<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Grab Bag of New Chinese Weapons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2008/07/25/a-grab-bag-of-new-chinese-weapons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/07/25/a-grab-bag-of-new-chinese-weapons/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 21:20:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirby</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/07/25/a-grab-bag-of-new-chinese-weapons/#comment-183105</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3969#comment-183105</guid>
		<description>you like to compare wz731 with Scimitar? does scimitar have a raisable battle field radar???
these weapons look &quot;pathetic&quot; to you? in the battlefield PLA has tradition to use things which work, from home-made mortars during civil war, to the wide array of networked equipment today which are integrated within doctrine.
btw chinese casualties in korea were 400,000 including wounded--less than the number suffered by south korea alone. please stop using random numbers. who do you think knows more about china&#039;s own losses, the PLA, or american cowboys trying to brag their victories?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you like to compare wz731 with Scimitar? does scimitar have a raisable battle field radar???<br />
these weapons look “pathetic” to you? in the battlefield PLA has tradition to use things which work, from home-made mortars during civil war, to the wide array of networked equipment today which are integrated within doctrine.<br />
btw chinese casualties in korea were 400,000 including wounded–less than the number suffered by south korea alone. please stop using random numbers. who do you think knows more about china’s own losses, the PLA, or american cowboys trying to brag their victories?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirby</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/07/25/a-grab-bag-of-new-chinese-weapons/#comment-183104</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3969#comment-183104</guid>
		<description>you like to compare wz731 with Scimitar? does scimitar have a raisable battle field radar???
these weapons look &quot;pathetic&quot; to you? in the battlefield PLA has tradition to use things which work, from home-made mortars during civil war, to the wide array of networked equipment today which are integrated within doctrine.
btw chinese casualties in korea were 400,000 including wounded--less than the number suffered by south korea alone. please stop using random numbers. who do you think knows more about china&#039;s own losses, the PLA, or american cowboys trying to brag their victories?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you like to compare wz731 with Scimitar? does scimitar have a raisable battle field radar???<br />
these weapons look “pathetic” to you? in the battlefield PLA has tradition to use things which work, from home-made mortars during civil war, to the wide array of networked equipment today which are integrated within doctrine.<br />
btw chinese casualties in korea were 400,000 including wounded–less than the number suffered by south korea alone. please stop using random numbers. who do you think knows more about china’s own losses, the PLA, or american cowboys trying to brag their victories?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin reynolds</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/07/25/a-grab-bag-of-new-chinese-weapons/#comment-183103</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3969#comment-183103</guid>
		<description>If you all remember your history, the T-38 tank used by the Soviets in WW2 was designed and built in the USA not Russia.
Components of the short-lived Canadian built AVRO have been found on Soviet and Chinese aircraft.
As long as there is a market elsewhere, free world technology WILL end up in some fanatical force somewhere and used againbst U.S. and her allies.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you all remember your history, the T-38 tank used by the Soviets in WW2 was designed and built in the USA not Russia.<br />
Components of the short-lived Canadian built AVRO have been found on Soviet and Chinese aircraft.<br />
As long as there is a market elsewhere, free world technology WILL end up in some fanatical force somewhere and used againbst U.S. and her allies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SSR</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/07/25/a-grab-bag-of-new-chinese-weapons/#comment-74256</link>
		<dc:creator>SSR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3969#comment-74256</guid>
		<description>Interesting article. to bad about the (low) level of debat here :-)
SSR
http://www.hjv.dk
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article. to bad about the (low) level of debat here :-)<br />
SSR<br />
<a href="http://www.hjv.dk" rel="nofollow">http://www.hjv.dk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s,dog7</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/07/25/a-grab-bag-of-new-chinese-weapons/#comment-183102</link>
		<dc:creator>s,dog7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3969#comment-183102</guid>
		<description>Russians are dogs, the government that is.
think about it, they tolled china to send troops to
fight south Korea, 1 million died, but did they send troops,, no,, they would not attack Germany unto they had to, look at Japan, unto America dropped a nuclear bomb on them, the Russians declared war on Japan,, only because they new Japan was finished and new if they started a war with America they would be finished as well,, they always wait and see,, never do any think unless they are safe.
America has had 60 years of new weapons then china, I bet they stole some weapons,, but i bet there is better weapons that we will never see unless America starts to loses the war.
Russia will probably try get china to go to war with America, to see what happens.
If America and the free world comes up with a new weapon like the nuclear bomb back in ww2, I hope they attack Russia and any full evil country with or with out nuclear weapons and set the world right once and for all.
No more communist countries, all democratic, the communist countries 98% don</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russians are dogs, the government that is.<br />
think about it, they tolled china to send troops to<br />
fight south Korea, 1 million died, but did they send troops„ no„ they would not attack Germany unto they had to, look at Japan, unto America dropped a nuclear bomb on them, the Russians declared war on Japan„ only because they new Japan was finished and new if they started a war with America they would be finished as well„ they always wait and see„ never do any think unless they are safe.<br />
America has had 60 years of new weapons then china, I bet they stole some weapons„ but i bet there is better weapons that we will never see unless America starts to loses the war.<br />
Russia will probably try get china to go to war with America, to see what happens.<br />
If America and the free world comes up with a new weapon like the nuclear bomb back in ww2, I hope they attack Russia and any full evil country with or with out nuclear weapons and set the world right once and for all.<br />
No more communist countries, all democratic, the communist countries 98% don</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GI-Gizmo</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/07/25/a-grab-bag-of-new-chinese-weapons/#comment-183101</link>
		<dc:creator>GI-Gizmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3969#comment-183101</guid>
		<description>The Soviets pushed China to intervene in
Korea. They suffered almost a million casulties
at the hands of the UN (mostly US) and vowed
to never confront the US head-on again.
The US has vowed to avoid a war on the Asian
mainland. You better bet the Chinese are trying
to get the upper hand on us, and they are using
asymmetric tactics. At this point the US-Sino
relationship is so intertwined that one could
not fall without damaging the other. We in the
US seem to create or feed the monsters of the
World when it benefits us, then when they have
served their purpose we distinguish them.
All great civilizations are conquered from
within?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Soviets pushed China to intervene in<br />
Korea. They suffered almost a million casulties<br />
at the hands of the UN (mostly US) and vowed<br />
to never confront the US head-on again.<br />
The US has vowed to avoid a war on the Asian<br />
mainland. You better bet the Chinese are trying<br />
to get the upper hand on us, and they are using<br />
asymmetric tactics. At this point the US-Sino<br />
relationship is so intertwined that one could<br />
not fall without damaging the other. We in the<br />
US seem to create or feed the monsters of the<br />
World when it benefits us, then when they have<br />
served their purpose we distinguish them.<br />
All great civilizations are conquered from<br />
within?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonny the fart</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/07/25/a-grab-bag-of-new-chinese-weapons/#comment-183100</link>
		<dc:creator>jonny the fart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3969#comment-183100</guid>
		<description>--Also,their military could come over [be invited] here as &quot;UN Peacekeepers&quot; if our republic was to fall apart &amp; dissolve into anarchy.--
pss..PLA Armed Police has arrived Haiti to carry the UN peace ..
now dance a troll dance Roy, DANCE!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>–Also,their military could come over [be invited] here as “UN Peacekeepers” if our republic was to fall apart &amp; dissolve into anarchy.–<br />
pss..PLA Armed Police has arrived Haiti to carry the UN peace ..<br />
now dance a troll dance Roy, DANCE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonny the fart</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/07/25/a-grab-bag-of-new-chinese-weapons/#comment-183099</link>
		<dc:creator>jonny the fart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3969#comment-183099</guid>
		<description>Hell,Yao Ming is probably a member of the PLA.
WHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hell,Yao Ming is probably a member of the PLA.<br />
WHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Smith</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/07/25/a-grab-bag-of-new-chinese-weapons/#comment-183098</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3969#comment-183098</guid>
		<description>GI Zhou,
Hey,Yao Ming is a Chinese spy studying NBA methods to insure that China will win the Gold medal in Basketball this year.
Seriously,it is interesting how so many Chinese products were found to be so faulty,but we haven&#039;t changed our buying habits.We take it on faith that China will improve their products because we are their best customers &amp; they wouldn&#039;t want to lose our business.
jonny the fart,
No matter if the Chinese civilian corporations work for the Chinese spy agencies,they all work for or are part of the &quot;People&#039;s Liberation Army&quot; of the &quot;People&#039;s Republic of China.&quot; Hell,Yao Ming is probably a member of the PLA.
I seriously doubt that the Chinese have plans to invade us militarily.They could just buy up our country.
Also,their military could come over [be invited] here as &quot;UN Peacekeepers&quot; if our republic was to fall apart &amp; dissolve into anarchy.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GI Zhou,<br />
Hey,Yao Ming is a Chinese spy studying NBA methods to insure that China will win the Gold medal in Basketball this year.<br />
Seriously,it is interesting how so many Chinese products were found to be so faulty,but we haven’t changed our buying habits.We take it on faith that China will improve their products because we are their best customers &amp; they wouldn’t want to lose our business.<br />
jonny the fart,<br />
No matter if the Chinese civilian corporations work for the Chinese spy agencies,they all work for or are part of the “People’s Liberation Army” of the “People’s Republic of China.” Hell,Yao Ming is probably a member of the PLA.<br />
I seriously doubt that the Chinese have plans to invade us militarily.They could just buy up our country.<br />
Also,their military could come over [be invited] here as “UN Peacekeepers” if our republic was to fall apart &amp; dissolve into anarchy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonny the fart</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/07/25/a-grab-bag-of-new-chinese-weapons/#comment-183095</link>
		<dc:creator>jonny the fart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 08:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3969#comment-183095</guid>
		<description>---can&#039;t the US scramble GPS signals in a certain region, making the GPS functionality of the UAV useless?--
yes.. but China has own GPS system. (wich btw is working better then russian GLONASS).
you can see it here in PLA-&quot;comercial&quot;.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtTHjdH3ApM
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>—can’t the US scramble GPS signals in a certain region, making the GPS functionality of the UAV useless?–<br />
yes.. but China has own GPS system. (wich btw is working better then russian GLONASS).<br />
you can see it here in PLA-“comercial”.<br />
<span style="text-align:center; display: block;"><a href="http://defensetech.org/2008/07/25/a-grab-bag-of-new-chinese-weapons/"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/gtTHjdH3ApM/2.jpg" alt="" /></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

