DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Door Kickers » Kill Bin Laden: UPDATE II

Kill Bin Laden: UPDATE II

tora-bora.jpg

[EDITOR: Updated Nov. 7, 2008 — After some cor­re­spon­dence with the author I have decided to redact his real name, though it had been revealed by another forum quite a while ago. Fury made a com­pelling case that he was wor­ried about putting his family’s live in dan­ger, and as some­one with a young daugh­ter of my own, com­pas­sion out­weighed jour­nal­is­tic ethics. I am sin­cerely sorry for any prob­lems this may have caused and I wish Fury the best of luck in his endeavors…Please read the upcom­ing review of “Kill bin Laden” on Military​.com.]

So, after I posted the last thread, I went over to a forum that’s pop­u­lated with no-​​joke spe­cial oper­a­tions forces troops and looked at the dis­cus­sion on the KBL/​ Dalton Fury imbroglio. Man is it hot in there.

Apparently, Dalton Fury’s real name is [DELETED BY EDITOR]. I was wrong in think­ing he was Pete Blaber, though it does turn out from the dis­cus­sion that Blaber has a book of his own com­ing out called “The Mission, The Men, and Me: Lessons from a Former Delta Force Commander” that’s sup­posed to be avail­able in December.

These oper­a­tors at the forum are none too kind to a guy who’s attempt­ing to “profit” from reveal­ing covert oper­a­tions cov­ered under top secret non dis­clo­sure agree­ments. They skewer him and smoke his body over a pit of coals. But none of them dis­putes who he is, what he’s done or how the mis­sion went down. There’s lit­tle com­ment about the actual 60 Minutes broad­cast, though it would have been help­ful if the reporters had men­tioned the con­tro­versy Fury has caused and held fast on call­ing him by his real name [DELETED BY EDITOR]. Once it’s out in the open, it looks a lit­tle ridicu­lous for a rep­utable news orga­ni­za­tion to stick to a pseudonym.

As a reporter who’s cov­ered the mil­i­tary for a decade, I get a lit­tle annoyed at the knuckle-​​dragger atti­tude that some­one who says any­thing about their covert activ­ity should be ban­ished. Give me a break. That atti­tude per­pet­u­ates an elit­ist, Samurai men­tal­ity that says “you don’t need to know. Just trust us, we know what we’re doing…”

Sorry, but I — and mil­lions of other Americans — pay your salary and we damned right want to know what you’re doing. You work for us. So I’m glad, as long as it doesn’t delib­er­ately put lives in dan­ger of death (like the politically-​​motivated CIA tell-​​alls did back in the ‘70s), that these sto­ries come out. There’s been seven years between then and now, surely Delta and CIA have new ways of doing things that aren’t com­pro­mised by this book.

I will say that I think Eric Haney’s book went over the line — in terms of TTPs and train­ing. Ouch…And the guys over at the oper­a­tor board skew­ered him for that as well. But that’s a case where the quilty plea­sure of the inside gouge out­weighed my scru­ples a bit…Inside Delta Force was SUCH a good read.

– Christian

Share |

October 6th, 2008 | Door Kickers | 4108114 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/10/06/kill-bin-laden-update-ii/Kill+Bin+Laden%3A+UPDATE+II2008-10-06+18%3A38%3A29Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Plan to Kill bin Laden Rejected | No (Quranic) Justice in Peace » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Kayaker says:
    October 7, 2008 at 1:31 pm

    Christian..
    Cold ? Hey, I wear a Dry Suit, hope­fully you do also. You come across as very inma­ture as well as a self right­eous sort of guy. You remind me of that arro­gant reporter who was in that famous movie with John Wayne, the “Green Berets”. All full of him­self and demand­ing to know every­thing yet couldn’t han­dle the truth when com­plete strangers told him oth­er­wise. Fortunately, later in the movie, he saw the light. Perhaps you need some of the same.
    Personally, I would like to know who your employer is so he /​ she can get an ear­ful. Your report­ing is very toxic and you need to be held account­able as a result to your read­ers Mr. Christian.
    Perhaps your in the wrong line of work Mr. Christian. Considering that the coun­try is in its sev­enth year of war against a deter­mined enemy, maybe you can enlist into either the US Army or the Marine Corps and expe­ri­ence the fight with a weapon instead of a legal pad and a pen­cil. Then you can learn all about OPSEC and what it means when your life is on the line.

    Reply
  2. steve says:
    October 7, 2008 at 1:34 pm

    “Hello? Editor? I dis­agree with one of your reporters and I demand you fire him, Yes, I know I’m free to choose not to read any more of his writ­ings. But, I think it would be best if you fired him so noone ever gets offended again.”

    Reply
  3. Kayaker says:
    October 7, 2008 at 1:38 pm

    Nice try “Steve”. But this is the real world. You can say what you want then you need to held accountable.

    Reply
  4. steve says:
    October 7, 2008 at 1:43 pm

    Oh, I must have mis­read the Constitution, you know the whole part about free­dom of expres­sion. If you had him on a fac­tual error or delib­er­ate mis­re­port­ing, you would have some point. However, since he merely stated his opin­ion, which would be under the purvue of edi­to­ri­als, you don’t. Of course, I could be mis­taken in my opin­ion that the owner of a web­site has the right to say pretty much fool thing he likes on it. He even gives you the oppur­tu­nity to dis­agree with him in real time. Why so mad?

    Reply
  5. steve says:
    October 7, 2008 at 1:51 pm

    Besides, do you have any idea what a flame fest like this does to his hits count? If I was his edi­tor at another venue, I’d tell you to go piss up a rope just so you come to my web­site to post how much I suck.

    Reply
  6. Kayaker says:
    October 7, 2008 at 1:54 pm

    Steve.…
    Its your gen­eral atti­tude and lack of knowl­edge that is con­sid­ered toxic regard­ing my reply as well as those oth­ers pre­vi­ous to mine. Just like my reply to Mr. Christian. You can say what­ever you want to sup­port some twisted belief but then you need to be held account­able for your actions by oth­ers that are inter­preted as garbage.
    We all know that bla­tant stu­pid­ity mixed with arro­gance isn’t an accept­able stan­dard in soci­ety when you are demand­ing to know stuff that you are not enti­tled to. If Mr. Christian worked for me and know­ing what I under­stand about his char­ac­ter now, I would kick him to the curb. Thats why Mr. Christian isn’t like other respected reporters in the field like COL. Ollie North. He has no cred­i­bil­ity. You can loose your cred­i­bil­ity in a heart beat and he did with many of us vet­er­ans here.

    Reply
  7. steve says:
    October 7, 2008 at 2:02 pm

    Well, I respect your opin­ion, even though I dis­agree with it. You were free to express it here, because you held him account­able for his opin­ions and directly called him on it. It’s a great sys­tem. What makes you think his employ­ers if any should have to share your opin­ion and fol­low your wishes? Are we going to go the Politically Correct route and have a check list of what he can or can’t have for an opin­ion and have him fired for not complying?

    Reply
  8. unmannedanimal says:
    October 7, 2008 at 2:07 pm

    afaik chris­t­ian IS the edi­tor of defense tech.

    Reply
  9. steve says:
    October 7, 2008 at 2:08 pm

    Welcome to the world of blog­ging, thanks for playing.

    Reply
  10. Kayaker says:
    October 7, 2008 at 2:10 pm

    Steve…
    When pigs roll in the mud, they are surely going to get oth­ers muddy as well. Mr. Christians employer undoubt­edly wants to remain clean of any mud them­selves and won’t tol­er­ate hav­ing their pro­fes­sional image tainted by an indi­vid­ual who comes across as arro­gant and demean­ing to our peo­ple in uni­form and the impor­tant mis­sions they must per­form in war time.
    As for Political Correctness, that has no place in the Armed Forces and has destroyed soci­ety in large part today over the course of the last 15 years. But on the other hand, when you embarass your­self and your employer and try to bring dis­credit to oth­ers when its not war­ranted, you will pay a hefty price that will fol­low you. Thats real­ity no mat­ter where you go today. You prac­tice that mind­set in the work place, you won’t be able to get a job toss­ing pack­ages at UPS.

    Reply
  11. Team Sergeant says:
    October 7, 2008 at 2:10 pm

    Hey Christian,
    Those are some pretty big words com­ing from indi­vid­ual such as you. Someone told me that if you had to list your most dan­ger­ous exploits that list would include talk­ing back to your preschool teacher and rip­ping the tags off your mat­tresses.
    Tell me lit­tle man what do you know about the war­rior code or ethos? And what don

    Reply
  12. steve says:
    October 7, 2008 at 2:18 pm

    BTW, speak­ing as cur­rently a blue col­lar kind of guy. Jobsites and work­places are usu­ally noth­ing but strongly voiced unin­formed opin­ions. He’d prob­a­bly have a ball at UPS ;p
    Fine, go find some of the peo­ple he writes for and give them hell. But, I’m pretty sure they already have read this. Most employ­ers already know how to “get on the Google”.

    Reply
  13. Christian says:
    October 7, 2008 at 2:33 pm

    Team Sergeant,
    I thought we were buds too…?
    Anyway, read the post more care­fully and you’ll see I didn’t rip any­one off. And ear­lier in the com­ment­ing I said why I didn’t men­tion the board you and I both know about.
    Also, I’ll tell you and “kayaker” — The Green Berets is more apt than you each could know. Reminds me of the time I had to hand a box of 5.56 to the SAW gun­ner on the roof of our COP dur­ing a night attack.
    That was WAY harder than talk­ing back to my preschool teacher and almost as risky as rip­ping the tags off my mattress…

    Reply
  14. prekay says:
    October 7, 2008 at 3:13 pm

    i dont under­stand why he’s not wanted by the f.b.i for 9/​11 hes wanted for other things but no 9/​11

    Reply
  15. prekay says:
    October 7, 2008 at 3:14 pm

    i dont under­stand why he’s not wanted by the f.b.i for 9/​11 hes wanted for other things but no 9/​11

    Reply
  16. Kayaker says:
    October 7, 2008 at 3:21 pm

    Team Sgt.…
    Wait.…I’m a retired 11Bravo and for­mer 11 Mike. I served over 22 years in boots. Whats that com­ment about me not under­stand­ing the US Army Green Berets? I have close friends who are SF and retired as well. I have older friends that I knew as a young kid who served in Special Forces in Vietnam as well. Trust me, I know more about SF than you give me credit for.
    Semper Fi

    Reply
  17. Kayaker says:
    October 7, 2008 at 3:26 pm

    Christian.…
    Oh sorry…I got Team Sgt. con­fused with Mr. Christian. Face it man…your just a wannabe. If your half the man you think you are, you would go enlist and stop with your arro­gance and inma­tu­rity here try­ing to pass your­self off as some wor­thy “new man”. I got a job for ya pick­ing up trash on a beach. Snap to it man. You can then demand to know all you want about why your pick­ing up trash and I can say…OPSEC my good man.…OPSEC.

    Reply
  18. Grandjester says:
    October 7, 2008 at 3:55 pm

    Kayaker,
    Christian is a fine American, doing his job.
    Ollie North is a trai­tor. Simple fact, he should have been hung for his crimes against this nation or spend­ing the rest of his life in Levenworth at the very least.
    If North is YOUR idea of a great American, then your ser­vice has taught you NOTHING.
    Please remem­ber the Oath both you and Mr. North took.

    Reply
  19. anonymous says:
    October 7, 2008 at 4:19 pm

    Reading this com­men­tary has done won­ders for my respect for mil­i­tary per­son­nel.
    Knowing that most mil­i­tary per­son­nel think that I am a “whin­ing civvie”, a “nau­se­at­ing effete intel­lec­tual”, and a trai­tor to my coun­try really retards my respect for mil­i­tary per­son­nel.
    Insulting some­one has never been a way to gain their respect or trust.

    Reply
  20. Gwynn says:
    October 7, 2008 at 4:24 pm

    JHFC — Bottomline: DF gave away no oper­a­tional secrets. So, the bosses don’t like the heat? Lay off him; nice to see some­one telling the truth. Personally, I bet it was Rummy who did them in.

    Reply
  21. Kayaker says:
    October 7, 2008 at 4:24 pm

    Dear Anonymous…
    We don’t ask for your “Respect”. Respect is earned and not given. If you have never served in the trenches, then leave your per­sonal feel­ings at the door.
    Life is hard when you have to live and walk around real men espe­cially vet­er­ans. If you can’t stand the heat, go back to Mama.

    Reply
  22. Grandjester says:
    October 7, 2008 at 4:33 pm

    Kayaker,
    I remind you AGAIN, you took an OATH to the Constitution of the United States, as did Mr. North. Mr. North VIOLATED that oath in addi­tion to giv­ing aid and com­fort to our ene­mies. TREASON as defined by that same Constitution. And you defend and admire that trai­tor.
    He should have gone to jail or the gallows.

    Reply
  23. gsak says:
    October 7, 2008 at 5:12 pm

    I’d like to close-​​out my own com­ments in this sand­box with mem­o­ries of all the Kayakers I knew…
    Kayaker,
    You’re the guy that I lock eyes with, point two fin­gers at my eyes, and then point one in the direc­tion you’re sup­posed to be looking.

    Reply
  24. Kayaker says:
    October 7, 2008 at 5:32 pm

    Quote…
    I’d like to close-​​out my own com­ments in this sand­box with mem­o­ries of all the Kayakers I knew…
    Kayaker,
    You’re the guy that I lock eyes with, point two fin­gers at my eyes, and then point one in the direc­tion you’re sup­posed to be look­ing.
    ~S~
    No need amigo. But I do have Thermal optics and my “Field Of View” is quite wide. Matter of fact, look to your left. See Mr. Cool Aide !?
    : )
    Hums.…“pick up your tracks and fol­low me…we are mech­a­nized Infantry…“
    : )
    On a lighter note…though, “Grandjester” is Mr. Christian in dis­guise. Nice one…

    Reply
  25. Todd Terral says:
    October 7, 2008 at 5:53 pm

    What a highly charged atmos­phere.
    Krag,CK_MC, Kayaker — You’re set­ting American civil-​​military rela­tions back years with your rants con­cern­ing “whin­ing” and your “us vs. them” men­tal­ity. We’re an all-​​volunteer, pro­fes­sional force which is sub­servient to civil­ian gov’t con­trol. Hence, less than 1% of Americans will ever serve in the mil­i­tary. That’s life. Get over it. Civilians are free not to serve if they choose not to. You’re all squan­der­ing an oppor­tu­nity to sell our col­lec­tive story to the American peo­ple and get them to buy into what we’re try­ing to accom­plish in the GWOT. You should be glad that civil­ians look at this blog and post stuff here. Their doing so means that they care about what we’re doing in this war.
    Roy Smith — if your serve in the mil­i­tary, your polit­i­cal com­ments in a mil­i­tary forum such is this are unpro­fes­sional and are over the line as estab­lished by Article 88, Contempt Toward Officials. Shame on you.
    Christian, Brian, SMSgtMac, and Steve — you’re all spot on.

    Reply
  26. KragCulloden says:
    October 7, 2008 at 7:55 pm

    “Krag,CK_MC, Kayaker — You’re set­ting American civil-​​military rela­tions back years with your rants con­cern­ing “whin­ing” and your “us vs. them” men­tal­ity.“
    Ask me if I care.…
    “You’re all squan­der­ing an oppor­tu­nity to sell our col­lec­tive story to the American peo­ple and get them to buy into what we’re try­ing to accom­plish in the GWOT.“
    No, I’m call­ing the boob that says “I’m a civil­ian and I pay your salary so tell me what­ever I want to know” a boob. Nothing more, noth­ing less.
    As I wrote pre­vi­ously, curios­ity does not equal need to know. Apparently a few of these tax-​​paying (and there­fore military-​​owning-​​and-​​commanding) civvies don’t under­stand that.
    Whether you pay taxes or not, doesn’t enti­tle you to squat. Civilians, by sim­ple fact of being civil­ians, do not have over­sight author­ity over the mil­i­tary or any other exec­u­tive branch agency.
    Walk into an FBI field office and demand to know every­thing they are doing and you’ll get about the same answer I responded with here in my first post.
    The “I pay your salary so I own you” men­tal­ity of Christian’s remarks pushed a but­ton. As he hasn’t retracted nor apol­o­gized for it, it appears to be his true atti­tude. Hence the ver­bal scorn he’s received from me and other vet­er­ans in these posts.
    Action » Reaction. Real simple.

    Reply
  27. KragCulloden says:
    October 7, 2008 at 7:57 pm

    Actually, I sup­pose that should be “typed scorn”, not “ver­bal scorn”, huh?
    Krag

    Reply
  28. Matt from Oz says:
    October 7, 2008 at 9:42 pm

    I have just read all the com­ments posted on this topic and find it amazaing that there is clearly and Us and Them men­tal­ity. My obser­va­tion would be:
    As mil­i­tary per­son­nel and pro­fes­sional solid­ers YOU all elected to serve, you alone made the deci­sion to pull on a uni­form and do the job. Thinking that because you made this deci­sion soci­ety now owes you some­thing (respect, admi­ra­tion, glory) is dif­fi­cult to fathom. You got paid, trained, feed, shel­tered and taught a code that few among you will know. But that seems to be not enough. You are all pro­fes­sional solid­ers and should act like it.
    As for the reporters, claim­ing an enti­tle­ment to infor­ma­tion that clearly will not affect your daily lives is some­thing that con­cerns me. Watching from afar and see­ing the man­ner in which the media/​reporters/​bloggers pub­lish infor­ma­tion is also dif­fi­cult to fathom. Reports claim the first amend­ment, but don’t under­stand the respon­si­bil­ity that comes when the aver­age Joe Citizen who could not find Iraq or Afghanistan with a GPS and guide is told what to think 24 hours a day.
    There are always two sides to a coin, and the prin­ci­ple that the US seeks to export is the fun­de­men­tal right to think what I want on any topic that I want. Seeking to silence that right is not dif­fer­ent to any other dic­ta­tor­ship… the only dif­fer­ence is that you have cable TV.

    Reply
  29. Matt from Oz says:
    October 7, 2008 at 9:49 pm

    The amazaing thing about these posts is that the mil­i­tary per­son­nel post­ing believe that some­thing is owed to them. You are pro­fes­sional solid­ers, you and you alone elected to do a job, you were trained, paid, and taught a code that few will know and under­stand. Believe that soci­ety now owes you some­thing because your a vet is some­thing that I strug­gle with.
    As for reporters and the media, with the first amende­ment comes the respon­si­bil­ity of ensur­ing your com­ments are fac­tual, unbi­ased and accu­rate.. When the aver­age Joe who could not find Iraq or Afghanistan with a GPS and guide believes that they see on the TV or the Web, that respon­si­bil­ity is even more crit­i­cal. Personal opin­ion should be labelled as per­sonal opin­ion.
    You all claim lib­erty, free­dom and jus­tice, but are so quick to claim as unpa­tri­otic, Unamerican or someother slur when the opin­ions or oth­ers are not com­pa­ra­ble with your own. That’s not democ­racy, its dic­ta­tor­ship, the only dif­fer­ence is that you have hol­ly­wood to dress the dilema.

    Reply
  30. KragCulloden says:
    October 7, 2008 at 10:44 pm

    RE: “Thinking that because you made this deci­sion soci­ety now owes you some­thing (respect, admi­ra­tion, glory) is dif­fi­cult to fathom.“
    What in the world are you read­ing?? Where in any of these com­ments did a military/​former mil­i­tary man make any remark that he was owed *any­thing*??
    The only one claim­ing enti­tle­ment to any­thing is Christian, claim­ing that because he wants to know some­thing, he should be told it, every other con­sid­er­a­tion be damned.
    So what exactly are you talk­ing about?

    Reply
  31. Rhyno327/lrsd says:
    October 8, 2008 at 1:07 pm

    Higher HQ turned him down? Yeah, I bet Rumsfeld was the one. He was so incompetent..

    Reply
  32. lordwilson says:
    October 8, 2008 at 3:30 pm

    I think you might find that British SBS/​SAS had Bin laden pretty much cor­nered at tora bora but were told not to get him by Tony Blair as the big W wanted Delta force to cap­ture him . By the time they arrived he had gone !
    ps my the­ory for peace in iraq and with the afghans , give them jobs on good money, i‘m sure twenty dol­lars a day is way more than the tal­iban pay , build­ing infra­struc­ture , far cheaper than keep­ing planes in the air and drop­ping jdam bombs and intro­duce air con­di­tion­ing on a mass scale with a big kill switch in each local uk/​us com­man­ders base ! any trou­ble no air con ! no job ! if that does not work nuke north west­ern pak­istan end of ! the whole prob­lem is that the mus­lim reli­gious nut­ters are the equiv­a­lent of the torque­mada in spain six hun­dred years ago , and we are liv­ing in the 21st century .

    Reply
  33. Sigaba says:
    October 9, 2008 at 12:39 pm

    Among the many points being missed here is the fact that Greer belonged to a pro­fes­sion.
    If a doc­tor per­forms a pro­ce­dure in vio­la­tion of his profession’s ethics because he thinks it is the ‘right thing to do’ or if a lawyer dis­closes con­fi­den­tial infor­ma­tion against the inter­ests of her client because the pub­lic has a ‘right to know’, those indi­vid­u­als are sub­ject to cen­sure, to dis­ci­pline, and to pun­ish­ment. (And for those of you who think such vio­la­tions are no big deal, then you’ll have no prob­lem plac­ing a loved one in the care of the quack in the strip mall down the street.)
    The con­cept of pro­fes­sion­al­ism is alien to today’s jour­nal­ist. Americans his­tor­i­cally have had a ten­u­ous grasp of the prac­tice of mil­i­tary pro­fes­sion­al­ism. We cit­i­zens have a desire to know the ‘inside story’ of just about every­thing. Yet, these facts do not trans­late into a viable argu­ment that our desires absolve Greer from a code of con­duct he agreed to observe. He gave his word, then he broke it, and now would have us believe that he’s done noth­ing wrong.
    Is that the kind of sol­dier you want pro­tect­ing you?

    Reply
  34. American Gentleman says:
    October 9, 2008 at 2:17 pm

    “There are MILLIONS of Real Americans that feel the way I do!“
    Here’s a hint. That is an argu­men­tum ad majorem fal­lacy and there­fore, would not sup­port your point at all.

    Reply
  35. American Gal says:
    October 9, 2008 at 3:56 pm

    “There are MILLIONS of Real Americans that feel the way I do!“
    Here’s a hint. That is an argu­men­tum ad majorem fal­lacy and there­fore, would not sup­port your point at all.
    American gen­tle­man,
    I grew up with fish­er­men. All the men in my fam­ily fished, and taught a cou­ple of us gals about rods, reels, tackle…and bait.
    Baiting is an art­form.
    If I must say it clearly, Christian does NOT speak for the masses in his, “We pay your salary” com­ment.
    Disgusting is too kind a word, IMHO, for the things this reporter has claimed.
    But, the folks he is “call­ing out” can take care of them­selves, so I should say no more, as I am just a civil­ian.
    American Gal.

    Reply
  36. steve says:
    October 9, 2008 at 5:36 pm

    Sigaba: The doc­tor exam­ple is really poor.
    A sol­dier who fol­lows orders at the time, but, blows the whis­tle a few years down the road is a totally dif­fer­ent ani­mal. Spec Ops guys are expected to act with lit­tle super­vi­sion in polit­i­cally and per­son­ally very volatile sit­u­a­tions. They are the most trusted of all our forces. It’s not in their nature to share in what they are doing due to the nature of their work. This guy came for­ward years after an oper­a­tion to let peo­ple know what seems to be a poor deci­sion by his higher ups. He fol­lowed his orders at the time, even though he strongly dis­agreed. He knows his risks for com­ing for­ward, he’s just the kind of guy I want in that slot. You make it sound like you should never come for­ward or speak up.

    Reply
  37. Richard says:
    October 9, 2008 at 9:00 pm

    I heard about this brouhaha and came over to read the orig­i­nal arti­cle and ensu­ing com­ments. FWIW, I am not impressed with what I have read here and doubt if I will ever be back as I have no inter­est in spend­ing time on a web-​​site edited by the likes of Mr Lowe and his obvi­ous dis­dain for us “knuckle draggers”…from which, BTW, he makes a liv­ing as a reporter and edi­tor of mil­i­tary issues.
    A few com­ments and I am gone:
    Reading these com­metns is like watch­ing a bunch of hogs star­ing at a wristwatch–y’all know you’re look­ing at some­thing but you have no idea what it is or waht it says…but you’re going to offer each other opin­ions about what you don’t know any­way.
    Having read Ernie Pyle’s dis­patches from the front and now read­ing a few of Mr Lowe’s arti­cles, I can say, “Mr Lowe, you are no Ernie Pyle.“
    Reading these com­ments and Mr Lowe’s arti­cles reminds me why our pol­icy on the teams was to always avoid reporters and, if con­fronted, would tell them to go talk to our commander…who wears two stars and has an office at Fort Bragg, NC. End of con­ver­sa­tion.
    My opin­ion of most of what I read here gives me the impres­sion that y’all are like those depicted on the cover of this mag­a­zine.
    http://​forums​.techguy​.org/​r​a​n​d​o​m​-​d​i​s​c​u​s​s​i​o​n​/​5​2​8​8​8​2​-​i​n​t​e​r​n​e​t​-​t​o​u​g​h​-​g​u​y​-​m​a​g​a​z​i​n​e​.​h​tml
    Richard
    _​_​
    BT

    Reply
  38. Sigaba says:
    October 9, 2008 at 9:25 pm

    Steve,
    I appre­ci­ate your response and the civil­ity with which you express your dis­agree­ment with my com­ment.
    In my view, the fact that the war is still in progress should have served as an addi­tional rea­son (since liv­ing up to his word wasn’t suf­fi­cient moti­va­tion) for Mr. Greer at least to have waited for the DoD to vet thor­oughly his work.

    Reply
  39. SWF says:
    October 10, 2008 at 3:00 pm

    ” pay your salary and we damned right want to know what you’re doing. You work for us.“
    You and the gen­eral pub­lic may want to know. Want does not imply a neces­sity or right to know every detail of oper­a­tions the gov­ern­ment, mil­i­tary or intel­li­gence ser­vices engage in. There are over­sight com­mit­tees in place for checks and bal­ances, and they are held to account for dis­clo­sure as well.
    What the American pub­lic know the world knows and that is the com­pelling rea­son for secu­rity of mil­i­tary oper­a­tions and the mil­i­tary com­mu­ni­ties.
    Mr. Christian, you state you and mil­lions of Americans should get to know every­thing you want to know.
    “You work for us. So I’m glad, as long as it doesn’t delib­er­ately put lives in dan­ger of death… that these sto­ries come out.“
    How the hell do you know what infor­ma­tion will put lives at risk, delib­er­ately or unin­ten­tion­ally. What gives you insight as to how past plans or oper­a­tions might affect future plans or oper­a­tions.
    “But that’s a case where the guilty plea­sure of the inside gouge out­weighed my scru­ples a bit…Inside Delta Force was SUCH a good read.“
    Well good to know you’ll admit your pri­or­i­ties. Entertainment and bar room, water cooler, and cof­fee table quar­ter­back­ing first, secu­rity and lives of the mil­i­tary some­where after that.

    Reply
  40. Walter M. Clark says:
    October 17, 2008 at 8:06 pm

    Yes, the mil­i­tary do work for the peo­ple of the United States of America. That’s a given. The prob­lem comes from some­one, either in/​formerly in the mil­i­tary or some­one else, gov­ern­ment, for­mer gov­ern­ment, Congress, for­mer Congress or media, exposes clas­si­fied infor­ma­tion that has not yet been declas­si­fied. ONLY if the pur­pose is to expose ille­gal activ­ity (and in the war on those rad­i­cal islamic slime­bags we’re now fight­ing I’d make that not an excep­tion) should ANYONE be per­mit­ted to expose clas­si­fied infor­ma­tion to non-​​authorized indi­vid­u­als.
    THAT’S why you have Congress, and the Executive Branch of the US Government. The President, who­ever he/​she is, keeps a small group of Senators and Representatives in the loop. The greater the num­ber of peo­ple who know a secret, the greater like­li­hood of that secret being blabbed.
    For exam­ple, peo­ple involved in secret/​top secret activ­i­ties in World War II have (mostly) lived within any non-​​disclosure agree­ments they signed. Finally, in some cases 50 years after the end of the war, stuff is being declas­si­fied and made avail­able. THAT’S the way this should work. And gov­ern­ment, includ­ing the lead­ers of Congress and the Executive Branch, should imme­di­ately fer­ret out any­one who is leak­ing secret infor­ma­tion and pros­e­cute them to the full extent of the law. ESPECIALLY in cases like the NY Times pub­lish­ing info on the bank­ing activ­i­ties that were LEGALLY but secretly being used to track and cap­ture ter­ror­ists. We elect our gov­ern­ment and we should let the gov­ern­ment do its job. And a spe­cial pun­ish­ment should be avail­able for peo­ple like Jay Rockefeller who sat on a secret Congressional Committee and leaked secrets to the press!
    OT, we should also be a lot quicker to pros­e­cute vio­la­tions of the Logan Act, too.

    Reply
  41. Abn says:
    November 14, 2008 at 9:59 am

    I did my time in the army in units that dealt with far less secre­tive mat­ters than exposed in the book in ques­tion. Yet I was expected to observe both OPSEC and PERSEC at all times. I even signed a few NDA’s in my time as well.…
    This book was not approved, it was deemed to be beyond edit­ing to pro­tect both past and cur­rent clas­si­fied infor­ma­tion. The author was told this and decided that he need not fol­low the rules.
    I have had the honor and priv­i­lege of know­ing men who have served in that Unit and oth­ers in the SOF Community. The author betrayed a trust, and he betrayed his Oath and his agree­ment to not dis­cuss his actions or those of his Unit. Like I said I knew men who served in the Unit, I sure did not know what they did, nor did or will I ever need to know that. “Need to know” is not an excuse to hide away some dirty secrets, it is there to save lives, pro­tect the men and woman who do the things on our behalf.… Sorry, but the atti­tude that we are all enti­tled some­how to infor­ma­tion of this mag­ni­tude is ludi­crous. Knowing that there are things going on, peo­ple out there lay­ing their lives on the line should be enough. 99.99% of it we will never know, and their deeds will never be pub­licly acknowl­edged. Perhaps that is the only part that both­ers me, but they know it going in, and accept it as a part of the job..
    As to the Tax Payer com­ment.. man that just rubs me wrong and hard. I pay taxes too, I paid them while I served, as well. So was I pay­ing my own salary? We all pay out taxes, we all pay our share, well per­haps not all of us. This does not give us any right to know any­thing beyond our pay grade, and or secu­rity clear­ance. Guess what? You do not need to know every­thing, and you sure do not need to know the level of detail the author went to in writ­ing his book. If you really want to know, then I sug­gest a trip to the Army recruit­ing Office would be a good place to start. Make sure you get Airborne in your con­tract, vol­un­teer for either Rangers or SF… then go ahead after you make your E-​​5 and request to be assessed…If you are even for­tu­nate enough to be invited for that.
    So to all those who did serve and con­tinue to do so, I raise my glass to you and say a prayer that you all come home safe.

    Reply
  42. Ron says:
    December 5, 2008 at 1:31 pm

    Well how about that! The civil­ians now have a “need to know”. And when they find out what is really going on some of us will be hauled in front of a Senate Findings Commitee and jailed for war crimes and for vio­lat­ing the soverign states of our allies. I can tell you with com­plete cer­tainty that the book cov­er­ing my ser­vice will not be get­ting pub­lished in my life­time. I can also say that I do help a cer­atin author pen some very good best sell­ers with­out sac­ri­fic­ing the oath I took and endan­ger­ing my fel­low troop­ers. End of story. Torch.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    Recent Comments
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      Yeah, I don't get it. The "Dragon...
      Ptsfp
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Should wikipedia Ned Kelly.He used armour that worked in...
      Nick
    • UPDATED: Details on Army’s New Afghanistan Duds
      Marines win agin hoo rur
      greg
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      To the poster "batvette" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
      gee lets forget about winning a war as long...
      greg stocks
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage