<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Air Force 2?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2008/07/23/the-new-air-force-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/07/23/the-new-air-force-2/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 21:20:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/07/23/the-new-air-force-2/#comment-74058</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3962#comment-74058</guid>
		<description>Where&#039;s a catastrophic rotor failure when we need one
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where’s a catastrophic rotor failure when we need one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff M</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/07/23/the-new-air-force-2/#comment-74057</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3962#comment-74057</guid>
		<description>He looks good... but the plane looks even better.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He looks good… but the plane looks even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/07/23/the-new-air-force-2/#comment-182932</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3962#comment-182932</guid>
		<description>Check out that nifty little IRM jammer on the side of that thing.. most ch46 don&#039;t have em. People need to get a clue. Look at how far he flew. What is safer on an A to B safe to safe rout were vertically landing is needed? Obviously the high and fast Mv-22.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out that nifty little IRM jammer on the side of that thing.. most ch46 don’t have em. People need to get a clue. Look at how far he flew. What is safer on an A to B safe to safe rout were vertically landing is needed? Obviously the high and fast Mv-22.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/07/23/the-new-air-force-2/#comment-182929</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3962#comment-182929</guid>
		<description>&quot;See, we trust our stuff so much we would even fly senators in it!&quot;
Messiahs too, evidently.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“See, we trust our stuff so much we would even fly senators in it!“<br />
Messiahs too, evidently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TB</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/07/23/the-new-air-force-2/#comment-74052</link>
		<dc:creator>TB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3962#comment-74052</guid>
		<description>The guy flew in an Osprey?
He&#039;s got more guts than I thought.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guy flew in an Osprey?<br />
He’s got more guts than I thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Endre</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/07/23/the-new-air-force-2/#comment-182928</link>
		<dc:creator>Endre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3962#comment-182928</guid>
		<description>Thinking the exact same thing when I saw the pictures in the news - they had Obama on the tarmac and the Osprey in the background, and my mind went.. &quot;oh no, they did not...&quot; So I guess there are others than just senators campaigning these days. &quot;See, we trust our stuff so much we would even fly senators in it!&quot; Flying him out in that instead of a C-130 MUST have been a concious decision to show it of, nothing routine nor even logical about it otherwise.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thinking the exact same thing when I saw the pictures in the news — they had Obama on the tarmac and the Osprey in the background, and my mind went.. “oh no, they did not…” So I guess there are others than just senators campaigning these days. “See, we trust our stuff so much we would even fly senators in it!” Flying him out in that instead of a C-130 MUST have been a concious decision to show it of, nothing routine nor even logical about it otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wild Bill</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/07/23/the-new-air-force-2/#comment-182927</link>
		<dc:creator>Wild Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3962#comment-182927</guid>
		<description>Do you think they let Obama shoot the machine gun out the back on the trip over to Jordan?  You know a low level pass over some poor sheep and </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think they let Obama shoot the machine gun out the back on the trip over to Jordan?  You know a low level pass over some poor sheep and</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/07/23/the-new-air-force-2/#comment-182925</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3962#comment-182925</guid>
		<description>I noticed it right away too last night on the news. Previous posts make me think the security advantage of flying higher and faster than a conventional helicopter without sacrificing VTOL is what made the decision &quot;logical&quot;, at least on the surface.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed it right away too last night on the news. Previous posts make me think the security advantage of flying higher and faster than a conventional helicopter without sacrificing VTOL is what made the decision “logical”, at least on the surface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Total</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/07/23/the-new-air-force-2/#comment-182924</link>
		<dc:creator>Total</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3962#comment-182924</guid>
		<description>Abel, not Able.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abel, not Able.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Total</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/07/23/the-new-air-force-2/#comment-74046</link>
		<dc:creator>Total</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3962#comment-74046</guid>
		<description>_Of course_ they&#039;d put him in something dangerous if it meant funding.  Able Upshur and Thomas Gilmer discovered that to their cost in 1844.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>_Of course_ they’d put him in something dangerous if it meant funding.  Able Upshur and Thomas Gilmer discovered that to their cost in 1844.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

