DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » The Defense Biz » A PhantomSkunk in the Works

A PhantomSkunk in the Works

I’m sure you guys have seen this already, but in case you haven’t yet, our friends at Aviation Week ran an interesting piece the other day on the development of a hypersonic demonstrator.

My question is whether this is the first time (at least in a high-ish profile) that Boeing has teamed with Lockheed Martin’s Skunk Works (I assume Boeing’s Phantom Works crew is involved) for a project that could be a large-scale deal?

I think it’s kind of cool to think that all those 10-pound brains could be getting together to come up with a new plane like this.

This article first appeared at Aerospace Daily & Defense Report.

Boeing and ATK have joined the Lockheed Martin Skunk Works team bidding to build the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency’s (DARPA) Blackswift hypersonic technology demonstrator.

Northrop Grumman is understood not to have bid, making it likely a contract will be awarded to Lockheed by September. The unmanned, reusable turbojet/scramjet-powered Blackswift is planned to fly in 2012.

Under DARPA’s Falcon program, Lockheed has completed conceptual design of a demonstrator, the HTV-3X, that forms the basis for the Blackswift. The goal of the demonstration is to take-off conventionally, accelerate to beyond Mach 6, maneuver and return to a runway landing.

Skunk Works also is performing subscale tests of the combined-cycle propulsion system, which comprises a high-Mach turbojet and dual-mode ram/scramjet. The turbine is used for take-off and landing, and to accelerate the vehicle to Mach 4, where the ramjet takes over.

Lockheed has ground-tested inlets and nozzles that are shared by the two engines, says Stephen Walker, deputy director of DARPA’s Tactical Technology Office. The challenge is in combining both flowpaths over the Mach range during which both the turbine and ramjet are operating, he says.

Be sure to read the rest of this story, a piece on more “war bots” for Joes and a bulkhead-by-bulkhead look at the death of a frigate from our Aviation Week friends at Military​.com.

– Christian

Share |

July 28th, 2008 | The Defense Biz | 397111 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/07/28/a-phantomskunk-in-the-works/A+PhantomSkunk+in+the+Works2008-07-28+12%3A35%3A56Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « One Heck of a Ride | Cyber War Capabilities » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Logan Hartke says:
    July 28, 2008 at 9:39 am

    No, this isn’t quite the first time. Back in the early 90s, they teamed together for the A/F-X program.
    http://​www​.globalsecurity​.org/​m​i​l​i​t​a​r​y​/​s​y​s​t​e​m​s​/​a​i​r​c​r​a​f​t​/​a​-​x​.​htm
    Flight had a good article on it back in ’94.
    http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1994/1994%20-%200212.html
    http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1994/1994%20-%200213.html

    Reply
  2. pleuris says:
    July 28, 2008 at 4:46 pm

    Maybe it’s just me but is this just X-33 ‘II’

    Reply
  3. murc says:
    July 28, 2008 at 5:59 pm

    The X-33 was to have rocket engines & it was to take off and land the same as the space shuttle does today.
    as for the article, Part of me thinks its cool…the other part of me think…What Took So Long?!
    this thing sounds like its going to operate the SAME way as the BlackBird, except it can go mach 6 instead of mach 3.3.

    Reply
  4. Camp says:
    July 28, 2008 at 8:00 pm

    “Blackswift hyperplane hits trouble in Washington“
    http://​www​.theregister​.co​.uk/​2​0​0​8​/​0​6​/​1​3​/​b​l​a​c​k​s​w​i​f​t​_​d​a​s​h​_​f​o​r​_​c​a​s​h​_​s​l​a​s​h​ed/
    “DARPA Lifts the Covers on Vulcan Engine“
    http://​www​.abovetopsecret​.com/​f​o​r​u​m​/​t​h​r​e​a​d​3​6​4​9​7​4​/​pg1

    Reply
  5. Roy Smith says:
    July 28, 2008 at 9:25 pm

    Let me go into my “Generation Kill” Captain America “Spazz Attack” mode:
    Great,just great!!!! Didn’t it occur that there are Chinese cyber spies running around & we just tipped them off to a new weapon system which is supposed to be TOP SECRET????!!!!! People could die here,you know!!!!! I’m very sure that Chinese cyber spies read blogs like this trying to find out new secrets & we just handed it to them on a silver platter. Let’s just give them more secrets why don’t we. Everytime we discuss a weapon system,we’re leaking information to the enemy. We need to DENY the enemy,not help them at every corner!!!!
    Captain America spazz over​.By the way,I’m being sarcastic as hell.

    Reply
  6. Greg says:
    July 29, 2008 at 8:44 am

    Wouldn’t it be more cost effective to just upgrade and produce more b-1b’s and b-2’s? At the rate we are going we will end up with just 2 of these hypersonic bombers. It seems that in the 90’s we decided we don’t want to upgrade aircraft anymore just replace them. b-1b with an upgraded engines say the engines from the raptor, and upgraded generators for a cruise missile launch pad and b-2’s with whatever necessary upgrades for penetration makes a whole lot more sense. Do they have no confidence in their current bombers that were just produced a relative short time ago?

    Reply
  7. darksidius says:
    July 29, 2008 at 5:49 pm

    Its a very great news we are now in 21 century, its time for a new kind of plane to run. Skunk works and Phantom works is the dream team to produce the Blackswift. Its time to go hypersonic, its the futur for aeronuatics, subsonic is the past. This two firm will make a very big plane good luck Blackswift.

    Reply
  8. kamas says:
    August 6, 2008 at 3:51 am

    For you, I would rather to give up my all treasures and the kamas which I practice the level hard.

    Reply
  9. cheap cronous cro says:
    August 6, 2008 at 3:52 am

    And he has given 50W cheap cronous cro to me, I was smiling secretly, my master had not known my details.

    Reply
  10. Requiem gold says:
    August 6, 2008 at 3:54 am

    My friends in order to help me, send me much Requiem gold, I was very thank him.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Hey if it works for the troops on the...
      Marshall Tall Eagle
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      If you are going to do close air support (CAS),...
      LTCMike69
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      The Air Force has got it backwards again. Here it...
      gmanaz
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      Damn it! I thought this hole tanker BS was over with...
      Thunder350
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      my bad… i misread your second to last...
      Project Thor
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      excuse me… were you reading what i...
      Project Thor
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      Welfare and warfare are necessary. The argument on...
      calw
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      Get out of wheeled CrapMobiles and get off the roads...
      IEDDEFEAT
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      Nope. Crash a Harrier every other flight and it would still be...
      Hx2
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      That's a misleading response – the issue...
      Why
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage