DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Polmar's Perspective » Russian Force to the Caribbean

Russian Force to the Caribbean

velikiy.jpg

The Russian gov­ern­ment is send­ing one of the world’s largest war­ships into the Caribbean for a joint naval exer­cise with Venezuela. This will mark the first time since the end of the Cold War in December 1991 that a Russian naval force will sail that “American sea.” The ships will oper­ate in the Caribbean dur­ing November, show­ing sup­port for Venezuela’s gov­ern­ment, which is strongly anti-​​United States.

Leading the Russian force will be the Petr Velikiy, a 26,000-ton, nuclear-​​propelled “bat­tle cruiser.” The ship, com­pleted in 1998, is the world’s largest war­ship other than air­craft car­ri­ers, and dis­places more than twice as much as the largest U.S. sur­face com­bat­ants, the Aegis mis­sile cruis­ers of the Ticonderoga (CG 47) class.

While Russian offi­cials have denied that the deploy­ment is linked to the United States send­ing naval ships into the Black Sea to visit a Georgian port, the Petr Velikiy cruise cer­tainly reflects Prime Minister Vladimir Putin’s efforts to demon­strate that Russia is again a major political-​​military “player” on the world scene. The sin­gle Russian air­craft car­rier, the Admiral Kuznetsov, led a task force into the Mediterranean in late 2007, and there have been peri­odic long-​​range flights by Russian Bear bombers as the Putin regime seeks to impress other nations that Russia is still a great power. Admiral Eduard Baltin, for­mer com­man­der of Russia’s Black Sea Fleet, said that the Caribbean maneu­vers mean that “Russia is return­ing to the stage in its power and inter­na­tional rela­tions which it, regret­tably, lost at the end of last century”.

“No one loves the weak,” Baltin was quoted as say­ing by Russia’s Interfax news agency.

Baltin, in January 2007, had declared that there was a buildup of U.S. nuclear-​​propelled sub­marines in the Persian Gulf area for the pur­pose of a Tomahawk mis­sile strike against Iran.

“The pres­ence of U.S. nuclear sub­marines in the Persian Gulf region means that the Pentagon has not aban­doned plans for sur­prise strikes against nuclear tar­gets in Iran. With this aim a group of multi-​​purpose sub­marines ready to accom­plish the task is located in the area,” he said.

There has been intense Russian inter­est in the Caribbean area since 1959, when Fidel Castro took con­trol of Cuba and began nego­ti­a­tions with the Soviet Union for eco­nomic and mil­i­tary assis­tance. As the Soviets built up an arse­nal of defen­sive and offen­sive weapons in Cuba in 1962, there were plans to dis­patch cruis­ers and destroy­ers as well as sub­marines to the area to be based in Cuban ports. In the event, at the time of the cri­sis only a few Soviet diesel-​​electric sub­marines were in the area. Following the cri­sis addi­tional con­ven­tional sub­marines vis­ited the island’s ports, with the first nuclear sub­ma­rine arriv­ing in 1969. Almost simul­ta­ne­ously a mis­sile cruiser and two other sur­face com­bat­ants vis­ited Cuba. Additional Soviet war­ships made peri­odic deploy­ments into the Caribbean, includ­ing the heli­copter carrier-​​missile cruiser Leningrad in 1984.

At the same time as these ship visit to Cuba, naval Bear reconnaissance/​targeting air­craft made peri­odic flights from their Northern fleet bases, down the Atlantic, and landed in Cuba for short-​​term oper­a­tions. They sub­se­quently returned to their Soviet bases.

Such flights and war­ship vis­its came to an end with the demise of the Soviet Union.

The rel­a­tively mod­ern destroyer Admiral Chabanenko (com­pleted in 1999), prob­a­bly another sur­face com­bat­ant, and an oiler will accom­pany the Petr Velikiy to the Caribbean. The nuclear-​​propelled war­ship is one of two remain­ing ships of a class of four “bat­tle cruis­ers” at the Baltic Shipyard in St. Petersburg. The two other ships are no longer oper­a­tional. These giant cruis­ers have com­bi­na­tion oil-​​burning and nuclear propul­sion plants that can drive them at 32 knots. They are armed with a mas­sive array of anti-​​ship, anti-​​submarine, and air/​missile defense weapons.

– Norman Polmar

Share |

September 10th, 2008 | Polmar's Perspective | 406358 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/09/10/russian-force-to-the-caribbean/Russian+Force+to+the+Caribbean2008-09-10+13%3A10%3A26Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Truth, Lies and Videotape: The Azizabad Raid | FLASH: NO Tanker RFP Til Next Admin » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Joe Cottone says:
    September 10, 2008 at 9:21 am

    I see that this “pos­ture” move by the Putin gang is try­ing to show their flag/​wave a small stick at the US Navy & US in gen­eral.
    If it means any­more than bravado at a time when the Putin gang is pos­si­bly going to lose their naval base at Sevastapol, I can’t see its worth while wast­ing all that time on Hugo’s ego.
    Russia would be bet­ter off keep­ing their fleet close at hand rather than a cruise half way around the world where they’d only lose those ships in any event for if noth­ing else but a lack of re-​​supply/​fuel/​ sup­port in cri­sis as in 1962.
    I think if Putin is try­ing to scare his for­mer slave states back into sub­mis­sion he’s sorely mis­taken. In fact it might just have the oppo­site
    effect. The Ukraine might just boot the Russian fleet out of the Crimea alto­gether. That would in fact cause the Putin gang to invade the Ukraine thus fight him­self so to speak. Not only would this set back Russia’s abil­ity to uti­lize a warm water port that they’ve always needed, but would also show the west­ern allies their true ambi­tions.
    Maybe the new Russian pres­i­dent bet­ter show some nerve and put Putin on ice before things really get out of control.Especially if he has his sights set on Poland/​Chech repub­lic or the Baltic states.
    Russia need to go foward with its think­ing & not regress to Stalin tac­tics of yes­ter­year.
    Joe Cottone

    Reply
  2. coolhand77 says:
    September 10, 2008 at 9:28 am

    Too bad we don’t have a bat­tle­ship to field against their bat­tle­cruiser…
    “Petr Velikiy, meet Missouri, Missouri, Petr Velikiy, you boys play nice now.”

    Reply
  3. Jimbo Jones says:
    September 10, 2008 at 9:42 am

    Wait and watch for that out­dated heap of junk to break down, was it not the admi­ral of one of those types of bat­tle­crusier who said some years ago its lucky it never blew up it was so crappy,lol.
    Ah yes here we are after a minute of googling:
    Mar. 24–MOSCOW — In yet another blow to Russia’s belea­guered mil­i­tary, the navy’s com­mand­ing admi­ral ordered a nuclear-​​powered bat­tle cruiser to return to port Tuesday for fear that “it could explode at any moment.“
    Adm. Vladimir Kuroyedov said the Peter the Great, the flag­ship of the Northern Fleet, had become unsea­wor­thy and dan­ger­ous. During a recent inspec­tion he found the cruiser to be poorly main­tained, includ­ing “the con­tents of the (on-​​board) nuclear reactor.”

    Reply
  4. Jimbo Jones says:
    September 10, 2008 at 9:45 am

    hey, won­der if it will be as amus­ing as thier last years exer­cise, the one where it took the bear air­craft twelve hours to locate thier own car­rier group, in the med and if i rememe­ber rightly there were ships break­ing down then.

    Reply
  5. Jimbo Jones says:
    September 10, 2008 at 9:47 am

    FTA: “No one loves the weak,” Baltin was quoted as say­ing by Russia’s Interfax news agency.
    Baltin, in January 2007, had declared that there was a buildup of U.S. nuclear-​​propelled sub­marines in the Persian Gulf area for the pur­pose of a Tomahawk mis­sile strike against Iran.
    Yep he was dead right there about Iran wasn’t he…

    Reply
  6. Ternarydaemon says:
    September 10, 2008 at 10:34 am

    “hey, won­der if it will be as amus­ing as thier last years exer­cise, the one where it took the bear air­craft twelve hours to locate thier own car­rier group, in the med and if i rememe­ber rightly there were ships break­ing down then“
    Do you know how dif­fi­cult it is to actu­ally locate a ship in the ocean. Let alone a mil­i­tary ship. Oceans are BIG.
    Without satel­lite tar­get­ing, any navy in the worls would take sev­eral hours to find it, even one as large as a carrier.

    Reply
  7. Andre says:
    September 10, 2008 at 10:36 am

    The Russia’s mil­i­tary was a bus­tard child for a last twenty years since Perestroyka started.
    Therefore, Russian mil­i­tary equip­ment is not in the best of shapes nowa­days. Their mil­i­tary per­son­nel is grossly under­paid, so it’s not sur­pris­ing that that their equip­ment is poorly main­tained and fail­ing.
    However, I really wouldn’t want that piece of junk to sink in our or near-​​by waters since it’s nuclear powered.

    Reply
  8. Jimbo Jones says:
    September 10, 2008 at 10:49 am

    “Do you know how dif­fi­cult it is to actu­ally locate a ship in the ocean. Let alone a mil­i­tary ship. Oceans are BIG.
    Posted by: Ternarydaemon at September 10, 2008 10:34 AM“
    It was sail­ing in the mid­dle of the Medetarainian Sea not the Atlantic Ocean or Pacific Ocean. I realise you prob­a­bly a but­thurt Soviet, sorry Russian fan­boy but those big sys­tems on the Bear should have been able to locate their car­rier group but failed mis­er­ably, face it they sucked.

    Reply
  9. PO says:
    September 10, 2008 at 11:28 am

    In response, US State Department spokesman Sean McCormack poked fun at Russia’s navy. He said that if Russia really intends to send ships to the Caribbean, “then they found a few ships that can make it that far.”

    Reply
  10. Mike says:
    September 10, 2008 at 11:44 am

    It would seem way to easy to blow this thing out of the water.. God I love America.

    Reply
  11. Jimbo Jones says:
    September 10, 2008 at 11:49 am

    Perhaps the ships will be loaded with passports…

    Reply
  12. Ed says:
    September 10, 2008 at 2:08 pm

    This just in! Disney has begun prepar­ing for shoot­ing of Pirates of The Carribean IV “The quest for the Has-​​been Navy“
    Johnny Depp will still play Jack Sparrow, Hugo Chavez will have a sup­port­ing role as the Crazy Uncle Hugo and the Russian Navy will play the part of the British Navy in the movie.
    Coming to a Theater near you!

    Reply
  13. Friend says:
    September 10, 2008 at 2:22 pm

    Two Tu-​​160 bombers just landed in Venezuela for exer­cises. Whoever has hyper­sonic mis­siles wins. I con­grat­u­late you on your over­con­fi­dence. You dudes of course are tall buffed, not fat and pim­pled teens I sup­pose. I will be in Cuba for my January vaca­tion, no fat Americans.
    You Americans are ruled by mon­ey­chang­ers. Just look at the faces of dudes who tes­ti­fied in con­gress today on defense, walk around in Manhattan and look at who rules you and sells you genet­i­cally mod­i­fied food that makes you fat, while they them­selves shop at Whole Foods stores.

    Reply
  14. pedestrian says:
    September 10, 2008 at 2:24 pm

    Hey Ruskies, if you want to prove you guys are no cow­ards, why not try come to Cuba and fly your bombers on the east coast of US from above the North Pole. I bet you Ruskies have no guts to do so. We know Ruskies are cow­ards afraid of get­ting US much more mad lol.

    Reply
  15. Ptsfp says:
    September 10, 2008 at 2:32 pm

    Lol,yeah maybe their rusty sex­tant will fail and they will run into Hugo.
    Passports in bot­tles will show up all along the South American coast. Atleast they are of some value, they will imme­di­etly be turned in for the 5 cent deposit on the bottle…

    Reply
  16. Ptsfp says:
    September 10, 2008 at 2:35 pm

    oops… Ike I mean, not Hugo.

    Reply
  17. Shiznitz says:
    September 10, 2008 at 2:38 pm

    Please.
    I won­der if the Russian pop­u­la­tion sees these sto­ries and says, ‘Yes! We’re back!‘
    …or do they see through the facade and say, ‘who are we kid­ding? Our mil­i­tary is in NO SHAPE to alter atti­tudes in the world. Good thing we have the ‘nat­ural resources’ ham­mer for about 3 — 5 more years.‘
    Let’s get real, now.
    Noone wants a fight, ESPECIALLY the Russians…

    Reply
  18. Jimbo Jones says:
    September 10, 2008 at 2:47 pm

    “who rules you and sells you genet­i­cally mod­i­fied food that makes you fat,
    Posted by: Friend at September 10, 2008 02:22 PM“
    And there we have it Ladies and Gentlemen — the most pathetic, ill informed and retarded com­ment of the week, ‘Friend’ your cred­i­bil­ity has just dropped to zero on this site.

    Reply
  19. James says:
    September 10, 2008 at 5:01 pm

    ships,missiles,passports,gas.…..bring it all because we have a every­thing defense sheild.….…its called CHUCK NORRIS(GBHRK)
    http://​www​.youtube​.com/​w​a​t​c​h​?​v​=​C​o​N​S​b​p​g​y​WBQ
    one all men had 3 tes­ti­cales but chuck was prac­tic­ing his round house kick and found it got in his way so he cut one off..hense all men now have only 2 testicals.…..the 3rd noir­ris tes­ti­cal is cur­rently wor­shiped in Mecca
    and “Friend” i sec­ond jimbo

    Reply
  20. adw says:
    September 10, 2008 at 5:27 pm

    I notice all the chest thumpers here are for­get­ing the 16,000 nuclear war­heads Russia has (they may not where they all are, but they know where most of them are) and the fact that when it came to South Ossetia and Abkazia, Putin’s crew were quite a bit more polit­i­cally com­pe­tent than Condi etc.
    Yes the US has bet­ter ships, but the US had a bet­ter Navy than that avail­ble to the Sunni insur­gency too. Took a while to get a han­dle on that, didn’t it?
    The Moskva class ships have S300’s on the back, and so they can still make a pain in the arse of them­selves, I wouldn’t want to be in an F-​​18 if one of those came at me.
    So enough with the child­ish belief in vio­lence already!

    Reply
  21. James says:
    September 10, 2008 at 6:07 pm

    So enough with the child­ish belief in vio­lence already!
    ok you can talk to me about peace love and socal­ism ill kick you in the groin see who wins

    Reply
  22. user_hostile says:
    September 10, 2008 at 6:17 pm

    And the answer for the NATO ques­tion:
    French Guiana.
    And what’s my prize, Camp?

    Reply
  23. Rhys says:
    September 10, 2008 at 8:19 pm

    I think what has to be real­ized, is the more peo­ple poke coun­tries like Iran, Russia and Venezuela the more they will push back. Sure they might be no real threat in terms of supe­ri­or­ity but a col­lab­o­ra­tion on many fronts, cou­pled with more allies in other regions such as Korea (maybe even China) will make it impos­si­ble for the US to a act to save every­one. Heck the best thing any army can do is roll over invite the inva­sion in and then wage a drawn out low tech guer­rilla cam­paign sim­i­lar to Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan.
    You only have to look at the US suc­cess in Iraq and the NATO fail­ings in Afghanistan and now the insta­bil­ity gen­er­ated in Pakistan.
    If you think these coun­tries are weak then look at the might of Israel over Palestine, has Palestine given up? No they con­tinue to find sup­port and con­tinue to fight. They have lit­tle more then bombs on bod­ies, a des­per­ate but effec­tive message.

    Reply
  24. SarahLies says:
    September 10, 2008 at 9:29 pm

    The point isn’t at all to flex mus­cle in a con­ven­tional mil­i­tary way as sug­gested by some posts here. Russia wants to demon­strate to us that our mis­sile defense shield is worth­less. What good is a mis­sile defense shield when Russian bombers are parked off­shore, ready to drop the nuke at a moments notice?

    Reply
  25. Ontos says:
    September 10, 2008 at 9:51 pm

    Ohhh.…. boys, this is some seri­ously bad news.
    It would take the Navy lit­er­ally *dozens* of min­utes.… per­haps even the best part of an hour to have all this gear rust­ing in the bot­tom of the Caribbean.
    This would be over in the amount of time it takes the aver­age Chief to down a cup of cof­fee.
    Semper Fi, Gentlemen

    Reply
  26. Russian says:
    September 10, 2008 at 10:41 pm

    Any ship can be sunk in a mat­ter of min­utes and this one is not an excep­tion. I hope that this ship never rots on the bot­tom of the Caribbean, because that would mean that all of us are already dead before it hits the bottom.

    Reply
  27. meanrusski says:
    September 10, 2008 at 11:41 pm

    Remember 1962. People who repeat the same mis­takes twice, are idiots. The US should have lis­tened to Pat Buchanan for the past sev­eral years — we would not be in this posi­tion now.
    http://​mamarus​sian​bear​.blogspot​.com/​2​0​0​8​/​0​9​/​p​a​t​-​b​u​c​h​a​n​a​n​-​p​r​o​p​h​e​t​-​i​s​-​n​o​t​-​w​i​t​h​o​u​t​.​h​tml

    Reply
  28. GI Zhou says:
    September 10, 2008 at 11:54 pm

    Hmmm Single cap­i­tal ship, no escorts, only three aging heli­copters, now where were those Los Angeles and Virginia class attack sub­marines? First rule of naval war­fare, holes below the water­line sink ships quicker than holes above it.

    Reply
  29. chuckbmc says:
    September 11, 2008 at 2:01 am

    lets get real here , putin is angry over the missle defence and of our war­ships in their black sea. todays U.S. Naval forces are unequaled we have the capa­bil­ity of sink­ing Putins canoes and chi­nas punt boats at the same time.

    Reply
  30. Jimbo Jones says:
    September 11, 2008 at 3:13 am

    “I hope that this ship never rots on the bot­tom of the Caribbean, because that would mean that all of us are already dead before it hits the bot­tom.
    Posted by: Russian at September 10, 2008 10:41 PM“
    What if it blew up on its own accord through either incom­pe­tence or faulty reac­tor or weapons stor­age? The Kursk (lol) was just as impor­tant, that sunk and were all still here.
    Next up:
    “The point isn’t at all to flex mus­cle in a con­ven­tional mil­i­tary way as sug­gested by some posts here. Russia wants to demon­strate to us that our mis­sile defense shield is worth­less. What good is a mis­sile defense shield when Russian bombers are parked off­shore, ready to drop the nuke at a moments notice?
    Posted by: SarahLies at September 10, 2008 09:29 PM“
    No, in a global thermo nuclear war with the Russians mis­sile defense makes not a speck of dif­fer­ence for obvi­ous rea­sons of the amount of ICBMs involved and thier flight paths over the poles (not any­where near the pro­posed sites in east­ern Europe and the site in Alaska would be over whelmed within sec­onds. Russian bombers in Cuba or Venezuala dur­ing a nuclear con­flict would be utterly point­less, there sim­ply is no need for them when they the Russians have thou­sands of ICBMs that get to America faster and do more dam­age.
    All the bombers would become is easy tar­gets for tom­a­hawks, ICBMs etc. Far bet­ter the Russians kept them back in Russia where if things did kick off they have at least a small chance of get­ting them off the ground before the war­heads start rain­ing down on thier air­bases. This stunt with the bombers really is noth­ing more then that — a stunt for publ­city and pro­pa­ganda for thier peo­ple and thier allies (lol).

    Reply
  31. Jimbo Jones says:
    September 11, 2008 at 3:26 am

    “If you think these coun­tries are weak then look at the might of Israel over Palestine, has Palestine given up? No they con­tinue to find sup­port and con­tinue to fight. They have lit­tle more then bombs on bod­ies, a des­per­ate but effec­tive mes­sage.
    Posted by: Rhys at September 10, 2008 08:19 PM“
    You really couldn’t have picked a worse exam­ple if you tried could you, lets see, Isreal is a pros­per­ous and wealthy coun­try, Palestine a com­plete sht hole. Isreal would have wiped those sav­ages out a long time ago if it wern’t for ‘inter­na­tional’ con­dem­na­tion every­time a pales­tin­ian or ten is killed through thier own stu­pid­ity which is in turn a prod­uct of their own stu­pid men­tal­ity that the Jews are evil and must die etc etc. Oh btw your heroic (in your eyes not mine) sui­cide bombers are a fail­ure, less and less of them get through and when they do thier ttacks do noth­ing but harden resolve to wipe out the sav­ages, the sui­cide attacks have no bear­ing on Israels mil­i­tary or its power, they sim­ple serve as pathetic jes­tures of a desparate bunch of sav­ages intent on killing as many inno­cent civil­ians as possible.

    Reply
  32. Joe says:
    September 11, 2008 at 4:31 am

    “Hmmm Single cap­i­tal ship, no escorts“
    Ummm.….no?
    ”*Leading* the Russian force will be the Petr Velikiy, a 26,000-ton, nuclear-​​propelled “bat­tle cruiser.“
    At least one destroyer is listed as being in the group (still I admit hardly a wartime escort). It’s hard to imag­ine why any­one would send a nuclear-​​powered sur­face com­bat­ant out alone ever, sim­ply because of all the prob­lems that aren’t fatal if there are two hulls in the area rather than one…
    And stop plan­ning how to sink it, any­way. They’ve got few enought left that are sea­wor­thy — don’t be mean.

    Reply
  33. Joe Cottone says:
    September 11, 2008 at 7:59 am

    I think instead of moth­balling or send­ing our older Forestal class car­ri­ers to the scrap yards, we ought to keep them along with all those F14 Tomcats & start another fleet called the “Home Waters Fleet” & keep half the car­ri­ers in the Gulf of Mexico & the other half in the Pacific sup­ported by a battleship(s) & older but use­ful cruis­ers & destroy­ers & subs to patrol these waters.
    It would cer­tainly nul­lify any naval buildup by Hugo & cohorts plus with the help of the USCG medium & high endurance cut­ters they should be able to shut down the drug traf­fi­cers too.
    At the min­i­mum we should be able to nip Hugo’s Ego in the bud & keep drug smug­gling way down.
    As for Putin’s folly on the high seas, he’s prob­a­bly going to lose what ever ship that can still make the trip here but will not have a home port in the Black Sea to go back so they will have to go back to Murmansk or worse yet Vladavlisok in the north pacific. I am sure they can make it (we might have to toe them).
    Joe Cottone

    Reply
  34. Joe Cottone says:
    September 11, 2008 at 8:00 am

    I think instead of moth­balling or send­ing our older Forestal class car­ri­ers to the scrap yards, we ought to keep them along with all those F14 Tomcats & start another fleet called the “Home Waters Fleet” & keep half the car­ri­ers in the Gulf of Mexico & the other half in the Pacific sup­ported by a battleship(s) & older but use­ful cruis­ers & destroy­ers & subs to patrol these waters.
    It would cer­tainly nul­lify any naval buildup by Hugo & cohorts plus with the help of the USCG medium & high endurance cut­ters they should be able to shut down the drug traf­fi­cers too.
    At the min­i­mum we should be able to nip Hugo’s Ego in the bud & keep drug smug­gling way down.
    As for Putin’s folly on the high seas, he’s prob­a­bly going to lose what ever ship that can still make the trip here but will not have a home port in the Black Sea to go back so they will have to go back to Murmansk or worse yet Vladavlisok in the north pacific. I am sure they can make it (we might have to toe them).
    Joe Cottone

    Reply
  35. C says:
    September 11, 2008 at 8:55 am

    Show boat from Russia, maybe we should send a missle crusier into the Black Sea instead of a com­mand ship. Tit-​​for-​​Tat and the beat goes on. One thing for sure I am sure the Democrats will want to fund a new social pro­gram to fight this re-​​emerging mil­i­tary chal­lenge. Perhaps a sen­sativ­ity pro­gram for our military.

    Reply
  36. Camp says:
    September 11, 2008 at 10:49 am

    Don’t for­get that Venezuela has signed a deal “to buy five Project 636 diesel sub­marines, and four Project 637 Amur sub­marines at a later date”. And the cur­rent sur­face pack­age is likely to have an few sub-​​surface escorts. It would be inter­est­ing if one of the 4 sur­face ships being sent, was a sub-​​tender.
    They could be deliv­er­ing the Venezuelan sub­marines. Or Conducting advanced train­ing & coor­di­na­tion exer­cises for Venezuelan crews on Russian subs. The Battle cruiser & it’s destroyer will prob­a­bly sim­u­late an American Carrier Battle Group, along with the 2 ASW bombers sim­u­lat­ing B-​​52s… But that’s just a guess. :\
    “Venezuela strikes

    Reply
  37. Chris says:
    September 11, 2008 at 11:05 am

    Russia might just be able to take us in a bat­tle, because we can’t pro­nounce the names of there ships and would spend half the bat­tle who we’d be targeting

    Reply
  38. reshtet says:
    September 11, 2008 at 12:01 pm

    Why allow it?Since they sup­port the ter­ror­ists with arms deals.…ANd they have been in Syria(ramiy)and gave Iran fuel for a reac­tor etc…
    Wake up please!!!

    Reply
  39. Glenn says:
    September 11, 2008 at 1:26 pm

    welp when you play wussy for over a decade tak­ing hit after hit and just slap­ping hands what do you expect? this Nation has had its hands slapped while doing a worth while deed and we have always backed down. we need some­one like regan back in office with some power n guts to put these coun­tries in their place. crap look at rus­sia act­ing like it a world power to deal with, well make no mis­take it is but then again. if we recruited every­one in the state of texas alone we could out gun, out num­ber, and beat their com­mu­nist asses back to rus­sia. the old soviet union is gone..our forces at one time were stronger but since the carter and clin­ton clo­se­ing our bases and let­ting our troops slowly dwin­dle down to low num­bers and if we set back and let the rus­sians actions intim­i­date us then we are the wussies..i say its time we make a stand and once n for all show the world that we are the super­power and to leave us alone or pay the con­siquiences. get back our wordly regog­ni­tion. i served my time in viet­nam , we stood like dumb jack­asses and waited to get shot at before we could shoot back.. and if we shot some­one we bet­ter be ready to prove they shot first. i remem­ber the days when i came home to an ungrate­ful nation and they still are for the most part . America wake up. buy all the guns and rifles you can „because the day is com­ing when we will prob­a­bly have to fight right here on us soil…because most of the lib­eral jack­asses wont make a stern stand against our ene­mies and believe it or not.. this coun­try has many nations who would love noth­ing more than to see us crawl­ing in the grass look­ing for food.. we give mil­lions , maybe even bil­lions to all those coun­tries who hate us includ­ing all the rus­sians, and islamic nations. crap we pay bil­lions to the arabs and then pay top dol­lar for their oil..we are there lets take our war debt in oil. what are we afraid of? rus­sia? syria, jor­dan iraq,? i’d guess the free world is afraid of Iran… lets not for­get, they are per­sians who became islamic
    extrem­ist and when their leader was here , you know why he was always smil­ing? because he had no fear of the US Military forces.. i best stop or one of the lib­er­als might try to slit my throat while i sleep. if he can get past my bull dogs.

    Reply
  40. Glenn says:
    September 11, 2008 at 2:04 pm

    well i read one of the post and it trig­gered a good move for our mil­i­tary forces, thanks be to god.. instead of moth balling our our old but good shaped ships.. make another fleet .maybe not as good as what we have in the oceans but none the less an American Presence in an ever chang­ing world. put them in the gulf of mex­ico and carra­bian sea and to patrol our home­land waters..
    no need to junk a good ship that can still be used..

    Reply
  41. reshtet says:
    September 11, 2008 at 8:08 pm

    I won’t ever trust DOD Linguists or Networkers ever!!!

    Reply
  42. ROBERT TORRES says:
    September 12, 2008 at 11:33 am

    HUGO CHAVEZ IS JUST ANOTHER NORIEGA , CAN YOU PLEASE UNITED STATES BRING HIM TO BE NEXT TO NORIEGA IN MIAMI THE WORLD PEACE NEED THOSE PEOPLES TO BE TIED, THEY ARE EVIL PEOPLE THEY DON’T LOVE PEACE WE HAVE TO LOVE EACH OTHER GOD BLESS YOU.

    Reply
  43. Robert says:
    September 12, 2008 at 11:45 am

    Hugo Chavez is just another Noriega will you please bring him and set a bed next to Panama Gral. Noriega in Miami we don’t want peo­ple like him to be free they has to be tied, those peo­ple who donot love peace are evil, please bring him back home before is to late, are so many peo­ples around who does evil. God bless you.

    Reply
  44. Walter Berns says:
    September 12, 2008 at 6:49 pm

    There are no such things as Russian Battleships, it is just Russian hype and counter adver­tis­ing..
    MOSCOW (AP)

    Reply
  45. VileFather says:
    September 13, 2008 at 11:42 am

    Please CIA, will you do the world a favor and remove Chavez once and for all?
    Please be seri­ous about it (not like Fidel Castro’s failed attempts).
    And you don’t need to be cre­ative about the removing/​killing method, any­thing that works will do

    Reply
  46. Russian cruises says:
    September 25, 2008 at 8:43 pm

    Welcome back to the world Russia

    Reply
  47. angel says:
    October 21, 2008 at 8:37 pm

    That’s OK!But take a closer look fol­low­ing link,It’s great to DVD and PSP con­verter for mac!
    DVD Ripper for Mac,
    Mac DVD Ripper Suite,
    Mac DVD Converter Ultimate Suite,
    Mac DVD Copy,
    Mac DVD Creator,
    Mac DVD to iPod Converter,
    Mac DVD to iPhone Converter,
    Mac DVD to MP4 Converter,
    Mac DVD to Apple TV Converter,
    Mac DVD to PSP Converter,
    Mac DVD to BlackBerry Converter,
    Mac DVD Audio Ripper,
    Edit DVD,
    Vob Converter for Mac,
    VOB to iPod Converter for Mac,
    VOB to Apple TV Converter for Mac,
    VOB to PSP Converter for Mac,
    VOB to MPEG4 Converter for Mac,
    VOB to M4V Converter for Mac,
    VOB to 3GP Converter for Mac,
    VOB to MPG Converter for Mac,
    VOB to AVI Converter for Mac

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    Recent Comments
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      Yeah, I don't get it. The "Dragon...
      Ptsfp
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Should wikipedia Ned Kelly.He used armour that worked in...
      Nick
    • UPDATED: Details on Army’s New Afghanistan Duds
      Marines win agin hoo rur
      greg
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      To the poster "batvette" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
      gee lets forget about winning a war as long...
      greg stocks
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage