DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Bizarro » Invisibility and the ‘Super Lens’

Invisibility and the ‘Super Lens’

invisible-man.jpg

Last week we had the laser gun­ship, this week it’s the invis­i­bil­ity cloak.

Sounds a lot like sci­ence fic­tion but you’d be sur­prised how close Army researchers are to actu­ally attain­ing the Holy Grail of invisibility.

According to Dr. Richard Hammond, a the­o­ret­i­cal physi­cist with the Optical Physics and Imaging Science depart­ment of the Army Research Office, engi­neers are closer than they’ve ever been to devel­op­ing a mate­r­ial that can bend light around an object ren­der­ing it invis­i­ble to cer­tain wave­lengths — light being one of them.

So far sci­en­tists have suc­cess­fully tested so-​​called “meta-​​materials” — ones that are man made and built at the mol­e­c­u­lar level — that can ren­der an object invis­i­ble to microwaves, which has a larger wave­length than light, Hammond said.

“This is a new par­a­digm for the sci­ence of light,” he said dur­ing a DoD blog­gers’ round­table today. “It can be bent [using these mate­ri­als] in an almost arbi­trary way.”

There are some sig­nif­i­cant obsta­cles to mak­ing a usable “invis­i­bil­ity cloak,” how­ever. The main one is the mate­r­ial itself. Since it has to be build at the mol­e­c­u­lar level, mak­ing enough mate­r­ial to cover, say, a truck is still out of reach, Hammond said. Also, so far the sci­ence is there to block one kind of wave­length, but not another. So you could ren­der an object invis­i­ble on the UV spec­trum but not the vis­i­ble light one at the same time. And if you made some­thing invis­i­ble to the human eye, it would be impos­si­ble with­out some kind of other sen­sor for whoever’s behind the object to see any­thing since you’re rob­bing him of light.

“But in early appli­ca­tions we could shield an object from radar,” Hammond added.

Closer to field­ing is a sim­i­lar tech­nol­ogy using meta-​​materials that can enhance optics to see things at the cel­lu­lar or even mol­e­c­u­lar level — “smaller than the wave­length of light,” Hammond said, or less than .5 microns.

These “Super Lenses” could be used to detect chem­i­cal or bio­log­i­cal agents, focus vis­i­ble light to a sin­gle point to “uncloak” cloaked objects or help recharge solar-​​celled bat­ter­ies, and could be applied to micro­scope lenses to increase mag­ni­fi­ca­tion ten times, Hammond said.

Hammond has been work­ing with UC Berkley, University of Colorado at Boulder, Perdue and Princeton on these efforts under a three-​​year, $1 mil­lion grant.

– Christian

Share |

August 19th, 2008 | Bizarro | 402911 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/08/19/invisibility-and-the-super-lens/Invisibility+and+the+%27Super+Lens%272008-08-19+21%3A02%3A33Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « War and Peace — Russian Style | Corps Introduces Tough New Fitness Test » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. ohwilleke says:
    August 19, 2008 at 4:20 pm

    If the stuff is expen­sive to make, the ideal early appli­ca­tion might be a micro-​​UAV.

    Reply
  2. stephen russell says:
    August 19, 2008 at 9:39 pm

    Where do we invest?
    Many apps:
    Security
    Law enforce­ment
    Prison secu­rity
    Intelligence
    “armor­ing” VIP cars.
    “stealth” AF1?
    & more
    $$$$$$$$$

    Reply
  3. night says:
    August 20, 2008 at 2:07 am

    Hang on. Wouldn’t this ren­der microwave and laser weapons use­less? It’d just bend the uber-​​powerful beam straight around you and pre­sum­ably you would not feel any ill effects.
    Bummer for the chap stand­ing behind you though…

    Reply
  4. night says:
    August 20, 2008 at 2:13 am

    “And if you made some­thing invis­i­ble to the human eye, it would be impos­si­ble with­out some kind of other sen­sor for whoever’s behind the object to see any­thing since you’re rob­bing him of light.“
    Took me a minute to fig­ure out what this meant. Basically, inside the cloak it would be pitch black as all the light is being bent around you. I won­der if that might actu­ally be use­ful some­how. Anyone think of any appli­ca­tions that require absolute darkness?

    Reply
  5. josh betts says:
    August 20, 2008 at 9:12 am

    “Hang on. Wouldn’t this ren­der microwave and laser weapons use­less? It’d just bend the uber-​​powerful beam straight around you and pre­sum­ably you would not feel any ill effects“
    Excellent point. I’ve been fol­low­ing this for awhile and this is never men­tioned.
    Also, what hap­pens when you emit infrared radiation?

    Reply
  6. Pantera says:
    August 21, 2008 at 1:23 pm

    It seems like this would be more use­ful for a new gen­er­a­tion of stealth air­craft, since radar waves would just go around the air­craft and not get bounced back. Of course, then the stealthed air­craft wouldn’t be able to use radar. Interesting.

    Reply
  7. coolhand77 says:
    August 22, 2008 at 7:34 am

    FLIR is all the rage, and in truth, all you have to do is stick a receiver antenna out­side the “cloak” to receive sen­sor data from your AWACs. Either that, or you set it up so that only your sen­sors are uncloaked. It would still reduce a major­ity of your Radar Crossection, and make you look like a col­lec­tion of fly­ing “noise” around a cen­ter of…nothing.
    There was actu­ally a sci-​​fi book called “A Mote in God’s Eye” where the space­craft used an “energy shield” with sim­i­lar prop­er­ties. Their solu­tion was to stick probes and wiskers out­side the field. Sure, they could “burn off” your sen­sors, but the ship under­neath would be pro­tected, and you had backup “wiskers” you could deploy…and deploy­ing an antenna out­side a cloak like that is alot smaller than see­ing a whole freak­ing air­plane, even if the plane is stealthed.

    Reply
  8. app3 says:
    August 22, 2008 at 6:47 pm

    For sim­ple appli­ca­tions that only had to fool, say, civil­ians, one idea would be to project an image of what is behind the ‘cloaked’ object onto its surface.

    Reply
  9. skeptic says:
    August 23, 2008 at 4:45 pm

    A bit of crit­i­cal think­ing is in order. From pop­u­lar mechan­ics:
    http://​www​.pop​u​larme​chan​ics​.com/​s​c​i​e​n​c​e​/​r​e​s​e​a​r​c​h​/​4​2​7​7​6​0​7​.​h​t​m​l​?​n​a​v​=​R​S​S20
    So let’s assume all the tech­ni­cal chal­lenges are met (they aren’t). The meta­ma­te­ri­als work over the full vis­i­ble spec­trum (they don’t), it’s flex­i­ble enough to wear (it’s not), it doesn’t get dirty after five min­utes (it would), and it works whether you’re mov­ing or sit­ting still, up close or far away (you get it). Let’s pre­tend that meta­ma­te­ri­als have been honed to per­fec­tion and that they are avail­able for sale at a very low cost. Now let’s take a ride on the Skeptic Express.
    First stop: Blending into the vis­i­ble spec­trum doesn’t really make you invis­i­ble. You’d still be plain as day in other parts of the elec­tro­mag­netic spec­trum. Specifically, infrared emis­sions would make you an easy find for any­body with an infrared cam­era, as well as for deadly, heat-​​sensing pit vipers (such a nui­sance). And that’s just pas­sive detec­tion. You’d be even more vis­i­ble to active detec­tors […]
    Before you get too wor­ried that some sweaty U.S. Army guy is lurk­ing over your shoul­der clad in the Predator’s blurry bat­tle armor (the mil­i­tary did fund part of the new research), remem­ber this: So far the most cutting-​​edge research can only cloak tiny objects, under lab­o­ra­tory con­di­tions, and on a lim­ited range of wave­lengths. You’re safe, for now, along with the pri­vacy of cheer­lead­ing squads the world over. Thank heavens.

    Reply
  10. tootall1121 says:
    July 2, 2009 at 11:54 am

    It doesn’t really mat­ter if this achieved or not. Once it is, some­body else will come up with a way to defeat it.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    Recent Comments
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      Yeah, I don't get it. The "Dragon...
      Ptsfp
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Should wikipedia Ned Kelly.He used armour that worked in...
      Nick
    • UPDATED: Details on Army’s New Afghanistan Duds
      Marines win agin hoo rur
      greg
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      To the poster "batvette" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
      gee lets forget about winning a war as long...
      greg stocks
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Time to bring military clothing into the 21st century. I...
      bobbymike
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part IV : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : But beam-riding isn't used by bombers...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      To the poster "Charles" : Part I :...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage