DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Grand Ole Osprey » Bell Bearish on 609

Bell Bearish on 609

bell609.jpg

Defense Tech friend and con­trib­u­tor Bob Cox of the Fort Worth Star Telegram has been a Bell-​​Boeing/​Osprey/​tiltrotor watch­dog for years. His lat­est story is quite a scoop and looks like a crush­ing blow to the civil­ian tiltro­tor indus­try in which Bell had invested a lot of effort and hope.

Bell Helicopter spent a half-​​century devel­op­ing tilt-​​rotor tech­nol­ogy and the V-​​22 Osprey, but the com­pa­nys once-​​enthusiastic com­mit­ment to build a sim­i­lar air­craft for the civil­ian mar­ket seems to have dimin­ished considerably.

The com­pany doesnt see a promis­ing mar­ket in the U.S. for the BA609 tilt-​​rotor air­craft and has shifted a larger share of the con­tin­u­ing devel­op­ment work to its Italian joint-​​venture part­ner, AgustaWestland.

Bell will con­tinue to pro­vide per­son­nel and some fund­ing for con­tin­ued devel­op­ment and test­ing of the BA609, but Mike Blake, exec­u­tive vice pres­i­dent of pro­grams for the com­pany, said AgustaWestland will pro­vide more cap­i­tal and take the lead in com­plet­ing flight test­ing and pro­duc­tion of the aircraft.

“I think Bell will always be involved in the 609 pro­gram in some way,” he said in an inter­view with the Star-​​Telegram. “How is to be determined.”

Officials of the two com­pa­nies met recently and agreed on the lat­est revi­sion to the devel­op­ment plan and timetable, Blake said. Test air­craft three and four have been deliv­ered to AgustaWestland, which will now oper­ate three of the four test planes. Bell will con­tinue test flights of the first air­craft from its Xworkx facil­ity in Arlington.

A six– to nine-​​passenger air­craft, the BA609 was designed to take advan­tage of tilt-​​rotor tech­nol­ogy to pro­vide an air­craft for gov­ern­ment and private-​​sector users that com­bines air­plane speed with the ver­ti­cal take­off and land­ing capa­bil­ity of a helicopter.

When the Bell-​​Agusta alliance was formed in 1998, com­pany offi­cials adver­tised the BA609 as a $10 mil­lion air­craft and said they had 68 orders. Now they have about 80 orders, many of them on the books for a decade. No firm price is quoted pub­licly, but num­bers in the range of $15 mil­lion to $20 mil­lion each are tossed about within the indus­try.

Publicly, Bell offi­cials con­tin­ued to voice sup­port for the pro­gram. But pri­vately its another matter.

Again, as you all know I’m a pro­po­nent of tiltro­tor tech­nol­ogy and think that oppo­si­tion to it has become almost like a reli­gion. And with the bleak his­tory of the V-​​22, who can blame them.

But to me if the civil­ian ver­sion of the V-​​22 can’t get any trac­tion then it seems that tiltro­tors still have a long way to go before they can be con­sid­ered viable alter­na­tives to rotor­craft. And I guess cost and con­ve­nience would have to play a large role as well.

Good on Bob for keep­ing Bell honest.

– Christian

Share |

July 7th, 2008 | Grand Ole Osprey | 394091 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/07/07/bell-bearish-on-609/Bell+Bearish+on+6092008-07-07+16%3A13%3A51Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « 10K MRAPS Lumber into Battle | Point Blank Wins Again » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. ohwilleke says:
    July 7, 2008 at 12:41 pm

    The cur­rently eco­nom­i­cally viable uses are light civil­ian pas­sen­ger rotor­craft are basi­cally, in approx­i­mately this order of mar­ket size:
    1. TV News
    2. Medevac
    3. Law enforce­ment
    4. VIP trans­porta­tion
    5. Military/​coast guard/​national guard duty
    A tilt rotor doesn’t seem to add much to TV News or Law Enforcement use, where the focus is on hov­er­ing while in the air at short range, not medium dis­tance trans­port with ver­ti­cle land­ing.
    The military/​coast guard/​national guard func­tion seems more likely to be filled by the Osprey than the 609. SAR duty and secu­rity team trans­port both favor large pas­sen­ger num­bers and pay­loads.
    This leaves Medevac and VIP trans­port. Both are thin mar­kets. But VIP trans­port is thin­ner and more price con­scious — tak­ing a heli­copter from a down­town heli­pad to pri­vate jet isn’t that much more bur­den­some than going direct from heli­pad to des­ti­na­tion, but is much cheaper, although some­one might want one for the atten­tion it attracts. The VIP mar­ket is also lim­ited by the tor­tured test­ing his­tory of the Osprey which might inspire fear when your bil­lion dol­lar CEO is in one.
    Medevac seems a per­fect role for the 609. Time is truly of the essence for mede­vac. The need for rotor­craft is to take­off and land, rather than to hover dur­ing flight. The greater range and speed than a tra­di­tional rotor­craft would be a sig­nif­i­cant ben­e­fit. And, the abil­ity to have a larger pay­load would be nice; most have room for one or two patients and two crew, at best.
    The best busi­ness strat­egy for sell­ing the 609, it would seem to me, is to get the planes out there being used so that they can demon­strate their value. Individual lives saved in remote areas make a bet­ter sales pitch than spec­i­fi­ca­tions on paper.
    Perhaps Bell should try to get a rural health grant to put some in the hands of com­mu­ni­ties that need long range, dif­fi­cult ter­rain mede­vac and can’t afford it. Alaska’s ear­mark kings and queens would have an eas­ier time sell­ing 609s for remote mede­vac than they would roads to nowhere.

    Reply
  2. tipover says:
    July 7, 2008 at 12:48 pm

    Military capa­bil­ity and require­ments don’t always cross over to civil­ian needs. Someday some­one may come up with a need for VTOL, long range, high speed that jus­ti­fies the price. Example: The Hummer is a great mil­i­tary vehi­cle but most civil­ians don’t have the real need for the vehi­cles capability’s at the cost involved. Something cheaper will do the job (H2 and H3 work as well in most cases, are cheaper and still pro­vide some ego boost for wannabe’s).
    So far the mar­ket for the prod­uct has not been devel­oped or is there. It sounds like the man­u­fac­tur­ers need to develop and SELL their prod­uct; the cus­tomers are not run­ning to them with money in hand.
    Could it be that mil­i­tary con­trac­tors are used to the cus­tomer com­ing to them with a request for a prod­uct, pay­ing for devel­op­ment and oblig­at­ing them­selves to a min­i­mum purchase?

    Reply
  3. Dennis says:
    July 7, 2008 at 12:58 pm

    Another rea­son they may be back­ing away is a British Company just came out and said they are devel­op­ing a Hybrid tilt rotor design.
    A tur­bine makes elec­tric­ity in the body and sends it to elec­tric motors to turn the props.
    No fuel lines thor­ough the tilt part. No mul­ti­ple hydraulics sys­tems through the tilt part.
    This design is about a hun­dred times sim­pler. And a lot more heavy duty.

    Reply
  4. Formerly known as Skeptic says:
    July 7, 2008 at 1:12 pm

    One other sig­nif­i­cant mar­ket seg­ment for civil­ian rotor­craft is the off­shore oil rig trans­port. A tiltro­tor would seem to be ideal for this mar­ket seg­ment as well.

    Reply
  5. justbill says:
    July 8, 2008 at 5:18 am

    Except per­haps for mede­vac use, where speed often means life, I don’t see many civil­ian cus­tomers legit­imiz­ing the increased cost of a tilt rotor vs. what’s already on the mar­ket at a lower price. Bell is prob­a­bly doing the smart thing.

    Reply
  6. Roy Smith says:
    July 8, 2008 at 6:16 am

    Why couldn’t VIP air squadrons like the Army’s 12th Aviation Battalion or the Marine’s Marine One Squadron use them? I also thought that the Coast guard were con­sid­er­ing using these? I don’t think that the prob­lem here is no mis­sion for them,but it is rather no imag­i­na­tion for what they could do.Also,if it’s a mat­ter of cost,congress doesn’t seem to have a prob­lem with find­ing money for bridges to nowhere in Alaska,I’m very sure they could find money for this.

    Reply
  7. David Hambling says:
    July 8, 2008 at 7:40 am

    Breaking news: Tilt-​​rotors are not eco­nom­i­cal!
    Next up: What is the Pope’s reli­gion?
    Not too sur­pris­ing, but it’ll be very impres­sive if they really can deliver a 609 at less than $25m at that vol­ume. Meanwhile, other tech­nol­ogy like the fast rotor­craft cov­ered recently is going to start eat­ing away at the potene­tial mar­ket at much lower cost.

    Reply
  8. coviepresb1647 says:
    July 10, 2008 at 10:45 am

    “Next up: What is the Pope’s reli­gion?“
    The Pope’s reli­gion is obvi­ously Catholic. However, in our denom­i­na­tion, our Confession (in addi­tion to the Lutheran and other Reformed Confessions) states that the Pope is Anti-​​Christ and “Son of Perdition” in the New Testament (i.e, Thessalonians).

    Reply
  9. SOF gold says:
    August 2, 2008 at 2:56 am

    The game world, Red dust roll, the vast human sea, a friend to encounter each other, can come together and mutual under­stand­ing, mutual under­stand­ing and closer, it is fate. In life jour­ney, in their dif­fer­ent life tra­jec­tory, the dif­fer­ent expe­ri­ences in the heart of the sea, to meet each other, it can be said is a lucky, fate is not at all times, should trea­sure the hard earned edge.
    Game days, he pur­sued JP, clothes com­pletely F10, fire 8. Hands and feet are com­pletely F10. Knife is the Z10. WGF com­plete sets of 80. Certainly, he spent a lot of SOF gold. He is also very good friends. They play with friends are also now 10 knives. But one day, the things of him was lost, we are very sad.

    Reply
  10. 2moons gold says:
    August 6, 2008 at 4:00 am

    Therefore, when I prac­ticed this role, I have also spent much energy and the 2moons gold.

    Reply
  11. Michael says:
    October 12, 2009 at 2:24 am

    Lacoste Shoes
    Discounted Lacoste Shoes
    Latest Lacoste Radiate Croc Shoes

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    Recent Comments
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      Yeah, I don't get it. The "Dragon...
      Ptsfp
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Should wikipedia Ned Kelly.He used armour that worked in...
      Nick
    • UPDATED: Details on Army’s New Afghanistan Duds
      Marines win agin hoo rur
      greg
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      To the poster "batvette" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
      gee lets forget about winning a war as long...
      greg stocks
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Time to bring military clothing into the 21st century. I...
      bobbymike
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part IV : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage