DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Polmar's Perspective » India’s Navy Expanding Rapidly

India’s Navy Expanding Rapidly

indian-navy.jpg

While Chinese naval mod­ern­iza­tion efforts are cap­tur­ing the atten­tion of Western naval offi­cials and ana­lysts as well as jour­nal­ists and even blog­gers, lit­tle atten­tion is being given to the Indian Navy’s mas­sive expan­sion effort. Mohammed Ahmedullah, a lead­ing defense writer, wrote in Military Technology (2/​2008):

“With the sec­ond biggest Army in the world and a rapidly expand­ing Navy, India knows that it needs to mod­ern­ize fast, leapfrog in tech­nol­ogy and accu­mu­late mil­i­tary assets rapidly over the next decade if it has to safe­guard it grow­ing eco­nomic might with mil­i­tary teeth.…”

Within a decade the naval forces of India will include two large air­craft car­ri­ers, a large force of missile-​​armed sur­face war­ships, and a sig­nif­i­cant sub­ma­rine flotilla, prob­a­bly includ­ing three nuclear-​​propelled attack sub­marines. The ratio­nale for the expan­sion of the Indian fleet is to pro­tect the flow of oil to India’s rapidly grow­ing economy.

However, the Indian sub­con­ti­nent sits astride the tanker sail­ing routes from the Middle East to Chin and Japan. And, Indian naval forces could come into play with respect to the con­tin­u­ing tur­moil and quest for resources in Africa.

The cur­rent Indian Navy expan­sion pro­gram pro­vides for the reha­bil­i­ta­tion of the Soviet-​​built, 44,570-ton car­rier Admiral Gorshkov in a Russian ship­yard. That project is far behind sched­ule and over cost; the ship should be fully oper­a­tional about 2015. India has also begun con­struc­tion of an “air defense ship” — a 40,000-ton car­rier to be com­pleted about 2018. (India now oper­ates the 28,700-ton, ex-​​British VSTOL car­rier Hermes; she was orig­i­nally launched in 1953 and com­pleted in 1969, and has been exten­sively rebuilt.)

Now being pro­cured are advanced missile-​​armed destroy­ers and frigates. Some are being fit­ted with the highly-​​touted Israel Barak-​​8 air-​​defense system.

With respect to sub­marines, the Navy cur­rently oper­ates 14 rel­a­tively mod­ern sub­marines: four German Type 209/​1500 (built in Germany and India) and ten Russian-​​built Kilo/​Project 877EM. Some of the lat­ter are being fit­ted to fire the Russian-​​developed Klub-​​S submerged-​​launch, anti-​​ship mis­sile. However, there have been some prob­lems encoun­tered with that mod­i­fi­ca­tion to the submarines.

Six French-​​built Scorpene torpedo-​​attack sub­marines are under con­struc­tion in at the Mazagon Dockyard in Mumbai. These will replace the last of the Foxtrot/​Project 641 sub­marines oper­ated by India.

Most sig­nif­i­cant, India will again oper­ate nuclear-​​propelled sub­marines in the near future. Three Akula/​Project 971 torpedo-​​attack sub­marines are on order, being con­structed in Russia. These are 33-​​knot, rel­a­tively quiet sub­marines, capa­ble of oper­at­ing to 1,970 feet feet, armed with four 21-​​inch and four 25.5-inch tor­pedo tubes and car­ry­ing 40 tube-​​launched mis­siles and tor­pe­does. (India pre­vi­ously oper­ated a nuclear sub­ma­rine from 1988 to 1991, when a Soviet Charlie I/​Project 670 cruise mis­sile sub­ma­rine was leased to India. Soviet per­son­nel oper­ated the submarine’s reactor-​​propulsion plant.)

For the past two decades India has also been work­ing on the devel­op­ment of an indige­nous nuclear-​​propelled sub­ma­rine, offi­cially labeled the Advanced Technology Vessel (ATV). The project has encoun­tered numer­ous dif­fi­cul­ties, but there are reports that the first ATV sub­ma­rine is now under con­struc­tion at the Mazagon Dock Yard. The first of sev­eral such craft may be com­pleted as early as 2010. She will have a sub­merged dis­place­ment of some 7,000 tons and will carry cruise mis­siles as well as torpedoes.

The Indian Navy is also procur­ing advanced air­craft to sup­port fleet oper­a­tions: These include MiG-​​29K multi-​​role air­craft and Ka-​​31 air­borne early warn­ing heli­copters for the car­ri­ers, and land-​​based Il-​​38D mar­itime patrol aircraft.

Whereas in the past few decades the Indian Navy has relied upon Soviet and — to a lesser degree — British naval tech­nol­ogy, Indian lead­ers are shop­ping world-​​wide. Israeli, French, and South African as well as Russian weapons are being sought. And, the for­mer U.S. amphibi­ous ship Trenton (LPD 14) was trans­ferred to India in 2007 and it is likely that six Lockheed Martin C-​​130J Hercules air­craft will be acquired. Obviously, there are other U.S. naval plat­forms and sys­tems of inter­est to India.

Thus, the Indian Navy is under­go­ing a mas­sive expan­sion. By some cri­te­ria the naval expan­sion is greater than that of the other ser­vices. And, unlike the Chinese naval mod­ern­iza­tion, India’s efforts are tak­ing advan­tage of essen­tially all of the world’s naval tech­nolo­gies and are being under­taken with rel­a­tively lit­tle publicity.

– Norman Polmar

Share |

June 10th, 2008 | Polmar's Perspective | 289916 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/06/10/indias-navy-expanding-rapidly/India%27s+Navy+Expanding+Rapidly2008-06-10+13%3A06%3A10Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « How Do You Take Your COFEE? | Transonic Lift Concept in the Works » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Lefty says:
    June 10, 2008 at 9:52 am

    I find it inter­est­ing that India could have a bet­ter Soviet Navy than the Russians do.

    Reply
  2. Jeff says:
    June 10, 2008 at 10:21 am

    I still wish we could be closer allies with India. They seem to do a good job of keep­ing muli­ple ethic groups decent towards each other.

    Reply
  3. slntax says:
    June 10, 2008 at 11:06 am

    i think india will start to flex more and more its navel mus­cles. esp with the news of the not so secret chi­nese sub base on Hainan Island in the south china sea. india is depen­dent on oil from the mideast to keep its econ­omy going. the last thing they need is the chi­nese to dom­i­nate the indian ocean. i think it would be smart for us, japan, korea and aus­tralia to get together and ensure indian and pacific trade routes.

    Reply
  4. turin says:
    June 10, 2008 at 11:32 am

    I would be very inter­ested in some cred­i­ble sources con­cern­ing the alleged three Akulas for India. This is a rumour thats going on for more than ten years now and it never went beyond any­thing more than hearsay. The author can even take credit for increas­ing the num­ber of phan­tom boats to three where before this num­ber was sup­posed to be one or two units. I fail to see any cur­rent or fore­see­able sig­nif­i­cance in this issue.

    Reply
  5. ohwilleke says:
    June 10, 2008 at 11:38 am

    Indian naval expan­sion has received less atten­tion because India is not in an expan­sion­ist polit­i­cal pos­ture. It doesn’t lay claim to Sri Lanka or the Maldives, for exam­ple.
    Its bound­ary dis­putes with China and the con­flict in Kashmir are in places where naval power is irrel­e­vant.
    China, in con­trast, lays claim to Taiwan and is per­ceived as a threat by our allies Japan and South Korea.
    India is also one of the most demo­c­ra­tic of the post-​​Colonial nations in the world, for all the warts that come with a democ­rac­tic form of gov­ern­ment.
    Far more trou­bling than Indian mil­i­tary expan­sion, is the fact that we are help­ing mak­ing the Pakistani mil­i­tary more capa­ble. Pakistan is a far less reli­able ally than India, is shel­ter­ing Osama bin Laden, has nuclear weapons, still has a per­va­sively mil­i­tar­ily influ­enced gov­ern­ment, and is just tran­si­tion­ing out of an out­right mil­i­tary dic­ta­tor­ship.
    Pakistan also has lit­tle case for a strong mil­i­tary. India has no designs on it. China’s ter­ri­to­r­ial dis­putes with Pakistan (if any) are far less seri­ous than those between India and China. And, Afghanistan is in no posi­tion to threaten Pakistan. Iran could be a threat to Pakistan but has no recent his­tory of hos­til­i­ties with it.

    Reply
  6. Marine1 says:
    June 10, 2008 at 12:38 pm

    Excellent. Our bul­wark against the Chinese and Russians is get­ting stronger. India is as des­per­ate for oil as we are, prob­a­bly more, and that works beau­ti­fully to our advan­tage. Not to men­tion they could help us crush the Iranians (who I don’t con­sider a threat)to try out their new toys.

    Reply
  7. James says:
    June 10, 2008 at 1:50 pm

    howly crap ohwilleke!!!!
    I agree dant see why we are even try­ing to be buddy buddy with pak­istan, india hates pak­istan pak­istan hates us evil amer­i­cans and india loves amer­ica. Hell sell them every­thing but the iowa class BB.
    my big prob­lem with india is theres still that damn class system.

    Reply
  8. James says:
    June 10, 2008 at 1:51 pm

    OMFG! spell check

    Reply
  9. Rix says:
    June 10, 2008 at 2:46 pm

    This ought to give Beijing some­thing to think about. Even bet­ter if we sell India some sensors…

    Reply
  10. Shantanu Chatterjee says:
    June 16, 2008 at 2:44 am

    Its the old­est rule in state­craft ‘enemy of my enemy is my friend’.
    India’s biggest threats for the forsee­able future are:
    1.A pow­er­ful china out to grab its ter­ri­toy across its vast bor­der.
    2.Terrorism
    3.High oil prices
    I believe you guys can feel our pain.

    Reply
  11. kotla says:
    July 26, 2008 at 4:40 pm

    i think the two three major things IN needs to do in next ten years is induct three carriers,six akula class nuc subs and air recon­nais­sance aircratfs

    Reply
  12. jayadeepan says:
    December 16, 2008 at 2:13 pm

    india fought islam for 1000 years and still stand­ing up proud ( even though indias soul suf­fered big time ) india fought british after islamic inva­sion for 100 years. after that india become poor and islam started pro­duc­ing like rabits ever since. hin­dus who fought proudly with wepons were in spir­ti­tual reha­bil­i­ta­tion after 1000 years war( thank god for all hindu gods incar­nated to fight islam and foriegn inva­sion) there is a say­ing when hindu gods wakes up the whole wolrd wakes up. and the caste sis­tem . it is the wor­rior caste who fought against islam for 500 years and after 500 years it is wor­rior caste who god con­vertred to sikh reli­gion who fought against bloody islam . hin­dus did not invite islam to india . islam invaded india. AND those kings of islam did not sleep until they have at one thou­sand inno­cent civil­ian brah­min is killed for 1000 years they did this. pro­tugese burned hindu brah­mins alive and they killed even 2 weaks old babies. so who ever do not like those gods who fight those ter­rerist it is there prob­lem . in the end what we fought for 1000 years will win. thank god for amer­ica to realise the true war and light up the whole world . true bat­tle is towords the ide­ol­ogy not peo­ple. some peo­ple will get killed dur­ing this bat­tle . but truth is these ide­ol­ogy of killing inno­cent peo­ple will be thrown into ara­bian ocian

    Reply
  13. Md Sabir says:
    June 28, 2009 at 4:40 pm

    Relation between India and Russia is becom­ing more of a busi­ness part­ner than a just buyer-seller.Example-Brahmos mis­sile, Sukhoi-​​FGFa etc. Even its said the build­ing of AkulaK-​​152 Nerpa (NATO Akkula-2)was funded by India as it became a moth­ball in mid-​​90s for hav­ing no funds for car­ry­ing on. Now India is buy­ing from USA, Israil and other coun­tries too.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      LOL Still all this pissing an moaning about the editorial...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare that...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Islame isn't a race, genius……
      Philo
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I sure as hell don't need to have someone take pictures of me...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "Now please tell me where in the Bible Jesus or his disciples...
      DualityOfMan
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage