DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Around the Globe » Georgia v. Russia

Georgia v. Russia

So now that Georgia and Russia have offi­cially chal­lenged each other to fisticuffs, how do the two match up?

Georigan Army.jpg

Georgian tanks w/​reactive armor roll into South Ossetia

Georgia has roughly 30k troops serv­ing in the Georgian Armed Forces, with 2,000 of their best troops serv­ing in Iraq. Though small, the Georgian Army is respected by their Coalition part­ners in Iraq as a highly com­pe­tent fight­ing force. They’re equipped with rel­a­tively mod­ern Russian weapons, to include some 200 tanks, 450 armored fight­ing vehi­cles, Su-​​25 and MiG-​​25 fighter jets, and a whole mess of artillery, mor­tars, sur­face to air mis­siles, etc etc.
The Russian bear is still, well… a jug­ger­naut. Ivan’s armed forces weigh in at just over 1 mil­lion troops. The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation suf­fered dur­ing the harsh post-​​Soviet breakup defense cuts, but have since flour­ished under Vladimir Putin. They are tech­no­log­i­cally advanced, dis­ci­plined, and effec­tively trained. The Russians are famil­iar and com­fort­able oper­at­ing in the Caucasus Mountain region, both from their uni­fi­ca­tion with Georgia under the Soviet Empire and from their fight­ing in nearby Chechnya.
So yeah, on the sur­face, it looks like we’ve got a clas­sic David v. Goliath matchup. Not so fast. As men­tioned, the Georgians can be mean lit­tle bas­tards. They’ve got a home field advan­tage, are furi­ously call­ing up reserves, and are fight­ing a Russian enemy that has one (one!!) sup­ply line over the Caucasus into South Ossetia. That logis­tics line, iron­i­cally enough, will be closed in a few short months by Russia’s old tried and true ally — Old Man Winter.
If Georgia can plug that hole, get cre­ative with their air defense assets, kill a whole mess of Russians, and force this thing into a win­ter over­time — I wouldn’t be sur­prised if the inter­na­tional com­mu­nity forces a peace favor­able to the Georgians.
Of course if they don’t plug that line, I can see Russia’s tanks bring­ing Georgia back into the fam­ily — the old school way.
–John Noonan

Share |

August 8th, 2008 | Around the Globe | 4003154 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/08/08/georgia-v-russia/Georgia+v.+Russia2008-08-08+20%3A30%3A15paisley You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « LCS No. 1 Underway at Last | Friday — Fire for Effect » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Jimbo Jones says:
    August 11, 2008 at 6:39 am

    “But being part of an inva­sion army in for­eign coun­tries is a shame, an insult to the idea of respect, decency and good-​​faith “
    Lol wut! hold up dude you wrote the above and Russian troops who your root­ing for are right now stomp­ing across geor­gia fir­ing at will!

    Reply
  2. question says:
    August 11, 2008 at 6:52 am

    There are more than 3.000 mer­ce­nar­ies, both amer­i­can paid and NATO’s forces. They are being ques­tioned right now.
    “Seriously dude your really pump­ing out the crap what with claim­ing NATO and the media is sup­port­ing Georgia its not even worth answer­ing“
    You are beyond repair.

    Reply
  3. Jimbo Jones says:
    August 11, 2008 at 7:26 am

    “you have no mind, you have order-​​processing-​​computer in your head, what­ever the boss says goes“
    Just to let you know that here in the west free think­ing and hav­ing opin­ions that dif­fer from our gov­er­ments is not an offence to the state like it is in Mother Russia, my point is we do not have to go with the offi­cial ver­sion of events, we are free to think what we like there­fore your com­ments about doing what­ever the boss says really are fantastical,unfortunatly how­ever in Mother Russia its rather dif­fer­ent in that not fol­low­ing the boss can lead to much unpleas­ant­ness. I guess its no won­der your ped­dling the propaganda…

    Reply
  4. freefallingbomb says:
    August 11, 2008 at 7:55 am

    What am I read­ing in this forum?
    Holier-​​than-​​thou U.S. Americans crit­i­ciz­ing the short Russian incur­sion in South Ossetia?
    U.S. AMERICANS CRITICIZING THE SHORT RUSSIAN INCURSION IN SOUTH OSSETIA ? ? ?
    Get the Hell out of Iraq and of Afghanistan before you ever open your dirty mouthes again, you MISERABLE Nazis!!!

    Reply
  5. question says:
    August 11, 2008 at 8:00 am

    What are you talk­ing about? I’m not russ­ian, and please stop using words like free­dom of speech, in the lov­ing west its a crime to even inves­ti­gate the 2

    Reply
  6. Jimbo Jones says:
    August 11, 2008 at 8:16 am

    “in the lov­ing west its a crime to even inves­ti­gate the 2

    Reply
  7. ruth says:
    August 11, 2008 at 9:15 am

    America refused to get into the 2nd world war until we were attack at Pearl Harbour…The war would have been lost if America had not par­tic­i­pated.., but then again America could not have won the war with­out all the other nations that participated…As for the holocaust..It really hap­pened and it was as bad as his­tory records…worse really when you con­sider not only were 6 to 8 mil­lion Jews mur­dered but also another 6 to 8 mil­lion Christians athe­ists, and oth­ers also murdered..35 mil­lion, mostly rus­sians also lost their lives in the military..Anyone who says oth­er­wise is a liar… I remem­ber the war.. and I have films of death cam­pls, etc..It is too bad human­ity is such slow learn­ers that we did not learn from that hor­ren­dous war… But Sometimes war is nec­es­sary to stop madmen

    Reply
  8. question says:
    August 11, 2008 at 11:01 am

    Pearl har­bour was a set up.
    Roosevet pro­voked it and knew it was com­ing.
    There is enough evi­dence to prove it.
    He ordered amer­i­can planes to be painted as chi­nese and anhilited japan­ese cities with inci­den­di­ary bombs, the japan­ese dis­cov­ered it and attacked the amer­i­can fleet. The amer­i­can blo­ques japan, forced the british against their will to betray japan leav­ing them back­stapped and rounded by amer­i­can and their allies turn­ing on them all because of amer­i­can inter­ven­tion.
    The con­cen­tra­tion camps are real, as the japan­ese and chi­nese are, but there was no real plan to anhilite noone. It was made up as the war was going on to give it more legit­i­macy and jus­tify the dead of so many amer­i­can in one of the many euro­pean wars that the amer­i­can had noth­ing to do there. It was delib­er­ately planned, proved by the joke called the nuren­m­berg ‘tri­als’ were magic sto­ries and con­fes­sions were signed through tor­ture of the loser side, the ger­mans, they con­fesed what­ever the amer­i­cans told.
    The ‘trial’ was, and still is a shame of the legal sys­tem, there was no trasla­tor, no lawyers, hell the jury was made of amer­i­can gen­er­als!.
    That was all the ‘proof’ about the holo­caust.
    After that the for­bid to inves­ti­gate it, right now there are polit­i­cal pri­sion­ers in europe, lawyers, his­to­ri­ans, reporters, all kind of peo­ple who dare to ques­tion the ‘offi­cial truth’ are behind bars.
    There is no evi­dence of either bod­ies or the infra­struc­ture for such a mas­sive task. Nor is the account­ing of civil­ians, the num­bers don’t match. 1 mil­lion peo­ple may have died, because it was a war, and the pri­sion­ers were the first on the list for food and sup­plies. If thet wanted them dead they could have killed them right there, why bother keep­ing them for years! It’s a lie, just like the Maine used to go after Spain in the cuban war, just like the tonkin inci­dent, just like every­thing your lying white house spokesman tell.
    I’m not a con­spir­acist, i do believe the moon land­ing, I don’t believe in secret groups orga­niz­ing the gov­er­ments, I just care about what the gov­ern­ments do, what their actions are, what their laws are. Yes, the 11S offi­cial the­ory is bull­shit, don’t know exactly what hap­pened, but it’s 100% clear that they are hid­ing some­thing, the comi­sion should be reopened and given full author­ity. I may even go to the point of admit­ing that maybe, maybe they have a rea­son to hide it, maybe one of the build­ings was a secret cia head­quar­ters of some­thing like that, maybe the attack­ers use some advan­tage that for national secu­rity rea­son must remain class­si­fied, but don’t tell that what the gov­ern­ment tells is real. And by the way, I don’t care much, acci­dents hap­pened, there are crazy peo­ple out there out­side of men­tal facil­i­ties, some crime may hap­pen from time to time, but the total­i­tar­ian laws approved with that excuse, as with the fake anthrax, that con­cers me, the gov­er­ment is very pow­er­full and should be look upon with cau­tion, power cor­rupts, and big power as is the excuse of ter­ror­ism, is very dan­ger.
    Laws don’t cease to exist because we are at war, they are explicitely design for war, it is at these moment when they are needed most, in these times of emo­tions, hatred, and suf­fer­ing is when we have to be care­full not to kid­napp or kill inno­cents. And amer­i­cans talk­ing about inno­cent killed dur­ing the world war…you know, you launched to nukes on civis, just to prove your point, scare the sovi­ets, or aug­ment your ego, you didn’t have to do that, the japan­ese fleet and aire force were destroyed, their coun­try under block­ade, they weren’t a theat. It was a war crime.

    Reply
  9. Jimbo Jones says:
    August 11, 2008 at 11:28 am

    “Hey, cheap Anglo bio­mass, why don’t you quote your two Fuehrers Bush and Blair a bit for us?“
    Daddy let you on the pc again i see, sigh, any­way you do know Blair has long been gone from his pre­vi­ous job as Prime min­is­ter. Once again you make your­self the laugh­ing stock of defese tech.

    Reply
  10. Jimbo Jones says:
    August 11, 2008 at 11:31 am

    “Pearl har­bour was a set up.
    Roosevet pro­voked it and knew it was com­ing.
    There is enough evi­dence to prove it. (and a whole lot more trash spouted)“
    Congratualtions you take the prize of most demented poster on this board, FFB is not a patch on your insan­ity. (sorry FFB but this guy is leagues more deluded then even you, which is really say­ing something)

    Reply
  11. question says:
    August 11, 2008 at 12:36 pm

    Jimbo, you want books on why Pearl Harbour was a set up?
    (If I were amer­i­can and some­one told me one the most impor­tant things in our life was a lie I would be intriged and asked for more infor­ma­tion so I could ver­ify the claims)
    John Toland

    Reply
  12. Vercingetorix says:
    August 11, 2008 at 12:56 pm

    “Did it occur to you they were ready for a Georgian sur­prise attack because a: they had the Georgian com­mand wired for sound or b: it’s a good idea to keep high-​​readiness units in areas that might become a prob­lem?“
    A) Maybe.
    B) The Russians don’t HAVE any high-​​readiness units. Their mil­i­tary is in sham­bles. That means they had to make extra­or­di­nary prepa­ra­tions to get the 58th up and run­ning with­out clog­ging the streets with broken-​​down vehi­cles.
    This is a mil­i­tary board. You should know some­thing about the mil­i­tary before you open your yap. Like logis­tics, for instance.

    Reply
  13. question says:
    August 11, 2008 at 1:07 pm

    Vercingetorix, so, the rus­sians can’t have spies? or intel­li­gence? or any kind of rumours or infor­ma­tion or knews of geor­gians troops mov­ing in? they live in another planet and all the grow­ing mil­i­tary bud­get of the geor­gians, their wargames, train­ing, all of that are thins that the rus­sians never heard of, their troops are all sta­tioned in siberia hunt­ing bears, they would never have troops in their fron­tiers near a his­tor­i­cal con­flict, or a region where lots of other guys are prepar­ing to move in, they don’t have spy­planes or sats or old-​​fashion spiess, only the US have them right?
    So, you accused of lunatics those who dare ques­tion the offi­cial 11S story(tm, trade­mark, like walt dis­ney sto­ries), but sug­gest that some­how the russ­ian either mag­i­cally bombed their city from the enemy front or make the geor­gians attack ose­tia somehow

    Reply
  14. Roy Smith says:
    August 11, 2008 at 1:24 pm

    “B) The Russians don’t HAVE any high-​​readiness units. Their mil­i­tary is in sham­bles. That means they had to make extra­or­di­nary prepa­ra­tions to get the 58th up and run­ning with­out clog­ging the streets with broken-​​down vehi­cles.“
    Yeah,the Russians don’t have KBR to sup­ply all their needs like we do. That’s why the U.S. has the strongest & great­est army in the world,because WE have KBR to sup­port us.
    It looks like that Russian army in sham­bles is kick­ing Georgia’s ass. Damn you American advisers,where are you when Georgia needs you?

    Reply
  15. Camp says:
    August 11, 2008 at 2:10 pm

    Irony…
    Russia used mil­i­tary force to pre­vent Chechnya from sep­a­rat­ing from Russia.
    Russia is using mil­i­tary force to help Abkhazia & South Ossetia to break away from Georgia.
    For those who don’t know Georgia is directly south of Chechnya.
    http://​encarta​.msn​.com/​m​a​p​_​7​0​1​5​1​1​6​8​5​/​c​h​e​c​h​n​y​a​.​h​tml

    Reply
  16. Ptsfp says:
    August 11, 2008 at 4:05 pm

    I won­der if the “won­der­ful peace­keep­ing” Russians (I am being sar­cas­tic) will build a wall in Ossetia to “pro­tect” the Ossetians. Berlin Wall part 2.
    I think that this “flex­ing” of Russian mus­cle is to make them feel like a real power again. They are try­ing to prove to the world that they are a mighty mil­i­tary force by invad­ing a puny coun­try right next to them. They are like the high school yard bully. They pick a small coun­try close by and then bomb civil­ians. Yeah, tough, really tough…
    I love when Ukraine threat­ened to block Russian ship­ping. That brought an inter­est­ing response from rus­sia, “This is most unex­pected” they said. Yup just like in real life, stand up to the bully with num­bers and he folds.

    Reply
  17. question says:
    August 11, 2008 at 4:23 pm

    Yeah, an amer­i­can talk­ing about bul­ly­ing… with a dozen car­rier groups in front of all the coun­tries you like to ‘ensure’ behave acord­ingly… so your 800 or more mil­i­tary bases in 70 coun­tries…
    If you read what Putin said, it was unex­pected because they say they are friends and then sud­denly betray them.
    He also said that the US hang Sadam for destroy­ing 5 vil­lages, now the Georgians destroyed 11, and what is the US doing?

    Reply
  18. Ptsfp says:
    August 11, 2008 at 5:41 pm

    Question,
    Lol, no com­ment about the Berlin wall? I am an American by birth, and I have German ances­try.
    Neither trust Russian “peace­keep­ing”.
    Oh, and by the way, you have no one fooled with the upside down ques­tion marks. You are about as Spanish as I am you KGB agent you…

    Reply
  19. question says:
    August 11, 2008 at 6:41 pm

    Ptsfp, you know, I con­sider myself kind of lib­er­tar­ian, I don’t usu­ally like the gov­ern­ment or buro­crats, I think soci­ety works per­fect with­our a gov­ern­ment or a state, of course a tran­si­tion would need time but i do believe a bet­ter world could be pos­si­ble with­out taxes and laws gov­ern­ing our moral­ity, it would be more effi­cient and more free. So, I’m just the oppo­site of a com­mu­nist, I want 0% gov­ern­ment, and 100% pri­vate prop­erty, although I pre­fer it the prop­erty was aquired legally and through legit­i­mate means, just prop­erty. I’m not against vio­lence or defense, it just that I’m against ini­tat­ing it, if you are attacked, legit­i­mate defense, but ini­ti­at­ing the use of force is a crime, a real one, not like those crime­less vic­tims like ‘burn­ing a flag’ or ‘buy­ing a us flag made in china’, so, i hate com­mu­nists, and the urss, i explained before that i even pref­ered a europe ruled by hitler than the europe ruled by stalin, the point is, you didn’t, you gave East Europe to the sovi­ets, hell you even start the whole war ‘try­ing to pro­tect Poland’ and ended with Poland destroyed and ruled by the iron boot of the urss, great res­cue! You promised full pro­tec­tion to a bunch of fas­cist gen­er­als in poland who were abus­ing poor civil­ian ger­mans who were put under pol­ish ruled by the unjust and vengeance­full treaty of ver­sailles. You basi­cally started what Roosevelt called, with his own words, “The Unnecesary War”, there’s a new book with this exact title. It has a lot of other well proven ‘gems’ of your might leader and all pow­er­full pres­i­dent. Even after dead, he still con­tin­ues his dream of bring­ing more wars and destruc­tion to the world thanks to a car­rier in his name.
    So the Berlin wall was not a good idea, had I lived dur­ing the russ­ian rev­o­lu­tion I would have fight against the bolcheviks. But, the berlin wall is not the only one, there is the Koren DMZ, a fron­tier who still sep­a­red fam­i­lies and that the kore­ans of both sides wanted to end, but your mil­i­tary pres­ence doesn’t help, indeed, just so you can keep troops near china you are stop­ping the inmi­nent rec­on­cil­i­a­tion, not so good.
    And yes, I’m a spaniard, ask what­ever proof you want, although I don’t see the relevance.

    Reply
  20. Jimbo Jones says:
    August 12, 2008 at 5:25 am

    Go away ques­tion, we are bored of you here and you are low­er­ing the stan­dards of the debate with your tin foil crap such as no holo­caust and the earth is flat.

    Reply
  21. Jimbo Jones says:
    August 12, 2008 at 5:26 am

    http://www.alaska.net/~clund/e_djublonskopf/Flatearthsociety.htm
    This is ‘Questions’ web site btw people.

    Reply
  22. question says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:04 am

    Jimbo,

    Reply
  23. Jimbo Jones says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:19 am

    your a nit arn’t you, i don’t respond to your absurd alt-​​history lessons because they are utter garbage wor­thy of noth­ing more then laugh­ter and full scale mock­ing. Don’t bother respon­ing to me in per­son as i have no more time for internet-​​jesters such as you. Have fun learn­ing about the holo­caust at your local library, douche.

    Reply
  24. Jimbo Jones says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:19 am

    btw i’m a brit, you douche.

    Reply
  25. question says:
    August 12, 2008 at 8:07 am

    Yeah, learn­ing about how your pres­i­dent Churchill pre­pared and insti­gated the Second World War by giv­ing an imposi­ble and ilegi­mate full pro­tec­tion guar­an­tee to the Polish was not impor­tant isn’t?
    Learning that Churchill was the first to order the air bomb­ing of civil­ian cities is not impor­tant?
    Of course you won the war, you wrote his­tory, but there are still one magic thing called books, where his­to­ri­ans dig out through offi­cial papers of the time. So, you don’t want to know about your country’s his­tory? You have more impor­tante things to do like, pro­tect­ing your ego and the ver­sion you were given as a child, it would hurt to know most of whay you believe in is a lie. Being lied to like a sheep hurts. I under­stand, you can go to your impor­tant tasks, like war­mon­ger­ing the nuk­ing of iranians.

    Reply
  26. Just Steve says:
    September 13, 2008 at 8:11 pm

    Jimbo, praise the coun­try full of false truths and empty promises right? I say pity the fool that believes there is. Pearl Harbor was not set up by any­one exclud­ing Yamamoto. You’re an idiot. Don’t bother reply­ing, cause I won’t. Other than this, I will not argue with some­one who does noth­ing to try and change a sup­posed oppres­sive gov­ern­ment. Granted it won’t work, but it would be funny to see you try.

    Reply
  27. Azervideo says:
    May 8, 2009 at 5:30 pm

    for free inter­est­ing videos please visit azervideo dot net

    Reply
  28. Robert says:
    August 9, 2009 at 8:16 pm

    Good post ‚thank u !

    Reply
  29. hquynh says:
    October 15, 2009 at 9:33 pm

    ??
    ????
    ??
    ???? ??
    ????
    ??????
    ?? ??????
    ???
    ???
    ????
    ???? ?????
    ?
    ?? ??????
    ?? ??????
    ?? ??????
    ??? ??????
    ?? ??????
    sod
    ???
    ???? ???
    ?? ????? ?????
    ????
    ????
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ?DVD
    ?DVD
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ???? ??
    ???? ??
    ???? ????
    ??? ????

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      In DTI this article is credited to Sharon...
      Wembley
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Jews wasn't a threat for anyone, that's why this was a tragedie
      A.g.
    • Quick-Deploy 120mm Mortar
      The 120 is mounted in the back of a mortar track and...
      SSG Knapp 11C3O
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I am a New Yorker, and have seen the holes in the ground where...
      Sam
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "This is not the first Muslim soldier to commit treason against his...
      Sam
    • Time to Pull the Plug
      4. The Iraqi Rebels went underground to penetrate OUR and...
      Osher Doctorow
    • Time to Pull the Plug
      Some questions about the Gen. Petraeus Iraqi "Surge"...
      Osher Doctorow
    • The Non-lethal Claymore
      There is a non lethat weapon put out by laser energitics name daser...
      red
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      These guys seem to have had the right idea for a while,...
      TheBoogyMan
    • Airbag Defense
      Hey jack ass (fart) at any time durring that triade did you watch the video?...
      Valcan
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage