DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Mercs » Mercenary Air

Mercenary Air

blackwater-tucano.jpg

This morn­ing Military​.com has a story on America’s most famous (or infa­mous) pri­vate secu­rity con­trac­tor, Blackwater USA, pur­chas­ing a light attack aircraft.

Report Says Blackwater Bought Fighter (AP)

A sub­sidiary of U.S. mil­i­tary secu­rity con­trac­tor Blackwater Worldwide has pur­chased a fighter plane from the Brazilian avi­a­tion com­pany Embraer, a Brazilian news­pa­per reported June 1.

The 314-​​B1 Super Tucano propeller-​​driven fighter — the same used by the Brazilian mil­i­tary — was bought for $4.5 mil­lion and deliv­ered to EP Aviation at the end of February, accord­ing to the Estado de S. Paulo newspaper. 

First of all the head­line is mis­lead­ing. The Tucano isn’t a “fighter” unless you’re a seri­ously third world air force. But it has been bandied around as a good answer for a “counter-​​insurgency” air­craft. So Blackwater has clearly done some research (and been read­ing DT, I have to assume) on the best plane to fight a dirty war. It’s inter­est­ing, too, that the com­pany is buy­ing new. Seems to me there’d be a lot more sur­plus gear on the mar­ket for them to snap up — and keep it low pro­file as well.

It was not clear if it was Embraer’s first sale of a military-​​style air­craft to a pri­vate com­pany. EP Aviation has 33 planes and heli­copters reg­is­tered with the FAA, accord­ing to the agency’s Web site, only one of which is from Embraer.

Officials with Brazil’s gov­ern­ment and Embraer declined to com­ment on the Estado report. Phone calls to Blackwater were not returned.

The sale was appar­ently approved, the Estado report noted, by Brazil’s pres­i­dent in a deal nego­ti­ated with the U.S. government.

Brazilian law pro­hibits the sale of arms to com­pa­nies or for use in exist­ing conflicts. 

It does worry be a bit each time a com­pany like Blackwater con­tin­ues this arms build up. Sources tell me they’ve got a “Spectre’-like” gun­ship already, and they’ve been buzzing around Baghdad in spec-​​ops-​​style armed Little Birds. So what hap­pens when a con­tract with the US Gov goes bad — say Congress pulls fund­ing from a con­tract mid­way through the agree­ment. Will Blackwater use this kind of equip­ment to come col­lect what it’s owed? Seems far fetched, I know, but Blackwater offi­cials are down­play­ing the Tucano buy to curb fears.

The news­pa­per reported that Blackwater pres­i­dent Gary Jackson said the plane would be used for training.

The plane sold to EP Aviation did not include the two .50-​​caliber machine guns nor­mally attached to the wings. 

Oh, I’m sleep­ing bet­ter already…

– Christian

Share |

June 2nd, 2008 | Mercs | 287863 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/06/02/mercenary-air/Mercenary+Air2008-06-02+11%3A30%3A19Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « The Sunday Paper | Hezbollah’s Cyber Warfare Program » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Chris says:
    June 2, 2008 at 9:13 am

    The real­ity is most Blackwater staff are for­mer US mil­i­tary and are loyal to the US. Short of civil war Blackwater isn’t going to use this equip­ment on its own coun­try.
    Like it or not, Blackwater is a nec­es­sary evil in a time when, frankly, the US mil­i­tary is a bit too slow and polit­i­cally cor­rect. Spec Ops may have the fastest response time of any orga­ni­za­tion, but the polit­i­cal B.S. that goes on before they are called costs lives.

    Reply
  2. Foreign.Boy says:
    June 2, 2008 at 9:32 am

    Maybe they are join­ing the air races?
    http://​www​.red​bul​lair​race​.com/

    Reply
  3. Patrick says:
    June 2, 2008 at 10:28 am

    Is it just me or does the 314-​​B1 Super Tucano look a lot like a P-​​51?

    Reply
  4. Roy Smith says:
    June 2, 2008 at 10:29 am

    Blackwater USA is the “American Foreign Legion” that David Hackworth envisioned(but I’m sure not as a Private Military Company).Instead of the Air Force being forced to buy planes that they don’t want for counter-​​insurgency missions,the “counter-​​insurgency” mis­sion can be con­tracted out to Blackwater.Let Blackwater send their Super Tucanos to take out Colombian cocaine fields or Afghan opium fields & nobody will mourn the loss of life of their “oper­a­tors” in such mis­sions.
    Blackwater,like it or not,is a glob­al­ist corporation(a small one,but one nonetheless).Read Bob Shepherd’s book “the Circuit” for a good descrip­tion of Private Military Companies.

    Reply
  5. Graham Strouse says:
    June 2, 2008 at 10:57 am

    It DOES look a lot like a P-​​51. Huh…

    Reply
  6. C-Low says:
    June 2, 2008 at 11:56 am

    At some point as the V-​​22 goes full op they will require the gun­ship half of the equa­tion.
    I am think­ing this or a US ver­sion of this lit­tle bad boy will be the answer. Fast enough to keep up and short take off enough to oper­ate in a aus­tere heli­copter base dirt rolling take off strip.

    Reply
  7. Foreign.Boy says:
    June 2, 2008 at 12:37 pm

    I don’t know how stingers work…
    But would a 314-​​B1 Super Tucano be safe from Stingers.

    Reply
  8. TB says:
    June 2, 2008 at 12:53 pm

    Chris,
    The arti­cle is about a mer­ce­nary com­pany who’s pri­mary mis­sion is being state depart­ment body guards, not Special Forces. What do they need a third-​​world prop fighter to “train” for anyway?

    Reply
  9. Byron Skinner says:
    June 2, 2008 at 1:14 pm

    Good Morning Folks,
    Lets see the U.S.A.F. wants F-22’s, F-35’s and manned B-3’s.
    Our enemy is a state­less, air force­less insur­gency oper­a­tion oper­at­ing in both urban and iso­lated areas.
    Blackwater has been sub-​​contracting Afghanistan and Iraq on the ground and on the water.
    What about aquir­ing this air­craft by Blackwater is not under­stood, dah.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply
  10. Rick says:
    June 2, 2008 at 2:13 pm

    Foreign Boy,
    Stingers work just fine against pro­peller dri­ven air­craft of all types. That’s both fixed and rotor wing. Air fric­tion heats the pro­peller enough to get a lock-​​on.

    Reply
  11. pete says:
    June 2, 2008 at 3:02 pm

    This should be pretty safe from Stingers, Iglas and Strelas. None of those mis­siles will be able to lock onto the rel­a­tively neg­li­gi­ble heat sig­na­ture of this plane. Heck they can’t even lock onto most mod­ern civil­ian jets with mod­ern engine design.
    As for it look­ing a bit like a P-​​51, it seems quite a bit smaller to me. Still, if you are going to build a design on top of another older design then that is a great place to begin.

    Reply
  12. W Jacobs says:
    June 2, 2008 at 3:52 pm

    It looks more like the T6 Texan II or the Pilatus.
    And hey look it uses the exact same P&W engine as those two. They are all actu­ally real close in design. Fast decent han­dling would be good to keep track of arms and drug smug­glers. Good heaters will hit this plane. The odds of a ter­ror­ist actu­ally hit­ting it with a heater is 50/​50. Flares on the plane would drop that down con­sid­er­ably.
    Let them have it. It is noth­ing but a tar­get to our fight­ers so poses no real threat in the event they want to try and use it to get their con­tract money.

    Reply
  13. Charlie says:
    June 2, 2008 at 4:20 pm

    Ray — you might note that the Columbians have a nice force of Tucano’s already, and are a crack­er­jack COIN force at this point.
    This is a log­i­cal out­growth of doing COIN with­out US offi­cial sup­port­ing assets. I’m given to under­stand they have financ­ing for a lot of other assets as well.

    Reply
  14. Mike says:
    June 2, 2008 at 5:01 pm

    The plane or jet of this type is not a good COIN air­craft at all, even a A-​​10, no mat­ter what type. A good COIN air­craft is some­thing with a good obser­va­tion capa­bil­ity such as a heli­copter, a preda­tor, or a C130 Gunship that can make good obser­va­tions and pre­ci­sion strikes. An attack heli­copter like the Apache is by far the best type of COIN air­craft out there.
    Aircraft like the A-​​10, and other strike air­craft are good at when fight­ing a known enemy, or instances like the ini­tial inva­sion, but are not good in the COIN role.
    What is needed is an air­craft that can do two things..
    ONE: Make good obser­va­tions with high tech sen­sors . (found on preda­tor, gun­ships, or attack heli­copters)
    TWO: Make pre­ci­sion strikes.
    Some air­craft can do obser­va­tion part well, and have an F16 make the strike, and vise versa, but with­out the both of those you can­not have a good COIN aircraft.

    Reply
  15. pfcem says:
    June 2, 2008 at 6:07 pm

    Byron Skinner,
    The USAF NEEDS F-22’s, F-35’s & manned B-3’s to replace its aging fighter & bomber fleets which have been neglected for far too long so that heaven for­bid should a REAL war break out, we will win. And don’t for­get that we had to (& did) win a war vs “con­ven­tional” Iraqi mil­i­tary forces before we could even get to the point where we are at today.
    The cur­rent state­less, air force­less insur­gency oper­a­tion “enemy” NEVER was a cred­i­ble MILITARY threat & never required any specific/​special mil­i­tary equipment/​system to defeat. All that is/​was REALLY needed is/​was the will (& the polit­i­cal per­mis­sion) to actu­ally FIGHT them.
    As for COIN, MQ-​​1 Predator & more recently MQ-​​9 Reaper have been doing that job for the USAF.

    Reply
  16. Reginald Oka says:
    June 2, 2008 at 7:17 pm

    A lit­tle backup if the U.S. or Iraqi forces are slow on the response. Two .50 cal­ibers isn’t much fire­power, but enough to hose the bad guys long enough to allow for an extrac­tion or a quick get­away. Buys time for the lit­tle birds to get inbound with more firepower.

    Reply
  17. SCC says:
    June 2, 2008 at 8:02 pm

    “Two .50 cal­ibers isn’t much fire­power, but enough to hose the bad guys long enough to allow for an extrac­tion or a quick get­away.“
    The Tucano isn’t lim­ited to two .50 cals, it was designed to carry two fixed .50s and mount weaponry on up to 5 hard­points. The hard­points can take 20mm can­non pods, rock­ets and bombs (includ­ing a lim­ited vari­ety of pre­ci­sion guided muni­tions) and air to air mis­siles. Load her up and she’ll do more than allow forces under fire to make a quick get­away…
    “The plane or jet of this type is not a good COIN air­craft at all, even a A-​​10, no mat­ter what type. A good COIN air­craft is some­thing with a good obser­va­tion capa­bil­ity such as a heli­copter, a preda­tor, or a C130 Gunship that can make good obser­va­tions and pre­ci­sion strikes. An attack heli­copter like the Apache is by far the best type of COIN air­craft out there.“
    Excuse me? Did you ever hear of the Hawker Typhoon or the A-​​1 Skyraider? Aircraft like the Tucano & A-​​10 are excel­lent COIN air­craft, par­tic­u­larly when a JTAC (or sim­i­lar) is on the ground.
    They carry enough fire­power for mul­ti­ple attacks (includ­ing with pre­ci­sion muni­tions if needed), can tran­sit to hotspots quicker than any attack heli­copter can and have bat­tle­field loi­ter times in excess of 2 hours (greater than most, if not all, attack heli­copters). Fitted with drop tanks (or even air-​​to-​​air refu­elling capa­bil­ity for the A-​​10) they can increase their loi­ter time & range con­sid­er­ably fur­ther, mak­ing them more use­ful over a wider area than an attack heli­copter. Recon/​targeting pods (like the Litening) can also be fit­ted to some of these low’n’slow air­craft giv­ing them excel­lent obser­va­tion capa­bil­i­ties.
    They’re also arguably less vul­ner­a­ble than rotary winged air­craft being able to loi­ter at higher (and safer) alti­tudes and attack at greater speeds reduc­ing the chance of being hit on attack runs.
    COIN air­craft are a valu­able part of COIN air-​​ops, they offer a sub­tly dif­fer­ent set of capa­bil­i­ties that com­ple­ment those of chop­pers and UCAVs. Writing them off so eas­ily is a mistake…

    Reply
  18. W Jacobs says:
    June 2, 2008 at 8:09 pm

    Mike you might want to check out the arti­cle.
    http://​avi​a​tion​week​.com/​s​h​o​w​n​e​w​s​/​0​2​f​i​d​a​e​/​t​o​p​s​t​o​0​2​.​htm
    They will be no slouch with that kind of avion­ics suite. Also they will be a great deal cheaper than an Apache or AC-​​130. The super Tucano is capa­ble of deliv­er­ing pre­ci­sion weapons.

    Reply
  19. W Jacobs says:
    June 2, 2008 at 8:15 pm

    Heres a link to a Tucano work­ing with an obser­va­tion air­craft. You will see the lit­tle fighter come in and take shots on the drug plane.
    http://​www​.live​leak​.com/​v​i​e​w​?​i​=​0​6​3​_​1​1​8​2​3​0​0​981

    Reply
  20. ohwilleke says:
    June 2, 2008 at 9:34 pm

    There are lots of ideas float­ing around out there about how to find a polit­i­cally fea­si­ble way to replace or sup­ple­ment the capa­bil­i­ties of the A-​​10 for coun­terin­sur­gency war­fare. This one is a might bit too cre­ative for my tastes.

    Reply
  21. Roy Smith says:
    June 2, 2008 at 10:46 pm

    C’mon,whats the prob­lem? The U.S. con­tracts Blackwater to per­form counter-​​insurgency mis­sions “off the books;” Blackwater uses “their own money” to pur­chase Super Tucanos for the counter-​​insurgency missions;no “tax money” is diverted from F-​​22 or F-​​35 pro­grams to pay for this purchase.Everybody’s happy all over.
    Maybe Blackwater’s “Air Force” is the 21st Century “Seaspray” orga­ni­za­tion for Black-​​Ops’ air mis­sions.
    NOBODY would seri­ously believe that Blackwater would attack the U.S.,especially using Super Tucanos.Arguing if the Super Tucano is the right choice.….for Blackwater,only makes sense if you are on the board of direc­tors for Blackwater.

    Reply
  22. Maluka says:
    June 3, 2008 at 1:27 am

    Blackwater is smart. They know that if Hussein Obama is elected pres­i­dent those with fire­power will be the only ones able to pro­tect them­selves after Obama sells us out.
    Remember Obama’s words from his book the Audacity of Hope: “I will stand with the Muslims should the polit­i­cal winds shift in an ugly direc­tion.“
    That sounds like a sell out to me.

    Reply
  23. what ever says:
    June 3, 2008 at 1:58 am

    “The real­ity is most Blackwater staff are for­mer US mil­i­tary and are loyal to the US. Short of civil war Blackwater isn’t going to use this equip­ment on its own coun­try“
    If they re so loyal why not return to the mil­i­tary and serve thier coun­try again or tak­ing the pay cut is too much ser­vice for them

    Reply
  24. Patrick says:
    June 3, 2008 at 2:41 am

    A prop job with a cou­ple of 50’s and a rocket or two and folks are man­ning the sweat pumps about Black Water(again)! We trust our politi­cians fly­ing about in their pri­vate jets loaded with fuel& hot air. Me thinks I’ll trust Black Water.

    Reply
  25. J.Koehler says:
    June 3, 2008 at 4:00 am

    (With credit to Simon & Garfunkel for the tune):
    Hello Darkness my old friend
    I see the Republic is soon to end
    In a world of chaotic state­less crime
    The New Empire will rise in time
    and the Caesars will con­tend
    (Toynbee said these cycles never end)
    and a vision comes to mind
    of Nietzche’s future world of war
    and Orwell’s 1984
    Oh yes, “Rome” will decline and fall,
    (can’t we hear the clar­ion call?)
    and the music thun­ders loud
    and the vision of the cloud
    is of a mush­room bright and tall
    and shat­tered cities, dieing trees
    and shat­tered peoples,scattered leaves,
    Baghavad-​​Gita The Song of God
    repeats this is a road down which we’ve trod
    and this vision is the vision of a player
    des­ig­nated as the “red slayer“
    and the slayer is merely a tool
    used by the uni­ver­sal fool
    for “if the red slayer thinks HE slays
    he knows not the ways” of the end­less maker-​​user
    there is no win­ner there’s no loser
    no vic­tim, no abuser,
    just a wheel turn­ing once again
    Hello Darkness, my old friend.
    ——olde father-​​the-​​recalcitrant

    Reply
  26. Roy Smith says:
    June 3, 2008 at 6:13 am

    Military​.com has an arti­cle about the U.S. Government buy­ing 8 Super Tucanos for use in Iraq.
    http://​www​.mil​i​tary​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​u​s​-​m​a​y​-​b​u​y​-​b​r​a​z​i​l​i​a​n​-​f​i​g​h​t​e​r​s​.​h​t​m​l​?​c​o​l​=​1​1​8​6​0​3​2​3​1​0​810
    Now since the arti­cle is very vague about what they are being bought for,I won­der if they are buy­ing them to “give” to the new Iraqi Air Force? Blackwater could pro­vide “train­ers(?)” to “teach” Iraqi pilots how to use it(which is stu­pid because Iraq had pilots who flew MiG-​​25s & MiG-29s).Is this a new Counterinsurgency “Air Force” to be used by Blackwater in Iraq?

    Reply
  27. Damn says:
    June 3, 2008 at 6:24 am

    Good for them doing the right thing. But peo­ple its not like they have F14’s or some­thing come on. Mostly any­thing can shoot down those planes even bebe guns. Let them do their busi­ness in the other coun­tries every­thing will be fine.

    Reply
  28. justbill says:
    June 3, 2008 at 8:13 am

    “So what hap­pens when a con­tract with the US Gov goes bad — say Congress pulls fund­ing from a con­tract mid­way through the agree­ment. Will Blackwater use this kind of equip­ment to come col­lect what it’s owed?“
    Thanks, I just spit-​​up some of my ceral laugh­ing at this.
    The only per­son Blackwater could extort with this kind of fire­power is Mayor Ray Nagin of New Orleans the next time he uses mer­ce­nar­ies to con­fis­cate guns from their legal owners.

    Reply
  29. Rhyno327/lrsd says:
    June 3, 2008 at 8:37 am

    I got no prob­lem with it. Companies like Blackwater will, and are now, work hand in hand with the US mil­i­tary. These guys are pro’s, and hav­ing them on our side is a plus. They are able to do things for the US that offi­cial mil­i­tary can’t.

    Reply
  30. Opfor6 says:
    June 3, 2008 at 9:07 am

    This would be per­fect for our Border Patrol, of course armed with the .50cal for deter­ring infil­tra­tion along our bor­ders.
    Low and slow, armed to the teeth. That’s the ticket.
    Coyote sea­son is now open.

    Reply
  31. Edward says:
    June 3, 2008 at 9:16 am

    Folks,
    I think you are miss­ing why black­wa­ter would like a air­craft like this. Blackwater already has a failr decent Helicopter fleet of Little Birds. They bought a sin­gle plane from the looks of the arti­cle. It is unarmed, the wing guns were removed. It can fly higher and faster than a heli­copter can as well. This is a per­fect plat­form for recon. Most times it can fly high enough to avoid most ground fire, although stingers and MANPADS will always be a threat, but they aren’t really con­cerned with those com­ing after this air­craft.
    It will have a small foot­print and since its most likely going to be unarmed, it can prob­a­bly also be used as a sen­sor plat­form. I can pic­ture them hook­ing up some FLIR pods to this thing so they can see bad guys dur­ing low light mis­sions. If they are using it for train­ing, it could also pos­si­bly mean that they are try­ing to bid on con­tracts to train pilots, per­haps Afghani or Iraqi Airforce pilots on their lim­ited air­craft cur­rently avail­able. This thing is faster than most prop plane they would have, but not jet speed yet and would give them the option of using it for route recon missions.

    Reply
  32. Torch says:
    June 3, 2008 at 9:30 am

    Christian,
    I think you’ve been watch­ing too many spy movies.:) Most, if not all of Blackwater, is made up of prior ser­vice and spe­cial forces mem­bers of our mil­i­tary. I seri­ously doubt they have any inten­tion, other than pro­vid­ing sup­port for our front line troops, dig­ni­taries, and senior rank­ing offi­cials. It’s not like they’re a bunch of “Ruby Ridge” sur­vival­ists, wait­ing to take down our Government.
    Having Super Tucanos pro­vide COIN and FAC for US, Iraq, and Blackwater is a per­fect match. We haven’t had a plane, like this one, avail­able to us, since the OV-​​10.

    Reply
  33. freefallingbomb says:
    June 3, 2008 at 9:59 am

    I bet that in the near future the U.S. Armed Forces only exist to “project power” abroad (= to impress street chil­dren in Third World har­bour cities with their fancy air­craft car­ri­ers), to receive vas­sals of the U.S.A. at the air­port with fan­fare and to spin Propaganda, because the Nazi inva­sions them­selves will be increas­ingly per­pe­trated by for­eign “civil­ians” “work­ing” for U.S. American mer­ce­nary com­pa­nies at the U.S. Emperor’s fickle whims…
    WHAT A DERANGED COUNTRY !!! HOW D-​​A-​​R-​​E THE U.S. AMERICANS STILL CALL THEMSELVES “CHRISTIANS” ??!

    Reply
  34. Rottie says:
    June 3, 2008 at 11:33 am

    Our army has not had an effec­tive pro­peller dri­ven ground sup­port air­craft since the A1 Skyraider in Vietnam, aside from hele­copters. It is about time we started look­ing at that type of asset again. It cer­tainly is not the “Mudfighter” our defense folks looked at after Vietnam and that the Air Force protested against as an infin­ge­ment upon their ter­ri­tory, but is a step in the right direc­tion. Perhaps a “Mudfighter” type of air­craft will emerge from this step. Our ground troops require this type of sup­port which con­trary to pop­u­lar opin­ion was not filled by the F15 or F16. “Go Army”!

    Reply
  35. The Cenobyte says:
    June 3, 2008 at 11:36 am

    The ques­tion here more than any­thing else is why? Why do they need to train pilots to fly what is really a ground attack air­craft? There are much bet­ter air­craft for recon for far less money. Do we really want com­pa­nies with the sys­tems and know how to fly ground attack mis­sions against insur­gence? Remember this same com­pany send armed peo­ple into NO after the flood. For that mat­ter, whats going to hap­pen to those armed helos when they come home?

    Reply
  36. WR says:
    June 3, 2008 at 3:02 pm

    Byron Skinner,
    Tinsta ALLONS. TINSTA ALLONS!
    V/​R,
    WR

    Reply
  37. WR says:
    June 3, 2008 at 3:06 pm

    Fred,
    Not all reporters are draft dodgers, and not all of us are puddy boys. Strange con­clu­sions you have, baby boy.

    Reply
  38. Phil White says:
    June 3, 2008 at 7:57 pm

    They prob­a­bly bought it because the Iraqi air force is buy­ing sev­eral. I imag­ine Blackwater is look­ing at train­ing Iraqi pilots on that air­craft. Just a guess.

    Reply
  39. John says:
    June 4, 2008 at 10:29 am

    St. Peter was wel­com­ing some new ari­vals at the Purly Gates.…..He asked each arrival what their name was and what they were noted for.
    A black guy comes up to him and St. Peter says:
    “What is your name?“
    The guy says “Barack Obama.“
    “And what are you noted for Mr. Obama?“
    “I was the first black man ever elected as pres­i­dent of the United States.“
    “Oh, when were you elected?“
    “About 20 min­utes ago.”

    Reply
  40. Mike says:
    June 4, 2008 at 3:53 pm

    Yes I still believe this plane is a good close air sup­port air­craft, but not the best COIN air­craft.
    Like I said before, an air­craft like an attack heli­copter, AC130 gun­ship, or some­thing like the preda­tor are all great COIN air­craft because they can 1. Observe with great sen­sors for the few ene­mies mak­ing the attack and caus­ing the trou­ble, and 2. Make the pre­ci­sion strike or more if needed.
    Some air­craft can do one or the other, but the ones I men­tioned above can do both very well. This plane men­tioned can make strikes.. but we have plenty of air­craft that can do that. What is needed is an all in one air­craft such as an AC130, Attack helo (Apache) or UAV like the preda­tor with a great sen­sor pod below it and hell­fire pre­ci­sion strikes. Aircraft like the A10, Tucano, and Fighter jets able to make pre­ci­sion drops are all good ground sup­port craft, but not COIN air­craft. Theres a difference.

    Reply
  41. S M C H says:
    June 6, 2008 at 7:11 pm

    The prob­lem is 20 bil­lion rack­e­teer­ing and orgnanized ‘ter­ror’ and ‘anti-​​terror’ groups and grow­ing all under satel­lites while run­ning tril­lions behind it in fraud, leav­ing every part of soci­ety baren, while set­ting up ‘new’ mil­i­taries, deals, orga­nized crime; and those who are will­ing to val­i­date it as ‘peace’ and other terms which never come about, nor democ­racy; all being indicted and in line for indict­ments and ‘pri­vately’ run as ‘state’ Over 50 tril­lion a year in fraud with tax payer dol­lars and lives. not one mil­i­tary, UN, USAID, national area of gov­ern­ment, busi­ness, non­govern­ment not indicted or will be in line for it for run­ning the crime money. Every bit of it, totally ran by a only a few while dis­sem­i­nat­ing claims of ‘peace’ The destruc­tion is well ahead of any ‘reform’ or fix­ing. Over 50 mil­lion dis­placed by mort­gage fraud and crimes in the U.S. last year, and over 50 mil­lion indicted for obstruc­tions of jus­tice, orga­nized hate crimes, includ­ing mil­i­tary, war all under satel­lites grow­ing fraud; more than 50 times the amount of ‘war’ and hate groups from the 1920’s at which time there also was used ‘Foreign legions’ in France, and else­where all on their very own pub­lic and oth­ers; to believe the Patriotic plore and ‘hate’ and ‘war.’ Even the ‘Empire’ is now just a vac­cu­um­ing, of every dime in radi­a­tion, chem­i­cal, drug­ging using all agents, gangs. All agen­cies used as pri­vate dol­lars and money, includ­ing the tor­ture facil­i­ties and prison pro­grams, and kid­nap­pings, even legal kid­nap­pings resort­ing to using mil­i­tary. This has taken place again, non­stop run­ning crime money for over 50 years, and increas­ing. Crime money doesn’t have full brains.

    Reply
  42. osama says:
    June 7, 2008 at 12:19 pm

    go go gad­get
    gota love them nuckel heads
    usa is soon to be a third world coun­try if we allow the things that are going on like they are
    im ready for most any­thing are you.
    time for a all out rev­e­lu­tion­ary war in this coun­try.
    get rid of w dc and start all over
    vote ron paul

    Reply
  43. adad says:
    September 23, 2008 at 1:30 am

    thinks for share.
    http://​www​.MakeChineseFood​.com — learn­ing how to make chi­nese food, Chinese Food Recipes, Chinese cui­sine, low carb? low fat?low calo­ries and healthy Chinese food cook­ing recipes.

    Reply
  44. Yerik says:
    July 12, 2009 at 1:02 pm

    Hi guys. Level with your child by being hon­est. Nobody spots a phony quicker than a child.
    I am from Spain and now study English, please tell me right I wrote the fol­low­ing sen­tence: ““
    Thank :D Yerik.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage