DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Planes, Copters, Blimps » A Chocolate (well composite, anyway) Mess

A Chocolate (well composite, anyway) Mess

DT con­tributer emer­i­tus Chris Michel gave us a heads up about a series of pho­tos over at Gizmodo that show details of the after­math of the B-​​2 crash in Guam a few months back.

Here’s one of them:

B-2 crash.bmp

Composites have afforded amaz­ing per­for­mance capa­bil­i­ties in mod­ern air­craft but they are nasty when they burn. The fibers get air­borne in a fire and can get into the lungs of those who might inad­ver­tantly breath the smoke — which is why crash crews are care­ful to wear res­pi­ra­tors even after that flames die off.

Messy, ain’t it?

(Gouge: CM)

– Ward

Share |

July 15th, 2008 | Planes, Copters, Blimps | 395315 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/07/15/a-chocolate-well-composite-anyway-mess/A+Chocolate+%28well+composite%2C+anyway%29+Mess2008-07-15+14%3A30%3A18jnoonan You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « MV-​​22 Engine Problems in Anbar | China Threatens Olympic Cyber Attacks » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. FlawedLogic says:
    July 15, 2008 at 11:29 am

    Appears sal­vage­able. Could prob­a­bly sell this burnt to crisp, slightly used, stealth bomber to China for full price, and get our money back. OK maybe not, since China already stole most its secrets over the years.

    Reply
  2. Ed says:
    July 15, 2008 at 12:32 pm

    You know if the air­craft is con­sid­ered unfly­able after this, per­haps a good use for it would be to turn it into a test­bed for new tech­nol­ogy for the fleet of B-​​2s remain­ing. It may also pos­si­bly be used as a way to train new pilots, or to offer as a walk through for the media to keep the media away from the main flight line.

    Reply
  3. John Newwin says:
    July 15, 2008 at 9:37 pm

    If Obama in the Oval office right now he and his wife would be joy­full and would give this b2 to Iran for a gift.

    Reply
  4. USA says:
    July 15, 2008 at 9:41 pm

    A sad sight.

    Reply
  5. spartan1134 says:
    July 16, 2008 at 7:12 am

    yo 1 of those cost 2 bil­lion dol­lars i dont think their gonna just throw it away i sure as hell wouldnt.

    Reply
  6. Senator Curry says:
    July 16, 2008 at 7:15 am

    This brought back vivid mem­o­ries of the B50 Crash at the sam site on May 19, 1953. We were able to get the Pilot and Co-​​Pilot out but not the oth­ers. A hor­rific scene and per­pet­ual mem­ory. we did what we could tghough not enough.

    Reply
  7. AeroEngineer says:
    July 16, 2008 at 8:09 am

    No way is this plane sal­vage­able. After a fire like this, the struc­tures suf­fered likely heat dam­age, and the com­pos­ites are likely dam­aged in ways we can’t see from this pic­ture (mol­e­c­u­lar level dam­age). It ain’t made of RHA and DU like an Abrams! The plane is junk now, never fly again. Never seen a bil­lion dol­lars go up in flames like that.

    Reply
  8. Sam says:
    July 16, 2008 at 8:42 am

    If burn­ing of moister was known to pre­vent this. Why wasn’t SOP?

    Reply
  9. Sam says:
    July 16, 2008 at 8:43 am

    If burn­ing of moister was known to pre­vent this. Why wasn’t SOP?

    Reply
  10. brad pitt says:
    July 16, 2008 at 10:04 am

    parts!!!! :P

    Reply
  11. ron pond says:
    July 16, 2008 at 10:22 am

    You Tell Me any air­craft crash that is fun or funny to look at!!!.besides the pos­si­ble lose of life. there is always the (why) did it hap­pen and how do we cor­rect the problem.yes the air­craft looks nonrepairable.but I just imag­ine there is alot of parts and knowl­edge that can be glenned from this crash.how not to let this hap­pen again​.in order to advance in tech­nol­ogy there has to be a few bro­ken eggs.hopefully and pray­ing that no lose of life happens.just like the space shut­tles ( but to the mis­ery of every one. peo­ple died).I say keep up with all the good work it helps keep us free.

    Reply
  12. ExLoadmeter says:
    July 16, 2008 at 4:10 pm

    “If Obama in the Oval office right now he and his wife would be joy­full and would give this b2 to Iran for a gift”.
    Newwin, you’re out of line, and I think you will regret your state­ment when you dis­cover that Mr. Obama is far more mod­er­ate than you right-​​wing nuts give him credit for.
    Sad about such a beau­ti­ful machine, but yes, its scrap.….

    Reply
  13. James Baudier says:
    July 16, 2008 at 4:21 pm

    I under­stand that some elec­tri­cal con­nec­tors were not sealed cor­rectly and water shorted out some com­put­ers. Ref. above, Obama giv­ing it to Iran, he is cor­rect! Nothing on a crash can be re-​​used, espe­cially composit.

    Reply
  14. Michael L Henry says:
    July 16, 2008 at 6:00 pm

    The air­craft is not sal­vagable. Some com­po­nents might be but will need to be bench checked before they know. I helped build 19 of the air­craft and know them inside-​​and-​​out. It might bere­paired enough to be placed on a pedis­tal along side the “Arc Light” B-​​52. Using it for any­thing else would be cost pro­hib­i­tive. There are already 2 test beds (never flown) and the Simulators are the only log­i­cal pilot train­ing divice. MLH

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage