DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Door Kickers » Blackwater 2.0: ‘Operator Disneyland’

Blackwater 2.0: ‘Operator Disneyland’

FL_blackwater2_082608.jpg

MOYOCK, N.C. — It’s a name that’s become syn­ony­mous with the murky world of coun­terin­sur­gency in Iraq and Afghanistan — where the sub­tle tones of the enemy’s col­ors blend in with innocents.

In a war like this, no one is secure and the mil­i­tary has its hands full, so the American gov­ern­ment has turned increas­ingly to civil­ian con­trac­tors who pick up the slack where mil­i­tary and fed­eral secu­rity per­son­nel left off.

One of the most rec­og­niz­able play­ers in the pri­vate secu­rity indus­try is Blackwater Worldwide, the com­pany founded by for­mer SEAL Erik Prince in the mid-​​1990s. Though the com­pany is best known for its bur­ley, highly-​​trained secu­rity guards who are often pic­tured flank­ing State Department offi­cials and ambas­sadors in Iraq or Afghanistan, there’s more to this sprawl­ing, 7,000 acre com­pound here in the swampy coastal plains of North Carolina’s north­east than meets the eye.

“It’s a Disneyland for oper­a­tors,” said Blackwater found­ing mem­ber and cur­rent pres­i­dent Gary Jackson dur­ing an August 22 tour of the company’s grounds. “They come here and they just can’t believe it.”

With an array of fir­ing ranges, shoot houses, an avi­a­tion sup­port fleet and a ros­ter of train­ers capa­ble of deliv­er­ing instruc­tion on any kind of mar­tial skill known to man, Blackwater has become a jug­ger­naut in the world of pri­vate mil­i­tary companies.

Originally founded as a train­ing and tar­get man­u­fac­tur­ing com­pany, Blackwater has launched a media offen­sive to shake off its rep­u­ta­tion among crit­ics as a “shoot-​​first-​​ask-​​questions-​​later” band of bearded mer­ce­nar­ies. Two high-​​profile inci­dents in Iraq pro­pelled the nor­mally secre­tive com­pany onto America’s front pages, and the news wasn’t good.

In March 2004, four Blackwater con­trac­tors were ambushed and muti­lated in Fallujah, Iraq, spark­ing a bru­tal inva­sion of the city that was soon halted after the frag­ile Baghdad gov­ern­ment balked at the pub­lic out­cry. The inci­dent sparked a furi­ous debate over how pre­pared secu­rity con­trac­tors were to deal with the insur­gency and added fuel to sim­mer­ing resent­ment from tra­di­tional mil­i­tary forces angry that they had to come to Blackwater’s res­cue only to be pulled back before the job was done.

Then in September of last year, Blackwater guards secur­ing a State Department motor­cade were accused of killing as many as 20 Iraqis when they claimed their con­voy came under fire in Nisoor Square in busy down­town Baghdad.

Though Blackwater claims a per­fect record in secur­ing its clients, some say it comes at the cost of highly aggres­sive tac­tics and civil­ian bullying.

In the wake of those scan­dals and the nag­ging pur­suit of anti-​​Blackwater law­mak­ers, the com­pany is work­ing to bur­nish its image by going back to its roots: train­ing and logis­tics ser­vices — call it “Blackwater 2.0.”

“Our biggest growth units are inter­na­tional train­ing and avi­a­tion,” Jackson said, explain­ing that his com­pany now has only two per­sonal secu­rity detail con­tracts. “I lit­er­ally can’t put enough air­planes out there.”

With dozens of ranges that cater to every­thing from long dis­tance shoot­ers, to demo­li­tions tech­ni­cians to super-​​secret “tier one” spe­cial oper­a­tions forces, Blackwater is hard to beat when it comes to the sheer breadth of mil­i­tary tac­tics train­ing a force could do here — par­tic­u­larly at a time when com­mu­ni­ties increas­ingly shun the envi­ron­men­tal impact of mil­i­tary oper­a­tions in their backyards.

In fact, the Virginian Beach police depart­ment has a 40 year lease with Blackwater — 30 miles from the coastal city — to train its offi­cers, since range space is so lim­ited where they work, Jackson said.

And the company’s entre­pre­neuri­al­ism doesn’t stop there. In a cor­ru­gated steel air­plane hanger, a row of three Blackwater-​​designed mine-​​resistant ambush pro­tected vehi­cles sit in var­i­ous stages of assem­bly. The com­pany missed the ini­tial order for stan­dard MRAPs after the ser­vices reduced their buy, but the company’s new MRAP II — dubbed the “Grizzly” — boasts greater pro­tec­tion against armor-​​penetrating explo­sively formed pen­e­tra­tor bombs and could be a player for future orders that meet that grow­ing threat, Blackwater offi­cials say.

They’re even work­ing on cooking-​​grease-​​fueled vehi­cles, power-​​generating wind­mills and air­ship sur­veil­lance drones.

But, iron­i­cally, it’s Blackwater’s re-​​emphasis on train­ing that’s caught the ire of law­mak­ers in Washington who ques­tion why the Pentagon hires out instruc­tion crit­ics say should be taught in the ser­vices’ own school houses.

Blackwater got its first con­tract from the Navy after the bomb­ing of the Cole exposed a short­fall in tac­ti­cal train­ing capac­ity for its sailors. After 9/​11, that need increased as Sailors were called upon to board sus­pi­cious ships, defend their fleet from attack­ers and man defen­sive posi­tions in the Persian Gulf and elsewhere.

Today, Blackwater con­tin­ues that train­ing at its facil­ity here, bussing in Sailors from Norfolk every day to prac­tice take­downs on the company’s “ship in a box” — stacked, float­ing con­tain­ers assem­bled to mimic a ship’s bridge. So far the com­pany has trained about 130,000 sailors and says that in any one day over 5,000 stu­dents could be fir­ing, jump­ing, fight­ing and blow­ing things up on a Blackwater range.

Virginia Democratic Senator James Webb, a vocal critic of Blackwater and other pri­vate mil­i­tary com­pa­nies, has asked Pentagon chief Robert Gates to study how much train­ing civil­ian com­pa­nies pro­vide the DoD and to ana­lyze whether it would be more effi­cient for the ser­vices to do it on their own. Gates passed the ques­tion on to Joint Chiefs chair­man Adm. Mike Mullen, who’s look­ing into the matter.

To Jackson, all this talk gets his blood boil­ing. In his view, Blackwater responds to the needs of its cus­tomers when all else has failed, and he sees no prob­lem with fill­ing in on train­ing that the ser­vices can’t do them­selves with­out sig­nif­i­cant investment.

“The Navy can’t build that [train­ing] infra­struc­ture in 20 years. The only way they’re ever going to get there is to start the draft,” an exas­per­ated Jackson said. “The thing that really upsets me the most is that [train­ing] is run by contractors.”

“No mat­ter who wins the elec­tion, it doesn’t mat­ter. It’s not going to stop.”

– Christian

Share |

August 26th, 2008 | Door Kickers | 403820 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/08/26/blackwater-2-0-operator-disneyland/Blackwater+2.0%3A+%27Operator+Disneyland%272008-08-26+13%3A10%3A24Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Gi Zhou Examines the New PLA Corps | Why Not? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Wes says:
    August 26, 2008 at 9:30 am

    “Blackwater has launched a media offen­sive to shake off its rep­u­ta­tion among crit­ics as a “shoot-​​first-​​ask-​​questions-​​later” band of bearded mer­ce­nar­ies.“
    This effort will fail.
    Blackwater is by now firmly entrenched (thanks to the Liberal Media) as a shad­owy, sin­is­ter pri­vate army that answers only to the NeoCons. So what will this PR effort accomplish?

    Reply
  2. Ptsfp says:
    August 26, 2008 at 10:31 am

    What is next though? Fast food type mercs? Ok, so that will be a minor inva­sion, would you like a sniper team with that? We also have our value item menu…
    Honestly I am torn, I like black­wa­ter, but I think that our arm forces should be able to han­dle things w/​o call­ing in contractors.

    Reply
  3. wceqwc says:
    August 26, 2008 at 10:48 am

    Reminds me of Metal Gear Solid 4.

    Reply
  4. Paul says:
    August 26, 2008 at 11:12 am

    My prob­lem with Blackwater is mostly that their busi­ness model con­sists of hir­ing highly qual­i­fied spe­cial oper­a­tions per­son­nel away from mil­i­tary ser­vice. I don’t know what it costs to fully train a SEAL or Delta oper­a­tor but I would guess it’s a num­ber with at lest 6 zeros on the end. Blackwater can wait for these guys to come up to their reen­list­ment win­dow and then hire them away for pen­nies on the dol­lar. It’s a free coun­try and I fully sup­port any­ones right to choose a high pay­ing civil­ian job over mil­i­tary ser­vice but I don’t think the US gov­ern­ment should be cre­at­ing the mar­ket for those civil­ian jobs.

    Reply
  5. MM says:
    August 26, 2008 at 12:28 pm

    Following the 90’s reduc­tion in forces the nation’s largest reservist call-​​up in his­tory took place for mul­ti­ple the­aters in Southeast Asia, the largest being Iraq. Without the avail­abil­ity of train­ing of com­pa­nies like Blackwater our forces would not be at the cur­rent level of readi­ness. This is NOT com­pli­cated math rather it is basic sup­ply and demand filled by many who have served.
    Having per­son­ally had con­tact with sev­eral local area con­trac­tor employ­ees (includ­ing Blackwater) I know first hand that these are will­ing and capa­ble men and women, most of whom have served our coun­try and are happy to con­tinue to serve in a civil­ian capac­ity. Hand-​​Salute to these com­pla­nies for pro­vid­ing a job mar­ket to those who have served this coun­try– they con­tinue to thrive in a lack­lus­ter econ­omy doing what our tax dol­lars have trained them to do.
    If you have never suited up in a US mil­i­tary uni­form with pride and served our coun­try in defense of the flag– the weight of your com­ments carry lit­tle value in the eyes of those who have.
    Semper Fidelis.

    Reply
  6. MM says:
    August 26, 2008 at 12:54 pm

    Some ampli­fi­ca­tion to my com­ments: I served our coun­try dur­ing Desert Storm. Currently I work with both the active duty and con­trac­tor school houses as a DoD employee. The train­ing pro­vided by con­trac­tors allows com­man­ders to uti­lize more of our active duty ser­vice­mem­bers in oper­a­tional capac­i­ties while main­tain­ing train­ing in direct sup­port of our high level of readi­ness.
    Semper Fidelis.

    Reply
  7. CTR1(SW) says:
    August 26, 2008 at 5:51 pm

    I can just see con­gress “require­ing” the Navy to set aside 1/​2 of their SEAL teams for fleet train­ing. Like that’ll hap­pen. NOT!!
    As a train­ing facil­ity Blackwater appears to be “com­plete­ing the loop.” These are all “been there, done that” folks who are now tak­ing their skills and train­ing the fleet.
    I’m all for it!
    As for the con­gress­man from VA: He should stick to the mar­tini lunches and leave the warfight­ing to the warfighters.

    Reply
  8. Scott Germani says:
    August 26, 2008 at 8:27 pm

    I’m a com­bat vet­eran, am cur­rently a police offi­cer, and I’ve worked in the pri­vate sec­tor. The gov­ern­ment never has the time, resources, or money to train prop­erly. Troops and cops spend their own time and money to train at places like Blackwater because it’s their butts on the line! Kudos to the high speed instruc­tors at Blackwater who train the men and women who risk their lives to serve us.

    Reply
  9. conlad says:
    August 26, 2008 at 8:30 pm

    Hmm, first of all a com­ment to all those who critic the notion of expe­ri­enced sol­diers leav­ing the field to train: Blackwater is doing exactly that! They sim­ply lure these men away from the field with money, and then charge the armed forces a hefty amount to train their recruits. Of course, if these men are already leav­ing the force no mat­ter what, then I guess hav­ing Blackwater putting their skills to good use is bet­ter than noth­ing, but I can’t say how many leave for money and how many leave for other rea­sons. However, what­ever the rea­son, the case is that good sol­diers leave the front­lines, or may­haps return to it just under another flag, and leave your forces bare of some really good ele­ments and you must pay extra to recover their exper­tise.
    Another point you, amer­i­cans, should remem­ber. These are mer­ce­nar­ies, and as such obey ulti­mately the money. And it’s a good thing your gov­ern­ment is their main client, keep­ing in that way their loy­alty, but Blackwater has cen­ters all around the world, and do any of you know who gets trained there? Or for whom do they oper­ate for? I’d like to think secu­rity forces (and ones friendly to your coun­try), but, again, money and noth­ing else talks in this case.
    Just give it a thought, but remem­ber, his­tory teaches that mer­ce­nar­ies are only a bad nec­ce­sity, never a solution.

    Reply
  10. stephen russell says:
    August 26, 2008 at 11:23 pm

    I say Re mar­ket Blackwater & expand BW Ops to:
    CA NV NC FL PR USVI? HI, AZ, UT, CO?
    Reorganize Co.
    Rethink train­ing & tac­tics.
    Hire New Blood.
    Hire more ex vets & ex cops.
    Imagine Blackwater, Oahu HI or Sedona AZ or
    29 Palms CA etc.
    More diverse ops & locales & glob­al­wide employee base.
    Some good can come from this.
    Change Mgmt.
    Yes Shoot when Being Fired Upon or
    test BW oper­a­tors on US Mex bor­der, Good trial run alone on US Mex border.

    Reply
  11. Wes says:
    August 27, 2008 at 9:09 am

    Here is a post from Military​.com:
    “Has any­one cought the con­nec­tion: Black Water = Oil. Blackwater is a baby com­pany of Halliburton. Their main pur­pose in the global war on ter­ror is to pro­tect “energy resources.” That’s all you need to know. Everything else is a smoke­screen… “
    With left­ist crazi­ness like that, how can Blackwater counter with a PR cam­paign. So what.
    The Romans had a say­ing: NON CARBORUNDUM EST
    The Arabs have a say­ing: “Dogs may bark, but the car­a­van rolls on”.
    Or an American might say: “Keep on truckin’, Blackwater!”

    Reply
  12. Joe says:
    August 27, 2008 at 10:51 am

    “As for the con­gress­man from VA: He should stick to the mar­tini lunches and leave the warfight­ing to the warfight­ers.“
    The Congressmen from VA is for­mer Secretary of the Navy and a retired Marine who served in Vietnam.

    Reply
  13. DensityDuck says:
    August 27, 2008 at 12:21 pm

    Paul: In gen­eral, pri­vate indus­try pays bet­ter than gov­ern­ment work–even for sol­diers(*). Heck, if the gov­ern­ment paid bet­ter, they’d just stay in the Army!
    (*) please don’t give me a ration of shit here, I know that every­one who car­ries a gun likes to have their own per­sonal descriptor.

    Reply
  14. atmiller says:
    August 27, 2008 at 12:45 pm

    Our mil­i­tary needs to fun­nel some of the bil­lions of dol­lars we give them to the sol­diers. If we paid our sol­diers decent wages, then we wouldn’t lose our elite sol­diers to the mer­ce­nary groups.
    The gov­ern­ment pays mil­lions to train them, then pays Blackwater to use the mer­ce­nar­ies that the gov­ern­ment paid to train in the first place. Only our gov­ern­ment can be that stu­pid and still be in business.

    Reply
  15. CTR1(SW) says:
    August 27, 2008 at 6:39 pm

    Joe — Thanks for the back­ground on the “good” con­gress­man from VA. I was unaware.
    Curious though, Isn’t “Haditha” Murtha also a viet­nam era Marine. See how won­der­ful and help­ful he has been for his fel­low ser­vice­men and women.
    It is dis­cour­age­ing the num­ber of vet­er­ans who become politi­cians and “drink the koolaid” in D.C.

    Reply
  16. Ptsfp says:
    August 28, 2008 at 8:20 am

    It looks like the South African spe­cial task force lost 60% of their peo­ple to com­pa­nies like Blackwater in 2004.
    Great for the US, not so good for South Africa. These guys are very impres­sive. When Clinton vis­ited South Africa, the STF was the only South African force allowed to help with secu­rity. From what they say, they have not lost a hostage in 20 years, and some­times they do hostage res­cues daily.
    Can’t blame them though, I am just glad that they are on our side.

    Reply
  17. reshtet says:
    September 5, 2008 at 8:09 pm

    How is a secu­rity firm any­where near“Insurgency?“
    That was a non think­ing process or familiarization.

    Reply
  18. reshtet says:
    September 5, 2008 at 8:13 pm

    Oh boy!Military.com posted the lamest post ever…
    Just like they were look­ing to put up ABN,in the box I typed my mail.…Its your cur­sor admn…

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage