro­tec­tion. Today virus detec­tion relies on the iden­ti­fi­ca­tion of sig­na­tures in the code of the virus itself. Therefore, you have to have expe­ri­enced the virus, before you cre­ate the abil­ity to defend against it. You com­ment” Reports indi­cate” and “there is some evi­dence” do not make a “demon­strated capa­bil­ity” are indica­tive of that mind­set.
    Do we really want to wait till we expe­ri­ence a cyber attack that dis­rupts the U.S. the same way Estonia was dis­rupted or worse before we start to plan our defenses? I think not!

    Reply
  3. Spyguy says:
    May 27, 2008 at 2:13 pm

    HEY b want to try to defend you com­ment now. Kevin bings up one hell of a good point!

    Reply
  4. b says:
    May 27, 2008 at 2:36 pm

    Do we really want to wait till we expe­ri­ence a cyber attack that dis­rupts the U.S. the same way Estonia was dis­rupted or worse before we start to plan our defenses? I think not!
    No, cer­tainly not. Let’s take care of those Martians. I heard you are an expert of fight­ing Martians. All power and bud­gets to you.
    —
    More seri­ously:
    There are some Russian crime groups that do use bot nets.
    There some Chinese, German, U.S. based mafia and other crime groups who use the same tools. There are ways to defend against these and any IT man­ager worth his pay­grade knows how to do this.
    There is, unlike what you state, no evi­dence that these bot nets are state founded.
    But you build your “threat” on the Russian alleged bud­get, with­out ANY source.
    Now what is the U.S. bud­get on cyber attacks?
    As you seem to know the Russian one you will cer­tainly know the U.S. one. How about a com­par­i­son. May Russia just defends?
    Why do you want my tax­dol­lars to be wasted against this threat? Oh, that’s your job?
    Fine, but not with me.

    Reply
  5. SpyGuy says:
    May 27, 2008 at 2:43 pm

    B your coo­ment are out of place. Keep in on and intel­lec­tual level or don’t bother! Kevin don’t waist yrou time with “b” his com­ments are ot con­struc­tiveat ALL.
    Forget about “b” remem­ber never argue with a fool — bystanders can’t tell who is who.

    Reply
  6. Michelle says:
    May 27, 2008 at 7:00 pm

    I have a ques­tion for b — Kevin’s work was ref­er­enced by STRATCOM in a Congressional hear­ing last week. What have you done and who in that elite group have ref­er­enced you?
    See Washington Post Article
    http://​www​.wash​ing​ton​post​.com/​w​p​-​d​y​n​/​c​o​n​t​e​n​t​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​2​0​0​8​/​0​5​/​2​0​/​A​R​2​0​0​8​0​5​2​0​0​1​3​7​2​_​2​.​h​tml

    Reply
  7. pedestrian says:
    May 28, 2008 at 12:11 am

    I was famil­iar about the ugly spam bussi­ness in Russia, and on the oth­er­hand has great soft­ware such as the Kaspersky Anti Virus, but never had a clear vision about the Russian cyber war­fare team. Interesting report.

    Reply
  8. helovesgold says:
    May 28, 2008 at 7:31 am

    what bet­ter test bed is there than your client tar­get base ? bar­rage­ing radio free europe with soft­ware is a test. once there was a story about our x bunkie bin laden want­ing to bomb radio free europe instead or before 9/​11. a cyber stealth attack might be more sur­vivor­able than a gassed up jet smashed into Duetsche Bank H.Q. A West Point motto is ” Do not take coun­sel in your own fears. ” Momma said ” brains are bet­ter than brawn. ” ” Be pre­pared. ” DeVry Institute ? ” Gawd bless Milky Way ! ”

    Reply
  9. Seen the elephant says:
    May 28, 2008 at 8:28 am

    I spent the last six years of my mil­i­tary car­rer in Information Operations. Been to DISA, 1st IO Command, and over­seas. Seen the fire­wall logs of Federal and State orga­ni­za­tions, mil­i­tary and gov­ern­ment, where it is amaz­ing from where we are being probed and attacked. H*ll, I have been around long enough to remem­ber the first BRAIN virus (picked it up from one of my trips to Korea in the 80’s). The threat to EVERYONE’S net­works is real. We are not spend­ing enough to pro­tect our­selves. By the way, the Army’s ver­sion of Information Operations makes more sense then the other ser­vices, includ­ing the new Air Force com­mand. There is more to infor­ma­tion war­fare than dig­its and electrons.…

    Reply
  10. Kevin says:
    May 28, 2008 at 1:41 pm

    Ok — you had to bring up the old “Brain” virus. Now you have gone and done it — you made me feel old. I had totally for­got­ten about that one.

    Reply
  11. paul says:
    May 30, 2008 at 4:16 pm

    It’s all about IRC/​disruption and acute knowl­edge
    of polit­i­cal pull-​​sources etc…They won’t stop unless a cer­tain fig­ure speaks out.…But that fig­ure is usu­ally the one in com­mand and con­trol
    sta­tus etc…Key word:‘Acute.’

    Reply
  12. Charlie says:
    May 6, 2009 at 9:15 pm

    Russia should not be over looked,and if you seri­ously think that China is becom­ing a seri­ous threat,you have no idea who we are!!!! USA

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • New Army PEO on the way
      To get our AAA quality shoes at reasonable price, Your...
      nike air force ones
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage