Comments on: Army Chief on the Caliber Case

By: jason

jason — Sun, 13 Jun 2010 07:13:59 +0000

i liked your comment, i can see it going this way soon. w/ all the haters and people who will slip on there 2nd face while no one is looking (like heartless liberals„ bush did it)

By: Nathanael

Nathanael — Thu, 27 May 2010 19:14:54 +0000

AS member,I think that is very important(SPC)for the
special force and I can’t tell you exactly again
…!

By: Dude67

Dude67 — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 21:01:36 +0000

The Military has already done the work on a 6.8mm special purpose cartridge (SPC) for the Special Forces. It has almost twice the energy of a 5.56mm at the same range. Check out the specs.

By: Dude67

Dude67 — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:57:57 +0000

The Military has already done the work on a 6.8mm special purpose cartridge (SPC) for the Special Forces. It has almost twice the energy of a 5.56mm at the same range. Check out the specs. http://demigodllc.com/articles/6.8-mm-spc-cartrid... Here's another: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0BQY/is_4_... If you have MS Powerpoint you can see the specs: http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2004arms/session3/dennis... This is the round that all grunts should be using in the field!!

By: Joel

Joel — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:07:33 +0000

At the funding level, the military has de-emphasized the things that get the most work done in war and spent their money foolishly on flashy toys that look neat on the History Channel.
Like it or not, guns (from the rifle to heavy artillery) are the workhorses of the military. They kill the enemy in larger numbers than anything else and for the lowest cost. Perfecting ours, and the art of using them would do more for the military than anything else.
Unfortunately, the politicians in congress and the funding whores at the top of the military aren’t interested in anything that doesn’t include millions in unneccesary electronics.

By: P.J. Busche

P.J. Busche — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 01:27:35 +0000

The 5.56 NATO has served us, and regrettably, for 40 years; it is obsolete. It is long overdue to be replaced by something more potent. Urban encounters need greater knockdown than the 5.56 NATO.

By: Rhyno327/lrsd

Rhyno327/lrsd — Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:37:09 +0000

Yup, the Barrett 468 would be one of my choices. It can be fitted with a suppressor so you can save ur hearing. LWRC makes plenty of rifles for a 6.8mm round. One version you can swap ur short barrel for an 18 inch barrel. I hope the Army takes a real hard look at changing. You can clean that M-4, and if you get into a running gunbattle lasting over 24 hrs., you do not have time to clean it. So, it jams and ur out of luck. You need to pull that trigger more than once to bring a man down, I bet a 6.8 or 7.62 its usually one and done.

By: P.J. Busche

P.J. Busche — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:33:17 +0000

I’ve never been a proponent of small-caliber rifles for our infantry forces. Regardless, has the U.S. Army emperimented with necking-up the 5.56x45mm NATO to accept larger diameter projectiles for knockdown? Assuredly, 6.5mm-caliber bullets are likely the upper limit without experiencing cracked case necks. Both the 6.35x45mm and 6.5mmx45mm are worth looking at, as either one will send 87–90 graim bullets at over 2700 FPS from the M16’s 20-inch barrel.

By: Foxy

Foxy — Sun, 27 Jul 2008 06:42:13 +0000

6.5 Grendel Gas piston Uppers. 6.5 Grendel Gas Piston Uppers. 6.5 Grendel Gas Piston Uppers.
PROBLEM SOLVED!

By: sex videos

sex videos — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:34:44 +0000

love