DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Av Week Extra » India Reviews Offsets for Fighter Program

India Reviews Offsets for Fighter Program

This article first appeared at Aerospace Daily & Defense Report.

New Delhi — Prospective vendors submitted their offsets package Aug. 4 for India’s Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) program.

The proposal was submitted in response to the MMRCA request for proposals (RFPs), which asked all competitors to provide an “industrial participation” (IP) plan as part of their offering.

The RFP for the 126-aircraft MMRCA program went out to Boeing, Eurofighter, Gripen, Lockheed Martin, MiG and Rafale, and the companies submitted their bids in April.

Lockheed said its offer included a wide range of projects including investment, manufacturing, export creation and joint development.

“Lockheed Martin is committed to working with our industrial partners and Indian defense industry to develop long-term, high-value projects that bring technology and sustainable business to India,” said Orville Prins, a Lockheed vice president for business development.

The giant contractor, based outside Washington, D.C., is touting its history of having established four F-16 production lines outside of the United States as one of its selling points. It says it has achieved over $37 billion in offset program credits in 40 countries — “all without default or penalty. A proven cornerstone of these programs is the ability to provide transfer of technology to program partners.“

Boeing claims it has a formidable industrial lineup that includes a supplier team of 16 leading aerospace and defense companies with combined revenues of over $454 billion, as well as 37 public– and private-sector Indian companies.


Earlier this year, Boeing reached agreement to form a joint venture with Tata Industries Ltd. Last year, it reached another deal with Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd, which is adopting Boeing’s “Lean” and best-management practices. Boeing has also signed an agreement with international engineering firm Larsen & Toubro for joint exploration of business opportunities in the Indian defense market.

– Neelam Mathews

Share |

August 7th, 2008 | Av Week Extra | 39984 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/08/07/india-reviews-offsets-for-fighter-program/India+Reviews+Offsets+for+Fighter+Program2008-08-07+12%3A55%3A00Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Wednesday — Fire for Effect | MV-22 Used for SOF Training » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Sven Ortmann says:
    August 8, 2008 at 5:19 am

    Gripen = Saab, Rafale = Dassault Aviation
    I expect a first foreign sale of the Rafale or just another Su-27 family sale.

    Reply
  2. shantanu chatterjee says:
    August 8, 2008 at 9:25 am

    My money is on boeing its F/A 18 F414 engine is perfect for our LCA so we then have a 3 plane airfore thru ~2020 Su-30mki,F/A-18E/F and LCA(300/200/300 split) with the indo russian PAK FA and maybe JSF then inturn replacing these begining in say 2020–25 thru 2035 hopefully our economy should hold up till then.

    Reply
  3. mganpatkumar says:
    August 28, 2008 at 4:02 pm

    Sir, I totaly agree f-18 is the answer to the requirements of the air force and the navy, further more i would like to see the navy buy the P-8’s,S-76 and finally the updated state of the art Hawkeye and the army should go for the c-47and the apachee deal. india is opening up to the world so make it nato cmpatable and india as a world trader will go very far. also india should scrap the deal with the russians for the useless aircraft carrier and take the loss. buy us used carriers at least india will get a good deal plus further investments in India. thank you my name is mganpatkumar from Niagara Falls New York . like to hear comments?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      135,000,000 $ each for a fighter aircraft that's...
      Joseph
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Dumb and dumber………. The F35 is a...
      blackbull
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Why not bring in dirgibles( the original...
      mike rose
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Just give Burt Rutaan a Million bucks and he will...
      Dale
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      One means of defeating an enemy is to cripple...
      Cortland
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      No–but is it necessary for the projected cost per...
      BILL D
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      One fighter for everyone failed once before. However, it may be...
      Cortland
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Iagree that the stealth capabilities of the F22&F35...
      Chops
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Why would the Marines buy A-10s? They are a great...
      chaos0xomega
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      I agree-I noted in other comments that the f16 &f15...
      BILL D
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage