DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Afghan Update » Truth, Lies and Videotape: The Azizabad Raid

Truth, Lies and Videotape: The Azizabad Raid

All right, I just wrote out a long entry but it got erased when I tried to post it…frustrating.

But the deal is, I’m won­der­ing what in the Sam Hell is going on with this Azizabad raid story.

Saw a story last night on Fox about it. Ollie North (who I do not respect as a jour­nal­ist, but isn’t a bad guy per­son­ally — I’ve bumped into him on two trips to Iraq) and a pretty damned good cam­era­man with no Fox agenda were embe­ded with the MARINE spe­cial oper­a­tions force on the raid.

They saw the engage­ment. They saw the casu­al­ties. They did not see what “wit­nesses,” the UN, the Afghan gov­ern­ment or the New York Times (nice try with that BS iPhone video) saw.

Watch the report:

Now, what I want to know if there’s any­one else out there who can tell us the straight gouge. Why? Here’s what I’m wor­ried about. There’s a high level del­e­ga­tion going over there to con­duct another “inves­ti­ga­tion.” They HAVE to find some­thing wrong. Who are they going to hang out to dry? MarSoc…once AGAIN. Remember all the “civil­ians” they killed in March 2007 after that road­side ambush? They got kicked out of the­ater, the com­man­der in Afghanistan pros­trated him­self before the Afghans, the media and the Pentagon for for­give­ness. The Corps holds a pub­lic inquiry on the inci­dent and what do they find? The MarSoc oper­a­tors did NOTHING wrong.

How much do you want to bet this will be replayed once more? Help us keep this from hap­pen­ing again, folks.

– Christian

Share |

September 9th, 2008 | Afghan Update | 406243 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/09/09/truth-lies-and-videotape-the-azizabad-raid/Truth%2C+Lies+and+Videotape%3A+The+Azizabad+Raid2008-09-09+12%3A43%3A18Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Cave Canem: the Robot Dawg for MOUT | Russian Force to the Caribbean » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. YAWN says:
    September 9, 2008 at 3:41 pm

    What bugs me is that they weren’t laid out like that when they were killed. It’s easy enough to remove a weapon cover the bod­ies place them in a row and say civil­ians YEAH right I don’t believe that for a sec­ond. The US is not out to just nail any­one and every­one the steps they have to go through to even fire a mis­sile com­mon. Just because they fight in civil­ian cloth­ing does not make them civil­ian casu­al­ties.
    Bottom line: Remove there weapons and claim they are civil­ian it’s sim­ple pro­pa­ganda by the mil­i­tants losing.

    Reply
  2. marine-1 says:
    September 9, 2008 at 3:48 pm

    KILL THEM ALL!!!

    Reply
  3. C. Foskey says:
    September 9, 2008 at 4:56 pm

    The iphone does not sup­port video cap­ture capability.

    Reply
  4. CTR1(SW) says:
    September 9, 2008 at 5:00 pm

    MY ANGER!
    MY RAGE!
    When will we stop accept­ing our ene­mies account of the bat­tle?
    I’m with marine-​​1, but lets begin with the NYT.
    What do you call a per­son who looks like you, talks with you, rides with you into bat­tle, but secretly does all he can to destroy you? They used to call them spies, and shoot them. Today we call them embe­ded reporters.

    Reply
  5. CTR1(SW) says:
    September 9, 2008 at 5:09 pm

    CR wrote: “If we are not smart enough to alter our tac­tics and plan accord­ingly then we should sim­ply leave now.“
    SINCE WHEN DO WE ALTER OUR BATTLEFIELD STRATEGY TO PLEASE THE WORLD MEDIA, OR OUR MEDIA??? They all are the con­ve­nient idiots for our ene­mies.
    As for the UN reports: Were they there dur­ing the battle?

    Reply
  6. jeff says:
    September 9, 2008 at 5:16 pm

    Didn’t this same Marine SOF unit get in trou­ble last year and got kicked out of country?

    Reply
  7. Cole says:
    September 9, 2008 at 6:35 pm

    I read lots of arti­cles about this a week ago and this lat­est New York Times arti­cle seems to mir­ror many of them and add more detail if even part of it is true. Questions you gotta ask your­self that tend to mean at least some of it may be true:
    1) This is a dif­fer­ent part of Afghanistan where Pashtuns who form the base of the Taliban are not in charge. It’s not your typ­i­cal area for Taliban attacks
    2) The brother of the man being mourned who was also killed in this raid (executed?)had a con­tract to PROTECT the nearby allied base. Would he give up a lucra­tive con­tract to turn against his employer?
    3) It was 1 AM in the morn­ing when the friendly team did the body count. What can you see then even with NVGs. Obviously they would not stick around to dig through the rub­ble where most bod­ies would have been.
    4) It is under­stand­able that a large group of kids would be hud­dled together to sleep and be babysat while oth­ers celebrated/​prayed. Reports were that many folks were run­ning but small chil­dren prob­a­bly would not and would hun­ker down with their women babysit­ters.
    5) Why did we bomb so many build­ings? Was it smart at 1 AM when civil­ians are likely to be at home?
    6) I don’t think we have mul­ti­ple Oscar con­tenders in this neck of the woods. Reports seem to indi­cate that mul­ti­ple vil­lagers were highly upset. In addi­tion, while I under­stand that some try to claim depen­dents were killed to get paid, it has never been on this scale before. Why did this one par­tic­u­lar group raise such a stink when most other attacks don’t cre­ate many head­lines?
    7) Hate to say it but with Ollie North on hand, there was prob­a­ble incen­tive to put on a good show for the press. The Fox footage I saw was not con­clu­sive. If you approach any group’s homes in Afghanistan at night they may open fire on you…especially if you are guard­ing the base, already had your brother killed, and think the Taliban might be after your tribe that I sus­pect was not Pashtun. 8) While I cer­tainly under­stand that col­lat­eral dam­age will occur and the Taliban uses human shields, it still does not jus­tify bomb­ing so many homes when at 1 AM you could expect civil­ians to be inside.
    9) Because Herat is not an area where allied oper­a­tions occur as com­monly, it could eas­ily be a case where bad intel­li­gence was pur­posely given to kill off an oppo­nent tribe. Without exten­sive deal­ings in the area before or after, it would be a fairly sim­ple ruse to pull off.
    I stand behind the war and our troops 1000% but we DO need to be more care­ful using airpower.

    Reply
  8. Foreign.Boy says:
    September 9, 2008 at 7:47 pm

    Ever since the Vietnam war; America and espe­cially the west­ern pow­ers have proven to be ‘weak’ in the face of an enemy. Bloody our nose, and we’ll go home. Embarrass, humil­i­ate, depict us as mon­sters and we will go home.
    Honestly… Its messy when these things hap­pen.. its sad and unfor­tu­nate. But they hap­pen.
    The only thing I’m won­der­ing is how sure are they that this was done by the U.S. and not a Taliban ‘clean up crew’.

    Reply
  9. CR says:
    September 9, 2008 at 9:34 pm

    “War is the con­tin­u­a­tion of pol­icy (pol­i­tics) by other means.“
    – Karl von Clausewitz
    Please the media Obviously my point did not get across…we are engaged in a war of ide­oli­gies and we must under­stand that this war is being fought on the ground and in the hearts and minds of mil­lions of mus­lims world­wide. So long as the Taliban can show images of dead ‘vil­lagers’ (real or not) they will have a con­ti­nous stream of rein­force­ments and so will Al Qaeda.
    The media reports what they see and even if they implant their bias that is beyond our control.…stop whin­ing about this and real­ize what the root prob­lem is.…why is it that the Taliban and Al Qaeda can seem­ingly always recon­sti­tute them­selves despite all our best efforts? They are por­tray­ing this as a war on Islam and with the Muslim audi­ence they are suc­ceed­ing.
    Trying to win this war by mil­i­tary means alone is a recipe for failure.…

    Reply
  10. CR says:
    September 9, 2008 at 10:00 pm

    Oh and by the way.…lets count how many pow­ers have been able to con­trol that tribal area between Pakistan and Afghanistan.….exactly zero. England tried, Russia tried…shall I con­tinue.…
    Those whose for­get history.….

    Reply
  11. Vstress says:
    September 10, 2008 at 3:26 am

    Marcello:
    Please show me the pic­tures of this car you are talk­ing about!!!!
    Did you not see that pho­tos? You are dis­prov­ing the point you are try­ing to make by quot­ing num­bers. The media did blow this out of pro­por­tion and did lie.
    here are your “hun­dreds of bul­lets“
    http://​www​.nan​car​row​-web​desk​.com/​w​a​r​e​h​o​u​s​e​/​s​t​o​r​a​g​e​2​/​2​0​0​7​-​w​4​2​/​i​m​g​.​3​8​9​2​5​.​h​tml
    Maybe lots of these bul­lets were of a mol­e­c­u­lar size, new US weaponary?? lol
    CR:
    While I agree his­tory does teach us and we should lis­ten, is it a rea­son to give up? Look at Northern Ireland, it’s look­ing really good these days, yet it def­i­nitely has taken a great num­ber of years. They never had infra­struc­ture prob­lems to deal with or ever had a land mass the size of Afghanistan to deal with.

    Reply
  12. Wembley says:
    September 10, 2008 at 7:03 am

    If the sit­u­a­tion weas reversed, and US jour­nal­ist said there were civil­ian casu­al­ties when every­one else denied it, who would you believe?
    I’m sure the truth will come out in the end, but a lot of peo­ple will still be in denial.

    Reply
  13. Marcello says:
    September 10, 2008 at 9:38 am

    @Vstress: unfor­tu­naly i don’t have the pic­tures they showed in the Italian media, but i clearly remem­ber the car being in a much worse shape than that, i’ll look into it (and i remem­ber it being white and not sil­ver gray, but this cer­tainly depends on how the pic­tures were taken).
    In the Prowler inci­dent the fact that the pilots were fly­ing too low and fast was proved dur­ing the process.
    M

    Reply
  14. C. Foskey says:
    September 10, 2008 at 9:52 am

    Re: Marcello
    “Despite the fact that the car was actaully rid­dled with hun­dreds of rounds the US com­mis­sion decided that Nicola Calipari was killed by acci­dent by stray bul­lets.“
    The com­mu­nist woman claimed 400 rounds fired, when the car was hit with 5.

    Reply
  15. Jimbo Jones says:
    September 10, 2008 at 9:53 am

    Marcello ain’t got any pic­tures, he’s just spread­ing shitty lit­tle rumours, oh and good job if they did kill your pre­cious Italian secret ser­vice agent, rea­son being we don’t want ass­hats strik­ing up deals with sav­age ter­ror­ists as it only encour­ages more kid­nap­ings and beheadings.

    Reply
  16. CR says:
    September 10, 2008 at 10:27 am

    Jimbo,
    I am in no way say­ing we should give up…we can­not afford to lose this conflict.…but I am say­ing that we need to rethink how we are fight­ing the war against the Taliban.
    We need to be very care­ful with the appli­ca­tion of force and work with the peo­ple in that region. It is not easy but it can be done.…
    When peo­ple say things like “Kill them all” they are play­ing into the hands of the Taliban and Al Qaeda, it’s exactly what they want. They want to be able to show on TV scenes of dead vil­lagers as the result of US airstrikes.…it’s the best recruit­ment mate­r­ial in the world for them.
    Education, sta­bil­ity, peace and pros­per­ity are the ene­mies of extremeism and fanat­acism that’s how you start to attack the root cause of the global jihadism movement.

    Reply
  17. CR says:
    September 10, 2008 at 11:45 am

    From an arti­cle regard­ing the use of Predator UAVs to find Bin Laden.…
    “In inter­views, the offi­cials attrib­uted their fail­ure to find bin Laden to an over­re­liance on mil­i­tary force, dis­rup­tions posed by the war in Iraq and a pat­tern of under­es­ti­mat­ing the enemy.”

    Reply
  18. JEFF says:
    September 10, 2008 at 2:48 pm

    Instead of killing the embe­ded reporters who have an agenda and only report what they want you to see, why don’t peo­ple just come up with their own con­clu­sions on issues like this? Instead of believ­ing every­thing the media crams down your throat why don’t peo­ple actu­ally do their own research. The interet has defi­nately brought it to your fin­ger­tips, all you have to do is research it on your own to get around all the biased out there. I pre­fer to watch mostly Foxnews with a lit­tle CNN to counter each bias but on sub­ject like the Tanker Fiasco I’ll go out and research it myself and come to my own con­clu­sion. The prob­lem is peo­ple are gen­er­ally too lazy to look things up for them­selves, hence the rea­son we should restrict who we allow to vote. Americans, on the whole, are not edu­cated enough to vote for the country’s best inter­est. RANT OVER

    Reply
  19. CR says:
    September 10, 2008 at 5:01 pm

    “Kill them all…“
    Yeah, it’s work­ing great so far genius.….
    http://​www​.msnbc​.msn​.com/​i​d​/​2​6​6​4​2​4​15/

    Reply
  20. sapper says:
    September 10, 2008 at 5:54 pm

    I have to go with the SOF team on this one. The video doesn’t seem to show much and the insur­gents there have resorted to killing civil­ians and then forc­ing their fam­i­lies and vil­lagers to claim the US killed them to deface the US and Afgan gov’t and then col­lect the soli­atium pay­ments made to the fam­ily.
    Along with forc­ing groups of civil­ians into fight­ing posi­tions with the tal­iban so when the US forces take out the fight­ing posi­tion they also kill the civil­ians in there which is then given to the media to make the US look bad.

    Reply
  21. CTR1(SW) says:
    September 10, 2008 at 7:18 pm

    CR wrote:

    Reply
  22. Dennis says:
    September 10, 2008 at 8:59 pm

    Maybe it is just me, but isn’t it time to leave Afghanistan?
    Granted Bin Laudin may still be out there, but what strate­gic value does the coun­try have except being a train­ing ground for the spe­cial forces?
    The real prob­lem of 9–11 was a immi­gra­tion agency that was asleep at the wheel…
    Some may sug­gest I am say­ing cut and run, but I think it is time to take a hard look at what we are fight­ing for over there.
    There is no “Domino effect” over there. Just a bunch of screwed up Muslim coun­tries.
    We could be there for a hun­dred years and things will not be better.

    Reply
  23. CR says:
    September 10, 2008 at 10:58 pm

    First of all what is a “save mus­lim..“
    Secondly, the igno­rance being dis­played here is stag­ger­ing.…
    Go visit Turkey CTR1.….

    Reply
  24. Sam says:
    September 10, 2008 at 11:53 pm

    It never takes me long to find anti-​​Muslim big­otry being spread by posters on any topic that has to do with Muslims.
    CTR1(SW)seems to think he under­stands Islam and Muslims and tells us all that “there is no such thing as a safe Muslim.” Apparently, we are all moles who have yet to be acti­vated by some shad­owy gov­ern­ment or orga­ni­za­tion. Sounds like The Protocols of the Elders of Islam if you ask me.
    As for Israel, it is not just “Muslim extrem­ists” who are fight­ing for their free­dom. Palestinian Christians and Muslims have strug­gled for lib­erty for years against Israeli ter­ror­ism, mur­der and theft. Will any­one here have the courage to sup­port the Palestinian people?

    Reply
  25. CR says:
    September 11, 2008 at 12:14 am

    CTR! wrote: “The Koran is the only

    Reply
  26. CR says:
    September 11, 2008 at 10:23 am

    *CR breathes a sigh of relief.…*
    Tontochoc, you have restored my con­fi­dence that there is intel­li­gent life here.….
    Excellent points by the way.…a good exam­ple of turn­ing the tide against an insur­gency is what they did in the Anbar province.…I like Patreaus, he gets it…

    Reply
  27. CR says:
    September 11, 2008 at 4:18 pm

    Steve,
    Very good points.…my point with the Crusades was that Christianity is one of the few reli­gions to have actu­ally com­manded the slaugh­ter of non-believers.…like CTR1 is imply­ing Islam com­mands it’s fol­low­ers to do.

    Reply
  28. CTR1(SW) says:
    September 11, 2008 at 6:41 pm

    I some­times rant for affect.
    CR.
    You still claim that chris­tians are com­manded to kill unbe­liev­ers, but you have failed to iden­tify the sen­tence or para­graph in the new tes­ta­ment. It is not there. On the other hand, there are 109 seras, called

    Reply
  29. tontochoc says:
    September 12, 2008 at 1:29 am

    It’s rant for effect, not affect, Heaven for­bid you call for affec­tive fire when I want effec­tive fire.
    I have been told that the the ground forces biggest enemy in Afghanistan is the air force. You also give Islamic armies far more credit than they deserve. Paraphrasing Hillaire Belloc, what ever hap­pens we have got Trident, strate­gic bombers, Minuteman and they have not. Have there been any suc­cess­ful Islamic armies defeat­ing another coun­try of sim­i­lar size. No. To be bru­tal it is gen­er­ally accepted that the best mil­i­tary force in the Middle East and North Africa, other than the Israelis, are the Jordanians. They haven’t won squat although forc­ing out the PLO at the point of a Centrion tank bar­rel was a neat trick which screwed up Lebanon.

    Reply
  30. Sam says:
    September 12, 2008 at 9:45 pm

    The most pow­er­ful Arab mil­i­tary is the Egyptian Army.

    Reply
  31. CR says:
    September 14, 2008 at 10:31 pm

    CTR1, read the Old Testament.…the crap in there is unreal.…

    Reply
  32. Luke the Intrepid says:
    January 3, 2009 at 11:18 pm

    Learn to spot provo­cat­uer trolls like “jarhead-​​1″ who is just fish­ing for an emo­tional back­lash. Please do not feed the trolls. Take care of your­selves and spend more time with your fam­ily and friends if you find you can’t sep­a­rate the hate spew­ers from gen­uine peo­ple. This is a new year and a lot of things are hap­pen­ing. Get rested and stay healthy.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    Recent Comments
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      They are going to have to look at the whole...
      Wembley
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Just look at this " picture " for a moment. The...
      Zandor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      I know LOSAT seemed awesome but wasn't it cancelled? I...
      JimboJones
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Yes you're quite right, I get to witness...
      JimboJones
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage