DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Cyber-warfare » Iranian Cyber Warfare Threat Assessment

Iranian Cyber Warfare Threat Assessment

cyberfight.jpg

The Iranian military consists of the Army, Air Force, Navy, and a Revolutionary Guard force. Iran’s total active duty armed forces numbers 513,000, while reserves add another 350,000. The army is divided into 3 army headquarters with 4 armored divisions and 7 infantry divisions, 1 airborne brigade, 1 Special Forces division and now 1 cyber division. Their budget equates to between $95 and $100 per capita. This figure is lower than other Persian Gulf nations, and lower as a percentage of gross national product than all other Gulf States except the United Arab Emirates.

Education is considered a top priority in the development plans of the country, the authorities have endeavored to increase the primary education enrolment rate. In 2008 Iran had over 3.5 million students enrolled in universities. In the past two decades the education system and curricula have been reformed multiple times. Application of modern educational equipment and technologies such as information and communication technologies is developing considerably. The increased attention to higher education is producing the computer scientists and technology engineers necessary to have an advanced cyber weapons program.

Iran’s Software Capability

Iran has the capacity to meet the large domestic demand for software and at the same time to become internationally competitive. The software sector itself, although strong in some areas, is not internationally competitive. The Iranian High Council of Informatics has categorized 543 informatics companies, and the software sector output is around $50 million although, once again, statistics are educated guesses rather than based on hard statistical evidence.

Iran’s Asymmetric Capabilities

Iran has significant asymmetric warfare capabilities and poses an additional threat of proliferation. Iran’s economic growth last year surpassed 7%. The expansion of their economy is funding research, development and acquisition of strategic military capabilities. They are intensely focused on developing their other means of military and asymmetrical weapons and tactics. Iran’s military buildup poses direct threats to U.S. interests. It is believed that Iran has fairly advanced cyber-warfare weapons and offensive plans that include cyber attacks against a specific government web sites and infrastructure. Iran’s cyber ambitions are ambitious and troubling. The following section represents and estimation of Iran’s cyber warfare capabilities.

Estimated Cyber Capabilities

Iran Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC)

  • Military Budget: $11.5 Billion USD
  • Global Rating in Cyber Capabilities: Top 5
  • Cyber Warfare Budget: $76 Million USD
  • Offensive Cyber Capabilities: 4.0 (1 = Low, 3 = Moderate and 5 = Significant)

Cyber Weapons Arsenal (In Order of Threat)

  1. Electromagnetic pulse weapons (non-nuclear)
  2. Compromised counterfeit computer software
  3. Wireless data communications jammers
  4. Computer viruses and worms
  5. Cyber data collection exploits
  6. Computer and networks reconnaissance tools
  7. Embedded Trojan time bombs (suspected)

Cyber Weapons Capabilities Rating Moderate to Advanced

Cyber Force Size 2,400

  • Reserves and Militia: Reserve with an estimated at 1,200
  • Broadband Connections: Less than 100,000
  • Hacker Community: Hackers have demonstrated their capabilities by successfully attacking numerous Israeli Web site and others. Cyber activists are common in Iran and very active.

Many world leaders as well as U.S. President Bush has publicly vowed that he would never “tolerate” a nuclear Iran. The question now is what about a cyber Iran?

– Kevin Coleman

Share |

September 23rd, 2008 | Cyber-warfare | 408537 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/09/23/iranian-cyber-warfare-threat-assessment/Iranian+Cyber+Warfare+Threat+Assessment2008-09-23+12%3A14%3A56Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Ships that Won’t Sail | AFSOC Would (Almost) Kill for New Gunships » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. A says:
    September 23, 2008 at 10:09 am

    I am really wonderful how you evaluating the capability of other nation? that is what i believed the US lack of knowledge about Iran (and maybe other nations) in all aspects . you think these stuff are accurate ? not at all.i am an INFO SEC professional in IRAN.while i hope my nation can secure their network infrastructure and become one of outstanding force in Cyber-Warfare , but the truth is different.security in cyberspace is still overlooked by gov and we suffer from lack of professionals in info-sec (we buy too many high-tech hardware and software from US but we just buy and don’t know how to securely implementing them).peoples graduate from university , but with no up-to-date knowledge and hands on experience.this is not like the US university that the university and industry or gov are in tight relation with each other​.in most of time the basic principle of info-sec don’t understood by IT professionals.people think just about writing codes , install Network devices and OS , Application without security in mind. in most case i see network OS not patched since installation and nobody think about the risk because they don’t know what those patch do.i see too many network devices leaved with unsecured configuration.i am sure in iran we can’t count more than 100 Sec-pro (the real professionals not the script kiddies that even don’t know how TCP/IP work).it is odd how you estimated about 2400 cyber force.i should mentioned the possibility of using some cyber mercenaries from china , Russia of other cybercrime org. if you evaluated the other nation capability in cyber warfare (like china and US ‚but they are the big one and have real capability), i can sleep tonight without nightmare.

    Reply
  2. Kevin says:
    September 23, 2008 at 12:41 pm

    To answer your question here are the top 10 inputs.
    1. Exploits that have been said to have come from the nation.
    2. Past cyber attacks that have been said to have been launched by that nation.
    3. Military budget numbers published by third parties.
    4. CIA global fact data
    5. Education focus on computer science and technology
    6. Hi tech industry base
    7. Global communication study that identifies broadband connections per country
    8. Computer industry PC sales data
    9. Statements made by the nation’s government and military leaders
    10. Trusted web sources that track and publish military, intelligence and other related information.
    We do try to keep cyber crime and cyber warfare intel seperate.

    Reply
  3. Roy Smith says:
    September 23, 2008 at 1:21 pm

    You know,instead of all of this “boogeyman” bullshit,we need to worry about what is going on in Pakistan,for instance. If the Paki President & Prime Minister had not changed their dinner plans,they’d have been caught up in that hotel bombing & possibly killed. Also,let’s not forget the Bear(Russia) reawakening & sending military supplies,bombers,& navy fleets to Cuba,Venezuela,& Bolivia. Instead,we are treated to a daily diet of fear talking about “cyber terrorists”,“blond hair blue eyed” terrorists,& other assorted “boogeymen” & ghosts. We are thisclose to getting our asses handed to us in Afghanistan & we are busy chasing mythical creatures known as “terrorists” in our nation. Talk about a “Neo-Con” job. According to Homeland Security & our “Jewish” masters,all of us Goyim are “terrorists” & need to have our civil rights,liberties,& freedoms suppressed. All “defense spending” is geared to Northern Command & Department of homeland Security(to keep us Goyim in line),none to strengthen our national security against real enemies(Russia,China,& now Pakistan) with real conventional weapons & WMDs.

    Reply
  4. Factoryidiot says:
    September 23, 2008 at 4:20 pm

    Allot of superstition there, remembering such guess work lead to a wide belief Iraq had WMD’s.
    The amount of guess work and scare mongering in that article really makes it a waste of time to read. What were you trying to achieve?

    Reply
  5. SpyGuy says:
    September 23, 2008 at 5:32 pm

    I would like to specifically address Factoryidiot & Roy Smith.
    YOU TWO AMATURES NEED TO KNOCK-IT-OFF NOW.
    Intelligence work is all about collecting disparate pieces of information and data, keeping it in context, look for patterns and interpret what it means. That is what this article and most of this blog has been about and I hope will continue to be about. You AMATURES would be well served to shut up and learn something. The author is not always right

    Reply
  6. Site Visitor says:
    September 23, 2008 at 5:48 pm

    I consistently see such hostility to Kevin Coleman’s posting. Could someone please explain why this is?
    My only guess is that some of the “old-school” military types are intimidated by the “new-school” cyber warefare and don’t want to admit that an entire ware can be fought and won without a single bullet being fired.
    Iran’s cyber capabilities is an extremely relevent topic — why the hostility?

    Reply
  7. Brian says:
    September 23, 2008 at 7:21 pm

    Factoryidiot was not entirely wrong, IDIOT is in his name — that part was right

    Reply
  8. gsak says:
    September 24, 2008 at 12:35 am

    Anyone want to actually contribute something?
    I’m currently employed in the field of low-level network testing and such, and I say this is a relevant topic.
    When it comes to LAN/WAN-level PC security, Operating System diversity is an outstanding defense. It’s less-common for an individual intruder to be proficient in penetrating some arbitrary combination of Unix, Linux, SELinux, Windows, FreeBSD and Mac OS X simultaneously.
    I’ve seen some so-so security implementations on Secret networks while in the service, and I’m never surprised when I catch a news story talking about one being compromised.
    Same with the nuke security stories. I’m never surprised. It just reminds me of the good old days and never getting caught. Or getting caught and having a Master Chief let it go.
    So, America probably isn’t as slickity slick as you’d be tempted to think, but I’d bet that same rule applies to Iran, at least as much.

    Reply
  9. Wembley says:
    September 24, 2008 at 4:51 am

    The #1 top threat listed is an EMP weapon — but not evidence si given that Iran has or is developing this capability.
    That’s pretty weak stuff. The commenters saying that this look like an attempt to build up an imaginary threat do have a point. Let’s have some substance here.

    Reply
  10. Kevin says:
    September 24, 2008 at 8:41 am

    Wembley — three things!
    I REFUSE to publish anything that could compromise a source of intelligence or perhaps give any info as to how much we know or are prepared to handle these threats.
    Two as for the EMP capabilities look at the piece posted on here earlier on TEDS & EPFC. NATO has made many statements and conducted briefings on this threat.
    Recently NATO’s Chief of Cyber Defense stated that cyber terrorism/cyber attack poses as great a threat to national security as a missile attack. Strong words for sure.
    Most people do not equate cyber war with explosives, but that is short sighted. Ever heard of TEDs or EPFCs? If you haven

    Reply
  11. gsak says:
    September 24, 2008 at 11:35 am

    Kevin is talking about Transient Electrostatic Discharge and Explosively-Pumped Flux Compression Generators.
    There are a few others out there, including High-Powered Microware (narrow and wide-band), and particle beam techniques.
    Hardening of a target against these attacks usually has to be deliberate; in other words, don’t expect something to survive unless the shielding has been tested and also regularly maintained.
    I’m personally interested in laser-induced dielectric breakdown, with the intention of causing a natural lightning strike.
    Information on any of these examples is available on the unclassified Internet.

    Reply
  12. Kevin says:
    September 24, 2008 at 12:17 pm

    GSAK
    I heve been looking at laser-induced dielectric breakdown but there is very little research going on that I can find. Do you know who is conducting research in this area?

    Reply
  13. mtheory says:
    September 24, 2008 at 1:11 pm

    Hi Kevin,
    You’re right that it’s not a mature technology; however, there’s some work going on at NM Tech and here is a great report on some of the current research:
    http://​www​.opticsexpress​.org/​D​i​r​e​c​t​P​D​F​A​c​c​e​s​s​/​9​5​8​7​C​3​2​2​-​B​D​B​9​-​1​3​7​E​-​C​3​3​3​C​A​F​1​9​9​F​6​E​E​5​2​_​1​5​7​1​8​9​.​p​d​f​?​d​a​=​1​&​a​m​p​;​i​d​=​1​5​7​1​8​9​&​a​m​p​;​s​e​q​=​0​&​a​m​p​;​C​F​I​D​=​1​6​4​2​0​2​3​7​&​a​m​p​;​C​F​T​O​K​E​N​=​1​2​8​5​9​585

    Reply
  14. gsak says:
    September 24, 2008 at 1:13 pm

    Whoops.. I was playing around with different handle ideas and posted under the wrong one. :)
    Anyway, hope you like the article.

    Reply
  15. Jimbo Jones says:
    September 26, 2008 at 7:28 am

    Will the Iranians photoshop us to death?

    Reply
  16. XENUPS says:
    September 27, 2008 at 9:30 am

    2008
    ASHYANE TM
    DELTA HACKING TM
    JUST SEARCH IT IN THE GOOGLE

    Reply
  17. Rigma says:
    September 27, 2008 at 5:32 pm

    HAHA!Terrorists going to school is a given one…
    And that they hack better than write software is
    also a given one!!! They have no thoughts on personal upgrades…Astral religion…

    Reply
  18. angel says:
    October 21, 2008 at 5:08 am

    That’s OK!But take a closer look following link,It’s great to DVD and PSP converter for mac!
    DVD Ripper for Mac,
    Mac DVD Ripper Suite,
    Mac DVD Converter Ultimate Suite,
    Mac DVD Copy,
    Mac DVD Creator,
    Mac DVD to iPod Converter,
    Mac DVD to iPhone Converter,
    Mac DVD to MP4 Converter,
    Mac DVD to Apple TV Converter,
    Mac DVD to PSP Converter,
    Mac DVD to BlackBerry Converter,
    Mac DVD Audio Ripper,
    Edit DVD,
    Vob Converter for Mac,
    VOB to iPod Converter for Mac,
    VOB to Apple TV Converter for Mac,
    VOB to PSP Converter for Mac,
    VOB to MPEG4 Converter for Mac,
    VOB to M4V Converter for Mac,
    VOB to 3GP Converter for Mac,
    VOB to MPG Converter for Mac,
    VOB to AVI Converter for Mac

    Reply
  19. angel says:
    October 23, 2008 at 1:29 am

    That’s OK!But take a closer look following link,It’s great to DVD and PSP
    converter for mac!
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​r​i​p​p​e​r​-​s​u​i​t​e​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​-​s​u​i​t​e​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​c​o​p​y​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​c​r​e​a​t​o​r​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​t​o​-​i​p​o​d​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​t​o​-​i​p​h​o​n​e​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​t​o​-​m​p​4​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​t​o​-​a​p​p​l​e​-​t​v​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​t​o​-​p​s​p​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​t​o​-​b​l​a​c​k​b​e​r​r​y​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​m​a​c​-​d​v​d​-​a​u​d​i​o​-​r​i​p​p​e​r​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.macdvdripper​.org/​h​o​w​-​t​o​-​e​d​i​t​-​d​v​d​-​t​r​i​m​-​v​i​d​e​o​-​c​r​o​p​-​t​a​k​e​-​e​f​f​e​c​t​s​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.vobconvertermac​.com/,
    http://​www​.vobconvertermac​.com/​v​o​b​-​t​o​-​i​p​o​d​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​-​f​o​r​-​m​a​c​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.vobconvertermac​.com/​v​o​b​-​t​o​-​a​p​p​l​e​-​t​v​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​-​f​o​r​-​m​a​c​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.vobconvertermac​.com/​v​o​b​-​t​o​-​p​s​p​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​-​f​o​r​-​m​a​c​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.vobconvertermac​.com/​v​o​b​-​t​o​-​m​p​e​g​4​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​-​f​o​r​-​m​a​c​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.vobconvertermac​.com/​v​o​b​-​t​o​-​m​4​v​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​-​f​o​r​-​m​a​c​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.vobconvertermac​.com/​v​o​b​-​t​o​-​3​g​p​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​-​f​o​r​-​m​a​c​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.vobconvertermac​.com/​v​o​b​-​t​o​-​m​p​g​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​-​f​o​r​-​m​a​c​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.vobconvertermac​.com/​v​o​b​-​t​o​-​a​v​i​-​c​o​n​v​e​r​t​e​r​-​f​o​r​-​m​a​c​.​h​tml

    Reply
  20. mm says:
    May 5, 2009 at 4:34 pm

    down whit usa

    Reply
  21. 0neERROR Digital Hacking Tm ( IRAN ) says:
    May 8, 2009 at 9:55 am

    Hack is good BUT FIRST SECURITY !
    IRAN Hacking Army …
    Ready FOR attack …

    Reply
  22. 0neERROR Digital Hacking Tm ( IRAN ) says:
    May 8, 2009 at 9:57 am

    Hack is good BUT FIRST SECURITY .
    I R A N H A C K I N G A R M Y : READY …

    Reply
  23. kevin says:
    May 10, 2009 at 3:32 am

    kose nane khamenie ghatele iran,
    kose nane ahmadinejad dozde iran

    Reply
  24. MAHDI says:
    May 21, 2009 at 1:23 pm

    BE CAREFUL IRAN IS SO STRONG

    Reply
    • Pirooz says:
      December 2, 2009 at 7:15 am

      yes,Iran and it’s soldiers are very very strong.
      قوی هست قویتر هم خواهد شد
      ولی نه برای جنگ بلکه در برابر استعمارگران منفعت طلب.
      موفق باشی ایران من.….

      Reply
  25. Geraldanthro says:
    June 11, 2009 at 2:05 am

    Iran’s cyber capabilities are mostly kiddy scripts.
    Weak server protection and their WWW is subject to
    shut down with in 24 hrs, loss of all connections to outside world.
    http://​warintel​.blogspot​.com/​2​0​0​9​/​0​6​/​k​e​y​-​p​o​s​t​s​-​c​y​b​e​r​-​w​a​r​f​a​r​e​.​h​tml
    Gerald
    Anthropologist.

    Reply
  26. mohsen says:
    June 28, 2009 at 6:00 am

    ? ? ? ?
    ?

    Reply
  27. ferdosi says:
    July 18, 2009 at 8:29 am

    If I may, a few words to my friend the InfoSec Pro above: Buddy, what you say about sad state of security is true in the circles you work: “normal” corporations, dinky gov. offices, etc. You obviously don’t have very much info about the inner workings of the more security oriented establishments. Let me ask you this: in the more than a decade that Iran has had a national interbanking network, how many instances of cyber crime and hacking of the banking system servers has occurred? what? maybe less than 10? and i assure you, the banking networks are not the most secure networks in Iran — not by a long shot.
    Detailed information in this subject is not in the public domain — not even for veteran IT professionals in Iran. Successful launch of a satellite into orbit is no laughing matter — in terms of technical and scientific requirements. And i should be clear and emphasize on the launch ops — the satellite was a joke as we all know. do you honestly think government agencies with the kind of haphazard data integrity management policies that you described, could successfully carry out such extremely complex operations?

    Reply
  28. amir says:
    August 2, 2009 at 9:45 am

    ??? ?? ???????
    ??? ?? ??????
    ??? ?? ?????
    ?? ??? ??? ???????? ??????? ???
    WE STANDING FOR VICTORI

    Reply
  29. ProjectSAD says:
    August 13, 2009 at 6:50 pm

    Kevin, thanks for the great work. The abundance of noise pollution on this post goes to show how closely you

    Reply
  30. freedom says:
    August 29, 2009 at 1:09 am

    ??? ?? ?????? ??????
    down whit islam
    long live iran

    Reply
  31. ali says:
    September 7, 2009 at 4:09 am

    ???? ?? ?????? ??????
    ???? ?? ????????? ???? ???????? ?????? ??????
    ???? ?? ????? ??????
    ?? ???????

    Reply
  32. soheil bashardoust says:
    September 21, 2009 at 12:00 pm

    it is right
    http://​www​.boronz​.com
    persian directory

    Reply
  33. reza says:
    October 21, 2009 at 1:25 pm

    salam.salam be hameye kasani ke deleshon vase iran misoze​.az dast in mardom faghat mitonam sar be chah besporam…
    hala mifahmam hazrat ali chera ba chah dardo del mikard.delam az daste in mardom khone.adamaye hale hazer iran mesle mardom kofe ‚hata bad tar az ona shodan.man nemidonam in 40 melyon jamiat ke ray dadan be ki be chi be che hadafi ray dadan??????????
    be inke gosht beshe folan ghadar…
    be inke motadamun bishtar beshan…
    be ibke bishtar az in to donya khar beshim…
    be inke bishtar az in aghab bemonim to har arse…
    be chi vaghean be chi ray dadan.
    vaghean kheili adamye sathi negari hastim.
    delam be hale hamamun misuse.
    fekr mikonim ke khoda azamun razie.ama motmaenam ke halemun pishe khoda badatar az ye ghatel ya ye…
    iran dorost nemishe

    Reply
  34. jlkjlkjlkjlk says:
    December 2, 2009 at 7:11 am

    good luck Iran’s soldiers
    good luck Iran and it’s peoples

    Reply
  35. sedaye melat says:
    February 10, 2010 at 7:30 am

    zende bad irane islami (marg bar monafeghe vatan foroosh ) dorood bar khameney zende bad ahmadinezhad

    Reply
  36. mash oruj says:
    March 3, 2010 at 5:37 pm

    osvaldo garcia
    the more the defense power of a nation, the less dare of it’s enemies to think a bout having any harm to it.
    we TAKE PROUD!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      The Air Force has got it backwards again. Here it...
      gmanaz
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      Damn it! I thought this hole tanker BS was over with...
      Thunder350
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      my bad… i misread your second to last...
      Project Thor
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      excuse me… were you reading what i...
      Project Thor
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      Welfare and warfare are necessary. The argument on...
      calw
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      Get out of wheeled CrapMobiles and get off the roads...
      IEDDEFEAT
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      Nope. Crash a Harrier every other flight and it would still be...
      Hx2
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      That's a misleading response – the issue...
      Why
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      There are good off the shelf platforms, the...
      STemplar
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      The A-10 can't hang around for extended...
      Project Thor
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage