DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Around the Globe » Raw Footage of the Hit Inside Pakistan

Raw Footage of the Hit Inside Pakistan

– Christian

Share |

June 12th, 2008 | Around the Globe | 290793 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/06/12/raw-footage-of-the-hit-inside-pakistan/Raw+Footage+of+the+Hit+Inside+Pakistan2008-06-12+15%3A20%3A35Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Boeing Rethinking Plan To Back Out Of JCA | ALERT! » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Blogmasterpg says:
    June 12, 2008 at 11:19 am

    I’m ital­ian and i have many dif­fi­cul­ties to under­stand what voice saids… Can help me?PS: But it’s impressive!

    Reply
  2. Tartan69 says:
    June 12, 2008 at 11:36 am

    Why does the nar­ra­tor care so much about there being no mil­i­tary struc­tures or out­posts in the area?

    Reply
  3. DopplerDave says:
    June 12, 2008 at 11:37 am

    I thought “raw” footage was gen­er­ally devoid of water­marks and voice-​​overs.

    Reply
  4. slntax says:
    June 12, 2008 at 11:43 am

    the prob­lem is pak­istan they are help­ing the tal­iban while tak­ing bil­lions on mil­i­tary aid from us. we should just cut off aid to the pakistanis.

    Reply
  5. Foreign.Boy says:
    June 12, 2008 at 11:44 am

    Maybe the video was taken from a pre­sen­ta­tion on how to not cause col­lat­eral damage?

    Reply
  6. Jimbo Jones says:
    June 12, 2008 at 11:47 am

    good shoot­ing far as i’m concerned.

    Reply
  7. jeff says:
    June 12, 2008 at 11:48 am

    Blogmaster, the voice just says about 20 times that there are no struc­tures in the area. This empha­sizes the point that the peo­ple in the video are not guard­ing a bor­der cross­ing like Pakistan says they were.
    I say we ally our­selves with India and go nuts on these cra­zies. India has the man power and we have the technology.

    Reply
  8. Jose G. says:
    June 12, 2008 at 12:15 pm

    Quote {the prob­lem is pak­istan they are help­ing the tal­iban while tak­ing bil­lions on mil­i­tary aid from us. we should just cut off aid to the pak­ista­nis.}
    Then the US would be totally screwed in Afghanistan and will cost them even More then what it’s cost­ing them now!
    I think Pakistan should deploy the air­force to this area and any­thing within 1km of of Afghan side should be care­fully watched. Any closer then 500 meters should be Eliminated

    Reply
  9. C4Casey says:
    June 12, 2008 at 1:22 pm

    This looks like a ploy by Pakistan to get back at the U.S for accussing mem­bers of its gov­ern­ment for aid­ing the Taliban. I wouldn’t be sup­prised if those Pakistani sol­diers were killed by Taliban mor­tor or rocket fire. They’re just blaim­ing it on the U.S to deflect atten­tion away from pro-​​extremist ele­ments within their own government.

    Reply
  10. Foreign.Boy says:
    June 12, 2008 at 1:27 pm

    Pakistani,
    NATO isn’t just try­ing to stop the tal­iban.. its also try­ing to build a nation. Throwing 1000’s of land mines along a bor­der causes more prob­lems than it solves.

    Reply
  11. murc says:
    June 12, 2008 at 5:53 pm

    the video isn’t work­ing (on IE7 or FF).

    Reply
  12. Pakistani says:
    June 12, 2008 at 10:11 pm

    The US hasn’t been able to pacify Iraq (25 mil­lion pop­u­la­tion) in all these years
    There are over 10 mil­lion armed push­tuns in Fata alone… Overall Pakistan’s pop­u­la­tion is 165–170 mil­lion.
    Do the math
    The sit­u­a­tion in Afghanistan hasn’t changed in 7 years. You guys could prob­a­bly stay there for another 5 years, maybe?
    While the US is on the other side of the world; these guys live a cou­ple of hours bus ride from us.
    Lighting such a fire in your back yard is the most idi­otic thing imag­in­able.
    The stu­pid­ity of the entire thing is that a polic­ing prob­lem has been allowed to become a never end­ing armed conflict.

    Reply
  13. earmeat says:
    June 13, 2008 at 12:38 am

    good shoot­ing far as i’m con­cerned.
    Posted by: Jimbo Jones
    Agreed, done by the book. USAF put war­heads on foreheads.

    Reply
  14. earmeat says:
    June 13, 2008 at 12:38 am

    good shoot­ing far as i’m con­cerned.
    Posted by: Jimbo Jones
    Agreed, done by the book. USAF put war­heads on foreheads.

    Reply
  15. Jose G. says:
    June 13, 2008 at 11:32 am

    Also, the video keeps say­ing that no “build­ing or post” was hit. The US Gov’t says that there were 12 bombs dropped. I don’t see a footage of 12 bombs here??? Why don’t they show the video of the bomb that hit the Pakistani post???

    Reply
  16. Aussie ArmChairGeneral says:
    June 14, 2008 at 10:41 am

    Jeff thinks the US should ally itself with India “and go nuts on these cra­zies” [i.e. Pakistan]. Jeff seems to be for­get­ting that both India and Pakistan are nuclear pow­ers. The guy who calls him­self Pakistani on the other hand thinks the prob­lem is that this inci­dent took place inside Pakistani ter­ri­tory. The real prob­lem for both Afghanistan and the US and coali­tion in Afghanistan is that Pakistan is pro­vid­ing a sanc­tu­ary for cross bor­der incur­sions by the Taliban and Al-​​Qaeda. A basic tenet of counter insur­gency is to deny your oppo­nents such a sanc­tu­ary. In short the sit­u­a­tion as it stands is intol­er­a­ble for the US. The dif­fi­culty is that the US has no good options. The US and ISAF forces must find a way to break up these sanc­tu­ar­ies or face an insur­gency that will bleed them dry in the long run and sap their polit­i­cal will. Pakistan is a reluc­tant ally but turn­ing it into an active enemy would be a huge gamble.

    Reply
  17. freefallingbomb says:
    June 14, 2008 at 10:49 am

    To the poster “Pakistani”:
    The video func­tion in your link is dis­abled as well. It seems that that video has been removed every­where. I don’t know what’s going on. Maybe the U.S. Americans don’t want any­one (who hasn’t down­loaded the video already) to see it any­more, afraid of some poten­tial back­lash … should have thought ear­lier of that (me too).
    About your state­ment “Lighting such a fire in your back yard is the most idi­otic thing imag­in­able.”:
    I don’t mean to dis­re­spect the few truly patri­otic and heroic Muslims fight­ing in Iraq and in Afghanistan for their coun­tries’ lib­er­a­tions and for min­i­mally legit­i­mate gov­ern­ments too, not for some Fata Morgana gov­ern­ments set up by the same Jews and U.S. Americans who com­mit­ted 11 /​ 9 them­selves to invade the Middle East. But today, on the 14th of June of 2008, the Nazis have already been occu­py­ing Iraq for 1.913 days, and Iraq, with it’s pop­u­la­tion of 29.267.000 inhab­i­tants, a coun­try the size of France and awash in weapons, explo­sives and fight­ing expe­ri­ence from the for­mer fourth biggest Army in the World and frac­ti­cide ter­ror­ists etc.etc., has only been able to pro­duce an aver­age of 2,1 dead Nazis per day! And it doesn’t even take any fancy Iranian “E.F.P.“‘s or other con­tra­banded high-​​tech crap to anni­hi­late THEM ALL . It doesn’t even require any intel­li­gence at all, to be hon­est! Mathematically it only requires ONE IN EVERY 209 IRAQIS to pick up any old weapon and hit or stab an invader in the face, a sin­gle time in all these 5 years, even at the expense of his own life after­wards ( IF it even takes that much… ) ! Is that REALLY ask­ing too much of an entire pop­u­la­tion of 29.267.000 Iraqis — or even of two, who already lost over a mil­lion inno­cent civil­ians any­way, and com­pletely in vain? From this angle of view, how do you explain that today there are even any U.S. Americans and “Israelis” still left in the whole Middle East? If you Muslims were made of the same stuff as the proud Vietnamese or even as the Japanese, life would be rosy(ier) for you now!
    This isn’t what I call War or even “Resistance”… In my coun­try we call that cow­ardice, col­lab­o­ra­tion with the enemy, cring­ing, eter­nal shame, pros­ti­tu­tion, gay­ness, etc. .
    What next: Seeking good rela­tions with “Israel” too?
    I’m SOOO sorry for you…
    Salem aleikum.

    Reply
  18. Shantanu Chatterjee says:
    June 16, 2008 at 8:44 am

    front line ally in the war on ter­ror is also keep­ing osama bin laden alive and kick­ing inside their ter­ri­tory.
    Their hope is obama comes to power and with­draws from afghanistan and they then rename the tal­iban and let it cease power in Afghanistan and use des­per­ately poor afghan jehadis to stir things up in Kashmir.
    I say we declare balochis­tan an inde­pen­dant coun­try that way we deny china a base in the per­sian gulf(Gawdar) and cut these jok­ers down to size.
    That’s china’s strat­egy keep a half mad coun­try with nukes in the back­yard of both India and Japan(Pakistan & N Korea) so that they can­not form a strong explicit alliance in the US.
    Let’s smash Pakistan once and for all and then together deal with the biggest threat to free­dom and democ­racy in the 21st cen­tury together:China.
    Strong rumors sug­gests that the Pakistanis have agreed to sell nuclear war­heads to the Saudis in exchange for aid and cheap oil.
    I mean this is the coun­try which started Iran’s nuclear pro­gram by sell­ing them cen­trifuges and an A bomb design again for money.

    Reply
  19. VCVCXV says:
    December 22, 2008 at 7:43 am

    Google
    Google
    Google
    ?
    Google
    Google
    Google
    Google
    Google ?
    Google ?
    Google ?
    Google ?
    Google ?
    Google

    Reply
  20. leekien says:
    August 26, 2009 at 3:51 am

    ??
    ????
    ??
    ???? ??
    ????
    ??????
    ?? ??????
    ???
    ???
    ????
    ???? ?????
    ?
    ?? ??????
    ?? ??????
    ?? ??????
    ??? ??????
    ?? ??????
    sod
    ???
    ???? ???
    ?? ????? ?????
    ????
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ?DVD
    ?DVD
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ???? ??
    ???? ??
    ???? ????
    ??? ????
    ??? ????
    ??? ????

    Reply
  21. leekien says:
    August 26, 2009 at 3:53 am

    ?????
    ??? ????
    ??????
    ????
    ???????
    ??? ??????
    ??? ???
    ????? ????
    ????? ??????
    ????
    ????????
    ????
    ??
    ????????
    ???
    ?????
    ????? ??

    Reply
  22. rock says:
    October 4, 2009 at 3:24 am

    Women’s Supra Shoes
    Classic Supra Skateboarding Men Shoes
    Supra Skateboarding Men Shoes on sale
    Supra Skateboarding Men Shoes gold price

    Reply
  23. rockbily says:
    October 27, 2009 at 7:06 am

    Ugg boot
    ugg night­fall
    UGG Classic Crochet
    Cheap UGG
    UGG Sundance

    Reply
  24. rockbily says:
    October 27, 2009 at 7:08 am

    http://​www​.weblove​store​.com Cheap UGG

    Reply
  25. rockbily says:
    October 27, 2009 at 7:08 am

    http://​www​.weblove​store​.com Cheap UGG

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Sexing up the Headline
      a href="http://www.game4pow er.com">Buy wow...
      buy wow  gold
    • New Army PEO on the way
      To get our AAA quality shoes at reasonable price, Your...
      nike air force ones
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage