DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Around the Globe » A Couple Good Vids of the Georgia Fighting

A Couple Good Vids of the Georgia Fighting

This one is described as “Raw Footage Following Georgian Troops.” Notice the Su-​​25 “Frogfoot” being used in the air-​​to-​​ground attack. That’s the Sov ver­sion of the A-​​10 and was used exten­sively in Afghanistan back in the day.
Here’s another one that I’m not sure of the con­text. Since the upload date says Aug. 7 I won­der if it’s Georgian troops and Ossetian rebels.

– Christian

Share |

August 11th, 2008 | Around the Globe | 400821 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/08/11/a-couple-good-vids-of-the-georgia-fighting/A+Couple+Good+Vids+of+the+Georgia+Fighting2008-08-11+20%3A26%3A55Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Israel’s Russian SAM Zapper | Tuesday — Fire for Effect » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Anonym says:
    August 11, 2008 at 4:19 pm

    What weaponry is Su-​​25 using?

    Reply
  2. ST says:
    August 11, 2008 at 4:27 pm

    Probably UB-​​32 rocket pods (57mm)… Similar to what you see on Hind gun­ships and the Russian equiv­a­lent of cheap 2.75″ Zunis (“FFARS”)

    Reply
  3. ST says:
    August 11, 2008 at 4:35 pm

    Minor cor­rec­tion to my post: 2.75″ FFARS weren’t called Zunis. My bad.

    Reply
  4. Roy Smith says:
    August 11, 2008 at 6:06 pm

    HumanPestControl,
    Can you safely & con­fi­dently guar­an­tee that we could knock out the Russian mil­i­tary indus­trial com­plex? The U.S. has a finite num­ber of M1 Abrams tanks. For argument’s sake,let’s say that the U.S. only has a total of 8,000 tanks.That includes the stripped down chas­sises wait­ing to be rebuilt.
    Russia has the poten­tial to put out T-​​90 tanks in the num­bers that we pro­duced Sherman tanks dur­ing World War II.They can replace each & every tank we blow up.
    If they blow up an M1 Abrams tank,we have to col­lect what’s left of it,ship it back to the states & rebuild it. Even going through all of that rebuilding,refurbishing,& recy­cling of M1 Abrams tanks,we will still have only 8,000 of them.That fig­ure will NEVER increase. If the Russians decide to “deny the enemy” & keep hold of the M1 Abrams corpse they just blew up(meaning we can’t “recy­cle” it),then we are down to 7,999 tanks(even less if they keep “deny­ing the enemy” by hold­ing on to M1 Abrams corpses,not because they can use them,but to keep us from putting them back into ser­vice).
    Let’s face it,the U.S. & the rest of NATO have a seri­ous prob­lem with our main bat­tle tanks because we chose to close the fac­to­ries & break the mold for them. The U.K. decided to close down the fac­tory that makes tank rounds for the rifled tank gun on the Challenger 2. Now they have to change guns to a German smooth­bore gun,or they won’t be able to fight with their Challenger 2 any­more. The Germans not only stopped mak­ing the Leopard 2,but they stopped mak­ing spare parts & now they are fast run­ning out to sup­ply all of the nations using the Leopard 2 tank. France just let all of their mil­i­tary equip­ment fall to s**t & like I said before,I don’t know how many Leclercs are fit for com­bat.
    I have just explained the prob­lem with the “world’s great­est tank,” the Abrams.
    We emas­cu­lated our navy so badly,that we need civil­ian ships to resup­ply & refuel our air­craft car­ri­ers & destroyers(yeah,I know that our car­ri­ers are nuclear powered,but our destroy­ers are not) & we need Canada & our European NATO allies to pro­vide anti-​​submarine war­fare cov­er­age for us. Forget bomb­ing Iran with our naval assets if NATO isn’t on board because of this.
    Instead of being “independent”,we have become enslaved by the NWO & the UN & we are now “inter­de­pen­dent.“
    Forgive me for being bla­tantly rude,but only a moron with their head in the sand or up their arse would not be able to see this.
    There is NO F**KING WAY IN HELL we can touch the inte­rior of Russia with our mis­siles or bombs,so those fac­to­ries will keep s**ting out tanks & other equip­ment non-​​stop

    Reply
  5. Alex says:
    August 11, 2008 at 9:46 pm

    Operation bar­barossa ever enter your nog­gin HumanPestControl?
    The Germans had bet­ter sol­ders and bet­ter tanks. Hell they took 5 mil­lion soviet pris­on­ers. They thought the Soviets were on their last leg. I guess that should have put the nail in the soviet cof­fin right? Please HPC get a clue. You start to stir a hor­nets nest and see what hap­pens in a war of attri­tion. We only have so many apaches and M1a1’s. You might feel comfy in your cyber blanky hop­ing to god that there is no re-​​incarnate Zukoff, me not so much. You think a General Franks would be blitzkrieg­ging through the steppes undaunted, burn­ing and pil­lag­ing like a mad arian? NO NO NO.
    Come back to earth. When you do, go read a few his­tory books and then re-​​edumacate yourself!

    Reply
  6. Roy Smith says:
    August 11, 2008 at 10:39 pm

    HumanPestControl’
    For what whould be per­ceived to be Russia’s strategy,a blue water navy does not fig­ure in to it.The only place that Russia could put a “blue water navy” would be in Siberia on the Pacific & in the Arctic Ocean.If they put a fleet in the Baltic Sea(St. Petersburg) or the Black Sea,they’d be bot­tled up.
    The Russians’ plan is to be a land power. They will move through Georgia,Azerbaijan,& Armenia on one side of the Caspian Sea & Kazakhstan,Uzbekistan,Tajikistan,Kyrgyzstan,& Turkemistan down the other.With Iran,TURKEY,& the for­mer Soviet Central Asian States as a mil­i­tary alliance,Russia will then move through Iraq towards Israel with a com­bined African Union army led by Libya & the Sudan attack­ing Israel through the bombed out Egypt(from a pre­vi­ous war between Israel on one side & Hamas(Palestine),Hezbollah(Lebanon),Syria,Jordan,& Egypt on the other).
    Russia does not need a navy to try to invade Israel.

    Reply
  7. Roy Smith says:
    August 12, 2008 at 2:11 am

    The Sherman tank was a total piece of crap com­pared to the German Tiger tank. The ONLY advan­tage that the Sherman had was that we made so damn many of them com­pared to the finite num­ber of tiger tanks.
    This is the same sit­u­a­tion with the Russian T-72,T-80,& T-​​90 tanks. They can pro­duce so many while we can­not pro­duce one M1 Abrams to replace any tank we lose. Saudi Arabia,Kuwait,Iraq,& Australia are get­ting their tanks from OUR stock,or at least Iraq & Australia are. Egypt is sup­posed to have a fac­tory that still makes M1 tanks,but Israel could eas­ily blow it out of exis­tence.
    Why is it so hard to com­pre­hend this?

    Reply
  8. Roy Smith says:
    August 12, 2008 at 2:18 am

    “You have been obsessed with this old fash­ion E/​W tank bat­tle all week. A cold war obses­sion, with thou­sands of Soviet tanks rolling into Europe. Typical lin­ear think­ing that dri­ves me nuts.“
    No,all of those Russian tanks are going through Georgia,Azerbaijan,Armenia,Kazakhstan,Uzbekistan,Kyrgyzstan,Tajikistan,IRAN,TURKEY,& Iraq through to ISRAEL. They are not going through Europe.I also read where the U.S. Army is totally sur­prised with Russia’s speed in send­ing troops into Georgia.Obviously,they didn’t think that Russia was that sophisticated.

    Reply
  9. JEFF says:
    August 12, 2008 at 9:17 am

    Roy, man you are nuts about some tank facts. Have you for­got­ten about the Air Force, Apaches, A-​​10s? You can try to come back with some­thing about the Russian Air Force but it can’t even hold the jock strap (or train­ing bra) of the USAF. The main bat­tle tank is use­ful but grand Eastern Theater tank bat­tles are way obselote.

    Reply
  10. HumanPestControl says:
    August 12, 2008 at 11:28 am

    Alex,
    I am aware of WW2 his­tory, and am not advo­cat­ing a con­flict, but this is about me and Roy’s tank obses­sion dur­ing WW3, and a fear, that some­how Russia has a bet­ter, larger, and a more pow­er­ful mil­i­tary, using their ‘vast’ man­u­fac­tur­ing capac­ity and high tech sys­tems.
    I specif­i­cally wrote, the US would never invade Russia proper; this is (war gam­ing)) only about free­ing Georgia proper. The Russians will never and can never occupy all their old Soviet stomp­ing grounds, so a widen­ing cam­paign would not hap­pen too much.
    I don’t buy the qual­ity vs quan­tity argu­ments for a vari­ety of rea­sons, any­way. Yes, I do believe his­tory is over rated for a guide to the future. A philo­soph­i­cal argu­ment, not all that pop­u­lar but keeps the play book fresh and I find it more rel­e­vant to actual world events.
    The sim­ple fact that the US can bomb the hell out any coun­try in the world, and no one can bomb the US main­land with con­ven­tional weapons. We know it takes the US 2 years to mobi­lize its indus­trial base. The US is still the largest man­u­fac­tur­ing base in the world, despite the fears to the con­trary. (even big­ger than our out­sourc­ing friend China)
    I know it is Americans’ nature to make threats big­ger than they are, or even make some up, but Russia is not the Soviet Union, and even the Soviets were much more pathetic than we all thought. Stop watch­ing ‘Red Dawn’.
    Better ‘safe than sorry’ argu­ments are BS as well.
    US/​NATO vs Russia and who? 30 tril­lion dol­lar GDP vs 2 tril­lion GDP. But the Russians have more resources..etc.?
    China won’t be help­ing anyone.

    Reply
  11. Jan De Smet says:
    August 12, 2008 at 2:15 pm

    I think some­one should take the effort to mod­er­ate the com­ments on Defense Tech.
    I strug­gled through Roy Smith’s “enlight­ened” words and oh man…
    although “Stop watch­ing Red Dawn” was priceless

    Reply
  12. Roy Smith says:
    August 12, 2008 at 3:38 pm

    “Mis-​​ter Pu-​​tin ne-​​ver hangs a-​​round
    When he hears this Mi-​​ghty sound
    Here we come to SAVE THE DAY
    That means that the U-​​ni-​​ted States are on their way
    Yes-​​sir when there is wrong to right
    the U-​​ni-​​ted States will join the fight
    On the sea or on the land
    they’ve got the sit-​​u-​​a-​​tion well in hand.”

    Reply
  13. question says:
    August 13, 2008 at 12:34 am

    HumanPestControl
    “The US is still the largest man­u­fac­tur­ing base in the world,“
    You are wrong, his is the last year of the US.
    Next year China will be offi­cialy the first in the world.
    ” 30 tril­lion dol­lar GDP vs 2 tril­lion GDP. But the Russians have more resources..etc.?“
    Let me tell you one think,
    100 TRILLION DOLLARS.
    That it the debt the US have.
    And guess who owns them, CHINA and RUSSIA.
    So, the moment they get angry, the oblit­er­ate the US econ­omy, mas­sive infla­tion, unen­em­ploy­ment, civil unrest in a coun­try with mil­lion of armed peo­ple very angry with the gov­ern­ment…
    Let me tell you which econ­mies are grow­ing and which ones are losint, neg­a­tive groth… russ­ian esti­mated aprox for next years, 5%, china, 8–9%, US, –1%…
    Guess which coun­tries have been buy­ing mas­sive cuan­ti­ties of gold and sil­ver? Russian and China, this will back their cur­ren­cies the day you dis­cov­ered Cheney sold your gold to Russia so he could pay his wars…
    So, tell me, the moment you go to war…
    Who the hell is going to lend a sin­gle cent to an overex­tend mas­sively in debt in a rec­ce­sion with sky­rock­et­ing infla­tion and unem­ploy­ment and a very long and dif­fi­cult war com­ing?
    Your mil­i­tary has never been so weak­ened.
    And you haven’t read the lat­est about new gen­er­a­tion war­fare, yes, yous planes can be bombed in US soil while they are sleep­ing, its called ter­ror­ism, and if you are at war or about to enter one, your ene­mies will eas­ily fund and equip their own spe­cial forces teams who could already be in US soil and order to do mas­sive dam­age at night in ter­ror­ist ops, and with your 26 intel­li­gence agen­cies and grow­ing, your coor­di­na­tion would be min­i­mal, even less with satel­lites down.
    So don’t assume that because you are at peace you be attacked first in a pre­emp­tive one.

    Reply
  14. HumanPestController says:
    August 14, 2008 at 11:04 pm

    HAHAHAHAHHAHA, if Russia/​China destroy US econ­omy, by your logic China/​Russia would have lost $100 tril­lion of their own money, lost their entire econ­omy as well by los­ing the biggest mar­ket of their prod­ucts, put US 5750+ nuclear arse­nal at risk, lost bread bas­ket of the world (I guess you don’t need wheat/​corn/​rice/​beef), and pushed the world even worse than what the bar­bar­ians did to Rome. It took 1500 years to catch back up to Roman stan­dards. This time, I doubt if the world can come back at all. You don’t think you can with­stand the nuclear war, do you?

    Reply
  15. question says:
    August 16, 2008 at 6:25 am

    You are wrong. They don’t depend on the US, the don’t need you, sure, you are a good client, you buy all the shit they make, even your core net­work­ing equip­ment is made in china (with gifts inside).
    The US can’t sur­vive. China will just slow down a bit and redi­rect the shit, the prod­ucts to europe or to the new coun­tries who will take the place of the US. They got the bigest manufc­tar­ing, the best bussi­ness incen­tives, and 1 bil­lion of cheap worker still in china, maybe four hun­dred are already middle-​​class or about to become.
    Of course, a neo­con believes th romans were gods, well, if you ever put foot in roman ter­ri­tory you would see the ruins of all the cities they burned alive, the romans only brought two things, poverty and pro­pa­ganda, the destroy every­thing, slave, and tax so much peo­ple die of hunger while the romans had seven bitches each 24/​7 in their palaces. Propaganda because they burned ancient libraries, old stat­ues and any­thing that remem­bered the life with­out the new mas­ters.
    Keep scar­ing the world with your super­nukes and your super shield, one day you won’t have even money to power them on. You know, there is enough dol­lars to buy the planet four times over. Only your nukes keep peo­ple afraid and using the green-​​toiler-​​paper.

    Reply
  16. question says:
    August 16, 2008 at 7:16 am

    And you just explain to the world what kind of peo­ple you are.
    You threat with nukes those who dare to ask the US for the money the own them.
    You ask the world for money, the world lends you money but you don’t want to pay it back, and if the coun­tries who lend you the money (china) ask for what it’s theirs, You threat them with nuclear anhi­la­tion!
    It’s not their prob­lem that you have been print­ing dol­lar non-​​stop for a hun­dred years, no other coun­try has ever com­mit such atroc­ity, you scam the whole planet with your ‘dollar-​​gold’ con­vert­ibil­ity, one day you said, well, it seems we change our opin­ion uoaaah!! With the sta­tus of only super­power you force all the planet to only buy and trade oil with dol­lars, and the coun­tries who dare to chal­lenge you, get invaded, like Irak, or Iran, all the while you install more mil­i­tary bases in cen­tral asia, you are the empire, not ‘the rus­sians, but you got the press, you learned that from the nazis.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • New Army PEO on the way
      To get our AAA quality shoes at reasonable price, Your...
      nike air force ones
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage