http://defensetech.org/2008/05/27/the-house-panel-with-no-tiara/ The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:29:01 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://defensetech.org/2008/05/27/the-house-panel-with-no-tiara/#comment-180383 WR Fri, 30 May 2008 16:54:46 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2866#comment-180383 When I first read the "TIARA" bit, I was thinking of a figurative Tiara (sort of crown) and though the article was going to say that the House Panel effectively has no power. I cracked my own self up. Anyway, it seems that this will allow Congress increasing control over the military and defining military needs rather than the military, the only appropriate ones to define its needs. When I first read the “TIARA” bit, I was thinking of a figurative Tiara (sort of crown) and though the article was going to say that the House Panel effectively has no power. I cracked my own self up. Anyway, it seems that this will allow Congress increasing control over the military and defining military needs rather than the military, the only appropriate ones to define its needs.

]]> http://defensetech.org/2008/05/27/the-house-panel-with-no-tiara/#comment-180382 CTR1(SW) Wed, 28 May 2008 01:15:31 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2866#comment-180382 1) Just what we need. More bureaucracy. 2) Hey, SG-1 fans. Do the letters N.I.D. sound familiar? ("Civilian oversight of classified military programs.") 1) Just what we need. More bureaucracy.
2) Hey, SG-1 fans. Do the letters N.I.D. sound familiar?
(“Civilian oversight of classified military programs.”)

]]>