DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Cyber-warfare » Covering Up Cyber Assaults

Covering Up Cyber Assaults

cyber-map.jpg

Cyber attacks from indi­vid­u­als, orga­nized crime, extrem­ist groups, ter­ror­ists as well as nation states pose a sig­nif­i­cant threat to the national secu­rity of the United States. While many believe that this is a gov­ern­ment issue, closer analy­sis of the prob­lem sug­gests oth­er­wise. Any com­puter that is not prop­erly pro­tected can be com­pro­mised and used as a weapon against the sys­tem owner, busi­nesses and our econ­omy, the nation’s infra­struc­ture or in some rare cases our defenses. Personal, busi­ness and gov­ern­ment sys­tems are con­stantly under attack and the fre­quency and sophis­ti­ca­tion of the attacks is rapidly increasing.

The num­ber of new com­puter sys­tems threat sky­rock­eted nearly 570 per­cent from those iden­ti­fied in 2006. According to one 2007 com­puter secu­rity study, the aver­age annual loss reported by U.S. com­pa­nies increased by nearly 210 per­cent to $350,424 (per occurence) in 2007. The top three pri­mary sources of loss were finan­cial fraud, losses due to com­puter virus and sys­tem pen­e­tra­tion by out­siders. About 20 per­cent of the com­pa­nies report­ing secu­rity inci­dents said they have fallen vic­tim to tar­geted mal­ware attacks. Nearly 1.2 mil­lion dif­fer­ent pieces of mal­ware have been iden­ti­fied and reside in the mal­ware repos­i­tory. Malware is soft­ware designed to infil­trate or dam­age a com­puter sys­tem with­out the owner’s informed con­sent. The term is a com­bi­na­tion of the words mali­cious and soft­ware. The expres­sion is a gen­eral term used by com­puter pro­fes­sion­als to mean a vari­ety of forms of hos­tile, destruc­tive, intru­sive, or annoy­ing soft­ware. The bad news is mal­ware is just one of the many threats to com­put­ers, sys­tems and networks.

A reader of the blog asked me “Why with all the U.S. tech­no­log­i­cal exper­tise are we so vul­ner­a­ble to these threats?” That is a great ques­tion. Considering a recent report sug­gested that around 90 per­cent of breaches could have been pre­vented, why are our com­puter sys­tems so at risk?

After giv­ing this a fair amount of thought I came to the fol­low­ing real­iza­tion. It is our atti­tude! For some rea­son there is an abun­dance of “I know more than they do” types in infor­ma­tion secu­rity. If that is not bad enough, the sec­ond most promi­nent atti­tude is “It can’t hap­pen here” fol­lowed closely by “I will address it when it hap­pens to me.”

Example 1 — A $13 bil­lion pub­li­cally traded cor­po­ra­tion has five full time staff assigned to infor­ma­tion secu­rity. When I asked the Director how he spent his time he said by far most was in the Human Resources Department and with cor­po­rate lawyers.

Example 2 — A sys­tems design and devel­op­ment orga­ni­za­tion that ser­vices part of our nation’s infra­struc­ture was briefed on the issues and threats of cyber attack. Numerous exam­ples were pro­vided to that orga­ni­za­tion that showed their indus­try had already expe­ri­enced cyber attacks. In addi­tion, a high level overview of their oper­a­tional pro­ce­dures resulted in the iden­ti­fi­ca­tion of two crit­i­cal vul­ner­a­bil­i­ties that exposed the sys­tems to com­pro­mise. The orga­ni­za­tion addressed one of those issues and decided to take a wait and see approach to address­ing the other.

Example 3 — A secu­rity con­sult­ing firm con­tacted me as an advi­sor. They were brought in to review secu­rity and rec­om­mend changes of a pub­li­cally traded com­pany. During their work they dis­cov­ered the com­pany had been breached. They had found a “bot” attached to an Oracle data­base. The “bot” col­lected infor­ma­tion about the man­u­fac­tur­ing cost of the company’s prod­ucts. They approached the CIO with the facts and the Sarbanes-​​Oxley issues, he refused to com­mu­ni­cate the issue to the senior exec­u­tives and then can­celled their contract.

Well, we don’t know more than all the hack­ers do. This is a highly dynamic threat envi­ron­ment that even the top secu­rity pro­fes­sional say is “chal­leng­ing.” The “it can’t hap­pen here” atti­tude is insane. One vet­eran US Special Agent in cyber­crime inves­ti­ga­tion pub­li­cally stated how com­pa­nies do their best to cover up cor­po­rate espi­onage and insider theft. He went on to say he had seen entire cor­po­rate net­works of over 100,000 sys­tems com­pletely com­pro­mised and hun­dreds of thou­sands of files exfil­trated and not dis­closed. The fact is, if all sys­tem breaches were reported the secu­rity met­rics would be much worse that the ones reported ear­lier here. So it not only can hap­pen here, it prob­a­bly already did and got cov­ered up.

– Kevin Coleman

Share |

June 30th, 2008 | Cyber-warfare | 392916 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/06/30/covering-up-cyber-assaults/Covering+Up+Cyber+Assaults2008-06-30+12%3A40%3A46Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « The Sunday Paper (Imminent Threat Edition) | Development For B-​​52 Jammer Continues » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Ali says:
    June 30, 2008 at 10:12 am

    maybe inter­est­ing for you !! i am a secu­rity admin for one of the IRANIAN biggest comapny (yes your old enemy !!! ha ha ha). one of our servers was under attack for 2 day , some­one tried to extract info about com­pany activ­ity that is pub­licly acces­si­ble but not con­tain sen­si­tive information.the attack was not DOS , that was some kind of unau­tho­rized access.the inter­est­ing thin­ngs was attack was sourced from almost 30 coun­rty in dif­fer­ent region.hard to find who is really behind the attack but we find the proper way to block the attack.i belive the most threat against iran­ian com­puter sys­tem come from US.pretending that you are at high risk more than the coun­tries you named them adver­saries is like a joke.while most high-​​tech espe­cially com­puter related tech­nol­ogy come from US , most threats come from US.for etc what china can do while Windows code owned by MS and the most impor­tant , sophis­ti­cated linux ker­nel secu­rity , SELinux come from NSA !!! (i always dis­able it when i build my own linux kernel.who read the source code of SELinux entirely ? ) . but as your all time reader i awlays love your website.i think being enemy in cyber world is more bet­ter than reall war.who know , maybe we , in near future become friends.thks

    Reply
  2. pau says:
    June 30, 2008 at 3:12 pm

    Places such as military.com,navyseals.com,myspace.com are
    heav­ily hacked already…I’ve been deal­ing with it on my ids etc…It’s usu­ally VOIP Virtual etc.

    Reply
  3. pau says:
    June 30, 2008 at 3:14 pm

    Ali! Re-​​read your post,it doesn’t have a core!

    Reply
  4. Mongo says:
    June 30, 2008 at 10:16 pm

    That pic­ture is from the game Uplink. It’s a good game if any­one is interested.

    Reply
  5. Anjar Priandoyo says:
    July 1, 2008 at 2:05 am

    Nice infor­ma­tion thanks, quite sur­prise see the num­ber increased dou­bled even triple every year

    Reply
  6. Kevin says:
    July 1, 2008 at 8:03 am

    Ali
    I think you took a great first step on the path to friend­ship.
    As for your attack. Based on what you said in the post, it looks like a bot­net was used in the assault on your servers. That is becom­ming more com­mon now days. There are an esti­mated 150 mil­lion com­put­ers around the world that have been com­pro­mised and have bots implanted in them. Sourcing the attack has become nearly impos­si­ble given the use of botnets.

    Reply
  7. Kevin says:
    July 1, 2008 at 10:16 am

    Who is to blame you ask WE ALL AHARE IN THIS ONE.

    Reply
  8. JE says:
    July 1, 2008 at 1:25 pm

    US tech­no­log­i­cal exper­tise? Something like 60% of our engi­neers are for­eign born — young Americans just want to smoke pot, skate­board, become mar­ket­ing or psy­chol­ogy majors etc..
    Whatever tech­no­log­i­cal edge we still have is due to the fact that we were until recently (per­haps still are, but less so) a nice place to move too..

    Reply
  9. Archchancellor says:
    July 1, 2008 at 6:55 pm

    As Mongo men­tioned, the photo is from the com­puter game Uplink. For any­one who wants a crash course in how rudi­men­tary hack­ing works, try play­ing the game for just 30 min­utes and you’ll have a solid idea.

    Reply
  10. J.Noose says:
    July 3, 2008 at 7:49 pm

    I dis­agree. Playing the game Uplink for half an hour is *not* a crash course in how hack­ing works. One might learn a lit­tle about con­ceal­ing one’s phys­i­cal loca­tion by “bounc­ing” a sig­nal from Moscow to Tokyo to Seoul before attack­ing a tar­get in Dallas. Thus the techs in Dallas would look for sus­pects in Korea or Japan when they should be look­ing in Russia.
    There is a stan­dard CISSP course. Tell your boss to pay for it. Take it and pass. Then you will have a basic knowl­edge of hacking.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    Recent Comments
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      They are going to have to look at the whole...
      Wembley
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Just look at this " picture " for a moment. The...
      Zandor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      I know LOSAT seemed awesome but wasn't it cancelled? I...
      JimboJones
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Yes you're quite right, I get to witness...
      JimboJones
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage