DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Cyber-warfare » Protecting the Information Infrastructure of the United States

Protecting the Information Infrastructure of the United States

information-grid.jpg

The security of the United States depends on secure, reliable and resilient information systems. In light of this need the national security community came together to address traditional and emerging information security issues. Increasing security in cyber space is a very complex undertaking. Cyber security cuts across so many lines in the executive branch of government it creates a maze that is difficult to navigate. When you look at responding to and investigating cyber attacks, the Department of Homeland Security oversees protection of government networks.

What we need is a holistic approach that focuses on securing the physical and information infrastructure that is critical for our nation to function. In order for this to happen the government must form a tighter relationship with the private sector. This is primarily due to the fact that most of the Internet’s infrastructure is owned and operated by private business. This is not a new issue. For nearly a decade now, the government has called for greater cooperation between the public and private sectors on this issue. So far the response from the private sector has been a cold shoulder. Increasing security around our information infrastructure to the level now required due to the threats by cyber war and organized criminal activity requires a huge and ambitious initiative. Cyber security has to become a top issue for the 44th president of the United States. Both candidates have very little to say about cyber security thus far. This month, the McCain campaign released a document that outlines his technology policy vision. A review of the document yielded very little insight into the issue of cyber security. In fact, it was barely mentioned. Obama’s position is not much different. That being said, Obama has stated his intention to create a new White House position of the Federal Chief Technology Officer.

It is clear that the next president must focus on achieving our strategic security policy and doctrine as they relate to the issue of cyber crime, attacks and cyber warfare. Real-time security management, threat response and situational awareness activities coupled with fortification of the information infrastructure are critical capabilities to ensure that our information communications capabilities are not disrupted and continue to function under a seemingly endless variety of adverse conditions. The threats against our information assets in the public and private sectors have risen to a level that the risks now demand the immediate attention by the White House.

– Kevin Coleman

Share |

September 1st, 2008 | Cyber-warfare | 404817 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/09/01/protecting-the-information-infrastructure-of-the-united-states/Protecting+the+Information+Infrastructure+of+the+United+States2008-09-01+12%3A31%3A24Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Harrier Crash Due to Pilot Error | Sikorsky Debuts Fly-by-Wire UH-60M » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. az says:
    September 1, 2008 at 10:59 am

    I think DT should really stick to things that go boom.
    To me as a computer scientist the entire “Cyber-warfare” column is one grotesque heap of nonsense, written by people that obviously do not even remotely understand the very basics of the trade.
    The naming alone betrays ignorance. WTF prefix everything with “cyber”- without at least looking up what the word actually denotes.

    Reply
  2. Tartan69 says:
    September 1, 2008 at 11:56 am

    I agree with commenter az…there are way too many vague statements and “scary words” repeated in this post. While I don’t deny there are some gaps in the private sector’s security coverage over our infrastructure, if you’re going to write a post on it please cite some specific examples.

    Reply
  3. Camp says:
    September 1, 2008 at 12:33 pm

    “U.S. to deploy DNS Security in two years“
    http://​www​.securityfocus​.com/​b​r​i​e​f​/​807
    “DNSSEC Deployment Initiative“
    http://​www​.dnssec​-deployment​.org/
    “Inside NSA Red Team Secret Ops With Government’s Top Hackers“
    http://​www​.popularmechanics​.com/​t​e​c​h​n​o​l​o​g​y​/​m​i​l​i​t​a​r​y​_​l​a​w​/​4​2​7​0​4​2​0​.​h​tml
    “Crypto Kids“
    http://​www​.nsa​.gov/​k​i​ds/
    PS. Now that John McCain is the Republican candidate… I wonder how many times the movie “The Manchurian Candidate” (1962) will be aired on TV?

    Reply
  4. srv says:
    September 1, 2008 at 4:41 pm

    Be afraid, very afraid. Why, we missed Y2K Armageddon by just a hair.
    Private industry deals with hacking and internet issues 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, and has been for quite some time.
    The idea that gov’t has anything to teach them is completely laughable. Even the Air Force doesn’t believe that anymore. The gov’t doesn’t want better security, it wants more hooks for surveillence. Which you “freedom lovers” can’t support enough.

    Reply
  5. stephen russell says:
    September 1, 2008 at 5:52 pm

    Should have that position already in the DoD, State Dept, FEMA, Treasury Dept, CIA alone.
    Long overdue since 2K “bug”.
    Id rename the slot
    Federal Information Systems Security Officer.
    FISSO.
    more accurate.
    & now Gustav proves point even more.
    Keep IS systems flowing anytime, anyplace

    Reply
  6. ohwilleke says:
    September 2, 2008 at 6:03 am

    The premise that “The security of the United States depends on secure, reliable and resilient information systems.”, is not well established.
    It is not at all obvious that poorly functioning systems in cyberspace are anything more than an inconvenience, the vast majority of the time anyway.
    Usually, we learn about threats first through accidents, and then through intentional acts imitating accidents. Cyber attacks are relatively trivial threats to national security compared to the threats inherent in a well functioning cyber space, namely, easy and swift exchanges of information — which makes it easier for friend and foe alike to coordinate their activities and information themselves more accurately about facts relevant to their plans.

    Reply
  7. Kevin Coleman says:
    September 2, 2008 at 11:47 am

    Replies.
    1. AZ look at Estonia and the attacks on India’s information infrastructure and you will see why cyber warfare is being addressed!
    2. Tartan69 welcome to the world of cyber warfare. You want had information and we do not have an agreed upon definition or doctrine to cover such acts.
    3. Roy Smith — rant away but I would have to say your comment is as you put is filled with intangible things

    Reply
  8. grigori says:
    September 2, 2008 at 3:21 pm

    This is bullshit. Government needs less access to the information infrastructure, not more.
    The United States is being routed around by the rest of the world because of the Patriot Act and Sarbanes/Oxley. Companies don’t want the government to be able to pull all of their files instantly. The rest of the world realizes this and acts accordingly. We are scaring business away and soon will be a pariah in the international business community. (Hell, even Halliburton got the hell out and went to Dubai.) Executives can’t worry about travelling to the US without threat of all the info on their laptops disappearing into the DHS black hole.
    The internet was designed to withstand a nuclear attack. There should be no main checkpoints and repositories. The US is quickly law-making itself into a third world nation.

    Reply
  9. pete says:
    September 3, 2008 at 2:48 pm

    Where are all the weirdos coming from?
    Apparently this must have been linked to some Ron Paul forum or 9–11 truther forum.

    Reply
  10. anthony bauwens says:
    September 4, 2008 at 9:02 am

    If we have people we can rely on we wont need all that stuff. When 7/11 occurd why werent all these things working?

    Reply
  11. reshtet says:
    September 5, 2008 at 7:20 pm

    What a lame excuse for horrible belief systems!
    If you have evil info then it’s linked to all evil. But if it’s good then expect war…Only good
    attracts the evil of war and hacking…Prophecy…

    Reply
  12. ????? says:
    September 6, 2008 at 1:05 pm

    It is not at all obvious that poorly functioning systems in cyberspace are anything more than an inconvenience, the vast majority of the time anyway.
    ?? ???
    ?? ???
    ?????
    ?????? ??
    ??????
    ??????

    Reply
  13. reshtet says:
    September 8, 2008 at 10:38 am

    Most glitches in a PC are from PHP/scanners and
    automatic remoteness.…Just like my logins and posts…Your def.of inconvenience belittles a hackers mind of thievery!You will see why some day.

    Reply
  14. reshtet says:
    September 8, 2008 at 10:40 am

    Pete you are the wierdo!You stick out like an ext.
    url…Because you are one…Notice your post position and the ones you are looking at…

    Reply
  15. reshtet says:
    September 9, 2008 at 7:26 pm

    Security is kept by low output and using/surfing
    all the right places etc…Keep to the ‘sheep trail
    and don’t even blink to the left or right…‘Pc memories are spread out all over the place…

    Reply
  16. angel says:
    October 21, 2008 at 8:41 pm

    That’s OK!But take a closer look following link,It’s great to DVD and PSP converter for mac!
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​r​i​p​p​e​r​-​s​u​i​t​e​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​-​s​u​i​t​e​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​c​o​p​y​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​c​r​e​a​t​o​r​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​t​o​-​i​p​o​d​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​t​o​-​i​p​h​o​n​e​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​t​o​-​m​p​4​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​t​o​-​a​p​p​l​e​-​t​v​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​t​o​-​p​s​p​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​t​o​-​b​l​a​c​k​b​e​r​r​y​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​a​u​d​i​o​-​r​i​p​p​e​r​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​h​o​w​-​t​o​-​e​d​i​t​-​d​v​d​-​t​r​i​m​-​v​i​d​e​o​-​c​r​o​p​-​t​a​k​e​-​e​f​f​e​c​t​s​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.vobconvertermac​.com/,
    http://​www​.vobconvertermac​.com/​v​o​b​-​t​o​-​i​p​o​d​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​-​f​o​r​-​m​a​c​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.vobconvertermac​.com/​v​o​b​-​t​o​-​a​p​p​l​e​-​t​v​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​-​f​o​r​-​m​a​c​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.vobconvertermac​.com/​v​o​b​-​t​o​-​p​s​p​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​-​f​o​r​-​m​a​c​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.vobconvertermac​.com/​v​o​b​-​t​o​-​m​p​e​g​4​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​-​f​o​r​-​m​a​c​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.vobconvertermac​.com/​v​o​b​-​t​o​-​m​4​v​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​-​f​o​r​-​m​a​c​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.vobconvertermac​.com/​v​o​b​-​t​o​-​3​g​p​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​-​f​o​r​-​m​a​c​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.vobconvertermac​.com/​v​o​b​-​t​o​-​m​p​g​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​-​f​o​r​-​m​a​c​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.vobconvertermac​.com/​v​o​b​-​t​o​-​a​v​i​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​-​f​o​r​-​m​a​c​.​h​tml

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • Blog Note
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      The real issue is not what type of plane but trying...
      Bill
    • Paris Hilton: Patriot
      Omg! You can find her pictures and video here...
      WebWarez
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Marine Air Light? Wait…don't they...
      LtCol Ben
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Except its really not that stealthy… The...
      chaos0xomega
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Is an F-22 capable of landing even on a big deck carrier,...
      joe
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      From a national security perspective we should do all we can to keep...
      mike
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      Please define what is "best". Boeings plane is cheaper and...
      Curt
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      F4 was origionally a Navy Fighter, so coming up with a...
      Curt
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      The US Navy was right to bypass congress and develop the...
      Tony C
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      The fly-away cost of a F-22 is between 130 and...
      The Norwegian
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage