DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Around the Globe » Georgia Strikes Back With Air Defenses

Georgia Strikes Back With Air Defenses

If the land war in Georgia so far seems to be going decid­edly in favor of the Russian army and navy, the Georgians seem to be rack­ing up a lop­sided score with their air defenses.

Over the week­end, the Russians made a suc­cess­ful advance on land through South Ossetia to the out­skirts of the Georgian east-​​west trans­porta­tion hub of Gori. There also was a one-​​sided naval bat­tle — that resulted in the sink­ing of a Georgian gun­boat — in the Black Sea off the coast of the sec­ond break­away enclave of Abkhazia.

However, Georgian air defenses appear to be tak­ing a steady toll on Russian air­craft. Russia has admit­ted to los­ing a total of four air­craft (the Georgians claim 10) in the con­flict. So far they’ve admit­ted to the destruc­tion of three Su-​​25 Frogfoot strike air­craft and a Tu-​​22M3 Backfire bomber that was fly­ing a recon­nais­sance mis­sion.

Photos from the com­bat area show the wreck of the Tu-​​22 and a Frogfoot as well as a pic­ture of the Backfire pilot in a Georgian hos­pi­tal. The pilot was Col. Igor Zinov, a 50 year-​​old Tu-​​22M3 instruc­tor pilot sta­tioned at the Russian Flight Test Center at Akhtubinsk. (See Aviation Week’s defense photo gallery for photos.)


“Ergo, the Russians are using their A-​​Team, as expected,” a U.S. ana­lyst says.

Other ana­lysts say the Georgians are prob­a­bly oper­at­ing the SA-​​11 Buk-​​M1 (low-​​to-​​high alti­tude) and the (low-​​to-​​medium alti­tude) Tor-​​1M mobile air defense mis­sile sys­tems.

“The Russians have gone to great lengths to try and impli­cate the Ukraine in the Russian Air Force losses, even going as far as to sug­gest that an SA-​​5 sold to the Georgians by the Ukraine was respon­si­ble for the Backfire loss,” a sec­ond U.S. ana­lyst says. “That’s clearly not the case, but shows the Russian attempt to bring the Ukraine into the periph­ery of this event by impli­ca­tion, and to attempt to explain how one of their pre­mier long-​​range attack assets could have been shot down so easily.


“The Russian press has been mak­ing lots of noise about the BUK and TOR sys­tems, and I would say that the BUK is the most likely cul­prit for all of these air­craft losses,” the ana­lyst says. “If so, it points out a major flaw in the Russian plan — not gain­ing [and] main­tain­ing pure air supe­ri­or­ity [and] dom­i­nance over the bat­tle­space by tak­ing out the Georgian air defenses and air defense net­work before they went into the con­flict.“

Russian-​​built and designed air defenses are appar­ently exploitable, as was shown in the Israeli Air Force’s total shut down of Syrian air defenses prior to bomb­ing a sus­pected nuclear site. But Russia appar­ently has yet to apply the dig­i­tal keys to unlock the Georgians’ net­work.

During the months before the con­flict, the Russians claimed to have shot down sev­eral Hermes 450 UAVs (made by Israeli-​​based Elbit) with fighter air­craft sta­tioned at least tem­porar­ily in South Ossetia.

The Russians say they shot down a Georgian Frogfoot out­side the town of Eredvi in South Ossetia today. The Russians — in a stun­ning piece of irony — have twice bombed the Su-​​25 Frogfoot man­u­fac­tur­ing plant on the out­skirts of the Georgian cap­i­tal of Tbilisi.

Read the rest of this story from Aviation Week at Military​.com.

– Aviation Week

Share |

August 12th, 2008 | Around the Globe | 401319 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/08/12/georgia-strikes-back-with-air-defenses/Georgia+Strikes+Back+With+Air+Defenses2008-08-12+20%3A21%3A24Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « How the Russian and Georgian Troops Match Up | I’m Not a Laser Expert but I Do Play One on TV » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. kert says:
    August 12, 2008 at 4:22 pm

    Actually, the lat­est geor­gian claim for downed planes was 19

    Reply
  2. njfr says:
    August 12, 2008 at 4:56 pm

    This report seems pretty hard to square with these:
    http://​www​.mcclatchydc​.com/​h​o​m​e​p​a​g​e​/​s​t​o​r​y​/​4​7​6​1​8​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.mcclatchydc​.com/​2​2​7​/​s​t​o​r​y​/​4​7​8​1​5​.​h​tml

    Reply
  3. pete says:
    August 12, 2008 at 5:11 pm

    I find it very inter­est­ing that the Russians haven’t been able to dis­able the Georgian anti-​​air assets that are in the region and i am curi­ous if the U.S. or israeli gov­ern­ments have actu­ally been able to ren­der them unbreak­able by the Russians some­how. Either by reprogramming/​reflashing thier com­put­ers or com­ing up with some type of crypto the Russians sim­ply can not tackle.

    Reply
  4. Ptsfp says:
    August 12, 2008 at 8:59 pm

    As this thing seems to be com­ing to an end, the NATO nations are think­ing of a pun­ish­ment for Russia’s activ­i­ties. The stuff they are think­ing of doing seems like empty token things.
    I think that Russia should be forced to pay for the dam­age that they caused in the areas nowhere near the break away zones. Hell, make them rebuild the schools and other build­ings too…

    Reply
  5. question says:
    August 13, 2008 at 12:08 am

    “I think that Russia should be forced to pay for the dam­age that they caused in the areas“
    What are you talk­ing about?
    Italy and Finnland have already sided with Russia crit­ic­ing the anti-​​russian bias in the UE and are ok with the russ­ian sug­ges­tion of bring­ing the geor­gians to be judged at La Hague in the International Justice Sysstem.
    It was the goer­gians the one who attack, stop telling lies!
    And when the rus­sians entered, the geor­gians retr­reat a bit and con­tin­ued to bomb ose­tia from inside posi­tions in geor­gia!
    The loses the rus­sians sol­diers have suf­fered were for com­ing as soon as they could before every shelling of ose­tians vil­lages by the geor­gians means kids dead, orphaned and now you want the rus­sians to pay for a war that geor­gia started!

    Reply
  6. mike says:
    August 13, 2008 at 5:21 am

    The Russians know that there’s lots of US and prob­a­bly Israeli ELINT assets in the area. There’s no way they are going to tip their hand on their air defence sup­pres­sion stuff just to save a few Su-​​25s. It’s not like they were going to, y’know, lose or anything.

    Reply
  7. George says:
    August 13, 2008 at 5:27 am

    It seems that a lot of Georgian state­ments have turned out to be either false or stretch­ing the truth.
    Lots of mil­i­tary man­u­als rec­om­mend giv­ing good news to increase the moral of your troops. Maybe this is that.
    Still the fact that so many air­craft (4 con­firmed) were shot down may indi­cate either that the Soviet SAMs are good or that the used Russian air­craft do not have suf­fi­cient counter mea­sures to defeat such missiles.

    Reply
  8. Andre says:
    August 13, 2008 at 7:31 am

    I’m in no way will defend Russia. However, a few things that make me weary to side with Georgia.
    As Russian gov­ern­ment presents its case to its own peo­ple they went in there because Georgian army was essen­tially slaugh­ter­ing civil­ians left and right and last but not least Georgians were attack­ing their peace keep­ers.
    Let’s turn to his­tory and see what NATO did when Serbs start slaugh­ter­ing civil­ians. NATO brought in coali­tion forces and ‘explained’ to Serbs what they shouldn’t be doing. Well, Russians did the same thing to Georgia. So can we blame them now?
    Secondly, is there a prece­dent when reg­u­lar mil­i­tary force (Georgians in this case) was allowed to attack peace keep­ers with impunity. I’m not a mil­i­tary his­to­rian so any­one who can add to this point I will greatly appre­ci­ated.
    I hap­pened to speak Russian so I read some of the arti­cle and watch Russian news. They present com­pletely dif­fer­ent pic­ture from what’s being shown on BBC and CNN. I always liked BBC for there inde­pen­dent and objec­tive cov­er­age but I must admit that even BBC was re-​​playing same video clip for over two days. This makes me won­der is BBC ran out of news in the war zone (I don’t even bother with CNN). Russians at the same time were com­plain­ing about west­ern gov­ern­ments and media that they present skewed pic­ture of what ‘s really hap­pen­ing. So, are we really being BSed by our gov­ern­ments and media as to what’s really hap­pen­ing in S. Ossetia? My feel­ing that the answer is yes.
    As to pun­ish­ing Russia with pick­ing up a tab for all the destruc­tions. According to Russian news chan­nels, Medvedev/​Putin are allo­cat­ing bud­get for rebuild­ing S.Osetia though they aren’t the ones who did the shelling of Tshenvali.
    Anyway, this is just my two cents/​rubles ;-) on this topic.
    Fire away gents.

    Reply
  9. Ed says:
    August 13, 2008 at 10:18 am

    You folks want peace there? Here’s how to do it!
    First we have our planes that are based at Incirlik start fly­ing over Georgia and make a no-​​fly zone for all Georgian and Russian com­bat air­craft.
    Next we start fly­ing UAVs to mon­i­tor troop move­ments from both sides to stop their move­ments any­where, with a threat to open fire on either side that ven­tures across pre-​​determined red-​​lines.
    3rd, we move the Russian Forces out of Georgian, Abkhazian, and Ossetian Territory and move NATO peace­keep­ers in, per­haps using for­mer Soviet Republics for the troop con­tin­gent.
    4th, If the Russians still fail to stop aggres­sion and the Georgians keep sign­ing peace-​​deals, bring in emer­gency sup­plies of Javelins to Georgian Forces to stop Russian Armored forces and start fir­ing hell­fires from Predator UAVs.
    5th and final mea­sure if all oth­ers fail. American Combat Aircraft begin airstrikes against Russian Targets in Georgia, fol­lowed by US Ground Troops if need be.
    To all of you that say that Georgia needs to be pun­ished, start read­ing the facts of the story. The Georgians entered South Ossetia after sep­a­ratists fired on Georgian posi­tions, while the sep­a­ratists fired from next to the Russian Peacekeeper’s base in Ossetia, with Russian Officers look­ing on. The Russian forces in the Area entered Ossetia, less than 24 hours into the start of the con­flict, includ­ing launch­ing Airstrikes from mul­ti­ple loca­tions and bring­ing in Long Range avi­a­tion assets as well.
    After the Georgian offen­sive was repulsed, the Russians then entered Georgian ter­ri­tory from 2 fronts, both in Ossetia and Abkhazia, which also included tak­ing the largest port in Georgia, the largest Georgian Miltary base, and within 2 days, had siezed the only East-​​West cross­roads in the Country. Even after this was done and Medvedev claimed that he had called upon his forces to halt, airstrikes and ground assaults con­tin­ued, with Russian forces in the lead, fol­lowed by attacks in Kodori Gorge from Abkhaz sep­a­ratists.
    This is about the Oil pipelines. If Russia takes Georgia, all the oil pipelines from Azerbaijan are now firmly in Russian hands.

    Reply
  10. Roy Smith says:
    August 13, 2008 at 5:41 pm

    “First we have our planes that are based at Incirlik start fly­ing over Georgia and make a no-​​fly zone for all Georgian and Russian com­bat air­craft.“
    Turkey didn’t want any part of the Iraq war(except when they send troops & planes into Kurdestan),do you seri­ously think they will allow us to fly CAPs in Georgia? Besides,it strongly looks like Turkey’s days as a NATO mem­ber & ally are totally num­bered & she will line up with Russia & Iran.
    For what­ever reason,it looks like Russia may extend this into the Ukraine. You also have “Pro-​​Russian” sep­a­ratists in Moldova. maybe with the excep­tion of the Baltic States of Lithuania,Latvia,& Estonia,Russia is try­ing to seize con­trol of all the for­mer Soviet States that became inde­pen­dent after the fall of the USSR.
    Seizing the Ukraine & their defense fac­to­ries will help Russia tremen­dously.
    Maybe we could as a token mea­sure seize Kaliningrad from Russia in the Baltic Sea.
    Russia can’t help Serbia recover Kosovo & we could eas­ily blockade(talking about NATO doing this) St. Petersburg & then seize Kaliningrad. However,with the help of Iran,Turkey,Pakistan,& the Shanghai Cooperation Organization mem­ber Central Asian States of Kazakhstan,Kyrgyzstan,Uzbekistan,& Tajikistan,Russia will be able to block­ade Afghanistan.
    I com­pletely under­stand that there are delu­sional peo­ple out there who believe that the U.S. is so pow­er­ful & strong that other nations trem­ble at the mere men­tion of the name “the United States of America” & all oppo­si­tion melts away as our oppo­nents flee in fear & ter­ror,& all we have to say to Russia is “F-​​22 Raptor & UCAVs” & Russia will imme­di­ately sur­ren­der.
    That’s what I call,“strong delu­sion” & believ­ing a LIE. Those indi­vid­u­als CANNOT present a valid argu­ment as to why the U.S. is so powerful,they can only insult & belit­tle those who refuse to toe the “Neo-​​Con ‘Artist’” party line about why we scrapped so many of our weapon sys­tems & how what we have left can still “kick ass” & how “cold war” tactics(like massed armor for instance) are so yes­ter­day because.….because their arro­gant asses said so,& you & I would know it if we were as bril­liant & intel­li­gent as their arro­gant asses are.

    Reply
  11. Doz says:
    August 13, 2008 at 6:21 pm

    A Georgian “air defence net­work”? Nonsense. The vast major­ity of reports of the war indi­cate that the Russian Air Force has been bomb­ing Georgia with impunity — if Georgia actu­ally had a net­work worth a damn, as opposed to one or two SAM launch­ers that have inflicted a few shoot­downs, all those major tar­gets reported bombed — wouldn’t have eben bombed. I would’ve thought that was obvi­ous. It’s really not a big deal that Georgia’s shot down a few planes, the Russians still have obvi­ous air superiority.

    Reply
  12. TrentTelenko says:
    August 13, 2008 at 7:14 pm

    The four air­craft the Russians have admit­ted to los­ing so far are three Su-​​25 Frogfoot and a Tu-​​22 Backfire bomber.
    The sim­plest expla­na­tion is that the Su-25’s lacked pre­ci­sion guided ordi­nance and entered into the range of Georgian shoul­der fired mis­siles that hit them from behind and below. Their pilots never saw the incom­ing mis­sile that took them down.
    The Tu-​​22 was lost over Tblisi to an SA-​​11 that was not jammed because of the Georgian Su-​​25 strike that took out the 58th Army’s com­man­der on the 2nd day of the inva­sion.
    The Russians could not pro­tect their own armored columns with SA-11’s if they were busy jam­ming Georgian SA-​​11s.
    The Tu-​​22 went on a recce mis­sion dur­ing that time and got killed by an unsu­pressed Georgian SA-​​11 as a result.

    Reply
  13. Ptsfp says:
    August 17, 2008 at 6:56 pm

    Gotta love it, Russia signs an agree­ment to with­drawl imme­di­atly and they say they are not sure how long it will take. Then they site the Americans in Iraq.
    I don’t see how they can relate the two. The US is rebuild­ing a coun­try, Russia is destroy­ing one.
    Russia is strip­ping the coun­try, steal­ing and loot­ing. Probably plant­ing all sorts of intel­li­gence devices too…
    It is good to see the European nations stand­ing together against Russian aggres­sion. They will think twice before they try to do some­thing like this again. Especially if the coun­tries are armed with Patriot missle batteries.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    Recent Comments
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      The US Military should hold annual fashion shows. The Army...
      Zandor
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'd also like to point out, that soldier systems has been...
      a1189
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Has to do with traverse speed. If the target is close then the...
      Charles
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Totally forgot about astrogation. Star maps loaded into a...
      Charles
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      freefalling: -The Germans used beam-riding during WW2 and it...
      Charles
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      batvette: A lot of JSF money was spent before the meltdown....
      Charles
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
      Phantom Works is Boeing is it not? I dunno what...
      Charles
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Senator McCain says, “ Sticks and stones may break my bones...
      Alton
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Jimbo thats pretty much all the british government...
      Valcan
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      I hope so; flexible armor may save lives because...
      Marcase
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage