DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Cyber-warfare » Inside the Cyber Command Turf Battle

Inside the Cyber Command Turf Battle

cyber-attack.jpg

Reports by the Associated Press who obtained a memo on the sub­ject said this week the Pentagon delayed and may even kill the Air Force’s planned Cyberspace Command. Why exactly is up for spec­u­la­tion, but accord­ing to one insider who absolutely did not want to be iden­ti­fied — “It’s a dol­lar Grab”.

The insider went on to say that “with an esti­mated $30 bil­lion being spent on cyber capa­bil­i­ties, who can blame them?”

As I tally it, the Army, Air Force, CIA, NSA, DIA, DHS, StratCom and two uniden­ti­fied black-​​ops units have already begun devel­op­ing cyber war­fare capa­bil­i­ties. Anyone with an ounce of sense would not want to get in the mid­dle of that group! The Pentagon has to be think­ing it would be bet­ter to have one uni­fied cyber com­mand rather than all these dispirit efforts.

Cyber war­fare is a highly desir­able com­mand area — it is new, it’s excit­ing, it’s a real threat and arguably the hottest topic in mil­i­tary cir­cles. Multiple secu­rity experts, includ­ing myself, have warned that sig­nif­i­cant and very spe­cial resources and exper­tise are required to exe­cute the core ele­ments of the Bush administration’s cyber secu­rity plan.

Earlier this year I wrote an arti­cle titled “The Department of Cyber Defense” that was pub­lished by International Intelligence Magazine. It looked at this exact issue. The arti­cle was based on rumors back then that the Executive Branch was con­sid­er­ing estab­lish­ing a new depart­ment and cab­i­net level appoint­ment respon­si­ble for our country’s cyber offen­sive and defen­sive capa­bil­i­ties. By estab­lish­ing a new depart­ment and cab­i­net level posi­tion, one entity can focus on devel­op­ing cyber war­fare tech­nolo­gies needed to sup­port both defense and civil­ian agencies.

Remember we even cre­ated a new patch for the organization.

Richard Clarke has warned how sig­nif­i­cant a threat cyber attacks pose to the United States and our allies. Turf bat­tles and infight­ing are slow­ing the United States’ efforts to mit­i­gate this threat and develop the nec­es­sary offen­sive cyber war­fare capa­bil­i­ties. We can­not and should not tol­er­ate the inac­tion and lack of progress this squab­bling is causing.

– Kevin Coleman

Share |

August 15th, 2008 | Cyber-warfare | 402120 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/08/15/inside-the-cyber-command-turf-battle/Inside+the+Cyber+Command+Turf+Battle2008-08-15+11%3A43%3A02Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Friday — Fire for Effect | Coast Guard Joins the SEALs » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Edward Liu says:
    August 15, 2008 at 8:53 am

    After click­ing through to the Cyber Warfare orga­ni­za­tion patch and read­ing the com­ments that fol­lowed, can the first hard tar­get this group goes after be com­ment spam­mers with a ten­u­ous grasp of English spout­ing their swin­dle garbage every­where?
    Either that, or they should get recruited and deployed. Imagine the dev­as­tat­ing effect that Nigerian spam­mers and gold swindlers will have when deployed in force against the cyber-​​infrastructure of the enemy.

    Reply
  2. John says:
    August 15, 2008 at 4:56 pm

    “…dispirit“
    disparate

    Reply
  3. G says:
    August 15, 2008 at 8:22 pm

    Great, another depart­ment… add more to the already com­plex bureau­cracy, why don’cha?

    Reply
  4. Trial Lawyer says:
    August 16, 2008 at 4:26 pm

    Hey guys, this is all well and good but there are more press­ing needs right now. Like for instance, my Nigerian niece is sick and will die with­out help from our American friends. Any finan­cial assis­tance you can pro­vide is appre­ci­ated. If you help my niece and I, I’ll mail, free of charge, growth/​enlargement pills and herbal supplements.

    Reply
  5. Crister says:
    August 16, 2008 at 7:42 pm

    I agree with Ed, except with an addi­tion: we should recruit ALL avail­able spam­mers and focus their atten­tion on the aggres­sor of choice. What a denial of ser­vice attack that would be!
    LOL @ trial lawyer’s comment!

    Reply
  6. Crister says:
    August 16, 2008 at 7:45 pm

    Getting seri­ous though, James is right on tar­get here — except, of course, for the Department of Homeland Security part. It would be good to have pro­fes­sion­als han­dle this, not a bunch of wanna be amateurs.

    Reply
  7. Hammer6 says:
    August 16, 2008 at 11:27 pm

    How can the USAF lay claim to a new “domain” of war­fare when the ser­vice can’t han­dle its own issues (KC-​​X, nuclear secu­rity)? The ser­vice needs to focus on fleet recap­i­tal­iza­tion and pre­pare for the future in the domains for which it is now respon­si­ble. Cyber seems too mul­ti­dis­ci­pli­nary — and too impor­tant — to leave to the whims of one mil­i­tary service.

    Reply
  8. Joe says:
    August 17, 2008 at 12:56 pm

    I think the Military Branch with the smartest Military men and Woman should be assigned.

    Reply
  9. Apul says:
    August 17, 2008 at 3:08 pm

    I read all the cyber war­fare pieces on here plus the one Kevin wrote on Obama’s Cyber Defense Strategy and I have a ques­tion for Kevin. Are you the one he is going to appoint to head up our cyber defenses? I am not jok­ing –I am seri­ous — are you?
    Paul

    Reply
  10. Bambooviper says:
    August 17, 2008 at 8:39 pm

    Nothing but up the bud­get and the tax payer you know what.

    Reply
  11. lime says:
    August 18, 2008 at 7:01 am

    Cyber is not strictly a USAF domain; how­ever, USAF is the first ser­vice with the insight to ele­vate it to com­mand level. A lot of the snip­ing against Cyber Command comes from the fact some of the other services–and even some USAF persons–don’t like the atten­tion the Air Force has given cyber at its high­est levels…while they ignored it.
    It’s a big deal; big­ger than most out­side cyber really know. Cyber is where each indi­vid­ual mil­i­tary mem­ber who uses a com­puter is an oper­a­tor, and cyber­space is where each indi­vid­ual mil­i­tary mem­ber who uses a com­puter is vul­ner­a­ble to attack. Unlike oper­a­tors in other domains, these oper­a­tors have lit­tle train­ing and lit­tle under­stand­ing of the cyber domain.
    As for the other ser­vices and DoD ral­ly­ing against Cyber Command; its like my dad said about crabs in a pot. When one is about to escape; the oth­ers will pull it back down…so no one escapes. The same con­cept applies here.

    Reply
  12. focusonthis says:
    August 18, 2008 at 12:50 pm

    The prob­lem (imo) is that every­one is focused on the war on ter­ror. If you look at it long enough your going to find that there is no win­ning this bat­tle. The prob­lem with ter­ror­ism is so widely clas­si­fied and so hard to put a face to that we will find our­selves fight­ing any­one and every­one. We NEED to focus on Cyber Warfare. We NEED to focus on improv­ing this new bat­tle­space and our posi­tion in its strug­gle. If we dont look into it now, then in 10 years when some other gov­ern­ment is richer and more pow­er­ful, we will find our­selves lack­ing in the new war fronts.
    War has been wag­ing for thou­sands of years in the Middle East, what makes you think our goals are any dif­fer­ent from the goals of the last major pow­ers fight­ing over there.

    Reply
  13. Andy says:
    August 18, 2008 at 12:52 pm

    Unified Command is just that–unifying the Service Cyber Centers, so it is not about not hav­ing Service Cyber Commands–its about ensur­ing unity of effort and effec­tive­ness.
    Please note the US Navy estab­lished the Naval Network Warfare Command in July of 2002 and has been evolv­ing it since to mas­ter cyber­space, space infor­ma­tion Operations and the phys­i­cal layer on which it depends–and ts Navy Cyber Defense Operations Command pre­ceded them all.
    Its not about who is first or who is in charge it is about get­ting it right–we should not ceded any­thing to nation states, mis­cre­ants or crim­i­nals in cyber or any other domain.

    Reply
  14. anthony says:
    August 18, 2008 at 1:47 pm

    I think that they should have harscher penal­ties for per­sons that break in computer“hacking“punish them first by there own coun­try then a sort of inter­na­tiol court​.It seems at this moment peo­ple are still aloud to “hack“thats like break­ing in myhouse and pri­vate bank..

    Reply
  15. anthony says:
    August 18, 2008 at 1:48 pm

    I think that they should have harscher penal­ties for per­sons that break in computer“hacking“punish them first by there own coun­try then a sort of inter­na­tiol court​.It seems at this moment peo­ple are still aloud to “hack“thats like break­ing in myhouse and pri­vate bank..

    Reply
  16. Brian H says:
    August 29, 2008 at 7:53 am

    There are many dan­gers in the cyber world. For exam­ple, mal­orthog­ra­phers like anthony. You want “harscher”, anthony? How about a year of manda­tory reme­dial spelling edu­ca­tion for a first offense of dis­trib­ut­ing erro­neous let­ter sequences, and cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment for the sec­ond. Harsh enough for you? ;)

    Reply
  17. reshtet says:
    September 11, 2008 at 8:19 pm

    All I see here is labels not capa­bil­i­ties as Americans…My mil­i­tary ser­vice was wrecked by it!
    Agency this Commando that…

    Reply
  18. reshtet says:
    September 12, 2008 at 10:52 am

    HaHAHA!I saw a new ver­sion of BUD/​s class 234,and
    it’s a lie!Mr.Legg broke his leg dur­ing HELLWEEK,
    but they lit­er­ally showed him in the other phases
    any­how??? And he even grad­u­ated with 234,according
    to the camer­man??? But I read he grad­u­ated even­tu­ally with another class,after heal­ing and than saw a pic­ture of him before he came down with
    cancer…If that isn’t a wrong media what is???
    Wrong is wrong!!!Right is right!!!

    Reply
  19. reshtet says:
    September 12, 2008 at 6:26 pm

    The Navy will never mas­ter cyber/​info spaces!!!
    It’s a job,not their lives…ANything that isn’t
    per­sonal can­not be mastered!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    Recent Comments
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      Yeah, I don't get it. The "Dragon...
      Ptsfp
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Should wikipedia Ned Kelly.He used armour that worked in...
      Nick
    • UPDATED: Details on Army’s New Afghanistan Duds
      Marines win agin hoo rur
      greg
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      To the poster "batvette" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
      gee lets forget about winning a war as long...
      greg stocks
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage