DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Av Week Extra » Helo Needs Still Unmet For Space Command

Helo Needs Still Unmet For Space Command

This arti­cle first appeared in Aviation Week’s Aerospace Daily and Defense Report.

U.S. Air Force Space Command (AFSPC) is again push­ing for a pro­gram to replace its aging UH-​​1N heli­copters, say­ing that its cur­rent air­craft are too slow to han­dle the mod­ern nuclear weapons sup­port mis­sion.

AFSPC vice chief Maj. Gen. Thomas Deppe says that the com­mand has included a fund­ing request in its fis­cal 2010 draft bud­get to begin a pro­gram to replace the aging Hueys. “Any heli­copter in the inven­tory is faster than that UH-​​1,” he said dur­ing a break­fast speech May 28 hosted by the National Defense University Foundation. A new heli­copter would need to have greater range, improved speed and armor pro­tec­tion, Deppe added.

The heli­copters are used to escort nuclear weapons teams ser­vic­ing the Minuteman III inter­con­ti­nen­tal bal­lis­tic mis­sile fleet. They also are used to quickly trans­port secu­rity teams in the event of an alert at the mis­sile fields. Todays Huey lacks the range to tra­verse the largest of the mis­sile fields in one mission.


“An 80–85 per­cent solu­tion may be good enough,” Deppe said, acknowl­edg­ing that attempts to buy a Huey replace­ment in the past have failed to pro­duce a viable pro­gram. “We could buy some­thing off the shelf that could eas­ily” han­dle the mis­sion, he said.


Most recently, the Air Force dis­cussed the con­cept of a Common Vertical Lift Support Program, which would pro­vide a com­mon heli­copter to replace those used by AFSPC as well as the aging exec­u­tive trans­ports oper­at­ing out of Andrews Air Force Base, Md.

However, heli­copter pro­cure­ments for USAF appear to be paced by the Combat Search and Rescue-​​X (CSAR-​​X) quag­mire. The Air Force is exam­in­ing responses from CSAR-​​X bid­ders with an award pos­si­ble this fall.

Read the rest of this story, how some Dutch want to scut­tle the JSF and pics of a pooch with a nose for TNT from our Aviation Week friends on Military​.com.

– Christian

Share |

June 2nd, 2008 | Av Week Extra | 288032 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/06/02/helo-needs-still-unmet-for-space-command/Helo+Needs+Still+Unmet+For+Space+Command2008-06-02+20%3A14%3A58Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Hezbollah’s Cyber Warfare Program | Shakeup at OSD Acquisition Coming » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. pleuris says:
    June 2, 2008 at 5:48 pm

    So what’s the prob­lem? I can think of only two advan­tages for the UH-​​1; sta­bilty in flight and easy main­te­nance (as in sim­plic­ity and avail­abilty of spareparts). for the rest any helo with enough pay­load and range will do…So why not H-60M’s?
    And armor in a Helo? Until this day there is no trans­porth­elo that has armor in it’s orig­i­nal design (not talk­ing about armored seats), only add-​​ons kevlar and such. Providing extra weight penalty.

    Reply
  2. slntax says:
    June 2, 2008 at 7:38 pm

    i got a idea how about the chair force spend less money on fancy chow halls and bar­racks. and stu­pid poli­cies like air­men get extra pay because they dont have x amount of liv­ing space when deployed. then maybe they would have more cash to accom­plice their missions.

    Reply
  3. The Cenobyte says:
    June 2, 2008 at 8:48 pm

    What I took out of this is that some­one some­where is will­ing to take off the shelf stuff and make it work, instead of look­ing for some new super helo with a bil­lion mile range that can take a tril­lion 25mm rounds, they said really almost any bird we already use would work great. Can we get a few of them? If only more peo­ple oper­ated like that.

    Reply
  4. coolhand77 says:
    June 2, 2008 at 10:01 pm

    Eh, Space Command is prob­a­bly just pissy because they are feel­ing irrel­e­vant lately (no real threats except china and they arn’t being noisy all that much). They are prob­a­bly just push­ing for their own Ospreys since only the AF spec ops guys and the Marines have got­ten them so far.

    Reply
  5. stephen russell says:
    June 2, 2008 at 10:47 pm

    Get a newer copter?
    Used or New?
    BlackHawk?
    HH 53?
    S 67?

    Reply
  6. Roy Smith says:
    June 2, 2008 at 10:51 pm

    Why don’t they use UH-​​72A Lakotas? Like it or not,it makes sense.

    Reply
  7. Pan says:
    June 3, 2008 at 7:42 am

    These heli­copters are all Vietnam War vin­tage, and they were already show­ing signs of wear and tear when I was a mis­sile main­te­nance offi­cer at Minot AFB 20 years ago. They rou­tinely lost power in flight and it wasn’t uncom­mon for the pilots to auto-​​rotate onto some farmer’s chicken shed or barn. It was get­ting dan­ger­ous. Around that time, an air­borne secu­rity team escort­ing a nuclear weapons con­voy from Ellsworth AFB crashed, killing every­one on board. I fully sup­port get­ting our guys some decent and SAFE air­craft to fly in. They should have replaced the Hueys a long time ago.

    Reply
  8. Sgt JFK says:
    June 3, 2008 at 7:54 am

    I agree. Just bump up the quan­tity of UH-​​72A Lakotas we order. Roughly how many UH-1’s are we talk­ing about? Would this even be a big order?

    Reply
  9. Takeo says:
    June 3, 2008 at 10:23 am

    slntax:
    Maybe you should do a bit more research about how the var­i­ous allowance pays work. I’ll give you a hint, they are basi­cally the same for all the ser­vices.
    BUT: Before you fin­ish that bit of work I have two sug­ges­tions for you:
    1. Learn to spell, proper spelling makes you look like less of a moron.
    2. Use proper gram­mar. You should have been issued this abil­ity upon grad­u­ate from high school.
    3. Stop drink­ing what ever “hard core” ser­vice you belong to’s Kool-​​Aid.

    Reply
  10. Roy Smith says:
    June 3, 2008 at 11:03 am

    I’ll say it again,for state­side missions,the UH-​​72A Lakota is the way to go​.It has two engines like the UH-​​1N & most likely can do a bet­ter job than the UH-1N.It’s either that or have the Air Force buy the upgraded UH-​​1Y Huey that the Marine Corps are also buying.The UH-​​72A would most likely be cheaper though.If you just gotta have a tiltro­tor aircraft,but not one as big as the Osprey,you could get the BA609 Tiltrotor,but then again,the UH-​​72A would mostly be cheaper & just as good as the more expen­sive UH-​​1Y or BA609.

    Reply
  11. B52U says:
    June 3, 2008 at 12:05 pm

    Why not just replace them with Chinooks? fastest helo in the cur­rent inven­tory and it can carry a lot of stuff.

    Reply
  12. A Norththern Neighbour says:
    June 4, 2008 at 8:47 am

    Why not use V-​​22 Ospreys?

    Reply
  13. Roy Smith says:
    June 4, 2008 at 10:04 am

    “Why not use V-​​22 Ospreys?“
    Too big.If the Air Force wanted an ade­quate tiltro­tor aircraft,they could use the BA609 Tiltrotor.It’s smaller than the V-​​22.
    I’m sur­prised though how,except for one other person(this will be the 3rd time I men­tion it),nobody else is seri­ously con­sid­er­ing the UH-​​72A Lakota to replace the UH-​​1N Huey for U.S. Space Command.

    Reply
  14. AFBlue07 says:
    June 5, 2008 at 12:14 am

    Ok we are in the mid­dle of phas­ing out two per­fectly good air­frames… the HH-​​60 Pave Hawk and the MH-​​53 Pave Low. There is no need to develop a new helo or even look at pur­chas­ing com­mer­cial options. If you ask me Security Forces would prob­a­bly love hav­ing either one of these air­frames cov­er­ing their butts when the clowns get crazy.

    Reply
  15. rohan gold says:
    August 2, 2008 at 12:00 am

    At first I did not know any­thing, I had no friends and rohan gold, and soon I knew the first play friend, she had been very good to me my belt, also taught me how to make rohan crone. She is like my sis­ter, and later she mar­ried, she did not too much time play­ing games. So I become a per­son again.

    Reply
  16. Requiem Lant says:
    August 5, 2008 at 12:46 am

    In order to play the Requiem, I bought much Requiem Lant, it spend me much money.

    Reply
  17. Sword of the New World Gold says:
    August 8, 2008 at 8:41 pm

    By allow­ing play­ers to com­bine up to three per­son­al­ized classes at once, Sword of the New World Gold deliv­ers a pre­vi­ously unseen level of depth in char­ac­ter devel­op­ment and game­play strategy.

    Reply
  18. dofus kamas says:
    August 15, 2008 at 10:14 pm

    I do not want to spend my time to the game, but later I met her, in my life she was very impor­tant, we together to earn the dofus kamas, I think this life­time I will never forget.

    Reply
  19. 0p0 says:
    December 25, 2008 at 12:03 am

    http://​www​.njo100​.com/

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage