DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Cyber-warfare » What Constitutes an Act of Cyber War?

What Constitutes an Act of Cyber War?

cyber-attack.jpg

Throughout history wars have been triggered by events. Being at war is a state or condition. To be legal, a war must be declared by a branch of the government entrusted by the Constitution with this power. In the Constitution of the United States, Article I provides Congress the power to declare war. War is defined as a contention by force; or the art of paralyzing the forces of an enemy. An act of war is typically defined as an aggressive act that constitutes a serious challenge or threat to national security, armed conflict, whether or not war has been declared, between two or more nations; or armed conflict between military forces of any origin. This frames the discussions around traditional war. In the physical sense it is easy to define such infractions; enemy troops crossing another countries border, military strikes by missiles or bombs, basically you know it when you see it. What constitutes a serious challenge and a threat to our national security in cyber space? That is much more difficult to define.

In the U.S. Army’s Cyber Operations and Cyber Terrorism Handbook 1.02 I found the following reference to the definition of Cyber Warfare & Terrorism: “the premeditated use of disruptive activities, or the threat thereof, against computers and/or networks, with the intention to cause harm or to further social, ideological, religious, political or similar objectives or to intimidate any person in furtherance of such objectives.” This was an excerpt from an article I wrote back in 2003 when the issue of cyber war was in its infancy. While this frames acts of cyber war, in retrospect it does not address a measure of the disruptive acts or provide guidance assess if individual acts, or a collection of acts rise to the level to be considered an act of cyber war.

If a foreign government hacks a sensitive system of another government and accesses security and defense information, is that an act of cyber war? If so, that has already occurred. If a foreign government hacks a sensitive system of another government and places software on the system that collects data and sends it back, is that an act of war? If military personal from a foreign government infiltrates another nation’s networks or systems through the use of counterfeit hardware and monitors communications, is that an act of cyber war? Both are certainly acts of espionage and have already taken place. The factor that will determine if an act or acts of cyber attack rise to the level of an act of war rests in the magnitude of disruption that accompany the acts. Adding to the complexity is the fact that much of our critical infrastructure that are prime targets for cyber attacks are owned or operated by the private sector not the government. This infrastructure in some cases carries military communications, supports civilian emergency services as well business and consumer services. An attack on the infrastructure impacts multiple segments. The question of what constitutes an act of cyber war remains unanswered.

Given that we are in relatively new territory, each individual attack must be examined and the forensic evidence weighed to determine the source of attack. Little physical evidence will ever exist that you can hold up and point to or take a picture of and say “they did this.” Much debate is currently taking place over the legality of cyber warfare tactics and their use. Is a cyber attack on our networks and systems an act of war? Are acts of cyber espionage a violation of international law? It is better we investigate and answer these questions now rather than reacting to cyber events in the heat of the moment when they occur.

– Kevin Coleman

Share |

June 18th, 2008 | Cyber-warfare | 391014 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/06/18/what-constitutes-an-act-of-cyber-war/What+Constitutes+an+Act+of+Cyber+War%3F2008-06-18+15%3A58%3A46Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Huge Win For T-Sat Builders | Boeing Wins! » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Janiz98 says:
    June 18, 2008 at 12:24 pm

    An important discussion and I couldn’t agree more. Not just when to signify the beginning of a war but how does the Judeo-Christian tradition of a Just War fit in?
    LOAC, Geneva Convention, etc, etc…
    In terms of office water-cooler discussion: This forms the x and y axis of where computer nerds and history/polisci dorks meet.
    And God bless everyone who resembles this remark:)

    Reply
  2. nb says:
    June 18, 2008 at 12:35 pm

    Another question: if the US and say NATO, determined China and/or Russia were waging cyber-war, what would be the political result of a response like cutting off all access to the internet for those countries — perhaps even cutting the lines themselves in a punitive action? Yes, I recognize there would be “leaks”, but the re-routing of traffic would end up with severe bottlenecks paralyzing internet traffic. Would this be considered an overt act of war and what might it esclate to?
    Obviously, I’m ignoring US and NATO countries’ business connections…

    Reply
  3. DS says:
    June 18, 2008 at 1:05 pm

    I would say that any infiltration, regardless of how it’s done, would constitute an act of war if it can be directly linked to loss of human life. If not, it’s simply spycraft, and it will be taken care of outside of the public eye.

    Reply
  4. Janiz98 says:
    June 18, 2008 at 1:28 pm

    >I would say that any infiltration, regardless of how it’s done, would constitute an act of war if it can be directly linked to loss of human life.
    So do we launch a major investigation every time the ASIM box goes off? Oh, and what kind of investigation, one handled by DoD or DoJ?
    How do we discern the difference between an act of war and a criminal action?
    The simple answer is intent.
    The formal answer is proof.
    Sounds great until we worry about how to implement it.
    We have a tough enough time bringing cybercriminals to justice because we require evidence that will stand up in a court of law. How about an international court?
    If we respond to what we perceive to be an act of war, we need to provide proof that we were responding and not initiating. I mean, there are a few countries (everyone knows their names so I won’t bother writing it) who routinely probe our networks, taking full advantage of the gray area where our laws and international laws have not clearly defined.
    When do we consider something has crossed the line? Where is that line?

    Reply
  5. Kevin says:
    June 18, 2008 at 2:25 pm

    So did the hacking of the computers of the Senators’ by the Chinese constitute an act of war? Did the theft of 27 tera bytes of data form DoD in 2007 equate to an act of war?
    Based on some of the comments the answer appears to be yes!
    So does that mean we are at war?

    Reply
  6. marla says:
    June 18, 2008 at 2:46 pm

    I was in your presentation at the Disaster Management Conference in Toronto on Monday. I loved it and this site is a great addition to the info you provided!

    Reply
  7. Hooded swan says:
    June 18, 2008 at 9:18 pm

    A very good question & even more confusing in the larger context:
    1) 10s of 1000s of troops dead in Korea & Vietnam, 1000s more in Iraq, not 1 declaration of war
    2) Israel attacks the Liberty in ’67, US aid to Israel increases
    3) North Korea seizes the Pueblo in ’69, they “get a by” on account of the Vietnam War
    4) Don’t we all want to forget the events before after the bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut?
    5) The Iraqis attack the Stark in ’87, we go to war against Iran instead
    6) It’s too early to talk about the invasion of Iraq with any detachment. Eventually we will be able to.
    Before you tell me what is or isn’t a cyber act of war, can you tell me what is the significance of an act of war?

    Reply
  8. stephen russell says:
    June 18, 2008 at 9:36 pm

    Yes when Chinese openly attack US systems.
    When cyber terrorists assult key US systems.
    When finances Freeze IE ETF.
    Then we are at WAR.
    Time to rally the forces.
    24/7 war in cyberspace.
    Expand AF Cyber Command beyond the AF to the Navy 2nd.
    We are at war & it can cost us the economy alone.

    Reply
  9. mondo says:
    June 19, 2008 at 12:43 pm

    Human rights is a given, and laws addressing this internationally, when someone intrudes in some ones computer, to disrupt, crash a computer system with a virus or hacks information, this should be a crime, no country or agency is above this. I was hacked from China, my software traced this, it was done from 3 different locations, this was attached to pictures of merchandise, I was to sell! It took me 3 days for my computer to function normal. The motherboard later crashed!

    Reply
  10. freefallingbomb says:
    June 19, 2008 at 4:45 pm

    Why does this article here (as well as most of the posters who comment it) try to make any distinction between
    1) “war-like” (“war-triggering”?) computer espionage
    and
    2) (seemingly) “perfectly acceptable” electronic espionage (Echelon) and human espionage (U.S. Embassy staff) ?
    Both are preparation for war. For coherence’s sake, both should be dealt with equally.

    Reply
  11. Kevin says:
    June 20, 2008 at 10:18 am

    Free falling bomb
    There are many aspects to espionage and not all are preludes to war, for example, corporate espionage. One company conducting espionage operations on another is not a prelude to war. Espionage and spying goes on continuously and these acts have become so common they are accepted as a norm and not a leading event to war. If we were to say that all espionage is an event leading up to war, then we would have to say we are always at war because of how frequent espionage and spying is today. That was the reason I try to establish a very fine line between the two.

    Reply
  12. freefallingbomb says:
    June 20, 2008 at 12:53 pm

    To the poster “Kevin”:
    You wrote: “Espionage and spying goes on continuously and these acts have become so common they are accepted as a norm and not a leading event to war.“
    I’m sorry, but you just can’t defend such extreme, shocking, cynical realism and pragmatism towards all others and then simultaneously start your own essay with bomb(-ast)ic phrases like:
    “What Constitutes an Act of Cyber War? Throughout history wars have been triggered by events. Being at war is a state or condition.”,
    etc. etc. . There was also another recent article here on “defensetech-org” that seemed to try to justify U.S. American Airforce strikes against civilian hackers all over the World, imagine!
    What’s good for the goose (= the U.S.A.) is good for the gander/s (= Russia, China, any teen skater and his friends hacking into the Pentagon in a Cyber-Caf

    Reply
  13. Kevin says:
    June 20, 2008 at 3:17 pm

    To Free falling bomb
    I hate to break this news to you but — In testimony before congress High Ranking Government Officials have admitted that 27 tera bytes of DoD data was stolen via hacking from China in 2007. They went on to say that the Pentagon is attacked via cyber hacking 3 million times a day. On average within my corporate clients their systems are attacked over 1250 times a day and finally a government report stated that as many as 40% of computers in the U.S. have been compromised by bots and are part of “BotNets” and that 17% of the DDoS traffic that was used to attack Estonia last year origionated from the U.S
    SO with all those acts and no decalared cyber war yet I STAND BY MY STATEMENT
    and
    WE DO NOT HAVE AN ESTABLISHED SET OF CRITERIA THAT DEFINES AN ACT OF CYBER WAR!

    Reply
  14. Baniz says:
    September 5, 2008 at 1:33 am

    Cyber-war can be defined as a problem caused by a power equal to or more than your government. This problem has to take up more time that can be required to fix it.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Gees the price is on the roof already. Maybe we just...
      roland
    • Ft. Irwin, Where You At?
      I was the driver for BoB Gaygos, B Co 6/31st Commander....
      Ricky houltzhouser
    • Ft. Irwin, Where You At?
      Luis, I was Captain Gaydos, driver Sgt. Houltzhouser in...
      Ricky Houltzhouser
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      If you really want to win the war permanently, it will...
      steven
    • Cover Your Computer Mics and WebCams
      Another question, how would I physically obstruct the...
      Curious
    • Cover Your Computer Mics and WebCams
      whats a good way to physically cover my laptop webcam?...
      Curious
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      But, the Eurotrash airplane ISN'T better… The Boeing...
      WillyPete
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Gee, I wonder why? Oh! Maybe it's because the...
      WillyPete
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      It would also help, a LOT to 'limit' excess...
      WillyPete
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      And flush ALL those dollars already spent down the...
      WillyPete
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage