DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Around the Globe » A Couple Good Vids of the Georgia Fighting

A Couple Good Vids of the Georgia Fighting

This one is described as “Raw Footage Following Georgian Troops.” Notice the Su-25 “Frogfoot” being used in the air-to-ground attack. That’s the Sov version of the A-10 and was used extensively in Afghanistan back in the day.
Here’s another one that I’m not sure of the context. Since the upload date says Aug. 7 I wonder if it’s Georgian troops and Ossetian rebels.

– Christian

Share |

August 11th, 2008 | Around the Globe | 400821 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/08/11/a-couple-good-vids-of-the-georgia-fighting/A+Couple+Good+Vids+of+the+Georgia+Fighting2008-08-11+20%3A26%3A55Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Israel’s Russian SAM Zapper | Tuesday — Fire for Effect » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Anonym says:
    August 11, 2008 at 4:19 pm

    What weaponry is Su-25 using?

    Reply
  2. ST says:
    August 11, 2008 at 4:27 pm

    Probably UB-32 rocket pods (57mm)… Similar to what you see on Hind gunships and the Russian equivalent of cheap 2.75″ Zunis (“FFARS”)

    Reply
  3. ST says:
    August 11, 2008 at 4:35 pm

    Minor correction to my post: 2.75″ FFARS weren’t called Zunis. My bad.

    Reply
  4. Roy Smith says:
    August 11, 2008 at 6:06 pm

    HumanPestControl,
    Can you safely & confidently guarantee that we could knock out the Russian military industrial complex? The U.S. has a finite number of M1 Abrams tanks. For argument’s sake,let’s say that the U.S. only has a total of 8,000 tanks.That includes the stripped down chassises waiting to be rebuilt.
    Russia has the potential to put out T-90 tanks in the numbers that we produced Sherman tanks during World War II.They can replace each & every tank we blow up.
    If they blow up an M1 Abrams tank,we have to collect what’s left of it,ship it back to the states & rebuild it. Even going through all of that rebuilding,refurbishing,& recycling of M1 Abrams tanks,we will still have only 8,000 of them.That figure will NEVER increase. If the Russians decide to “deny the enemy” & keep hold of the M1 Abrams corpse they just blew up(meaning we can’t “recycle” it),then we are down to 7,999 tanks(even less if they keep “denying the enemy” by holding on to M1 Abrams corpses,not because they can use them,but to keep us from putting them back into service).
    Let’s face it,the U.S. & the rest of NATO have a serious problem with our main battle tanks because we chose to close the factories & break the mold for them. The U.K. decided to close down the factory that makes tank rounds for the rifled tank gun on the Challenger 2. Now they have to change guns to a German smoothbore gun,or they won’t be able to fight with their Challenger 2 anymore. The Germans not only stopped making the Leopard 2,but they stopped making spare parts & now they are fast running out to supply all of the nations using the Leopard 2 tank. France just let all of their military equipment fall to s**t & like I said before,I don’t know how many Leclercs are fit for combat.
    I have just explained the problem with the “world’s greatest tank,” the Abrams.
    We emasculated our navy so badly,that we need civilian ships to resupply & refuel our aircraft carriers & destroyers(yeah,I know that our carriers are nuclear powered,but our destroyers are not) & we need Canada & our European NATO allies to provide anti-submarine warfare coverage for us. Forget bombing Iran with our naval assets if NATO isn’t on board because of this.
    Instead of being “independent”,we have become enslaved by the NWO & the UN & we are now “interdependent.“
    Forgive me for being blatantly rude,but only a moron with their head in the sand or up their arse would not be able to see this.
    There is NO F**KING WAY IN HELL we can touch the interior of Russia with our missiles or bombs,so those factories will keep s**ting out tanks & other equipment non-stop

    Reply
  5. Alex says:
    August 11, 2008 at 9:46 pm

    Operation barbarossa ever enter your noggin HumanPestControl?
    The Germans had better solders and better tanks. Hell they took 5 million soviet prisoners. They thought the Soviets were on their last leg. I guess that should have put the nail in the soviet coffin right? Please HPC get a clue. You start to stir a hornets nest and see what happens in a war of attrition. We only have so many apaches and M1a1’s. You might feel comfy in your cyber blanky hoping to god that there is no re-incarnate Zukoff, me not so much. You think a General Franks would be blitzkriegging through the steppes undaunted, burning and pillaging like a mad arian? NO NO NO.
    Come back to earth. When you do, go read a few history books and then re-edumacate yourself!

    Reply
  6. Roy Smith says:
    August 11, 2008 at 10:39 pm

    HumanPestControl’
    For what whould be perceived to be Russia’s strategy,a blue water navy does not figure in to it.The only place that Russia could put a “blue water navy” would be in Siberia on the Pacific & in the Arctic Ocean.If they put a fleet in the Baltic Sea(St. Petersburg) or the Black Sea,they’d be bottled up.
    The Russians’ plan is to be a land power. They will move through Georgia,Azerbaijan,& Armenia on one side of the Caspian Sea & Kazakhstan,Uzbekistan,Tajikistan,Kyrgyzstan,& Turkemistan down the other.With Iran,TURKEY,& the former Soviet Central Asian States as a military alliance,Russia will then move through Iraq towards Israel with a combined African Union army led by Libya & the Sudan attacking Israel through the bombed out Egypt(from a previous war between Israel on one side & Hamas(Palestine),Hezbollah(Lebanon),Syria,Jordan,& Egypt on the other).
    Russia does not need a navy to try to invade Israel.

    Reply
  7. Roy Smith says:
    August 12, 2008 at 2:11 am

    The Sherman tank was a total piece of crap compared to the German Tiger tank. The ONLY advantage that the Sherman had was that we made so damn many of them compared to the finite number of tiger tanks.
    This is the same situation with the Russian T-72,T-80,& T-90 tanks. They can produce so many while we cannot produce one M1 Abrams to replace any tank we lose. Saudi Arabia,Kuwait,Iraq,& Australia are getting their tanks from OUR stock,or at least Iraq & Australia are. Egypt is supposed to have a factory that still makes M1 tanks,but Israel could easily blow it out of existence.
    Why is it so hard to comprehend this?

    Reply
  8. Roy Smith says:
    August 12, 2008 at 2:18 am

    “You have been obsessed with this old fashion E/W tank battle all week. A cold war obsession, with thousands of Soviet tanks rolling into Europe. Typical linear thinking that drives me nuts.“
    No,all of those Russian tanks are going through Georgia,Azerbaijan,Armenia,Kazakhstan,Uzbekistan,Kyrgyzstan,Tajikistan,IRAN,TURKEY,& Iraq through to ISRAEL. They are not going through Europe.I also read where the U.S. Army is totally surprised with Russia’s speed in sending troops into Georgia.Obviously,they didn’t think that Russia was that sophisticated.

    Reply
  9. JEFF says:
    August 12, 2008 at 9:17 am

    Roy, man you are nuts about some tank facts. Have you forgotten about the Air Force, Apaches, A-10s? You can try to come back with something about the Russian Air Force but it can’t even hold the jock strap (or training bra) of the USAF. The main battle tank is useful but grand Eastern Theater tank battles are way obselote.

    Reply
  10. HumanPestControl says:
    August 12, 2008 at 11:28 am

    Alex,
    I am aware of WW2 history, and am not advocating a conflict, but this is about me and Roy’s tank obsession during WW3, and a fear, that somehow Russia has a better, larger, and a more powerful military, using their ‘vast’ manufacturing capacity and high tech systems.
    I specifically wrote, the US would never invade Russia proper; this is (war gaming)) only about freeing Georgia proper. The Russians will never and can never occupy all their old Soviet stomping grounds, so a widening campaign would not happen too much.
    I don’t buy the quality vs quantity arguments for a variety of reasons, anyway. Yes, I do believe history is over rated for a guide to the future. A philosophical argument, not all that popular but keeps the play book fresh and I find it more relevant to actual world events.
    The simple fact that the US can bomb the hell out any country in the world, and no one can bomb the US mainland with conventional weapons. We know it takes the US 2 years to mobilize its industrial base. The US is still the largest manufacturing base in the world, despite the fears to the contrary. (even bigger than our outsourcing friend China)
    I know it is Americans’ nature to make threats bigger than they are, or even make some up, but Russia is not the Soviet Union, and even the Soviets were much more pathetic than we all thought. Stop watching ‘Red Dawn’.
    Better ‘safe than sorry’ arguments are BS as well.
    US/NATO vs Russia and who? 30 trillion dollar GDP vs 2 trillion GDP. But the Russians have more resources..etc.?
    China won’t be helping anyone.

    Reply
  11. Jan De Smet says:
    August 12, 2008 at 2:15 pm

    I think someone should take the effort to moderate the comments on Defense Tech.
    I struggled through Roy Smith’s “enlightened” words and oh man…
    although “Stop watching Red Dawn” was priceless

    Reply
  12. Roy Smith says:
    August 12, 2008 at 3:38 pm

    “Mis-ter Pu-tin ne-ver hangs a-round
    When he hears this Mi-ghty sound
    Here we come to SAVE THE DAY
    That means that the U-ni-ted States are on their way
    Yes-sir when there is wrong to right
    the U-ni-ted States will join the fight
    On the sea or on the land
    they’ve got the sit-u-a-tion well in hand.”

    Reply
  13. question says:
    August 13, 2008 at 12:34 am

    HumanPestControl
    “The US is still the largest manufacturing base in the world,“
    You are wrong, his is the last year of the US.
    Next year China will be officialy the first in the world.
    ” 30 trillion dollar GDP vs 2 trillion GDP. But the Russians have more resources..etc.?“
    Let me tell you one think,
    100 TRILLION DOLLARS.
    That it the debt the US have.
    And guess who owns them, CHINA and RUSSIA.
    So, the moment they get angry, the obliterate the US economy, massive inflation, unenemployment, civil unrest in a country with million of armed people very angry with the government…
    Let me tell you which econmies are growing and which ones are losint, negative groth… russian estimated aprox for next years, 5%, china, 8–9%, US, –1%…
    Guess which countries have been buying massive cuantities of gold and silver? Russian and China, this will back their currencies the day you discovered Cheney sold your gold to Russia so he could pay his wars…
    So, tell me, the moment you go to war…
    Who the hell is going to lend a single cent to an overextend massively in debt in a reccesion with skyrocketing inflation and unemployment and a very long and difficult war coming?
    Your military has never been so weakened.
    And you haven’t read the latest about new generation warfare, yes, yous planes can be bombed in US soil while they are sleeping, its called terrorism, and if you are at war or about to enter one, your enemies will easily fund and equip their own special forces teams who could already be in US soil and order to do massive damage at night in terrorist ops, and with your 26 intelligence agencies and growing, your coordination would be minimal, even less with satellites down.
    So don’t assume that because you are at peace you be attacked first in a preemptive one.

    Reply
  14. HumanPestController says:
    August 14, 2008 at 11:04 pm

    HAHAHAHAHHAHA, if Russia/China destroy US economy, by your logic China/Russia would have lost $100 trillion of their own money, lost their entire economy as well by losing the biggest market of their products, put US 5750+ nuclear arsenal at risk, lost bread basket of the world (I guess you don’t need wheat/corn/rice/beef), and pushed the world even worse than what the barbarians did to Rome. It took 1500 years to catch back up to Roman standards. This time, I doubt if the world can come back at all. You don’t think you can withstand the nuclear war, do you?

    Reply
  15. question says:
    August 16, 2008 at 6:25 am

    You are wrong. They don’t depend on the US, the don’t need you, sure, you are a good client, you buy all the shit they make, even your core networking equipment is made in china (with gifts inside).
    The US can’t survive. China will just slow down a bit and redirect the shit, the products to europe or to the new countries who will take the place of the US. They got the bigest manufctaring, the best bussiness incentives, and 1 billion of cheap worker still in china, maybe four hundred are already middle-class or about to become.
    Of course, a neocon believes th romans were gods, well, if you ever put foot in roman territory you would see the ruins of all the cities they burned alive, the romans only brought two things, poverty and propaganda, the destroy everything, slave, and tax so much people die of hunger while the romans had seven bitches each 24/7 in their palaces. Propaganda because they burned ancient libraries, old statues and anything that remembered the life without the new masters.
    Keep scaring the world with your supernukes and your super shield, one day you won’t have even money to power them on. You know, there is enough dollars to buy the planet four times over. Only your nukes keep people afraid and using the green-toiler-paper.

    Reply
  16. question says:
    August 16, 2008 at 7:16 am

    And you just explain to the world what kind of people you are.
    You threat with nukes those who dare to ask the US for the money the own them.
    You ask the world for money, the world lends you money but you don’t want to pay it back, and if the countries who lend you the money (china) ask for what it’s theirs, You threat them with nuclear anhilation!
    It’s not their problem that you have been printing dollar non-stop for a hundred years, no other country has ever commit such atrocity, you scam the whole planet with your ‘dollar-gold’ convertibility, one day you said, well, it seems we change our opinion uoaaah!! With the status of only superpower you force all the planet to only buy and trade oil with dollars, and the countries who dare to challenge you, get invaded, like Irak, or Iran, all the while you install more military bases in central asia, you are the empire, not ‘the russians, but you got the press, you learned that from the nazis.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Oh my god, scrap the entire thing already!
      MPY
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      The PT boats were specifically designed for littoral...
      PolicyWonk
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Blah, Blah, Blah They've been talking about this...
      Tim
    • Life Can Go On — JLTV Protest Denied
      are any of yall even in the army or marines...
      ARMY SPC
    • Russia’s Sneaky Missile: Details Here
      russia hydrofoil-carrier :...
      hydrofoil
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
      No problem if US with Obama...
      landouzy
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Unfortunately its only a Tucano trainer :-( Our CGS...
      wstr
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      alabama a&p's need that contract, keep fightin'
      buck
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Have'nt we built thousands of this in WWI and...
      roland
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      I'm enlisting in the Navy in July. We need more...
      Curtis
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage