<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Bye-Bye Pave Low, Hello Osprey</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2008/10/08/bye-bye-pave-low-hello-osprey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/08/bye-bye-pave-low-hello-osprey/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:29:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Nick</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/08/bye-bye-pave-low-hello-osprey/#comment-199296</link> <dc:creator>Nick </dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 03:04:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4111#comment-199296</guid> <description>why were pave lows retired? they seem like such a capable machine. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why were pave lows retired? they seem like such a capable machine.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vince</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/08/bye-bye-pave-low-hello-osprey/#comment-186161</link> <dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:41:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4111#comment-186161</guid> <description>If you would like to learn more about the USAF H-53 (MH-53M PAVE LOW), please visit www.thepavecave.com. Sincerely, Vince Webmaster for The Pave Cave </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you would like to learn more about the USAF H-53 (MH-53M PAVE LOW), please visit <a href="http://www.thepavecave.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.thepavecave.com</a>.<br /> Sincerely,<br /> Vince<br /> Webmaster for The Pave Cave</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: AD2 Bill Robinson USN</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/08/bye-bye-pave-low-hello-osprey/#comment-186160</link> <dc:creator>AD2 Bill Robinson USN</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 21:20:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4111#comment-186160</guid> <description>I have had the great privelage of having flown on the MH53 (Navy) out of Barber Point Hawaii on several occasions for various resons and I can say without pause that the V-22 does not hold a candle to that class of Helo. I was also able to catch a ride on a Pave Low III from Tampa McDill to Hurlbert Field in Fl and I spent the entire 2 1/2 hour flight with my jaw hanging. The FE was nice enough to describe the features of that fantastic bird. Top Notch! They had better keep those retired birds close because they will be called on again. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had the great privelage of having flown on the MH53 (Navy) out of Barber Point Hawaii on several occasions for various resons and I can say without pause that the V-22 does not hold a candle to that class of Helo. I was also able to catch a ride on a Pave Low III from Tampa McDill to Hurlbert Field in Fl and I spent the entire 2 1/2 hour flight with my jaw hanging. The FE was nice enough to describe the features of that fantastic bird. Top Notch! They had better keep those retired birds close because they will be called on again.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: lance d logue  panama city, FL</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/08/bye-bye-pave-low-hello-osprey/#comment-186158</link> <dc:creator>lance d logue  panama city, FL</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:00:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4111#comment-186158</guid> <description>just speculation, but i suspect that during the aborted ship rescue off Galveston, the &#039;53 was recalled so as not to show up incapable V-22&#039;s. As the fighter mafia demonstrated, higher, faster, further doesn&#039;t necessarily give you the best aircraft for the job. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just speculation, but i suspect that during the aborted ship rescue off Galveston, the ’53 was recalled so as not to show up incapable V-22’s. As the fighter mafia demonstrated, higher, faster, further doesn’t necessarily give you the best aircraft for the job.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: steve</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/08/bye-bye-pave-low-hello-osprey/#comment-186157</link> <dc:creator>steve</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 22:50:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4111#comment-186157</guid> <description>The 53 how will we miss thee. I remember the first time I saw one flying low to the Ranger School when I was in boot at Benning, thinking &quot;what the @#$% is that giant thing?&quot;. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 53 how will we miss thee. I remember the first time I saw one flying low to the Ranger School when I was in boot at Benning, thinking “what the @#$% is that giant thing?”.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PaveHYD</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/08/bye-bye-pave-low-hello-osprey/#comment-77659</link> <dc:creator>PaveHYD</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 11:59:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4111#comment-77659</guid> <description>Pave Low Leads! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pave Low Leads!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Greg</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/08/bye-bye-pave-low-hello-osprey/#comment-186156</link> <dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 10:54:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4111#comment-186156</guid> <description>Yeah, no shit GEN Castellaw.  Working as a Aviation Weather Forecaster, I can assure you that the pilot in command for that flight should have taken the Forecaster&#039;s warning a little more seriously; especially with an up-and-coming aircraft lacking anti-icing equipment.  Just another case of ignorance brought to you by U.S. &quot;Flyboys&quot; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, no shit GEN Castellaw.  Working as a Aviation Weather Forecaster, I can assure you that the pilot in command for that flight should have taken the Forecaster’s warning a little more seriously; especially with an up-and-coming aircraft lacking anti-icing equipment.  Just another case of ignorance brought to you by U.S. “Flyboys”</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: springbored</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/08/bye-bye-pave-low-hello-osprey/#comment-186155</link> <dc:creator>springbored</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 05:23:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4111#comment-186155</guid> <description>Norman--That 2006 &quot;cross the pond&quot; jaunt....didn&#039;t exactly go without a hitch: The only sour note so far during the V-22&#039;s appearance in England, which began last week with flight demonstrations at the far smaller Royal International Air Tattoo air show 75 miles away in Fairford, was a precautionary landing one Osprey made in Iceland on the way over. That aircraft suffered compressor stalls in its right engines, leading its pilots to divert to Keflavik, where the suspect engine was replaced with a spare that had been stationed in England in advance. The engine replacement took 36 hours, Gen. Castellaw said. The compressor stalls appeared to be related to &quot;weather conditions that we didn&#039;t anticipate,&quot; Gen. Castellaw said. On its way The Block A model V-22s flown to England lack anti-icing gear installed on the Block B Ospreys the Marines will deploy next year, he said. But he offered that the diversion did nothing to dampen the Marines&#039; pride in getting two V-22s to England by flying them from Goose Bay, Canada, with two aerial refueling tankers that refilled their tanks three times on the way - the Osprey&#039;s first trans-Atlantic trip. &quot;We got two aircraft over here,&quot; he said. &quot;When we fly them back, we&#039;re going to be a little bit more careful where we fly into weather. july 18 Dallas Morning News 2006 </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Norman–That 2006 “cross the pond” jaunt.…didn’t exactly go without a hitch:<br /> The only sour note so far during the V-22’s appearance in England, which began last week with flight demonstrations at the far smaller Royal International Air Tattoo air show 75 miles away in Fairford, was a precautionary landing one Osprey made in Iceland on the way over.<br /> That aircraft suffered compressor stalls in its right engines, leading its pilots to divert to Keflavik, where the suspect engine was replaced with a spare that had been stationed in England in advance.<br /> The engine replacement took 36 hours, Gen. Castellaw said.<br /> The compressor stalls appeared to be related to “weather conditions that we didn’t anticipate,” Gen. Castellaw said.<br /> On its way<br /> The Block A model V-22s flown to England lack anti-icing gear installed on the Block B Ospreys the Marines will deploy next year, he said.<br /> But he offered that the diversion did nothing to dampen the Marines’ pride in getting two V-22s to England by flying them from Goose Bay, Canada, with two aerial refueling tankers that refilled their tanks three times on the way — the Osprey’s first trans-Atlantic trip.<br /> “We got two aircraft over here,” he said. “When we fly them back, we’re going to be a little bit more careful where we fly into weather.<br /> july 18 Dallas Morning News 2006</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SMSgt Mac</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/08/bye-bye-pave-low-hello-osprey/#comment-186154</link> <dc:creator>SMSgt Mac</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 04:54:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4111#comment-186154</guid> <description>Because of attrition due to combat and age and the repeated recycling and remanufacturing of the airframes, just about the entire Pave Low fleet has a history worthy of displaying in an honored place within any aircraft collection. I&#039;d like to see all of the ones that remain put out to stud in major aerospace museums. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because of attrition due to combat and age and the repeated recycling and remanufacturing of the airframes, just about the entire Pave Low fleet has a history worthy of displaying in an honored place within any aircraft collection.<br /> I’d like to see all of the ones that remain put out to stud in major aerospace museums.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: stephen russell</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/10/08/bye-bye-pave-low-hello-osprey/#comment-77655</link> <dc:creator>stephen russell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 02:25:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4111#comment-77655</guid> <description>Produce more Ospreys (some for Civil use) Expand line more. Cut Prod costs alone. We need more V22s. Have V22 for  MARINE ONE V22 for 2020 White House use? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Produce more Ospreys (some for Civil use)<br /> Expand line more.<br /> Cut Prod costs alone.<br /> We need more V22s.<br /> Have V22 for  MARINE ONE<br /> V22 for 2020 White House use?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.006 seconds using apc
Object Caching 743/747 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 05:27:00 -->
