Comments on: Iran’s Natanz Tough Nut to Crack

By: shahin

shahin — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:34:06 +0000

I am supprised by everyone on this board that consider Iran’s armforces as ‘POTENT!” Iran armforces is weak! Israel and the US are making a HUGE mistake by not taking out the nuclear facilities! If Iran obtains the bomb then the game is over! Why in the world, the powers, attack Iraq but when it comes to Iran, a country who would like to destroy the state of Israel, offer the olive branch? That is out of logic. Unless, the western press has over exagerated about Iran’s nuclear embitions, which I think is the case!

By: priya

priya — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:59:47 +0000

exactly.. i agree wid Jack..
hey guys please visit my blog..
http://www.youknowster.com/jokes/view/263-you-know-youre-a-military-brat-when

By: Jeff M

Jeff M — Sun, 03 Aug 2008 01:09:09 +0000

http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20080701faessay87401-p0/condoleezza-rice/rethinking-the-national-interest.html
http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20080701faessay87401-p0/condoleez
za-rice/rethinking-the-national-interest.html
Featured article at http://www.foreignaffairs.org

By: Jeff M

Jeff M — Sun, 03 Aug 2008 01:07:39 +0000

Roy Roy Roy… you’re not listening to common sense. The powers that be in this world want you to know what’s going on, you don’t have to look beneath the surface of everything, most of what you see is how things really are.
I just read a great essay today at the bookstore, if you can get through the whole thing maybe things will make more sense to you. This woman should be running for President:
http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20080701faessay87401-p0/condoleezza-rice/rethinking-the-national-interest.html

By: Roy Smith

Roy Smith — Sat, 02 Aug 2008 15:04:40 +0000

Another “hairbrain” question,why doesn’t the DHS AND New York City not want “Joe Average Citizen” to carry around Geiger Counters & other detection devices,especially around New York City? Don’t you trust your completely loyal,patriotic,& law abiding [Goyim] citizens with such tools?

By: Jeff M

Jeff M — Sat, 02 Aug 2008 10:04:10 +0000

“Milstar satellite constellation consists of five satellites positioned around the Earth in geosynchronous orbits.“
I think we can lay that BS article to rest now.

By: Jeff M

Jeff M — Sat, 02 Aug 2008 10:00:43 +0000

Here Roy,
Visuals, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NeydrHKvpYM
You can see the alpha particles flying off of that chunk of material, they travel a few inches on average. Now imagine how many of those particles would hit a 5 ton satellite in space. A satellite in low-earth orbit, rotating the earth at high speed is maybe 200 miles up, a stationary satellite in GEO orbit is 22,236 miles above sea level.

By: Jeff M

Jeff M — Sat, 02 Aug 2008 09:45:37 +0000

Another thing Roy, that article says no such suitcase-sized device could exist, but that is total BS also. They built plenty of nuclear weapon that fit into a 155mm artillery shell. Critical mass for plutonium is 10kg using a beryllium reflector, add a few kg of high explosives and you have a suitcase bomb. The only devices big enough to need an 18 wheeled tractor trailer are hydrogen bombs. Pretty much any sized plutonium weapon could be made to fit into the trunk of a honda civic. This demonstrates a fundamental lack of knowledge on the part of this source.

By: Roy Smith

Roy Smith — Sat, 02 Aug 2008 04:40:27 +0000

NUCLEAR SENSING CAPABILITY
NEWS BRIEF: ” US Satellite Detection Of Portable Nuclear Weapons”, Rense.com, 11-7-2001, http://www.rense.com/general16/nucla.htm
“If an internal nuclear attack ever occurs in this country without a major failure of our satellite assets…perhaps we should rethink just who the enemy really is…“
These opening words are shocking, and they are intended to be. The writer wanted all of us to know that America has the technical capability to stop any terrorist in his tracks if he ever dares try to sneak nuclear weapons into this country. Let us now review the “rest of the story”.
“As you have probably heard from the major news networks, there is some concern about the so-called portable nuclear devices developed by the old USSR. Their former head of the KGB has confirmed the existence of 150 portable devices: 100 of which are presently unaccounted for … none of these devices are missing; We know exactly where these devices are located at any given point in time.
“This is how we know: During the 1980’s I worked as a Senior Systems Engineer for several DOD companies in San Diego (Advanced Digital Systems and SAIC). While in this position I was tasked with developing a ‘Fleet Satellite Catastrophic Restoral Plan’ for the Joint Chiefs of Staff. My group was to develop a method for satellite intelligence restoral in the event of a space born nuclear strike by the Soviet Union. In the course of this study, we had to review all satellite capabilities and characteristics: both current and projected through the early ninety’s. A series of satellites planned to begin deployment in 1989 … They carry special sensor devices (Developed by SAIC) that can detect high-velocity spin-off particles from enriched uranium (necessary for nuclear devices). Due to the small size and velocity of these particles, no amount of shielding can block them: not lead, not earth (sub-terrainian). Radiation hazards from these particles are minimal due to limited quantity. Our satellites are fool-proof in detecting and pin-pointing the locations of enriched uranium throughout the world.” (Ibid., Emphasis added)
Did you realize our satellites had this capability? They can accurately sense the “high-velocity spin-off particles from enriched uranium”, even if the device is encased in lead or buried in the earth! This capability means that we know the exact location of every nuclear warhead in the world. We know where every single Russian warhead is, and we knew that Saddam Hussein did not have nuclear warheads!
This news is simply staggering in its implications. The current news breaking all over the world is now telling us that the British MI6 and the American CIA were guilty of massive “intelligence failures” in their pre-war assessment of Saddam’s Weapons of Mass Destruction. But, this revelation tells us that such ‘intelligence failure’ is impossible, for we have the capability to pinpoint the exact location of every nuclear warhead on earth at any moment of time! “Rogue States” who are said to be developing their own nuclear capability would be giving up their nuclear devices quickly, for they would know that we know the location of each and every warhead.
Destroying an enemy’s capability depends largely on several factors: 1) Knowing the exact location of the target; 2) Having the weapons that can destroy the targets before the enemy can move them; 3) Possessing weapons accurate enough to destroy the target.
Our satellite capability to sense even minute high-velocity particles emanating from even the smallest nuclear device gives us the most important factor of all: Knowing the exact location of the target.
Since this information is so unbelievable, are there any other sources to which we can turn to gain verification? As President Reagan used to say often, “Trust, but Verify”.

By: Jeff M

Jeff M — Sat, 02 Aug 2008 03:21:07 +0000

Roy,
You can shield nukes with lead. Besides, detection in outer space would never work, it’s hard enough to detect a nuke passing through a border crossing, let alone from 200 miles above, in the pool of radiation that is outer space, when the entire earth below is emitting radiation as well as the massive sun. It’s not like a radio signal.