<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Missile Defense on the Skids</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2008/06/12/missile-defense-on-the-skids/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/06/12/missile-defense-on-the-skids/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:24:42 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: John</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/06/12/missile-defense-on-the-skids/#comment-181249</link> <dc:creator>John</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:40:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2909#comment-181249</guid> <description>This is what happens when your funding is guaranteed.  Who cares how long it takes to field the thing?  People are making big bucks dragging their feet while it&#039;s in dvelopment.  What&#039;s the hurry? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what happens when your funding is guaranteed.  Who cares how long it takes to field the thing?  People are making big bucks dragging their feet while it’s in dvelopment.  What’s the hurry?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brad</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/06/12/missile-defense-on-the-skids/#comment-41051</link> <dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 12:57:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2909#comment-41051</guid> <description>Any sort of professional that uses the word &quot;alarming&quot; and &quot;appears&quot; and especially &quot;raises questions&quot; is suspect. Where&#039;s the danger? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any sort of professional that uses the word “alarming” and “appears” and especially “raises questions” is suspect.<br /> Where’s the danger?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: navblk4</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/06/12/missile-defense-on-the-skids/#comment-181248</link> <dc:creator>navblk4</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:53:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2909#comment-181248</guid> <description>Not to get off track here, however I have researched various mishaps over the decades. It seems SON can invoke by way of lawful estoppel, non disclosure via common law. What I find interesting is so far I only see the president (explicitly) being the decision maker in this area and have not yet found lawful authority to delegate? However I&#039;m not working in this area now. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to get off track here, however I have researched various mishaps over the decades.<br /> It seems SON can invoke by way of lawful<br /> estoppel, non disclosure via common law.<br /> What I find interesting is so far I only see<br /> the president (explicitly) being the decision<br /> maker in this area and have not yet found lawful<br /> authority to delegate? However I’m not working<br /> in this area now.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SMSgt Mac</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/06/12/missile-defense-on-the-skids/#comment-41049</link> <dc:creator>SMSgt Mac</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:44:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2909#comment-41049</guid> <description>McCain: Change the country can survive </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain: Change the country can survive</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SMSgt Mac</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/06/12/missile-defense-on-the-skids/#comment-181247</link> <dc:creator>SMSgt Mac</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:40:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2909#comment-181247</guid> <description>Well I&#039;m sitting in an airport for the 4th time in 2 days, PO&#039;d already about missing a flight... and then I read this. I better check my BP. Let&#039;s get the &#039;not testing&#039; problem straight shall we? Is the problem the fact that there are things being found before the scheduled testing that could cause a problem, and therefore the test is being prevented from failure and more alarmingly to foes: not providing free fodder for complaint and second-guessing. What rational person would think the test should have gone forward without the ability to collect the data? Can Ms. Sampson explain why she thinks a problem with a test-specific piece of hardware that is not central to the core functionality of the system, and will not be part of an operational missile, reflects in any way shape or form to the quality of the system under test? How does catching this problem before a test reflect poorly on the test organization? Fine, &#039;test&#039; is behind schedule. Complain about that. But don&#039;t challenge the technical merits of the system based upon a piece of test hardware. I smell liberal arts grads with zero technical expertise. Or worse yet: former &#039;operators&#039; without a clue as to how things work behind the &quot;magic&quot; buttons. Lunacy...and a prime example of why I never cite CDI for ANY reason. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I’m sitting in an airport for the 4th time in 2 days, PO’d already about missing a flight… and then I read this. I better check my BP.<br /> Let’s get the ‘not testing’ problem straight shall we? Is the problem the fact that there are things being found before the scheduled testing that could cause a problem, and therefore the test is being prevented from failure and more alarmingly to foes: not providing free fodder for complaint and second-guessing. What rational person would think the test should have gone forward without the ability to collect the data? Can Ms. Sampson explain why she thinks a problem with a test-specific piece of hardware that is not central to the core functionality of the system, and will not be part of an operational missile, reflects in any way shape or form to the quality of the system under test? How does catching this problem before a test reflect poorly on the test organization?<br /> Fine, ‘test’ is behind schedule. Complain about that. But don’t challenge the technical merits of the system based upon a piece of test hardware. I smell liberal arts grads with zero technical expertise. Or worse yet: former ‘operators’ without a clue as to how things work behind the “magic” buttons.<br /> Lunacy…and a prime example of why I never cite CDI for ANY reason.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Roy Smith</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/06/12/missile-defense-on-the-skids/#comment-181246</link> <dc:creator>Roy Smith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:28:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2909#comment-181246</guid> <description>We should worry about Baraq Hussein &quot;the Handsome One By Whom Islam Will Fill the Earth(the actual meaning of &quot;Baraq Hussein&quot;,&quot;Hussein&quot; meaning &quot;Handsome One&quot; &amp; &quot;Baraq&quot;,also spelled &quot;Barack&quot;,being the name of the winged horse of Muhammad by which Islam is to fill the world and overcome it)&quot; Obama.But,I also have my doubts about John McChurian Candidate being a good president. Question,are the Pentagon &amp; Congress really,seriously trying to get our missile defense system to work? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should worry about Baraq Hussein “the Handsome One By Whom Islam Will Fill the Earth(the actual meaning of “Baraq Hussein”,“Hussein” meaning “Handsome One” &amp; “Baraq”,also spelled “Barack”,being the name of the winged horse of Muhammad by which Islam is to fill the world and overcome it)” Obama.But,I also have my doubts about John McChurian Candidate being a good president.<br /> Question,are the Pentagon &amp; Congress really,seriously trying to get our missile defense system to work?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: stephen russell</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/06/12/missile-defense-on-the-skids/#comment-181245</link> <dc:creator>stephen russell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:21:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2909#comment-181245</guid> <description>WTF BS is DC doing now (aside the JCA contract) with Missile defense. IE Rogue Missile defense aside to deter Incoming missiles from China. PRC China. Get the System UP &amp; Running. Purge the Old Blood, Hire New blood for project. Hire vets &amp; non vets. Get the System UP. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF BS is DC doing now (aside the JCA contract) with Missile defense.<br /> IE Rogue Missile defense aside to deter Incoming missiles from China.<br /> PRC China.<br /> Get the System UP &amp; Running.<br /> Purge the Old Blood, Hire New blood for project.<br /> Hire vets &amp; non vets.<br /> Get the System UP.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jeff Dulin</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/06/12/missile-defense-on-the-skids/#comment-181243</link> <dc:creator>Jeff Dulin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 02:03:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2909#comment-181243</guid> <description>I think we will beat this screwball O&#039;bhama, but mcCain&#039;s &quot;Coattails&quot; are so short, I fear we are going to loose a lot of very important ground in BOTH houses, not to mention loose the chance to appoint another Judge to the Court. McCain MUST find a good running mate and show more of us that he is not the liberal Manchurian Candidate I fear he is. JD </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we will beat this screwball O’bhama, but mcCain’s “Coattails” are so short, I fear we are going to loose a lot of very important ground in BOTH houses, not to mention loose the chance to appoint another Judge to the Court.<br /> McCain MUST find a good running mate and show more of us that he is not the liberal Manchurian Candidate I fear he is.<br /> JD</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Camp</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/06/12/missile-defense-on-the-skids/#comment-181242</link> <dc:creator>Camp</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:15:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2909#comment-181242</guid> <description>Well, it would appear that Sen.Obama is not a big supporter of missile defense... Maybe the MDA is just bracing for impact. http://youtube.com/watch?v=kRGru2CPC4E &quot;Second, I will cut tens of billions of dollars in wasteful spending. I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems. I will not weaponize space. I will slow our development of future combat systems.&quot; &quot;The Pentagon Gets Ready For President Obama&quot; http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htlead/articles/20080609.aspx </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it would appear that Sen.Obama is not a big supporter of missile defense… Maybe the MDA is just bracing for impact.<br /> <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=kRGru2CPC4E" rel="nofollow">http://youtube.com/watch?v=kRGru2CPC4E</a><br /> “Second, I will cut tens of billions of dollars in wasteful spending. I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems. I will not weaponize space. I will slow our development of future combat systems.“<br /> “The Pentagon Gets Ready For President Obama“<br /> <a href="http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htlead/articles/20080609.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htlead/articles/20080609.aspx</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chase</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/06/12/missile-defense-on-the-skids/#comment-181241</link> <dc:creator>Chase</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:22:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2909#comment-181241</guid> <description>Exactly....you got it right, grow a pair and hand out an asswhoppin </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly.…you got it right, grow a pair and hand out an asswhoppin</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 743/747 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 03:46:10 -->
