DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Door Kickers » Coast Guard Joins the SEALs

Coast Guard Joins the SEALs

FL_coastieSEAL_081508.jpg

The Coast Guard wants to get a bit more “hooyah” by jump­ing on the spe­cial oper­a­tions forces band­wagon with a new pro­gram that could put as many as 28 of its per­son­nel into elite Navy SEAL teams by 2016.

Under an agree­ment signed in early August among the Navy, Coast Guard and U.S. Special Operations Command, as many as four Coastguardsmen from across the ser­vice will be selected each year to undergo the rig­or­ous SEAL train­ing, includ­ing Basic Underwater Demolition School and follow-​​on instruc­tion. Eventually they would become full-​​fledged mem­bers of SEAL com­mando teams deployed to ter­ror­ist war zones.

Coast Guard offi­cials say this lim­ited num­ber of Coasties-​​turned-​​SEALs re-​​entering their ranks after a tour in the spe­cial war­fare com­mu­nity — which could last as many as seven years — will be a boon for morale, train­ing and job skills in a ser­vice that bridges the worlds of counter-​​terrorism oper­a­tions and law enforcement.

“What this does is it pro­vides us bet­ter capa­bil­ity, increased com­pe­ten­cies, more expe­ri­ence and greater knowl­edge to do the things that we are already doing today,” said Rear Adm. Thomas Atkin, com­man­der of the Coast Guard’s Deployable Operations Group which deals with spe­cial­ized counter-​​terrorism and mil­i­tary missions.

“They’re going to be able to bring back an esprit de corps that you learn within the SEAL com­mu­nity. We don’t always have that,” Atkin added dur­ing an Aug. 15 inter­view with mil­i­tary blog­gers. “We have a great ser­vice, I’m very proud to wear the blue, but the esprit de corps that comes out of the folks that go to BUDS [and] mem­bers of SEAL teams … those expe­ri­ences, that knowl­edge, that mind­set are all things that are going to ben­e­fit the Coast Guard in the long term.”

Though Atkin said “anec­do­tally” there’s a lot of enthu­si­asm for the pro­gram, so far no Coastguardsmen have applied in the two weeks since it was announced. The dead­line for appli­ca­tions is in mid-​​September.

The SEALs, along with other spe­cial oper­a­tions forces in the Army, Air Force and Marine Corps, have been adding to their ranks since the Sept. 11 attacks and the injec­tion of even a few more per­son­nel from the Coast Guard is a wel­come addi­tion, a Navy Special Warfare offi­cer said.

“What that means to us is approx­i­mately two SEAL pla­toons,” said Lt. Cmdr. Christian Dunbar, direc­tor of train­ing at the Navy Special Warfare Center in Coronado, Calif. “This just adds a greater base of qual­i­fied can­di­dates that don’t come from recruits in the Navy or from the fleet. … It’s a win-​​win for everyone.”

The new rela­tion­ship between the SEALs and Coast Guard was forged in an Aug. 1 mem­o­ran­dum of under­stand­ing signed by Commandant Thad Allen and rep­re­sen­ta­tives of the Navy and Special Operations Command after nearly a year of nego­ti­a­tions among the ser­vices. Allen wrote in an “Alcoast” mes­sage announc­ing the plan that Coastguardsmen will gain “valu­able skills and knowl­edge to sup­port [the] DoD and increase the Coast Guard’s capa­bil­i­ties in our ports, water­ways and coastal secu­rity mis­sion, specif­i­cally counter-​​terrorism and anti-​​terrorism operations.”

But the new pro­gram is not with­out its crit­ics, par­tic­u­larly within the high­est ranks of the Coast Guard com­mu­nity, sources say. The cul­ture of the more than two century-​​old ser­vice bridges both civil­ian and mil­i­tary oper­a­tions with a tra­di­tional empha­sis in res­cue, mar­itime safety and law enforcement.

Since the estab­lish­ment of the Department of Homeland Security and the Coast Guard’s new counter-​​terrorism role, that cul­ture and oper­a­tional men­tal­ity has changed, expe­ri­enced Coast Guard sources say. That’s made the shift toward a more SEAL-​​like ethos — par­tic­u­larly in the newly estab­lished Deployable Operations Group, where the SEAL vets will return for duty after their team tour — more accept­able to old-​​school Coastguardsmen.

“I think it’s going to be very com­pat­i­ble,” said Coast Guard Master Chief Petty Officer Darrick DeWitt, the DOG’s senior enlisted advi­sor. “When you look at the way the Coast Guard’s evolv­ing … bring­ing in that type of men­tal­ity and cul­ture and under­stand­ing of the oper­a­tions is going to be great for our organization.”

Officials with the DOG will han­dle the ini­tial SEAL appli­cants, putting them through a set of phys­i­cal tests to demon­strate whether they have what it takes to be a com­mando — a process Dunbar said would “set them up for suc­cess.” Those who make it through will enter pre-​​BUDS train­ing in December, and the first group will join a BUDS class in February 2009.

So far the plan is to have two offi­cers and two enlisted per­son­nel assigned to the SEALs each year, but Atkin said he’s not going to stick to that for­mula if the qual­i­fi­ca­tions don’t match.

To Atkin, a for­mer SEAL steeped in both the tra­di­tions of spe­cial war­fare and law enforce­ment would be a key addi­tion to his com­mand — and one long in coming.

“This is his­toric, it’s dif­fer­ent, but I think it’s very con­sis­tent with the long part­ner­ship we’ve had with the United States Navy stretch­ing all the way back to our birth 218 years ago,” Atkin said.

– Christian

Share |

August 15th, 2008 | Door Kickers | 402216 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/08/15/coast-guard-joins-the-seals/Coast+Guard+Joins+the+SEALs2008-08-15+19%3A27%3A15Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Inside the Cyber Command Turf Battle | Monday — Fire for Effect » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. OIFIII says:
    August 15, 2008 at 4:10 pm

    If you want to be a SEAL, why not just join the Navy? Seems like those that join the Coast Guard want to do Coast Guard stuff and peo­ple who join the Navy want to do Navy stuff.

    Reply
  2. John says:
    August 15, 2008 at 4:43 pm

    “…so far no Coastguardsmen have applied in the two weeks since it was announced“
    That’s because any­one tough enough and deter­mined enough to become a SEAL doesn’t join the Coast Guard, they join the Navy or the Marines. And I don’t mean that in a pejo­ra­tive way.

    Reply
  3. Old Crusty Chief says:
    August 16, 2008 at 6:37 am

    I dis­agree, boys. If they’re not already in, they’ll enlist soon enough. There are just some young men and women who want to be Coasties; hav­ing this brass ring hang­ing there will pull in just the kind of young men who’d love to reach for it wear­ing Coast Guard blue.
    What’s more, the Coasties have been cheek-​​by-​​jowl with the Navy for decades on sev­eral long-​​standing mis­sions includ­ing LEDET for counter-​​drug ops. When the shoot­ing stops in OIF/​OEF, these folks will still be doing some nut-​​shrinkingly dan­ger­ous ops with drug inter­dic­tion and non-​​compliant board­ings. Having fully trained and expe­ri­enced SEALs in their ranks can only be an enhance­ment…, and if the word gets out far enough, a deter­rent to knuck­le­heads on those non-​​compliant board­ings.
    So, BZ to the USCG and bully to the first appli­cant!
    Cheers,
    Chief B.

    Reply
  4. Old Crusty Chief says:
    August 16, 2008 at 4:18 pm

    Re: Byron
    I respect­fully dis­agree, Byron.
    First, 9/​11 for­ever blurred the for­merly dis­tinct lines among LE, intel, mil­i­tary, and civil oper­a­tions. Insisting that the Coasties stick reck­lessly to an LE role is an obso­lete idea. In any event, the nature of LE itself has evolved to become more vio­lent and more akin to SOLIC. Would you have Joseph Wambaugh’s “Blue Knight” serv­ing a drug war­rant in the Los Angeles of today?
    Second, the cost of train­ing a hand­ful of Coasties to be SEALs is tri­fling. The Navy will likely spend that much on new nametags and brass memen­tos next year.
    Third, osmo­sis works. I speak from my own expe­ri­ences that hav­ing some­one in a small unit with bet­ter skills and train­ing has a pos­i­tive effect on the entire team as that mem­ber passes on the learn­ing. “See one, do one, teach one” and “train the trainer” is the way we’ve done things in the naval ser­vice for a very, very long time. I don’t see why that wouldn’t work here as well.
    Lastly, any soul that can hump it all the way through BUDS and then all the fol­low on train­ing to actu­ally make it to the teams will no doubt have earned the respect of their fel­low SEALs… begrudg­ing or not. I’d be thor­oughly dis­mayed to find it oth­er­wise.
    J’attends votre r

    Reply
  5. stephen russell says:
    August 18, 2008 at 8:57 am

    About time, why not & estd SEAL force for the USCG IE Sea SWAT Force from USCG ships for mis­sions.
    Long over­due & needed. Expand the train­ing for CG per­son­nel A-​​Z.

    Reply
  6. LEON HOUSTON says:
    August 18, 2008 at 2:18 pm

    The Coast Guard has a record of work­ing with EOD/​Seal teams as far back as the 1984 Olympics. Oscar-​​Bravo 131, URAH! At least it is talked about now! Seals have gone to USCG schools and con­tinue to do so at CG Special Missions train­ing cen­ters along with Force Recon,ETC.. 9th PSU trained with Force Recon. We were a deploy­able oper­a­tions group.Can you iden­tify a Russian APC?
    Do you know how to counter a patrol ambush? If not shut up, sit down and let those who have done and will do take the lead!

    Reply
  7. Byron Skinner says:
    August 18, 2008 at 9:52 pm

    Good Evening Leon,
    I guess I meet your cri­te­ria to com­ment. What we are see­ing in Georgia is the Russian BMP-​​3 APC and as far as ambush patrols I was an 11B in Vietnam in 1966, I was out on dozens of ‘em. How many have you been on?
    As for coun­ter­ing an ambush the pla­toon size unit on Nov. 21, 1966 earned a Preidental Unit Citation for coun­ter­ing and bust­ing up an ambush of the NVA Dong Nai Regiment, we ended the war for them, our Platoon size unit not only pro­tected a con­voy we attacked into the ambush, we took 4 KIAs and left a body count in the hun­dreds and that was before Tac. Air got on the scene. The fol­low­ing week or so I was in another ambush at Soui Cat, that ended my career in Nam, there we took the 275th. VC Regiment out of the war. Oh by the way Leon, we got another Presidental Unit Citation for Soui Cat.
    What may I ask makes you an expert on ambushes?
    The Coast Guard is not in this busi­ness. They are the worlds best at what they do and with the politi­cians throw­ing money around they should be buy­ing new boats, air­craft and mod­ern­iz­ing their equip­ment.
    The Coast Guard needs a lot more items before they invest in the fool­ish­ness of SEAL train­ing for a select few. For starter they can get a replace­ment Patrol Boat for Oceanside Ca. who pre­vi­ous boat was scrapped because of age.
    ALLONS.
    Byron Skinner

    Reply
  8. LEON HOUSTON says:
    August 19, 2008 at 7:03 am

    My com­ments are directed at the inter­nal view of those mem­bers of the USCG that resist any change toward mil­i­tary action. It used to be peo­ple were opposed to the larger law enforce­ment role that devel­oped in the 1980’s. Anyone’s ser­vice out­side of the USCG’s 8 spe­cific mis­sion roles would have more oppor­tu­nity to do and know the skill sets that you pos­sess, but most do not know the skill sets we pos­sess.
    Equipment can come directly from DOD, when the CG comes under the NAVY dur­ing WARTIME. This has not hap­pened yet. Most peo­ple need to see and hear reg­u­lar USCG duties as an exam­ple, from US SPECIAL FORCES, a guide to to America’s Special Operations Units, the first para­graph states the following,“There’s an ocean-​​going ser­vice that is older than the US Navy, answers fifty thou­sand calls for help each year in all weather and sea con­di­tions, and deploys “res­cue swim­mers” and avi­a­tion assets that are rem­i­nis­cent of Navy SEALS ans AF Pararescue Jumpers.…. Coast Guard INTEL has been given a place in the national secu­rity pan­theon, and the NAVY has just trans­ferred a dozen 170-​​foot Special Operations ships to Coast Guard control-​​both sig­nals that this often over­looked branch of the ser­vice is about to assume a greater role in both secu­rity and Special Operations work.“
    My com­ments are try­ing to engage other ser­vice mem­bers like your­self. I remem­ber the Marines in Quantico did not know what to call us, until after­wards they said we rated as equiv­a­lent to US Army Green Beret in our train­ing scores for urban com­bat. I remem­ber when dur­ing night train­ing that the Marines at our des­ti­na­tion point eval­u­a­tion point kept won­der­ing how we could find the right asimuth 99% of the time. I sim­ply asked him had he ever run a res­cue pat­tern at sea? The base paper listed the pic­ture of Marines thank­ing the USCG for com­bat res­cues dur­ing WWII.
    Thank you for your com­ments, it leads toward JIATF
    under­stand­ing and com­bined force doctrine!

    Reply
  9. demophilus says:
    August 19, 2008 at 1:32 pm

    Leon, Byron:
    Not for noth­ing, but you might be com­ing at the same point from dif­fer­ent direc­tions. The US has a lot of dif­fer­ent brown water, “alli­ga­tor navy” mar­itime irreg­u­lar war­fare assets: the USCG MSST, PSU and LEDET teams, Navy Mobile Inshore Undersea Warfare, and Small Boat Units. That doesn’t even count dual func­tion units: haz­mat teams have some WMD response capa­bil­ity, and SAR can always drop the “res­cue” part of their skill set, and segue to “destroy”, if the mis­sion demands it.
    All of these units have been cross train­ing for some time. By most accounts, cur­rent port secu­rity and VBSS tac­tics have been pro­gres­sively refined by bounc­ing between USCG and USN teams. USCG and USN small boat units have worked side by side in pretty much every mod­ern war we’ve had.
    If you’re famil­iar with that long his­tory, hav­ing a few Coasties take SEAL train­ing almost smells like a pub­lic­ity stunt. It’s almost like a dis­trac­tion from prob­lems at higher lev­els of the USCG — Deepwater, the National Security Cutter, etc., etc.
    If not for the Posse Comitatus Act, the more effi­cient way to dis­sem­i­nate SEAL skills through the USCG would be to have SEALs tasked to the USCG. Because of Posse Comitatus, you could only do that with SEAL vet­er­ans, or pos­si­bly reservists. Don’t know if that’s real­is­tic, but IMHO as a tax­payer, it beats the sh*t out of hav­ing them go to PMCs.
    Don’t know; it’s food for thought. IMHO, some­thing hap­pens to irreg­u­lar war­fare doc­trine and/​or units when you put a logo on them. Competence is more than a new patch, or rat­ing.
    Good luck to every­one involved in the new ven­ture. Here’s hop­ing they don’t put hype over sub­stance. That’s the national disease.

    Reply
  10. LEON HOUSTON says:
    August 19, 2008 at 7:36 pm

    Byron, Leon:
    Same Page, I say again Same Page. Now let’s keep the brains work­ing here folks. I agree with all the fla­vors in the dish, we just have to work out the cook time. Yes, maybe it is a pub­lic­ity stunt, but let’s face it, the USCG needs as much PR as pos­si­ble, never the less, the prob­lems with pro­cure­ment are a new prob­lem to us. We used to say that our ships were made of wood and our crew of steel. Granted Deep Water seems to be another way to get Def Contractors paid with invalid results for the USCG. We know what we need, just let us build it off the shelf. Look how long it took the NAVY to fix the Mark V Seal Boat with the new one sit­ting in the water for review. I bet many injured SEALS knew how to fix it a long time ago!
    I am proud to have all of you com­ment about this issue. Hell, nobody even heard of a PSU,in the Coast Guard even, when we were start­ing 9th PSU.
    We bet­ter get this thing right because the more skill sets the bet­ter the sur­vival prob­a­bil­ity.
    The way we are being hit in Afghan cur­rently dic­tate that you can­not make any mis­takes and you have to use what you got with you, no MIKE force.
    We have to get to my “Perfect Battalion Concept” and use every­thing and the kitchen sink to make it work. No lim­its. Fort Sam is becom­ing the Medic train­ing base for all the services.Good start, pull some of us who have served to inter­face with author­ity to the defense con­trac­tors to solve prob­lems like Byron has listed with the USCG in asset pro­cure­ment, sug­gest action plans to the Joint Chiefs and lobby
    Congress if needed, but DO NOT STOP!
    Manpower prob­lems aside, let’s get every­one to serve, now is the time! I do not care if you draft, buy or steal, but we have to num­ber up every­one involved.
    Byron, I can remem­ber when fuel was lim­ited and patrols were restricted CONUS. I can remem­ber when I would buy parts for my 41UTB and 30 boat.
    I can remem­ber when 2 of us from Honor Guard were asked to stay behind in boot to train recruits and have unlim­ited schools but noth­ing promised.
    SEAL train­ing maybe, but it was secret then and I had a guar­enteed school and a future wife wait­ing for me. It just chaps this Chief’s butt that it took this long to get to this point!
    Semper Fidelis, Semper Paratus!

    Reply
  11. Alo Konsen says:
    August 25, 2008 at 1:50 pm

    Being a retired Coastie, I tend to bris­tle at igno­rant com­ments like Byron Skinner’s. I invite every­one to read the applic­a­ble Federal law that defines “armed forces” and “uni­formed ser­vices.” If you con­sult Title 10 of the United States Code, Section 101(a), you’ll find the fol­low­ing:
    (4) The term “armed forces” means the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard.
    (5) The term “uni­formed ser­vices” means — (A) the armed forces; (B) the com­mis­sioned corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; and © the com­mis­sioned corps of the Public Health Service.
    I’d also like to point out that as a lowly USCG junior offi­cer assigned to USCGC Basswood on Guam in 1995, my fel­low board­ing team mem­bers and I taught VBSS tac­tics to the SWCCs from NSWU-​​1. It was a nat­ural part­ner­ship.
    The SEALs them­selves reg­u­larly prac­ticed their var­i­ous attack tac­tics against our cut­ter while we prac­ticed anti-​​swimmer tac­tics to try to stop them. The SEAL/​SBU com­pound was lit­er­ally two berths away from us on Victor Pier, so it was a no-​​brainer to work together.
    The lines sep­a­rat­ing the mis­sions and skill sets of Coasties from the Naval Special Warfare com­mu­nity have been blur­ring for decades, dat­ing back to at least the 1980s and the DIAT/​IMLET project.
    For a more detailed under­stand­ing of the Coast Guard’s poten­tial con­tri­bu­tion to spe­cial oper­a­tions, read LCDR Russ Bowen’s 2006 the­sis on the sub­ject at http://​tinyurl​.com/​5​g​q​49z

    Reply
  12. Andrew says:
    August 26, 2008 at 7:38 am

    As a rel­a­tive of a Navy Seal, a vet­eran Law Enforemcent Officer with in DHS and aswell been in uni­form I believe hav­ing SEALS in the USCG Is a great idea. Hopefully they’ll allow those USCG Seal’s to work with other areas of DHS too get even more cross train­ing in.

    Reply
  13. eric says:
    December 1, 2008 at 7:37 pm

    We should call them sea lions.

    Reply
  14. MSST 12 says:
    June 5, 2009 at 7:56 pm

    Having been in the Coast Guard’s MSST pro­gram I was trained by a host of ex spe­cial oper­a­tors from many dif­fer­ent branches as well as swat oper­a­tors from across the coun­try. The Coast Guard is most definetly a part of the mil­i­tary and has a very real mis­sion that requires many of the same skills as that of a seal. The answer to the ques­tion about “why not join the navy to be a seal?” is that you are already in the USCG and want to do what­ever you can to always be bet­ter­ing your­self and con­tribut­ing to the fight against this coun­tries oppres­sors and ene­mies. The move to allow USCG mem­bers to be bor­rowed by the seals for train­ing and oper­a­tions pur­poses will be at the least a force mul­ti­plier for the entire Coast Guard and make the coun­try a safer place by increas­ing the oper­a­tional abil­i­ties of home based and deploy­able CG units. CG units that are based in the U.S. do not need posse comen­ta­tus (sp?) lifted to oper­ate inside the united states which makes them an obvi­ous choice for first respon­ders against domes­tic attacks and threats. So every­body wins. The coast gets to flex it mus­cles and the amer­i­can pub­lic gets to sleep sounder at night. Thanks to all the other oper­a­tors out there who give up large por­tions and their lives to keep us safe. Semper paratus.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      LOL Still all this pissing an moaning about the editorial...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare that...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Islame isn't a race, genius……
      Philo
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I sure as hell don't need to have someone take pictures of me...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "Now please tell me where in the Bible Jesus or his disciples...
      DualityOfMan
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage