<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Corps Seeks SAW Replacement</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2008/10/07/corps-seeks-saw-replacement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/07/corps-seeks-saw-replacement/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:25:49 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/07/corps-seeks-saw-replacement/#comment-198305</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 01:21:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4110#comment-198305</guid> <description>5.56x45mm NATO, the same as the M4 carbine which means that instead of with belts on a traditional SAW you can just get a magazine from your comrade when you run out of ammo instead of just being screwed </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5.56x45mm NATO, the same as the M4 carbine which means that instead of with belts on a traditional SAW you can just get a magazine from your comrade when you run out of ammo instead of just being screwed</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Maygay</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/07/corps-seeks-saw-replacement/#comment-189985</link> <dc:creator>Maygay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:37:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4110#comment-189985</guid> <description>If Chuck Norris used the IAR in a movie or in a commercial, then no one will talk feces about it. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Chuck Norris used the IAR in a movie or in a commercial, then no one will talk feces about it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: stump</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/07/corps-seeks-saw-replacement/#comment-77651</link> <dc:creator>stump</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:51:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4110#comment-77651</guid> <description>Has anyone every heard of the stoner machine gun? Stop trying to reinvent the wheel so to speak. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone every heard of the stoner machine gun? Stop trying to reinvent the wheel so to speak.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pappy063</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/07/corps-seeks-saw-replacement/#comment-186151</link> <dc:creator>Pappy063</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 06:39:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4110#comment-186151</guid> <description>There is a better weopond to  replace the Saw-M249. Get  from the Spanish firm  called Santa B</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a better weopond to  replace the Saw-M249. Get  from the Spanish firm  called Santa B</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jeff</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/07/corps-seeks-saw-replacement/#comment-186150</link> <dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:43:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4110#comment-186150</guid> <description>The IAR seems to be a step backwards.  Besides the weight of the BAR, the big objection to it was that it was magazine fed.  There is no doubt a basic load of 30 round magazines loaded with 5.56 NATO ammunition is either lighter than the basic load of 30-06 ammunition loaded in 20 round magazines or you are carrying far more magazines and ammunition. That having been said, the fact remains that you will be changing magazines every 30 rounds or less as opposed to every 200 rounds per belt.  That will be a distractor at best and an interference in suppressive/support by fire missions at worst. What I can see is the IAR with a redesigned lower receiver that accommodates the present or a similar design bandoleer box of 5.56 belted ammunition. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IAR seems to be a step backwards.  Besides the weight of the BAR, the big objection to it was that it was magazine fed.  There is no doubt a basic load of 30 round magazines loaded with 5.56 NATO ammunition is either lighter than the basic load of 30–06 ammunition loaded in 20 round magazines or you are carrying far more magazines and ammunition.<br /> That having been said, the fact remains that you will be changing magazines every 30 rounds or less as opposed to every 200 rounds per belt.  That will be a distractor at best and an interference in suppressive/support by fire missions at worst.<br /> What I can see is the IAR with a redesigned lower receiver that accommodates the present or a similar design bandoleer box of 5.56 belted ammunition.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mang</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/07/corps-seeks-saw-replacement/#comment-186149</link> <dc:creator>Mang</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:27:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4110#comment-186149</guid> <description>Thanks for the info, Matthew.  A great point about the L86 LSW&#039;s. Yeah, Christian, ufck the haters. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info, Matthew.  A great point about the L86 LSW’s.<br /> Yeah, Christian, ufck the haters.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: P.J. Busche</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/07/corps-seeks-saw-replacement/#comment-186148</link> <dc:creator>P.J. Busche</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:44:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4110#comment-186148</guid> <description>Christian, don&#039;t sweat the personal attacks from blog input.  You&#039;re doing a fine job, and your coverage of the IAR is excellent.  Keep providing us with more update on this subject.  My input on the IAR:  30-round magazines are not good enough.  A rotary magazine with greater capacity that is compatable with the IAR&#039;s magazine well is the obvious solution.  The M4/M16-style 30-round magazines should be considered as a backup option; not the primary source of feeding ammo. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christian, don’t sweat the personal attacks from blog input.  You’re doing a fine job, and your coverage of the IAR is excellent.  Keep providing us with more update on this subject.  My input on the IAR:  30-round magazines are not good enough.  A rotary magazine with greater capacity that is compatable with the IAR’s magazine well is the obvious solution.  The M4/M16-style 30-round magazines should be considered as a backup option; not the primary source of feeding ammo.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sven Ortmann</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/07/corps-seeks-saw-replacement/#comment-77644</link> <dc:creator>Sven Ortmann</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 12:45:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4110#comment-77644</guid> <description>@Christian: My few comments here are not entirely friendly because I still remember the level of this blog when Noah was here. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Christian:<br /> My few comments here are not entirely friendly because I still remember the level of this blog when Noah was here.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ZH Wong</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/07/corps-seeks-saw-replacement/#comment-186145</link> <dc:creator>ZH Wong</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 07:51:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4110#comment-186145</guid> <description>@tontochoc: I have no idea where you got the idea that the Ultimax wasn&#039;t in service with the Singapore Armed Forces. Since it was introduced as a SAW in the SAF, the Ultimax has been the primary infantry section-level fire support weapon till this day. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@tontochoc: I have no idea where you got the idea that the Ultimax wasn’t in service with the Singapore Armed Forces. Since it was introduced as a SAW in the SAF, the Ultimax has been the primary infantry section-level fire support weapon till this day.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: steve</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/07/corps-seeks-saw-replacement/#comment-77641</link> <dc:creator>steve</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 23:52:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4110#comment-77641</guid> <description>Christian: Be careful with thoseAirsoft guns we wouldn&#039;t want you to violate your parole for your mattress tag indiscretion back in 95. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christian: Be careful with thoseAirsoft guns we wouldn’t want you to violate your parole for your mattress tag indiscretion back in 95.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.003 seconds using apc
Object Caching 743/747 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 03:02:19 -->
